Antarctica's Wilkes Land Anomaly Confirmed!

-Ignore the intentional slide thread regarding Antarctic Satanic Temples-
A recent scientific gravitation study from NASA's Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment [GRACE] has just "confirmed" the existence of the Wilkes Land Anomaly (a 300 km wide impact crater) theorized by R. A. Schmidt in 1962 underneath 2km of icesheet in eastern Antarctica. Based on the 'extreme' gravity found in this part of Antarctica by NASA's GRACE satellites, they have theorized this mass/gravity anomaly is from a possible impact crater 5x LARGER than the Chicxulub crater in the Yucatan that caused the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event - as evidenced by the K-T Boundary Layer that can be verified geologically all over the world. The theory suggests this new discovery could possibly have been the trigger for "The Great Dying" or the Permian–Triassic extinction event. Even as far back as 2006 - GRACE had determined that there their global models showed "large uncertainties in the Antarctic region" - which is scientific language saying "wait, this can't be right".

Ohio State University Research - researchnews.osu.edu/archive/erthboom.htm
Antarctic Gravity Dataset - sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160122083759.htm
OSU 2006 anomaly - etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?0::NO:10:P10_ACCESSION_NUM:osu1149070384

That is, If it was an impact crater at all...

From wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkes_Land_crater#Wilkes_Land_mass_concentration
>The complete absence of a well-defined impact ejecta layer associated with the Permian–Triassic boundary at its outcrops within Victoria Land and the central Transantarctic Mountains argues against there having been any impact capable of creating a crater the size of the hypothesized Wilkes Land impact crater within Antarctica at the Permian–Triassic boundary

So there is an "extreme mass/gravity anomaly" found by NASA's GRACE satellites in Antarctica and it's NOT very likely to be an impact crater.... So what is it?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5LxdVW6AuPg
geology.geoscienceworld.org/content/26/11/979
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008GC002149/full#ggge1398-fig-0002
nasa.gov/feature/jpl/nasa-moon-mission-shares-insights-into-giant-impacts
mirror.co.uk/science/massive-object-hidden-under-antarctic-9530858
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4071252/Is-Nazi-UFO-site-buried-Antarctic-Bizarre-theory-claims-base-hidden-mysterious-150-mile-anomaly.html
thesun.co.uk/news/2489440/satellite-spots-massive-object-hidden-under-the-frozen-wastes-of-antarctica/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkes_Land_crater#Wilkes_Land_mass_concentration
geology.geoscienceworld.org//content/26/11/979
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008GC002149/full#ggge1398-fig-0001
npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/12/01/503626674/north-korean-volcano-provides-rare-chance-for-scientific-collaboration
academia.edu/17761291/Satellite_magnetic_anomalies_of_the_Antarctic_Wilkes_Land_impact_basin_inferred_from_regional_gravity_and_terrain_data
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2219761/Earth-hot-life-mass-extinction-250-million-years-ago.html
wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15503
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

2nd impact

He tripped face-first

Summary - ignore the spooky vibe
youtube.com/watch?v=5LxdVW6AuPg

I wish

Why do you think the satanic temple thread be ignored?

bump

The satanic temples is the gravitational anomaly.

>geology.geoscienceworld.org/content/26/11/979
>"The Great Dying was not caused by an impact

Here's a link back to the more interesting satanic temple thread:

Thanks, shills go here

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008GC002149/full#ggge1398-fig-0002

>it's definitely there, it's definitely big, it's definitely not an impact crater or a volcano

>satanic
>not a shill slide thread
yes goy, ignore the thread with NASA and University backed research suggesting a large anomaly buried underneath 2km of icesheet

secure team 10, a known hoax channel

What causes gravitational anomalies in the other places on Earth?

Barrel dives »

>ignores 10+ reputable science and geological reports
>ignores NASA findings
Shoo Shoo back to your satan thread shill

we second impact nao

as in this picture
large concentrations of mass, and they've figured out how to corelate it as impact data from a similar study from moon gravity research
nasa.gov/feature/jpl/nasa-moon-mission-shares-insights-into-giant-impacts

Didn't ignore the less than 10 other sources, I just couldn't understand why you would use secure team, they are laughable

bumping for second impact

mirror.co.uk/science/massive-object-hidden-under-antarctic-9530858

...

>mirror.co.uk/science/massive-object-hidden-under-antarctic-9530858
lol they source secure team 10.
HAHAHA

>more tabloid gossip on it
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4071252/Is-Nazi-UFO-site-buried-Antarctic-Bizarre-theory-claims-base-hidden-mysterious-150-mile-anomaly.html

mirror.co.uk/science/massive-object-hidden-under-antarctic-9530858

thesun.co.uk/news/2489440/satellite-spots-massive-object-hidden-under-the-frozen-wastes-of-antarctica/

all three source secure team 10, a known hoax channel

they clipped the summary part of the video which is legit summarization and intentionally left out the bullshit alien/nazi bizarreness. I must ask though, why you continue to ignore all of the credible scientific links? Could you make yourself look more like a shill?

If you want more (You)'s, try having something to say. Only shills act like this.

FFUGG!! :DDDDDD

I'm curious why you keep ignoring the science journals and NASA research? Oh yeah, you're a shill.

So I guess there's no, zero, none moderation now, and Sup Forums is dead.
How is this remotely Sup Forums related?

the credible scientific links mention a possible impact crater and gravity anomalies.
The tabloids link secure team 10 and all their ufo nazi base bullshit.

Dunno why you are saying it's not likely to be an impact crater.

>possible crater
Yeah, they think it is 5 times bigger than the biggest one on earth in the Yucatan that made the dinosaurs go extinct. Same one that left the K-T Boundary layer.

This one is 5x bigger, and has left no geologic record of debris. Even the wiki on it admits it is highly unlikely to be an impact crater:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkes_Land_crater#Wilkes_Land_mass_concentration
>The complete absence of a well-defined impact ejecta layer associated with the Permian–Triassic boundary at its outcrops within Victoria Land and the central Transantarctic Mountains argues against there having been any impact capable of creating a crater the size of the hypothesized Wilkes Land impact crater within Antarctica at the Permian–Triassic boundary

by my count there are 15 threads that are essentially porn and/or "How can whyte bois even compete" - another 10 about russia being the most evil thing ever - only about 5 negative Trump threads.

Go, go find one to get lost in.

OMG
I'm surrounded by tards on this board (and I know i shouldn't be surprised)
It's like you fuckers can't read or something.

Probably an impact crater based on the √2 ring-formation rule, antipodal (meaning opposite side of globe) Siberian traps, thinned lithosphere (crust) in the basin, etc

The point of debate is that the evidence for impact geologically speaking (peak in iridium concentration etc) doesn't line up with the extinction event (supposedly it's about 1 meter lower than the geological markers (fossils) showing the extinction).


"The breccias at all three locations also yielded shocked quartz, but it is an order of magnitude less abundant (0.2 vol%) and smaller (only as much as 176 micrometers m diameter) than shocked quartz at some Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary sites. Faint iridium “anomalies” were detected (up to 134 pgṁg−1). These values are an order of magnitude less than iridium anomalies at some Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary sites. Furthermore, peak iridium values are as much as 1 m below the isotopically and paleobotanically defined boundary. The idea that impact caused the extinctions thus remains to be demonstrated convincingly."

From source linked above:
geology.geoscienceworld.org//content/26/11/979

>left no geologic record
>within Antarctica at the Permian-Triassic boundary

Nope, definitely left a record or else we wouldn't have the shocked quartz or iridium or the bizarre concentrations of noble gasses, etc

"This evidence includes small chondritic meteorite fragments [Basu et al., 2003], fullerenes with extraterrestrial noble gas abundances and isotope ratios [Poreda and Becker, 2003], and a faint iridium anomaly [Retallack et al., 1998]. The strength of this evidence has been debated [e.g., Collinson et al., 2006] and obviously limited by the apparent absence of a source crater."

Source:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008GC002149/full#ggge1398-fig-0001

Well, the news is that now the source crater has been found; about 2km below a glacier.

There's 5 of these antarctica threads a day - usually alien or nazi or satanic temple themed... I never post in them, but sometimes people post beautiful pictures. But if you give them an actual newsworthy event with solid scientific and geologic evidence that suggests there could be a large mass underneath the ice? It gets ignored and shills abound.

>doesn't line up
You are right. It doesn't, there should be a foot thick layer of asteroid dust at the same depth across the globe at the ~250 million year mark underground.

It's not there, so it wasn't an asteroid. So what is underneath the 2km of ice?

where is the equivalent K-T boundary? oh yeah, there isn't one. It doesn't add up.

So you're saying the satanic temple complex is so huge it's causing a gravitational anomaly? This verifies everything then, holy shit.

bump, interesting thread

there's no evidence of an object, just a depression or crater, which is interesting enough.

...

Pol related because of the world leaders going to visit there


My $0.02 is that we humans are learning more about volcanism (if you people would read/skim through headlines you'd have noticed the increasing trend of volcanic activity being reported). It's difficult for a layperson to determine whether the amount of activity has changed, but reporting has increased regardless.
Our limited understanding of volcanism leaves much to be desired and regardless of whether it's possible, every country is probably currently researching how to fuck with volcanoes because there are significantly active volcanoes nearby or in every significant nation.
For example, china
npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/12/01/503626674/north-korean-volcano-provides-rare-chance-for-scientific-collaboration

...

it's archived.
Someone make a new one and abandon this Secure Team 10 hoax thread.

I'm not sure you understand the gravity of the situation

It's a storage facility for Australian shitposts

There IS a boundary (a shitload of dead stuff followed by FAR less stuff), just not the global sediment that would be expected due to previous findings.

thanks for keeping it bumped pajeet

Is this the new Pizzagate? A vast, unprovable conspiracy theory that could never be real

...

>Gravity of the situation
Nice, ICwutUdidthar

This might just be a finding, rather than a conspiracy. Nice effort though, 2/5

How is it conspiracy? Something down below the ice is massive enough to be picked up by satellite.

...

Geological grav surveys don't measure gravitational field, they measure the rock density below the surface over a certain distance.

Not the same thing, just letting you guys know, nothing to do with gravitational waves, just density.

Either it is on a mountain top, it is a mountain top or there is an error somewhere. Isn't the ice crust huge?

...

It still sounds plausible that this is an impact crater, just older than 250 million years. What are the comparable levels of shocked quartz and iridium for normal non-impact areas? If this Wilkes landmass is an impact crater, the levels in that report should still be higher than background levels.

>rivers of blood
nothing weird going on in Antarctica, nope

(Me)

Just speculating here and assuming it is an impact "arguendo" if you will (and a fucking big one)
The one article mentioned that it was somewhat unique for being a coastal impact crater. The (biggest) missing puzzle piece is globally distributed sediment ejected into the atmosphere upon impact, but if this area were submerged at the time of impact, then could we potentially only see local distribution rather than global distribution?

I have no idea where geologists have done samples examining this time period. So, if there have already been samples taken from the one edge of Australia, then this may have already been shot down.

Anyone have an estimated map of that region from 250ma?

centuries of glacial movement shapes the outcroppings of granite mountains

Praying that the Nazis actually escaped to Antarctica and have been preparing to cleanse this world.

Still some appear too odd

Just toying with the idea...
What if all the anti-nazi shilling happening throughout the western world was actually to prevent us from siding with them when they return ?

...

>Gravitational waves
You're literally the only person to use the word waves as of the time of your post.

Nobody was confused.

>don't measure gravitational field, they measure the rock density below the surface over a certain distance
Umm, they use strength of gravitational field to determine the density because the volume is a known entity...
So, they measure gravitational field to elucidate density. Can't measure density of actual samples because of all the ice on top of it.

why the plane pictures here? what is your point?

quads?

academia.edu/17761291/Satellite_magnetic_anomalies_of_the_Antarctic_Wilkes_Land_impact_basin_inferred_from_regional_gravity_and_terrain_data

from:
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2219761/Earth-hot-life-mass-extinction-250-million-years-ago.html

Very interesting theory. There's a new sociology meme going around that states that you only need 10% of a population to accept an idea before said idea is "accepted"---not necessarily embraced. If we can reach that 10% threshold, it would be enough, I believe, to affect major policy change in the West.....or at least to have the numbers to ensure victory for the Nazis when they reemerge from Antarctica kek

...

Actually, I'm kind of liking this idea of water existing at the site of impact because it may also explain away the issue of less shock quartz than expected. As far as iridium abundance goes I assume that can vary based on the age/origin of the meteorite.
But again, this is speculation and I'm terribly ignorant of many of the details regarding these issues. For example, I know that water would be vaporized on impact, but I don't know if that could significantly alter the force of impact to explain away the quartz issue.

...

...

This upsets me as groups that seek to hide truth will utilize it to control information more than to illuminate Truth

...

...

>memeteam
Stopped the vid as soon as that little Blue Ayy reared its ugly head.

It's the fortress of solitude, superman is there chilling, don't mess with him guys.
(Samefagging)

...

eww gross

...

based Taiwanese news channel

Gondola confirmed

Here's the Sup Forums relevance.

Nobody 'owns' Antarctica because it's too costly to do anything there (mining, oil wells, live, grow crops), just like nobody 'owns' the Moon.

IF this is a REAL impact crater it MIGHT be filled with more rare earth and platinum group metals than EVERY OTHER MINE ON EARTH. It might actually be worth 'owning' with an army and a city. Whoever 'owns' it could be the richest nation on earth.

Reminder, America is so cucking short sighted that if we went to war with China we would run out of rare earth metals in 18 months.

Just a thought.

As long as an uncensored Internet exists, it'll be impossible to totally suppress the truth. I shudder when I think about how easy it must have been for governments to control people with just newspapers and the radio back in the day.

>K-T Boundary Layer
layer of iridium enriched deposit (30x normal - iridium is rare) found worldwide at the same geological depth/age corresponding to the Chicxulub crater impact in the Yucatan which caused most non-avian dinosaurs to go extinct. Suggesting a large impact which caused a worldwide conflagration and mass extinction.

This one is supposedly 5x that size. No layer.

Pedosta also received emails from gooks about Antarctica

wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15503

>「 SECURE TEAM 10」

Please stop speculating. Pol needs to send someone to Antarctica to solve this once and for all.

...

Wild. Love it.

That's why insturuons are looking into more subversive ways of controlling the masse.

With automation, censoring is easier than ever.

The fight for Truth is far from in our favor.

that cigarette

you mean that pen?

Agreed. The elites will try to weaponize the Internet as well. A recent Stratcom report suggests adopting "memetic warfare" for NATO.

I'll look for some screen grabs

Australia holds most of the territorial rights and usage over the water around antarctica and antarctica itself. There's a theory that is why China is so hardcore importing itself here, because they want the final unexplored frontier for themselves when the day of the chink uprising comes.

>nobody owns Antarctica
pic related.

...

no1 cares the earth is flat or w/e u guys think back to