>there are 300 million cell phones in the US >it would take an entire year for a single person working 24 hours a day 7 days a week analyzing this data with their eyes and ears, analyzing it at the speed of light (digesting it as soon as they see it), and understanding every language used in every bit of data to make use of it
Why the hell are you people so paranoid and insecure? This data, even if read by AI, cannot be used against a person in court, or anything like that unless it goes through the eyes and ears of law enforcement. The only SINGULAR time being recorded online could hurt you is if you're being a bad person, or a criminal.
>If you haven't done anything wrong, you don't have to worry
Do I need to explain why this argument is retarded?
John Richardson
>The only SINGULAR time being recorded online could hurt you is if you're being a bad person, or a criminal.
That's a good enough reason for it to be illegal to monitor my data.
Ryan Harris
>one person NSA has been making some cutbacks I guess
Brandon Ramirez
What is a supercomputer and clustered computing?
Asher Howard
I'm paranoid of retards like you underestimating modern computing
Cameron Phillips
What if they have a program like shazam and it just sequences the words.
Sebastian Evans
>The only SINGULAR time being recorded online could hurt you is if you're being a bad person, or a criminal
perfect example of an indoctrinated person
Aaron Hall
Lol trump shills trying to convince you that NSA spying will be ok under Trump
Josiah Jones
Computers aren't people, they can't testify or harm a human, only humans can do those things
Blake Carter
This.
OP, you're either retarded or a shill for the NSA.
Joshua White
FUCK YOU TRUMP
Bentley Roberts
>This data, even if read by AI, cannot be used against a person in court Google will blackmail someone important within the next decade, and you're retarded if you can't see how. >Ah, yes, Senator Wowimmacunt. We understand that you don't like our proposal...it'd be a shame, if your wife ever found out about your taste for traps.
Logan Foster
consider this, and then consider very real nation threats to security and it quickly becomes obvious to anyone with any knowledge of how the government spends it's money that constant monitoring of you day to day activity becomes ridiculous
Eli Robinson
>fishing expeditions >future governments using old data >making criminals out of anyone those in power want to eliminate
Easton Nguyen
Ignoring your retarded conclusion, they don't need to actively monitor your communications to fuck you with it. If they suspect you of a crime, or even just have a personal vendetta, they just need to comb through your data until something damning is found.
Even worse, that would make it so much easier to have "thought crimes." Imagine getting arrested because of a private message to someone in which you expressed a politically incorrect opinion.
Dominic Jones
No, computers aren't people, you're correct, and can't harm by nature. But they are created to serve people who can harm and can carry malicious intent.
Lincoln Nguyen
Does anyone have the pepe picture where it's like an underground ritual room of sorts, with tadpole pepes swimming in canals of pee, and bigger pepes sitting in the back. And wojak in the centre about to be drowned in pee or something.
Are you really foolish enough to believe the data aren't stored and sorted?
Bentley Turner
>what are keywords >what are algorithms
James Gomez
Its called AI and recoding m8 that listens for keywords and can listen to million of calls simultaneously and filed them accordingly and break down by tier and links said instances to identity thus creating a reverse rendition file record for everyone in the country.
Its the same when you type into a computer certain words will get you looked at and certain complete phrases will REALLY get you looked at
the point is not to pin point one person but to have a ongoing building record on as many people as possible so if you do become a person of interest they will have enough evidence under you name when they decide to PULL YOUR FILE to create degrees of suspicion.
Christopher Cox
THIS
Angel Powell
>What is a metadata filter algorithm.
The stupidity is staggering.
Jonathan Bailey
If you're a criminal and not engaged in criminal activities, you have no reason to be afraid of the government keeping an eye on you. The only people who are afraid are the people who have something to hide
Owen Roberts
THANK YOU SIR, KEEP KICKING MY FACE SIR
Connor Taylor
That's why I should have access to my local politicians files and recoding's .
Jeremiah Martin
This one
I'm not sure if Wojak's going to be drowned though. I always thought of it as him being transformed into something, into a Poopoo Peepee likely.
Also, that he's wearing jeans and is bloodied makes it seem like he just recently arrived in this "dungeon" from the outside, and got involved in a fight with the guards there.
Perhaps he was searching for the other captured Wojaks, and the Big Boy Pepe wants to make an example out of him for the captured Wojaks. They already look very docile and demoralized, and this grotesque act, seeing one of their own humiliated like that, would break them even further.
Ayden Walker
The data is not all analyzed and thrown away as it is received. outside of features that get majorly red flagged most of the data is just automatically organized into databases for use as references.
the real value of mass surveillance isn't catching criminals in real time, that hardly ever works out. the real value is in being able to go BACK and look at the history of any individual or group of individuals after the fact. find their contacts and collaborators, figure out their psychology, etc.
there is also the ability to use all the recorded data to take down or frame any desired target. if any regular citizen becomes a problem, they can pull up their whole life, their internet history, their emails, their chats, their facebooks, their Sup Forums shitposts, their porn habits, their amazon purchases, their location history from cell phone gps,etc and use it against them.
look how much 'popular opinion' has swayed in just the last few decades. we went from anti-communist mccarthism to almost voting for a socialist president. we went from gays and trannies being mental disorders to being protected minority groups. imagine having your 'wrong' opinion on something from when you were a teenager used against you when you are 50-60 years old and running a business.
the true power of mass surveillance isn't about catching terrorists or criminals in real time, its the power to force everyone to fall in line and self-censor or be alienated from society.
as computing power and storage increase, more and more meta data will be collected on everyone, and that data will be more specific than your finger prints, it will map your mind and categorize you based on your opinions.
it is bad.
Daniel Cox
You shills are the worst. Once law enforcement is held accountable for their lies, perjury, tampering, and murder, then you can talk about increasing surveillance on the politicians. The citizens should be 100% secure in their affects without oath and affirmation which a computer cannot provide
Sebastian Sanders
Thanks
Austin Jenkins
>the real value of mass surveillance isn't catching criminals in real time, that hardly ever works out. the real value is in being able to go BACK and look at the history of any individual or group of individuals after the fact. find their contacts and collaborators, figure out their psychology, etc.
THIS guy gets it
reverse rendition to build cases against anyone who becomes a threat in the future.
James Adams
thank you, I came here to type this here is your (you) sir
John Rivera
Because Ctrl + F weed. Crtl + F kill all muslims
Nolan Rodriguez
...
Bentley Fisher
...
Grayson Moore
The ability of a people to rebel is a natural limit on the power of government. Advances in technology which make it harder to rebel, if left unchecked, will lead the government to make choices without considering the possibility of civil unrest, and thus without considering the opinions of its citizens.
Hunter Powell
They don't go through the phones, they put it through analytic algorithms as it passes through the cell towers,, the passive air them flags any keywords, phrases, or patterns it's been programmed to and a real human reads the report and decides to send the party and or not, a machine can't testify buy it's data analysis to can, silly
Landon Harris
Speech to Text translation. Indexed into highly optimized database that can be queried by specific search terms. Collect everything, only look at the interesting parts.