...
What did (((they))) mean by this?
>having a terrorist group around would make the world safer
Holy shit what the fuck are they smoking.
...
It means that we should kill everyone In the middle east
post the fucking link you deranged moor.
Archive link or fake news
To be fair we've killing our enemies there for 50 years and we only ever seem to lose.
>our newspapers stand in solidarity with fucking isis
why the fuck dont we just throw journalists in prison
>you must accept hell on Earth less there will be hell on Earth.
Typical priestly BS.
It's like busting a zit without washing thoroughly afterwards.
Its just going to scatter all the islamists to the wind and waiting for them to sprout somewhere else.
Unless we go in with 500k troops and turn Raqqa into a gravel pit, like we should have done from the start.
I don't know what they meant, but it's not exactly wrong. ISIS is already on the decline, and whatever comes from the power vacuums next will be much worse.
>does not even archive the link.
Spain truly is mixed just enough to no longer count as european.
I bet even mexico has higher development level by now.
Leaf post best post
exactly right
you gotta try poo in the loo though
Not safer, but more coherent, it's well known an enemy is needed for good social cohesion
Correct. The formation of ISIS after the collapse of Al Qaeda was the exact same case. People say Obama made ISIS as if he directly funded them significantly enough for them to become the threat they are now, but he didnt contribute as much financially as he did geopolitically.
The power vacuum will probably mean another radical islamist worse than its predecessor taking over the region again.
In fact, Spain is too white to no longer count as European while Estonia is about to count as Russian since all your women preffer their dicks than yours :D
Withdrawing troops from Afghanistan was an enormous mistake. Trump had better do a surge or the Taliban are just going to keep retaking districts.
>how are we going to proxy war against Iran without our "moderate rebels" (ISIS)?
Saudi Arabia got that covered, they will fund the shit out of anything that attacks Iran
Arabian sprint was mistake.
Writing a fucking clickbait headline that signals we should hesitate to end ISIS is exactly what is wrong with American journalism. It's #SlatePitching at its' finest.
We live in a primitive time don’t we? Neither savage nor wise. Half measures are the curse of it. Any rational society would either glass Mecca and Tel Aviv or address root causes.
>either glass Mecca and Tel Aviv or address root causes.
that's like saying one should either open the container or remove its lid.
I completely agree with you, but it's the sad truth that no matter what we do now, something worse will replace ISIS and we will have to fight it too.
Kek
ayy containment is the ultimate bluepill of half-measures
>it's not my problem but let's keep talking about it
D-d-don't you dare take them out! Russia hacked muh elections! Sanctions and WW3 NOW!
Lucky for us we don't have to fucking live there. Sort yourselves out, Dune Coons.
They will just replace ISIS with a terrorist group they can better control such as Nusra.
Every country in that region and the US wants a proxy terrorist group to call their own like Iran has Hezbollah. Having a mercenary military of shock troops has it's benefits. The problem was ISIS was stupid enough to bite the hand that fed them and tried to be their own group now they are paying the price.
Guaranteed Nusra will still be around long after ISIS are gone Qatar/Turkey need them for various things like blowing out Kurds, meddling in Syria or Libya or Yemen, or meddling in Egypt