Sup Forums gets triggered at commie threads

>Sup Forums gets triggered at commie threads
> Unironically support NatSoc

Ignorant ass nigga.

SAGE

I'm not anti-communism because it's historically totalitarian, I'm anti-communism because it's not racist and even paying lip-service to equality is too egalitarian for me.

Gee, its such a mystery how someone could like a reactionary ideology created SPECIFICALLY TO OPPOSE COMMUNISM if they hate communism. Really gets the ol' bees buzzin.

You think communism isn't racist because Stalin killed millions of his own people

Doesn't matter though because they're 2 sides of the same poisonous coin

>Sup Forums is one person

Communism was never properly implemented; we have not ever tried true Communism. It is the only way forward.

No, I think communism isn't racist because it's simply racist. In the USSR white Latvians and Asian Uzbeks had an equally shitty time.

>Doesn't matter though because they're 2 sides of the same poisonous coin
>le horseshoe theory
Our ultimate goal is the united supremacy of the Aryan race in a deeply hierarchical, patriarchal and spiritual society.
Their ultimate goal is a stateless, classless, moneyless utopia without hierarchy, sexism or any kind of religion.

>but historical implementation
Even in historical implementation communism and NatSoc were completely different.
They had state centrally planned economies. We had Keynesian corporatist economies that retained private control of capital.
We had family units and largely took women out of the workforce to go back into the home. They had abortion and women's liberation.
They had strict state atheism. We had relative religious tolerance and a very spiritual aura to the state itself.

The similarities end at being dictatorships that wore sick uniforms.

*simply not racist

Remove flawed human nature and it would work
In that case anarchy would be better
No governments > governments

>Implying I should listen to a peasant britcuck

...

The ultimate goal is to eliminate non Aryans in their vicinity rather than take the best and expel the worst.

Apologists try to make it seem like self defense but Nazis were the ones to invade multiple countries.

>2016
>being a lolbertarian capitalist that gets cucked by jews and their superior financial tactics

>/leftypol/ get trigger at NatSoc threads
>Unironically supports communism

FTFY

They can't help themselves, it's in their nature to let Jews rule over them.

Confirmed Sup Forums is a hugbox.

It's completely your fault if you ever get jewed. Don't blame capitalism for it

Very few of us actually support NatSoc, and everybody with a functioning brain can see that communism is for retards, and ws created by an evil NEET hypocrite of mass proportions that literally starved his children to death.

>/leftypol/ bans trump generals on their board
>relies on Sup Forums's free speech to post commie generals

/leftypol/ are like the autistic NEET version of Israel

>from /leftypol/
>bragging about anything
pick one

>/leftypol/ are like the autistic NEET version of Israel
kek'd audibly

nice job fags

Bruhs actually read the thread before you shitpost

Whats wrong with NatSoc? It's literally a flawless system.

Whilst I agree that it would be a grand thing for us all to be free this just isn't possible, the vast majority of people don't just need to be ruled but want it. As it stands hierarchy is here to stay, though maybe with a couple million years of evolution things will be different.

>The ultimate goal is to eliminate non Aryans in their vicinity rather than take the best and expel the worst.
You're god damn right it is.

Nat-soc was created to destroy communism.

They draw from fascism but that still isn't a good definition for what nat-soc is.

You sir (((OP))) are autistic.

For those who don't know what national socialism is, I recommend visiting the nat-soc threads that pop up from time to time.

Now, sage goes in all fields if you reply.

>natsoc eliminates most of germany's problems in 3 years
>this is a totally unstable system that will lead you to ruin goy

> You're god damn right it is
That's edgy but considering the degeneracy in the world, there might be some worth while thinking into it.

I mean, in older history when civilizations had some degree of religious tolerance and minorities under control, you didn't see teenagers acting like fairies or women becoming obese and yelling at old people
It also lead to the delusion of superiority which lead to the second most recorded amount of deaths in a period in history after the Atlantic Slave trades

>delusion of superiority
No, Aryans are just factually superior.

>recorded

Do you know how to use a calculator? If so you can determine on your own if those numbers are a little off
Protip: they are

Are you retarded? If you go on a commie board supporting NatSoc youre going to be shutdown. This is a rightwing board.
>inb4 "its for all politics!"
>inb4 hurr durr hugbox
SAGE

Proposing social darwinism as a political background is pic related. People should be rewarded with how hard they work, how hard they strive to have a good life. That's what capitalism is for. The Nazis wanted to reward for winning the genetic lottery.
Statistics are always debated but it is universally agreed that WW2 caused a catastrophic amount of casualties. It is also universally agreed that it was Hitler's fault.
Muh board culture amirit

> People should be rewarded with how hard they work, how hard they strive to have a good life.
And that much is already largely determined by genetics.

Pretty much doesn't mean all. Here in New York City, we have lots of Chinese and Indians in the highest tier schools (and they are not your typical dumbshit merican' schools)

Now don't get me wrong, I see what you mean. Again, here in NYC niggers almost always go to the bottom of the barrel schools

But Jews, Chinese, and Indians typically have very high end jobs in America and they are not white. Not spics or niggers though

1. Jews are white
2. There's literally over a billion Chinese and Indians, the vast majority of them are nigger-tier but given the sheer quantity of them it's no surprise that a small handful become successful.

Please explain NatSoc to me in detail. I think I read that states control large corporations in NatSoc but idk.

Your Nazi friends would say no to that

Naturally, I have this argument about Jews with other Nazis like twice a day.

I don't support national socialists or socialism in general.

>pol is one person

Might makes right is the only universal and 40 farmers with guns cannot deal with the logistical reach of a coordinated nation.

40 farmers may be trained in war, but they're farmers first. Meanwhile 400 soldiers are soldiers by profession.

As much as I'd like a world where government is unnecessary, I'm not stunted enough to think that's even a possibility because humans do not act selflessly by nature.