I am a Ph.D Ed.D studying eugenics and gifted education in the US for a privately funded (((foundation))). AMA

I am a Ph.D Ed.D studying eugenics and gifted education in the US for a privately funded (((foundation))). AMA

>AMA
No, go back to lebbit until you can form a proper OP. This isn't your personal blog.

Sorry, just trying to improve board quality from

>privately funded (((foundation)))
Name it

studying eugenics? Openly? Like is your foundation aware of it or are you just privately researching it?

fake user.

kike

The foundation is no open about it but we are studying it under the guise of "innovative learning techniques" in one branch and "brain-mapping technology" in the other. Openly self-labeling like that would get us shut down.

Ha, no. I have a pretty aryan family to feed.

What are you studying about gifted education?
If I had to guess I'd say "is it the cause or the effect of above average intelligence"

I have recently become very concerned with the motivations of the research directors and have begun my private research on them, lol.

I don't think you understand what "gifted education" is. Having an IQ 1 standard deviation above the mean qualifies your school for special funding on the student's behalf. The funds are intended to be used to educate those students but currently simply aren't. Until there is a prescribed "right" way to use said funds (IEP/504), the money goes into the general school fund. The feds give us money to tell them how to tell schools to use the money they give them.

That's not all we are doing, however.

What kind of timestamp do you want?

see

Sounds more like an audit than a study to me.

There are people who do that. My background is in genetics as is most of the people on my team.

We test on children so definitely not an audit.

what is this a reference to?

i have a question about intelligence testing and age.

so most people take the SAT when they are in high school, and a very high score indicates a very high level of intelligence. but if, say, a 30 year old took the SAT and a got a perfect score, could you reasonably conclude that he probably has a top 10% IQ or whatever, or is it a less valid assessment since he is much older than those whom the test was designed for?

What kind of diet can I eat that would keep me healthy but I'd never have to poop?

There is specific results from our research that shows a systemic abuse of males in education. Combined with federalizing standards (CCSS as the first widely accepted federalization of local education) I am deeply concerned with where we are going as a country.

Keep your mouth shut. Stop posting now.

SAT is an achievement test, not an IQ test. This is put in place to measure how closely you fit the state mandated mold of education. It is far more of a measure of the school district, although high IQ individuals often do well on them. It is a learnable test and therefore not valid as a measure of intelligence, rather of specific skills acquired in years of schooling.

Intelligence tests likeWISC or WPPSI si far more accurate at determining raw IQ (capability vs achievement) but schools are not interested in learning this score.

That should tell you something.

I recommend you gain 300lbs in a few months and then coast on reserves until death. Should entertain everyone here.

Thanks for the concern, user, but I won't be releasing information that can incriminate me or that isn't common knowledge to anyone on the team.

Infiltrate and subvert them all. Turn it into a program for us.

Infiltrate what? It's my study. I'm giving it to you by allowing you to rape my findings before they are (likely distorted and then) published.

Unless I am misunderstanding you. Do you mean sway the findings somehow to manipulate the current social trajectory?

Yes. Manipulate everything to further our agenda. You're in a very special position

I don't even know where to start with that. That is entirely unethical. (yes I hear the irony) And also, no idea what that would even entail.

Not rejecting the concept, just foreign to it.

No suggestions? Currently data shows basic subjugation of males and dysgenic breeding among even the educated. What reverse intel would right the ship?

Do you believe in race realism? I.. blacks have lower average IQs than the average Caucasian, while East Asians have the highest.

research seems to support it although there are a ton of other factors. Diet seems to be the main reason behind asian intellectual superiority.Whereas there is a distinct flaw in the study of blacks. I do notice a trended difference between blacks of mexican or carribean descent vs. African descent but it's difficult to find entirely pure subjects of either.

In case it was unclear, voluntary African immigrants, carribean blacks and even blackicans test higher and are more creative and clever than Southern (slavery) blacks.

There is something to be said for the obesity link in African americans - i.e. only those prone to high fat content could survive the slave voyage. I suspect it could be an evolutionary purge, that the innovative ones simply weren't sold into slavery, and/or possibly that higher intellect individuals (needing more calories all other things being equal) starved to death on the journey over.

Is there a correlation between Aspergers and giftedness?

absolutely. IQs over 120 are proportionally related to dropping out, unemployment, and general social ineptitude.

What brought you to Sup Forums of all places? And why are you telling us this?

What are the demographics of gifted children? Are you trying to find the genes for intelligence? I am interested in this subject.

I'm on pol regularly. Most educated people with any non-leftist political leaning are. I've had 3 very specific education related posts where I've felt like the general populace is entirely uninformed as to the purpose behind public education and where it is going. Thus, this.

Public education is a feminist institution and tool. We know it and it is shocking to me that most don't.

Do you realize eugenics is one of the four tenets of modern satanism?

Do you believe that gender identity is a social construct? How much of a role will it play when society gets to the issues eugenics and designer babies?

>feminist tool

Can you elaborate?

(Sup Forums isn't going to like this but)
While general averages do follow racial differences, true outliers (160+) happen in every race. It's difficult to gauge the demographics though, specifically because not all children are tested, children in poverty are tested at higher rates (to qualify for special funding), and race and class make understanding causation for Blacks specifically very difficult.

Demographics we know:

Women are more inclined to the average (part of the reason most in the field consider the intelligence tested by current IQ testing to be X-tied) Men are inclined to both high and low outliers.

>Currently data shows basic subjugation of males and dysgenic breeding among even the educated.

So where do you think this trend came from? Is it a remnant of soviet subversion from the 50s onward?

All of these ideas must have come from somewhere.

>It is a learnable test
Why is college board able to advertise it as unlearnable test though? I swear to God somebody could bring a suit to the collegeboard for this.

>Are you trying to find the genes for intelligence

No the study is trying to discover ways to identify genius and cultivate it from birth. It's not a gene but a set of characteristics/genes.

I have my doubts about whether this is actually the intended goal. So far, actions taken on the study have been pointedly in the other direction. And no, not a Satanist myself but as it is an extremely broad topic, that doesn't surprise me.
Gender Identity is absolutely NOT a social construct, however, this does throw support to the microscopic minority of people who have an incorrectly programmed brain. I would prefer to reprogram or surgically alter tranny brains rather than their genitals but this is a political issue and not open to the medical/scientific community.

The public school system became mandatory so women could work in WWII factories without guilt. It has become much more in the meantime.

This effect has a lot of causes, child support and paternity suits being a primary one. The public school system is a way for the government to "partner" with parents. i.e. replace them. In order to do so, you have to remove males and castle law mentality. Feminism, family law and the Dept of Ed are demonic triplets.

So you would say that convincing children that their either a little boy or a little girl is absolutely insane and damaging

So what do you think these institutions are planning as the end game for males? Mindless worker drones and soldiers? Where does the "demonic triplet" want us to go?

"learnable" perhaps is the wrong word. "Guessable" is probably more accurate.

Weren't you ever told "when in doubt choose C"? If you think about it, you have testing strategy drilled into from primary grades on.

I just remember seeing how the college board says it's a fair measure of achievement because it's not learnable or whatever. I just thought that was retarded because there is a clear pattern to the test that could be mastered.

>There is specific results from our research that shows a systemic abuse of males in education.

Please elaborate.

I think talking about it is a waste of time and a political strategy for naturalizing pedophelia (IMO).

>Mindless worker drones and soldiers?
Yes and no. The military is also political. It wouldn't surprise me if the military was an entirely female front and we just droned the shit out of everyone, but I digress.

End game is related to and . The state would be very happy to have every woman with children on welfare and every man laundering his money through the state. When the government controls the children, they control everything as most of our base driving factors center around propagation of the species.

You saw a wink. "Achievement" literally means information learned in educator circles.

Is there any demographic showing a spike in IQs? That is, between generations?

Although this might have already been asked...
Do you believe that consuming certain foods can allow for certain genetics to express themselves more so in the body.

Don't isn't healthy tho

what do you think about self-efficacy and thriving of teachers affecting common core?

what do you think about multiple intelligence theory?

Some examples:

1) Part A: We have proven that children in batches and geographical separation have hierarchies and roles that remain stable from year to year. Functionally, a child who has high potential but low achievement use to a traumatic event (death of a parent, for example) will be lower in the hierarchy of achievement for not only the year of trauma but will underachieve socially to maintain that status quo in subsequent years.

Part B: We have proven that male language skills are roughly 6mos-2 years behind females until roughly age 8 all other factors being equal. There are compensatory advantages, however in a call and response school system, these advantages do not reflect in achievement on paper. Ditto with fine motor skills (handwriting). 50 years ago boys were dominant in school. Around the same time, Kindergarten became available and then mandated. Now we are offering state paid-for preschool to low income areas -- even though I and other have proved time and time again that preschool does absolutely nothing to increase age 7 literacy rates.

Part C: The proven outcome of sending children to school earlier is that boys are introduced lower in the hierarchy, receive less teacher attention, are given multiple excuses, forced to endure developmentally inappropriate remedial work instead of developing the skills they are designed to develop at their age and are set up for failure for the rest of their k12 experience, encouraging them to be resentful of authority and not fight back against ritualized injustice.

College board is a bunch of shitheels that leech off of a monopoly they fucking rigged for themselves.

This is difficult to measure. IQ is a cross between potential ability and a culture's entire culmination of knowledge. The next generation will take the theories that eat up Sup Forums's time and energy for granted. All we can really do is measure IQ generationally by innovation. Consider the innovation of this century to the innovation of last century. Then consider if we are maintaining our current level of innovation,

IQ is ALWAYS tied to creativity.

What is the purpose of the state creating a dystopia for males?

Matter of fact, which state? The USA?

Question: What are the skills boys are supposed to be developing at that younger age?

Males cause all the fucking problems, women accept socialism and drone mentality easily.

Castrating males means society will be a bunch of docile sheep the ruling class can exploit and fuck over on levels not possible since feudalism died out.

This is probably out of your field, but have you had any findings on the increasing autism rates? The numbers just keep going up more and more each year. I assume that autism is almost always correlated with low iq, so I wonder if you have any insight to it.

Dude, it's fucked up and yet I knew it. It was kind of my experience growing up, the system hated me for being bright and male. Now I'm a fucking NEET and have to figure out how to game the system that gamed me for so long.

If it was bad in the 90s, I can't imagine what boys in grade school suffer now.

Seems like a waste of money.

any research about parents treating their girls better than their boys at home?

mm.. I haven't seen evidence to convince me. Other than healthy fats and similar basic nutritional basics. Sugar does slow down cognition.

I think self-efficacy is a big part of the teaching culture. Teachers were all against CCSS and some for the wrong reasons. The basic problem with CCSS is that standards that all children must meet is fundamentally flawed for a society - unless that standard has to do with basic citizenship rights or functional living.

I think multiple intelligence theory is spot on. It still doesn't mean any more than 1% of the population qualifies. But yes, you can be a prodigy at the piano and not be capable of understanding Calculus. Still genius. Still High IQ. Not capable of everything on CCSS.

Would you say political correctness is getting worse or better in the sector?

How has the internet affected the field, and academia in general?

Do you like Oregon, Michael?

>Consider the innovation of this century to the innovation of last century. Then consider if we are maintaining our current level of innovation,


The problem here then is that it is difficult to quantify innovation in respect to population size.

A bigger, denser population will tend towards more innovation has there are more people to have ideas, and more people to learn the ideas of others and interpret them in a novel way.

Reminder that the US used to be the most pro-eugenics nation until the Nazis went overboard.

Doubt the actual rate increased that much. It just started getting diagnosed more
>Oh you're a little socially awkward you have autism here buy those pills

Are there "minorities" on your team? How do they feel about this line of research.

Interesting theory. Over your career while studying genetics, what is one of the most interesting discoveries you've made?

I was in a gifted student program. IQ was measured in 140-160 range. The teacher was a raging libtard feminist and anti-white. Good to see this thread, it affirms to me that the push back is happening. You're doing the Lord's work OP.

So ... you're scheming up ways to implement eugenics? Preliminary thoughts?

Also, can you tell us what you've learned about what other 'behind the scenes, based rich people' are thinking?

seeMore or less. In a kinder version, if you allow women to have all the buying power (done) and allow them to control the children (check) and allow them to work and control their lives (double check), then all you have to do is create a law (SFA, thanks Hillary) that allows any government agent to take your children for a broad variety of reasons at any time to control the entire populace. Women do not accept socialism easily genetically, but they will 99/100 choose what is best for their one offspring than what is best for an entire nation.

And that ^^^ trait is directly linked to estrogen levels (and how far apart her eyes are fwiw).

Boys are naturally more social than girls at that age, but socialize differently and less verbally. Boys and girls under 12 have such vastly different needs they should never ever be placed in a coed classroom. A male Kindergarten should be outside felling trees and learning math skills via outdoor cooking and building. They should be learning verbal language and abstract reasoning through production, not hypothetical production ("story problems"). Girls are abstract far earlier (and peak far earlier) and are content to be abstract in this way.

OP I imagine your institution starts with a T and rhymes with writer's block? We've known for a while that you guys scour the internet to keep tabs on anyone talking about you.
The biggest trend that people talk about when discussing you guys is that they attended programs like GATE or SAGE, but strangely don't have any distinct memories of going to those special classes. We find it strange that so many of us who attended those gifted education classes seem to be congregating to sites like this. We believe these gifted education classes were some form of mind control/brain washing used to single out children capable of becoming extremely intelligent leaders and instead turn us into good goys, or failing that turn us into social reject dropouts. For whatever reason some of us must have rejected the conditioning and now we find ourselves here.
How accurate is this assertion?

Seems to be more about identifying those who are gifted or are likely to be gifted and making sure they are all thoroughly indoctrinated with correct thoughts and moulded the 'correct' way.

>'behind the scenes, based rich people' are thinking?

Are you Jason Richwine?

...

The autism rate IS increasing exponentially. (Side project: Do a little research on the US's vaccine "gift" to Turkey. It's fun) 10 years ago it was on the front burner and now the same higher ups are acting like we are crazy when we ask if we are ever going to release the findings.

It is interesting that Autism and aspergers are lumped into ASD when we have absolutely zero findings that they are in any way related.

not OP but a lot of this is just redefining what constitutes autism and now there is a large spectrum

> diet boosts east-Asian IQ

You gonna spill the details publicly some day?

>No, go back to lebbit until you can form a proper OP. This isn't your personal blog.
^^^^^^^^^^^This

Generation narcissist strikes again

Do you guys study the demographics/psychology of the teachers? I went to public school for my entire youth and in my experience, the majority of public school teachers are low achieving and low iq individuals. I also noticed a much higher than usual rate of extreme sadism and pedophilia. is there data to back up my experiences? Are most teachers degenerates and predators?

>127238 ▶
>File: Eugenics 1936.jpg (3.2 MB, 1354x3500)
Pinched. This is wonderful. Pro eugenics is a good good thing. We need to instill community debt guilt back into intelligent individuals. Sadly, it's more "intelligent" to get what you can out of this dying race and GTFO.

I am a minority.

That Sup Forums is right as often as it is wrong.

I think it has something to do with an ed degree being one of the easiest degrees to get. Literally requires so few credits at my college. If someone is a teacher they BARELY went to college.

Curiosity, can I have a green text life story? What are you up to now? Don't feel bad, any failures will simply affirm some of my research

Kys faggot

Sage

Your 'special' because you post on a Vietnamese cartoon prawn site.

No NO you are not. You are showing signs of paranoid schizophrenia though.

Generation narcissist strikes again.

Do most geneticists you know share your candour about the importance of eugenics to maintain a healthy population?

Do geneticists express dismay at the inability of society to accept that humans are not born tabula rasa?

Fish, omega 3

Interesting. Any more practical guidelines for homeschooling? I take it your findings show it to be better for making well-adjusted children.

redpill me on the roach vaccine

I see...

Thanks to you and the other user who replied to me.


One more: Do you think this type of information could be easily accessible for the "average working man", or would he have to be free all day to pursue this information?

I'm talking about government propaganda, subversion, and even what we are discussing in your thread.

Lastly, THANK YOU for making this thread user!

What are your thoughts on Trump? Did you vote for him?

Some of us were offered opportunities and our parents salivated at that "Gifted Education" tag and so we were put into school programs. I'm sorry you had to spend your school years scavenging the fields for potatoes and avoiding car bombs, Patrick.

No, I'm paid to figure out how to dull the population, not brighten it, although that is officially NOT the company line.

If you want to actually better our race, (I assume you are at least 100+ as you are taking this thread seriously and are on Sup Forums) breed. A lot. It's that simple.

I'm not a rich person. I have enough that my family isn't starving. Not enough to actually pay for their college education, thus why I am working in research and teaching at a university.

I'm not part of a conspiracy trying to trick you into anything. If it makes you feel better, I'll admit the things you suspect about VMAT2 are true and there are therapies that are already developed for it.