AMA- Holocaust & WW 2 (cont'd from yesterday)

Said I'd come back this morning, I think I'm earlier than yesterday and 'mericians won't be up but so it goes. Why do I think I'm "special" enough to do an AMA on this?
Have an MA from Columbia in History and an autistic knowledge of Holocaust, Judeo-Bolshevisim, WW 2 (Europe) and Jewry in General. Went into law after got disgusted with academia and dishonesty, I bill ~ $700 an hour (so each minute I type, you are getting $10 for free).

My spelling usually sucks since I'm typing so quickly to answer as much as possible, but yesterday was esp. bad so will try to write a bit more carefully if anyone is interested in this today. I keep a lot of bookmarks, but rarely use them since I have just about all of it memorized (while others were playing video games, drinking, hanging out, I was studying this is spare time). Anyway, if you have anything to ask, now is your chance.

Other urls found in this thread:

talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/top-social-conservative-hitler-used-gay-soldiers-because-they-had-no-limits
library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm
theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/21/study-of-holocaust-survivors-finds-trauma-passed-on-to-childrens-genes
youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE
youtube.com/watch?v=A5sbegfCz7o
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Oh, good, never got to ask you yesterday. What do you think of the SS? Also, was their a height requirement? Glad you came back today dude.

Was there a targeted ethnic cleansing or was it more of labour camps type of thing?

5'11"

As a fighting force, they were amazing, with something like a 10:1 kill ratio. No, there was no "height requirement" for the SS. This was only for the original SS (his body guards, who did have a height requirement) who later fought at the front as SS Adolf Hitler.
I actually thought this until I was about 17 and met a former SS officer out West in the US (sir ehe's dead by now) who was only 5 foot 3 or so.

I don't think it was "ethnic cleansing" as in systematic. The issue was, in the East (where most Jews who did die were killed) the vast, vast majority of fanatical communist agitators were Jews. so often the only way to pacify a newly captured town was to round up the Jews and machine gun them into a pit. Also, as the Germans moved to the east, often the local townspeople would round the Jews up themselves and begin hanging them for all the atrocities they committed under communism.

I am certain it was more than the Liebstandate that had height requirements.
I think Viking had them, and so did a few others like Das Reich

Who started WW2?

Did the Führer do anything wrong?

Are you NatSoc?

There's a very interesting example, after the war ended and before the Soviets got to Poland, the Poles began hanging Jews as fast as they could find the rope. Want to drive an old, PC bullshit artist (like John Merriman at Yale) crazy? Ask him about this, and why these Poles weren't thrilled to be "liberated" and were instead rounding up Jews rather than Germans.

>so each minute I type, you are getting $10 for free

You narcissistic faggot, your opinion is only worth what someone is willing to pay.

Guess what that amount is here? Fucking zero.

Get over yourself.

>Who started WW 2
Well, if you believe it was the Germans and that the goal of the UK was to "restore Poland's territorial integrity," that didn't end up working out did it? Irving writes a good deal (as does Pat Buchanan to an extent) about how churchill had been bought and paid for by the Jewish community in the UK, which is why in 37 or so he suddenly develops this keen interest in "stopping Hitler."

>Did Hitler do anything wrong

He probably should have headed across the Caucuses and seized the oil fields. Would have been in a much better position. Also, the russian offensive was launched way too late. Had it been launched earlier, most likely they would have taken Moscow

>are you a Nat-Soc
no, Nat Scialism was...as AH said, historical movements are footnotes to the lives of great people. Iff was tied to AH and to Germany of the 30s and 40s. Without that, you have no Nsism (IMO).

Did Hitler actually commission a squad of fag SS that were especially brutal?

>Get over yourself.

>fag SS
Have never seen anything like that in the archives, though if you have info, would be interested. In fact, if you got caught egging it up in 1930s Germany, you were in big, big trouble and probably would have ended up in a camp. Which may sound cruel but look at what society has become now. give an inch, they take a mile.

this is a really good thread. thanks op.

Are you talking about the SS unit initial formed out of convicted poachers led by a legitimate psychopath that later just took violent criminals before it was dissolved?

Of course, you have to understand the Third Reich's reaction to queers in context of just following the Weimar. Just like the book burnings. It was never "illegal" to own any any books in Nat Soc Germany, not even The Communist Manifesto. they were a public display (in days before TV) that there was new ownership in charge and that their tastes in literature differed markedly from the old boss. So they burned pornography, jewish garbage, marxism, etc..

talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/top-social-conservative-hitler-used-gay-soldiers-because-they-had-no-limits

Just wanted to know if it was true

Same fag here. What was the driving force behind communism and jews, since they're mostly pro-capital as even dictate by their religion?

Interesting. Here are my questions:

1. How many people were gassed in Auschwitz per day on average
2. How many cremators did Auschwitz have?

Wasn't here for the previous threads. Is the Holocaust a lie? And how do we know you are who you say you are?

I'd give you an answer but i think Churchill said it an article in 1921 better than I ever could (yes, it's completely legit):

library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm

>How many people were gassed in Auschwitz per day on average
Vero. The Brits broke the enigma code (as you know from recent movies). Each morning, Rudolph Höess (different from "Hess") would send out the number of prisoners that came in, the number leaving for other camps, number died from natural causes, and number hanged. The Brits would get this info each morning.

>And how do we know you are who you say you are?
Well, let me give you my name and scan my license, hold on a minute... if you have an IQ over 60 my friend, you can tell from google in 2 minutes if I know what I'm talking about or I don't. I'm not claiming to be some...pop star or to have any unique access to material no one else does. It's all on net or in archives, just a question of if you want to spend 10,000 hours learning it.

>Vero.
Eish, ZERO. I need to get one of those thing that let you glance a computer in bed but they look faggoty.

google tells me 6 million jews were killed, is this true?

take a guess user. let's look at one of my favorite pictures to come out of the Zündel trial when they got caught in their own lies"

So you do not believe in the holocaust as it were, then?

Stfu you faggot

I have no idea if you or most are aware of this, but you do know that in France you can go to jail for publicly stating that the Holocaust is exaggerated, a fraud, used by Jews to push their own agenda...the UK just got an even stricter law under May. Oh, and they are pushing for a similar law in the US too. They have to find a way around that pesky first amendment, but they will.

so all you have are Sup Forums tier pics as your source? Is revising the number really so crazy? Not very convincing.

Let me tell you what Dr. Pierce used to say. Jews did die during the war. I've talked to german soldiers who shot Jews. And if they want to call that a "holocaust," that's fine with me. Where it gets crooked--and Finkelstein wrote an entire book on this called "The Holocaust Industry--" is where they claim some outlandish number and then use it to try to extort other nations, grab land, as an excuse for crimes, you name it. now THAT is crooked.

Taking into account that the 6 million is a Jewish kabalistic number and it was based on the first auswich plaque. The fact that you still can go to jail for questioning it speaks for itself

>being wrong by 2.5 million
Its pretty crazy

Almost as if someone just made it up

In any case, the burden of proof for a crime is on the accuser, is it not? If you are accusing, the burden of proof is on you. You are claiming "6 million Jews died," correct? OK, show is the evidence. Beause the re cross numbers and the Auschwitz death certificates released from the Russian archives in 1995 put the number at about 84,000.

>I have an MA from Columbia

>I went into law

What about a JD to practice law, you fucking autist?

This is, after quite a bit of research, my conclusion as well. Yes, jews died, yes there were definitely some atrocities directed towards them - but then again, so they were against everyone else by everyone else.

These gas chambers gassing 6 million of them and making soap and light lanterns out of them...yeah I'm not buying that so much. From some source some ~200k jews died in reality during WW2. Which is a lot, but really nothing special considering total victims of WW2.

History is now forgotten and mostly written by the winners. It's very hard to figure out what is a lie and what is the truth.

Thank you. Great reply.
I want to touch on the cremators - there were not that many correct? Certainly not enough to expose of the supposed dead bodies?

Also,
Do you happen to know how the NS categorized Hungarians? Were they considered Aryans, Honorary Aryans, or neither?

We're all talking how the mass killing of Jews didn't happen, but what about the Poles, Romanians and all the other ethnic groups? Was that also fake/exaggerated?

This was shitty spelling. let me rewrite (this new no YOU thing is driving me insane): "In any legal case, you have to come before some sort of court and prove the guilt of the accused. IF you want to mention Nuremberg, before the trial the Brit "judge" remarked "the only real question is the height of the rope..." Also, only SIX witnesses in total were brought, all shown in retrospect to be outlandishly corrupt (see video documentary "One Third Of the Holocaust.") Evenbetter, read the transcripts from The Avalon Project at Yale and the description of human lampshades, soap, shrunken heads. This has all been exposed as complete bullshit.

They lied. Aushcwitz is the most important because if (when) that ship sinks, the entire fraud is over with. My favorite new Jewish scam is the claim that "holocaust trauma is passed on genetically." (!!!) this isn't some crazy jew ranting in his basement, these are "serious" doctors claiming this to set up next generation of gibsme:

theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/21/study-of-holocaust-survivors-finds-trauma-passed-on-to-childrens-genes

>t a JD to practice law
really? You need a JD to practice law? thanks, I thought I could have just skipped those years and gone right in, but good thing I have people ike you to remind me. Would you like he name of school too and year? I've been here too long fucko, I know how doxxing works. Even giving my MA school was maybe too much.
>I can't argue with him on facts, so I'm going to try to pick him apart on anything else.

>Holocaust passed to kids
This is just Jews Jewing.
They are still getting reparations and inflating the survivor count for gibs.

>mass killing of Jews didn't happen
If you do the math, even by modern methods, there was no way. I'd recommend going to Yale's Avalon Project to read the Nuremberg transcripts. Wernick's description of how the bodies were "burned in pits," and "women were put on top on men since they burned faster."

It's literally comical. You can tell just from the testimony the prosecutor trying to shut him up before he reveals himself as totally insane.

> days without jewish tricks.jpg

Why were certain parts of the Holocaust glossed over in a few sentences during the Nuremburg trials?

Were SS officers really tortured into giving false testimony? I don't believe the Holohoax but I've always thought the Revisionist angle that "They were tortured in to giving false testimony!" rather flimsy and I've never found any proof that it actually happened.

If you are new to this (even if you are not), this guy's autism makes mine look mild by comparison. I may/may not have more as regards books and sources, but he builds entire models, puts on demonstrations of how long it takes to burn a rack of lamb. This is a great place to start if you are new to this:

youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE

cool.
You got anything on the Hun question?

Most people remember the germans as kind conquerors. Very civilized. My grandfather's father told my grandfather that they gave chocolate to the kids.

>I've never found any proof
Nor will you ever find proof, and was the idea. All you will find is circumstantial. If you want "circumstantial," read aboutt he case of the Jew Solomon Morrell, and a book about him called "An Eye for An Eye." He head to death over 300 German former SS men with table legs while they were tied. The Poles asked Israel to extradite him and the Jews said 'sorry, you are too late, statue of limitations goy."

these are the very same Jews dragging 102 year old clerks through the court system now. I can't prove to you the rumors that they had their testicles smashed with hammers, toe nails pulled out, etc..

I'd simply point you to people like Morrell and also "The Morgenthau Plan" and what he wanted to do to ALL Germans to see what the Jews in Roosevelt's (later Truman's) gvt wanted to do to the Germans.

>an MA
>an
Your opinion is worthless.

This, even the Jewish historians admit. the German army had the best record as occupiers of any Army in the war, including the American army and French Army.

>Your opinion is worthless
Fair enough. Yet, you haven't refuted a single a thing I've written, have you? Are you then suggesting hat I've written is inaccurate or untrue? I'll wait for your refutation...

> muslim immigrants don't learn english
It checks out.

I have a funny feeling I'll be waiting a very long time...

On a scale of 1 to 10, how evil are the jewish people in your opinion?

I don't need to the fact is you out yourself as a dullard.

"I have an masters"

Sure, you keep on larping tiger.

Rude Gayland

Someone gib link to previous thread plox

His English is miles better than your French. Go fuck yourself with your pedantic bullshit.

To blame an individual Jew (other than someone like Trotsky/Bronstein or Kagonavich or Ilya Ehrenburg, etc..) is hard IMO. But as a group? They are absolutely found wanting in group morality. They are hypocrites to a degree that staggers the goyish imagination. And this isn't just my opinion. Read Truman's diaries? Same opinion. Listen to Nixon's tapes? Same opinion.
They are...essentially, as it's said here EVERY..FUCKING..TIME. Find something degenerate or anti-White or sleazy, and 99% of the time, you will find a Jew. As a group, in terms or morality? a 10.

Fucking awesome, all commies must hang

The frog spells like shit I agree but it isn't difficult to read bong

>I don't need to the fact
Indeed, you don't. That sentence right there sums it up Chaim.

Why isn't this common knowledge btw? Commies infiltrating the education system?

Actually, "an MA" is correct, not "a MA". A/An is decided on the abbreviation, not the full word of it.

Jesus christ, you can't even speak your own language.

Just go fuck yourself you filthy paki.

In case you are too self absorbed to realise
>
>> muslim immigrants don't learn english
>It checks out.
that was meant for you.
An MA is gramatically correct

>I don't need to the fact is you out yourself as a dullard.
How to write this correctly: I don't need to(PERIOD). The fact is(COMMA), you out yourself as a dullard.

And I'm writing a mile a minute. You have all the time in the world, you admit you have no facts (not one), AND you have no command of the English language.

A person who studies for a masters wouldn't get something so basic so wrong.

They also wouldn't need validation from anonymous shitposters on the internet.

More likely OP specialized in European WW2 history and dropped out of uni.

The education system isn't enough to teach all of this, also (((their))) influence

Yes kaffir, listen to the sandnigger from Marseilles. His opinion is the same as some Americans opinion, so surely its true.

All shitskins must die.

He's not wrong, you are you disgusting paki, go hang yourself.

Google up when to use a or an with abbreviations and acronyms.

I'm gonna lock him after this but appernlt he doesn't realize an when you are writing the abbreviation, you don't say "a MA" since the since the "a" is long. I'm not teaching 3rd grade grammar to retards; nor am I letting a kike derail the thread.

Well it's been fun baiting all you autists, thanks for all the yous.

The kike brigade has arrived. But you'll notice, they never have good arguments. I'll say the same to you I said to the other one. You say I'm incorrect? OK, refute anything I've said. You've had time to google. find something. But you won't, because you know you can't.

the Jew won't fight you on facts, since he knows he doesn't have any. Just trying to insinuate I'm a shitskin (I'm blue-eyed and born in Brittany actually). More proof that when they face people who genuinely know their business, they won't argue with you.

I guess they didn't lie to comfort me for the 400 euro when they said a CPE means my english is better than a native's on one of his good days.

Jews are sneaky.
They get away with racial supremacy by calling themselves religious, but treating Judaism like a race.
Judaism is the only religion that does DNA tests for entry like in Israel.
Half of them don't follow the scripture either. They use their religion as a club to conspire and good plausible deniability.

>baiting all you autists
translation: "I got the shit kicked out of me and trying to salvage some pride after everyone in thread pointed out I was wrong."

Pretty much this.

Oh, incase you're wondering whether or not you're being baited use the citation criteria.

If you wouldn't feel the need to cite it because it's considered common knowledge you shouldn't feel the need to correct them.

It just seems staggering that a lie could become so pervasive, even when the facts clearly steer towards the opposite. How the hell do they do it?

does anyone still feel like doing this or is it boring now? If there are any real questions or anyone wants a source about x or y ask now because no idea when 'll be back on here, have to earn my shekels.

Is it true that hitler had an interest in the occult ? If so, please elaborate.

Why have jews been banished over 100 times? Will we muster the courage to ban them again?

Do you believe there is an active attempt to get people to forget about the other peoples who were killed during WW2, including. Poles/Slavs/gypsies/homosexuals/mentally ill

What do you think of the Possen speech, even if it doesn't outright say extermination it does strongly imply something is happening to Jews

Have you read the book, The Black March. What do you think of the beginning chapters in which the author describes the heavy increase in anti-Semitic propaganda in school questions?

>staggering that a lie could become so pervasive
Why Professor Butz--the first real "Revisionist--" called his book "The Hoax of the 20th Century."

OP is a faggot

nobody cares dumb faggot
fuck off

Is there any way this lie could be torn apart? What would have to happen? What would the repercussions be for the perpetrators of these lies?

Also were there really jews that assisted the SS like Soros? Any interesting facts about Anne Frank?

Great Thread OP.

>hitler had an interest in the occult
No, but Himmler did. He was big into Aryan mythology and he designed the castile that was the SS headquarters as a "knights of the Roundtable" (even though that's Brit or Cornish mythology). He also had some odd ideas where he allegedly encouraged SS men to try to get their wives pregnant in cemeteries containing the graves of great Germanic heroes.

sure I have a book on it somewhere on shelves but honestly too exhausted to get up and look. Irving's bio on Himmler should have some stuff on it. Hitler had no interest in that sort of thing.

>Also were there really jews that assisted the SS
Interesting, Jews were bankrolling Hitler right up until 1938. They still thought he was crooked like every other politican and was in all of it for fame and money. When they finally realized he wasn't and actually meant business, a lot of them were in deep shit. Deservedly so.

Didn't hitler Aquire the spear of longinus, with which christ was stabbed in the ribcage ?

Sure I'll think of more.
Was there a long term plan after sending Jews to ME/Madagascar? Would they be constantly monitored/policed?

>number died from natural causes, and number hanged.
source?

You remind me DxD

Huh ?

Rostchilds? Also weren't they pissed when he essentially went off the reservation and developed a new currency for Germany + creation of 6,000,000 jobs?

How did the Rothschild agent who stayed in the Reich's bank stay in the Reich's bank even after Hitler decided to overthrow international finance?

>Is there any way this lie could be torn apart?
I've thought a lot about this, I honestly don't know. If we take Dr. Pierce's theory od societies where the most important group in a society is "the observers," once the jews begin to go too far...think about Gladwell's theory of "the Tipping Point." Assuming there are enough White people left, eventually it's going to reach a tipping point to where it all just falls apart on them.

I'm not a big fan of "Milo" by any means, but look at how crazed those people get. Can you imagine if someone like ME were allowed to come and speak? As bad as the 60s were in many ways, they still let men like GL Rockwell speak on campuses.

the more they push it underground, I'd like to say someday it's all going to explode at same time, the damn is going to break. This information is all out there, and it's all demonstrably true. Going to be interesting to see how much longer it lasts. Zündel had some great thoughts on this:
youtube.com/watch?v=A5sbegfCz7o

Good question.
[spoiler]Hitler was a deep agent [/spoiler]