Russian Hackers

>tfw all the "thank you based Russian hackers" threads leaking emails before Trump's victory
>tfw now everyone on Sup Forums is denying Russia's involvement with the election

When the narrative on Sup Forums was that the Democrats are rigging the election in Hillary's favor, you guys supported Russian hax, but now that they're turning the narrative around and showing that Russia rigged the election in favor of Trump you deny it. It's good to see that Sup Forums's first language is still hypocrisy with doublethink thrown in for good measure.

Other urls found in this thread:

theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/
thegatewaypundit.com/2016/12/revealed-michigan-recount-uncovers-massive-voter-fraud-detroit-precincts/
us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf
thehill.com/homenews/campaign/309915-report-russia-hacked-emails-associated-with-rnc
arstechnica.com/security/2016/12/did-russia-tamper-with-the-2016-election-bitter-debate-likely-to-rage-on/
cnbc.com/2016/12/08/homeland-security-tied-to-attempted-hack-of-georgias-election-database-report.html
zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-14/georgia-confirms-homeland-security-attempted-hack-election-database-10-separate-time
thefreethoughtproject.com/georgias-election-servers-hacked-dhs/
rt.com/op-edge/371729-person-year-2016-russian-hackers/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Inb4 some memetard spouting "HURR DURR NO PROOOFS, WHERE ARE PROOFS??"

It's Sup Forums

Of course most of them aren't very smart to begin with, considering the fact that they support a kike lover.

"Rigging the election" is better described as exposing corruption in the DNC and collusion with MSM.

Can someone explain the 'misinformation' Russians have been spreading exactly?

My understanding was that the average person doesn't really know what is in the podesta leaks, only that Hillary is generally untrustworthy with a private email server.

>exposing corruption is now a bad thing and called "rigging the election"

Here, read this and come back after, then you'll see where there's doubt
The article was written by a Hillary supporter btw
theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/

It's one thing to leak emails and expose corrupt politicians.

It's a whole different thing to rig the election.

The democucks say russia rigged the election while offering zero evidence and letting Trump be president anyway. Literally whiny cucks.

Hillary is a literal criminal and people think she should be president even though she lost because "muh feelz".

It's pathetic.

Well being that the CIA released thier report and it showed ZERO evidence of Russian involvment I would say we were still correct.

thegatewaypundit.com/2016/12/revealed-michigan-recount-uncovers-massive-voter-fraud-detroit-precincts/

>>triggered