Reminder that Italians were the only people who managed to stay relevant through ALL historical eras while Nordcucks...

Reminder that Italians were the only people who managed to stay relevant through ALL historical eras while Nordcucks can only say they were 'successful' from 1800s and onwards, a small fraction of historic.

>Antiquity

Etruscan/Roman civilization.

>Early Middle Ages

The prosperous Italian city-states.

>Late Middle Ages

Renaissance.

>Modern times

Lots of important inventions such as the induction motor, radio, telephone, electric battery, electroplating, nuclear energy, helicopter, microship, desktop computers, etc.

How can Nordcucks even compete?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=72cg_hWFQ-A&feature=youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Rights
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Italy
youtube.com/watch?v=2G2z0qIcfNo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrait_of_Paquius_Proculo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samnites
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Go fuck yer self

m.youtube.com/watch?v=72cg_hWFQ-A&feature=youtu.be

>Etruscan/Roman civilization.

Italians? Sorry, Latin is the word you're thinking of. They were Latin (real Latin, not your south and central American shitfriends) and from Latium.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Rights

That's how the Romans defined themselves. ACTUAL Romans, as a race, and not as a form of citizenship.

Latins were an ITALIC tribe located in the ITALIAN peninsula. The concept of "Italy" has always existed since ancient times.

The patrician families were mostly Greek Euboeans and some Ionics.

how can you be so vastly wrong in one sentence?

Excuse me, the preferred non-binary, gender neutral terminology is: Latinx

No it hasn't. Italy was a region in what's now Southern Italy and Latins weren't a singular tribe. There were many hundreds. Hence why the Social War, the Latin War, the Latin Rights and Julius Caesars (then later Octavian Caesar's) attempt to unify the Italian peninsula (aka the Latin people) didn't exist.

This is just an insult to my intelligence. I'm very familiar with Roman history and know for a fact you're talking rubbish.

>didn't exist.
DID exist*
Well, I fucked that up, didn't I? My bad.

Sorry. I'm cis-Celtic scum, I know.

I once fucked an Italian girl in the ass and got some shit on my dick and it was ORANGE, disgusting

wew lad, it's this thread again

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Italy

>Roman Italy was created officially by the Roman Emperor Augustus with the Latin name Italia. It was the first time in history that the Italian peninsula (from the Alps to the Ionian Sea) was united under the same name. In the year 292 AD

Reminder that you're not Mediterranean but a Brazilian dindu, DeMarcus.

Yeah, every fucking day this monkey comes with this shit.

>Caesars (then later Octavian Caesar's) attempt to unify the Italian peninsula (aka the Latin people) didn't exist.


That's what I said. The Latin Rights, the Social War and the Latin war all came before this - by many centuries. Rome controlled vast territories by the end of the Republic.

...

No it didnt, for being a huge muh heritage fag you know nothing about Roman history. Many Gauls had latin status before other Italic people did living on the peninsula and even Gallic senates were instilled before Senators from Sicily

Indeed. Julius Caesar made nobility from allied Gallic tribes Senators in Rome after the Gallic Wars were over and many kept their positions well after his assassination.

I'd call OP a moron but his bait has been pretty successful.

Latins were Italics though, so much alike other Italics from all over the peninsula, from Venetics to Samnites to Sicels(?), they weren't foreign in Iron age Italy, I don't see how you are making a point given that Italy is diverse to this day anyway and "Italians" simply refers to this variation.

italians are niggers and nothing less, the sewage spawned from the italian woman spreading her legs for arabs, greeks, germans and berbers

top butthurt, stay mad

Nigger-brazil who has done nothing except being niggers, is shitposting as usual.

As much as I know these threads are bait, I don't like ancient 'nationalities' being equated to modern nationality and 'Italian' really doesn't do the Romans justice. Understanding Roman history means understanding its early history, as a kingdom and as a republic (but specifically as a fishing village and later a small city state). Calling them 'Italian' really overrides that.

How do you know where the Italic tribes came from in Iron Age Italy? That's still vastly debated. I was discussing this on historum not too long ago.

>I don't understand Roman history: the post

Your cuckold fantasies aren't reality, Nigel. Just admit Nordcucks are garbage compared to Meds already.

"But I must begin with Europe, because it is both varied in form and admirably adapted by nature for the development of excellence in men and governments, and also because it has contributed most of its own store of good things to the other continents; for the whole of it is inhabitable with the exception of a small region that is uninhabited on account of the cold. ... The Romans, too, took over many nations that were naturally savage owing to the regions they inhabited, because those regions were either rocky or without harbours or cold or for some other reason ill-suited to habitation by many, and thus not only brought into communication with each other peoples who had been isolated, but also taught the more savage how to live under forms of government. But all of Europe that is level and has a temperate climate has nature to coƶperate with her toward these results; for while in a country that is blessed by nature everything tends to peace, in a disagreeable country everything tends to make men warlike and courageous; and so both kinds of country receive benefits from each other, for the latter helps with arms, the former with products of the soil, with arts, and with character-building."
Strabo 2.5.26

Why hasn't this faggot been banned yet?

as long as we understand "Italian" as simply having a geographic and ethnic meaning i.e ethnically from the Italian peninsula, there shouldn't be confusion

of course Latin is a strict subset of Italic, not all Italics were strictly Latin, just like Scots is a strict subset of Brits and not all Brits are Scots

I assume all Italics most likely came from the north-east in various waves, from villanovan related ones to Italic proper waves. The similarity in their tongues points to some similarity in ethnicity as well. Of course it's still not clear where exactly did they came from.

But in any case, we are talking "Italics" not necessarily as the invaders but as the populations that resulted from the intermixing with the locals.

I'm going to dinner now, I'll reply later if the thread is still alive.

>mediterraneans are the master race
>t. brazil

This

brazilians are basically white looking niggers?

No, I completely agree with you on that first sentence. But that clearly isn't what OP means. He's simply using Italian and "Nordic" in a modern sense.

As for who or where Italic tribes came from, nobody knows but it's out of doubt that during the imperial period the great majority of Roman population (in the sense of the whole imperial population) was not made by Latins or anyway population from central Italy. It's quite obvious.

And one of the reasons this is such a complex issue is that "Roman" was a nationality or a grant of citizenship on paper. There were a race of Romans which ruled over Rome well into the mid-to-late Prinicipate, but there were Northern African provinces that had been Roman territory since the Punic Wars whose people were considered 'Roman' and many would be even ethnically due to migrations and centuries of Romanisation, but equally as many (and probably more) would not be.

>implying the country I'm from is relevant to this

Keep up with the ad-hominem, Nordcucks.

>Modern times

Here Italy is considered an irrelevant place that is lazy, backwards and lets all the brown people through.

>fucking nordcucks
>t. brazil

>it's another latin american thinking he's real latin and therefore a med

Let me guess. London? I personally love Italy. Tuscany is one of my favourite places in the world.

>tfw nordcuck pattern facial hair

THESE THREADS ARE A JEW PLOT TO DIVIDE THE WHITE RACE

IGNORE THEM AND MOVE ON

THESE THREADS ARE A JEW PLOT TO DIVIDE THE WHITE RACE

IGNORE THEM AND MOVE ON

THESE THREADS ARE A JEW PLOT TO DIVIDE THE WHITE RACE

IGNORE THEM AND MOVE ON

Nope, if i was from London i'd just call them my brothers. :^)

If I say I'm of unmixed European ancestry you won't believe me anyway. All you're doing is trying to avoid the argument and namecalling.

that nice pic of yours is cherrypicking manifest, my dear ape

Are Mediterraneans historically superior to Nordics? Let's find out!

The Nordic race can be clearly defined by its blond hair and blue eyes. The Mediterraneans, however, have a much broader range of features. The root of the Mediterranean supremacy claim are Ancient Greece and the Roman empire. However, the success of these societies was very much because of circumstance, not race. The Roman Empire cannot even be clearly defined as a Mediterranean achievement, since it was comprised of an enormous mixture of peoples "integrated" into "Roman" culture, and their technology and wars were largely based on knowledge from non-Mediterranean sources.

Despite the Roman Empires circumstantial success, their values were always inferior to Nordic values. Their entire culture was just degeneracy, which eventually led to their downfall, whereas Nordics strong pagan values remained despite Christianity's best efforts, and because of these, northern Europe ended up being superior to the Mediterraneans. To adopt such values into your life, I suggest you stop watching porn.

...

youtube.com/watch?v=2G2z0qIcfNo

Fernando Martinez is a meme based on the 'Romantic' stereotype of the Latin nations.

We hate Romans now? I don't get it.

Q: does Nordic specifically mean Scandinavia or does it mean Northern Europe? Because if you mean Northern Europe why are you even posting this joke of a thread?

This is complete rubbish. The whole "muh degeneracy" myth in regards to Rome comes from the historian Edward Gibbon who was discredited over a century ago now. You have no excuse for believing this at all. You speak of "Pagan values," as if these were in any way complicit with our current values, or viewed in any way as righteous. For the record though, Rome had established laws on human sacrifice dating from the Second Punic War & as far as we know, though our knowledge of Roman civilisation is largely unknown prior to 400BC due to the first Sack of Rome, it was never practiced in Rome.

"Degeneracy" DIDN'T lead to Rome's down fall. Rome had fell into a system of having multiple leaders (Two Augustus' and Two Caesars) with no defined boundaries, each with their own heir and each answered to seperate Senates (East and West) since Diocletian established the Dominate. Currency inflation had been an issue since the Crisis of the Third Century, civil war and plagues ruptured several Eastern provinces (including Armenia which were known as being vehemently anti-Roman), the Edict of Caracalla is sometimes contributed to the Fall of Rome since it offered citizenship to every otherwise freeman living in the boundaries of the Empire, and although I'm not sure I subscribe to this theory, this undoubtedly contributed to the Crisis of the Third Century which did lead to the Fall of Rome.

Rome fell because arguments are complete rubbish and your lack of knowledge on Roman history was in evident when you used the words "Roman Empire" to describe all of Rome.

Those pictures were retrieved from modern day Tunisia. 'Roman' was a grant of citizenship, as stated several times in this thread. They certainly did define western civilization, if we credit Hellenic culture with its creation though.

Sage divide and conquer threads

Scandinavia/Germany. Germans and Scandicucks were still very backwards before the Age of Enlightenment.

STOP THIS FUCKING THREADS.
We don't give a fuck which is the master race, only faggots with inferiority complex.
So shut up, niggers are the problem, not the europeans. (Europeans niggers like Renzi and Merkel included).

Slavs, Anglos, Mediterraneans and Nords are all pathetic.

Who /Celt/ here?

Italians are Mongrels
>Italians are Mongrels
Italians are Mongrels

Italians are not White

>Those pictures were retrieved from modern day Tunisia.

Top kek. One was discovered in Northern Italy (it was Etruscan art) and the others are from Pompeii. You're a retard for not knowing that.

...

>Roman Empire
>Spanish Empire
>Napoleon
>Great Britain Empire (anglos arent nordics pls)

meantime in Snowniggerland... (pick related)

Stinking Gauls.

>Implying modern Italians are even remotely close to Romans
When will these filthy Lombards learn?

The full group now.

Romans were white. Italians are not white.

Also, here is a bit of reading for our historically illiterate Bong friend:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrait_of_Paquius_Proculo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samnites

This fresco is one of the most well known and the fact that you thought it was from Tunisia is laughable. I'd call you a troll but that's one massive wall of text. You seem very passionate.

Fuck off kike.

You're right. The top one is Etruscan, and that's Terentius Nea (spelling) who are thought to be Samnites or other Italic tribes. I was thinking of the ones at the Carthage National Museum like pic related. I don't know where the bottom one is.

But do you dispute the fact that essentially every political theory we've ever built has been added on from what the Romans left us? I mean, you're American. Your system (a Republic) is literally Roman.

fucking nice work man. I think I was the britbonganon that asked you for a Celt a while back

Reminder that modern Italians aren't even close to being original Romans.

>"subflavum" means any fair hair color, not blonde
>Pliny XI ends at chapter 119, no such reference
>John Malalas is not considered a historically credible source by anyone and I can't even find anything about him referencing the Roman Emperors in any way
>rest of the 'sources' come from a literal nazi who lived in the Third Reich

It's time to stop with the WE WUZ, snowniggers. It's getting embarrassing.

Italian pride world wide

>historically illiterate
I took studies in Late Republican-Early Prinicipate studies and worked under an exhibitions officer when my job was history related you fucking moron. I've actually visited these museums, and thought they were the ones that were in the National Carthage museum. Google them, some are online.

What Nordicks actually believe.

>How can Nordcucks even compete?

By having some of the most successful societies on Earth at this very moment, you monkey.

Now, go google "beautiful woman" and come back and tell me how many spics and niggers you see.

>if I spam this picture enough times it'll get rid of the fact that the Nords are right

>words

That doesn't invalidate my point. How in the fuck can you claim all of this without once visiting the ruins of Pompeii? How have you not seen that fresco (one of the most well preserved)?

Ah, cool. Glad you like it.

Nordic women are stuck up sluts and cunts

i'd take a Portuguese qt any day

>we have some success in the modern age, that means you can ignore the rest of history where we've been irrelevant niggers living in a frozen tundra

Sorry, but that's not how it works. You need to see the whole picture.

if you like women with moustache, go ahead,.

>American - too dominating

BASED

I've never been to Pompeii. I've been to the museum where the bottom one is but haven't seen it before besides maybe online (Museum di Capodimonte). I know of the Samnite with his wife, I didn't know they were from Pompeii. I thought they were the collection found from Northern Africa.

Don't be bitter, Manolo.

cute

A Jew?

>I thought they were
Just Terentius Nea and his wife rather. I knew the top one is Etruscan because Etruscan art is easy to differentiate.

i wasn not kidding.

just google "portugesas"

yfw you know blondes have no history and are nigger tier.

>Brazilian
>Calling anyone a nigger

t. francisco silva santos oliveria ( 1/8th venetian italian)

What is climate based progress?
What is slaves? brainlet

>tfw you know modern Italians are nothing like ancient Romans

Why do people reply to monkey bait? You fuckers are actually dumber than the delusional apes from my country.

WE WAZ KANGS AND SHIEET!

What is that recolored vase supposed to prove?

>implying you aren't a monkey yourself

another quality brazilian thread

You don't know shit.

WE WUZ ARYAN ROMANZ

This debate about the ethnicity of ancient Italic peoples is retarded because you can simply google these tribes. The person you posted looks Celtic and one or two of these tribes have been hypothesized to have been Celtic peoples before they were integrated into Rome.

We discussed this further up. The discussion you quoted was in regards to where frescoes were found, not the origin of Italic people.

I already posted this at the beginning of the thread, but where Italic tribes (and particularly the Romans) came from is all theories. It's pretty well established that nobody knows where they came from.

>The discussion you quoted was in regards to where frescoes were found, not the origin of Italic people.

It would make sense that the frescoes of middle - upper class people in a certain area would be representative of what the average Italic person looked like. The Tunisia comment was retarded and misinformed--it seemed like you were trying to claim Italic peoples didn't look swarthy when it is quite obvious many of them did (not all, but they were obviously darker on average than the Nordic/Germanic peoples).

Looks like a woman with bleached hair to me, but let snowniggers keep with their WE WUZ fantasies.

They came from the Indo-European migrations. Where else?