Why does Marxism not work?

Why does Marxism not work?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7BTDRLcPsPo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Who said it doesn't work? Have you ever seen the fortune of Rothschild? Do you think they could have had their money without parasitism the state through progressive tax? What centralized banks that leech the working class and give it to internationalists?

Because a Marxism relies on all people to work together, the problem is 1/2 of our population are complete degenerate shitheads

*What about

Human nature

Rothschilds made their money via capitalism.

Ah, sure.
>DOWN WITH THE 1%
[we want you to put us in the 1%] right?

...

...

...

Logic

Lazy people can't be punished by the free market, they're still owed a "share", which becomes unsustainable without forced labor. The makers can't support the takers. Also the bureaucracy in charge of distribution will likely be abused, turning it into essentially an oligarchy.

It also is supposed to be moving towards a stateless world, but people are tribalistic and resist this

Bakunin on Marx and Rothschild

“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of bloodsuckers, a single gluttonnous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ....”

Source: Michael Bakunin, 1871, Personliche Beziehungen zu Marx. In: Gesammelte Werke. Band 3. Berlin 1924. P. 204-216

P.S: Bakunin was scum but he was dead right about Marx's plan.

Because porky won't let it.

sure buddy, sure

> commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce

See for yoursef.

Goes against all human history, which is hierarchical. Every communist regime has always had some form of elite...which is against communism doctrine.

What normally happens is an old elite is replaced with a new elite that proceeds to butcher the middle class in the name of "class solidarity" with the poor, who remain poor.

I'm consistently baffled by retards that want to give it another go. Meanwhile, fascism actually works when it doesn't have the capitalist/communist world waging war against it.

Oh, but it does.Social democracy and communism are very popular, successful and stable political ideologies.

>Marcos
>Libertarian Socialism
>Not the PRI's Puppet
This what chairos actually believe

because it affords no opportunity for those of us who want to work hard to have more wealth.

i want to spend 80+ hours a week in the office (i already spend that much in the library).

i don't want to be on the same income level as a dude weed lmao millenial.

...

How does that even make any sense? The employer gave you the tools, raw materials and training as well as assuming all of the risk if he business goes under. Why should they not get the profits?

where the hell did you all get this

in the soviet union the planning system was strongly proenthusiastic and against dude weed lmao because having no job was criminalized, not working good would let down the plan and lead to you getting beaten the fuck out by your brigade boss

and if you were more succesfull at work you were paid over the salary, the more you overdo the plan = the more you get

my father had a salary of 400 roubles while other brigade members earned only 180 just because he worked hard

Not to mention the very people who perpetuated the divide and conquer agenda of identity politics are the same proponents of socialism. Just how will we get people to work for a collective when they fucking hate each other right now? Not to mention all those people on the bludge currently won't go for this work for (less) welfare idea. Don't tell me it's designed to fail. How can I ever argue "it's not real communism" knowing that now?

cucktural marxists are not socialist at all, they just want you to pay for their college

in soviet russia those bags of shits would not receive a rouble of welfare (cause there was none) and would probably be forced to work as street sweepers

Not really that's the last of its problems. Even on a homogenous state people need motives, rewards and investment. Nobody is gonna fucking build a space station only and for the sole purpose of the betterment of humanity.

Marxism is a fairy tale, it's last stage is incorrectly named an utopia when in fact it's a dystopia. A fully equal society people would just get suicidal, depressed, not reproduce, and lack any motivation.

>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

youtube.com/watch?v=7BTDRLcPsPo

What the CIA did to sankara still boils my head.

That's because socialism or the left in general thrives on division to trigger a 'revolution'. This division can be of any kind, usually class based. Once the party feeding the hate amasses enough outrage they proceed to radicalise, dismiss anything that has to do with their opposing side, and try to topple them.

no capitalist believes this
they are paying you to produce something or to provide a service and only for that. and if not for the worker the boss would not get the profits.
no capitalist lets his boss trample all over his personal life, get out of your echo camber you spaintard.

Because it delegates the work to it's more successful brother, Capitalism.

By the way Americans you can expect all your lefties to become more united and extreme, this is what the left does. The parties behind this will just sit and enjoy the show. They will start protesting and using young and naive people as cannon fodder, if the authorities intervine and even dares to touch them they will get victimized and spread all over the news, this will feed a chain of outrage, this another way they will gain more support.

Because there isn't a single factor motivating a socialist citizen to do anything at all for the state except the threat of reprisals from superiors.

If I was working in a nuclear plant and saw an improvement to make it safer or cheaper im in line for promotion. Under Socialism i would keep my head down for fear of embarrassing my superior who will ship me off to the gulag whenever he wants. Consequently Chernobyl blows up, people starve to death or (like in the very end) you have a military flying millions of dollars of fighter jets on bald tyres.

Because people aren't lobotomized drones.

You can make them recite commie dogma at gunpoint for days. You can't make them stop looking out for their self-interest and their family, at the expense of the collective.

except with the internet we can see exactly what happened, and get professional opinions within a day
plus lefties have been doing this shit for a while now, even normies know this now