Christian Compound-Style Polygomy living

This could be the truest of true red pills (((they))) don't want you to know about.

SCENARIO:
The European population is dwindling. Both Protestant and True Catholic faiths are dwindling. Morals are dwindling. Degeneracy on the rise. Poverty on the rise. Crime on the rise. Immigration on the rise. (((Refugees))) on the rise. Media corruption on the rise.

There is only one way to combat all of these evils. There can only be one, because it is the only solution which fights against ALL of these issues simultaneously, WHICH IS WHY THEY DESTROYED THE COMPOUND IN WACO TEXAS WITH FIRE AND BLOOD.

>Community living, sharing resources, and energy in a loving christian environment.
>Teaching children in a christian environment away from bad (((media))) corruption.
>Mostly homogenous racial makeup. Even with multiple generations of offspring, genetic mix would become primarily European DNA backgrounds.
>Multiple wives per man IN MARRIAGE. No cheating. Cheaters are excommunicated from the compound/commune property. If 2-5 wives is not enough for you, you are beyond help.
>1 man per X wives. Each woman marries to ONE man. One man can be married to multiple women, but those women must remain honor bound to the man. Again, if any woman is found cheating, HER and THE CHEATER will be removed from the compound. Their children may choose to stay or go if old enough. But they cannot come back.

There is a reason the government hunts down and murders any peoples found practicing this lifestyle.

Other urls found in this thread:

dictionary.com/browse/automatization
youtube.com/watch?v=juykxj3VhfY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

pill bump

>Community living, sharing resources, and energy in a loving christian environment.
Communism is cancer.
>Multiple wives per man IN MARRIAGE. No cheating. Cheaters are excommunicated from the compound/commune property. If 2-5 wives is not enough for you, you are beyond help.
Pic related.

Kill yourself.

Why are leafposters so stupid? who knows.

Anyway, Commune style living does not mean communism. Everyone lives on the property. It can be one large compound or multiple properties with central buildings. Like how towns get started. But with rules. People will share resources (this is not strict. Some resources don't have to be shared, other resources it will be expected to be shared.)

We don't let people fall through the cracks but we don't allow people to be lazy bums. You can just sit in and get free gibs. But you can't become a jew baron and control the group.

If women cannot control their lust and the men cannot discipline themselves then they have to leave. I don't care what you post about the open market sexual situation with the top 20%. If the people of the commune cannot respect marriage they will be asked to leave. If they refuse they will be forced to leave.

>There is only one way to combat all of these evils.
Automatization to remove any economical incentive foreigners would bring, artificial wombs so that women lose their standing in society - brainscans determining leftist thought with drones automatically expiring these non-functioning citizens from a distance in the long run.

*can't just sit in and get free bigs, sorry.

Technology and automation inherently bring the evils of modernization to an otherwise peaceful community.

the poor (which statisticly is most people on earth) cannot afford artificial wombs. Even a C-section birth costs $3500 us dollars, let alone the miracle of fucking birth.Everything else you wrote is pure whimsical fantasy.

Regardless, that's the only way to combat these things because they attack the root problem.

Funny how someone dreaming of his own town would talk down on someone's whimsical fantasies.

You're a commie 15 year old, aren't you? The '''politics'''' you describe are shared by pretty much every dumb teenager.

the idea of a pure ethical, conservative government that uses high tech drones equipped with brain scanning devices and unlimited authority to kill which can interpret these brain scans as progressive liberal thinking from long distance is something out of sci fi. Beyond that, large portions of the population would be wiped out. That is not a realistic solution I believe.

Your method of combating these evils involves mass killings of people based on only a single criteria. However it does nothing to stem jewish media, corrupt government, foreign influence or anything else.

A realistic figure for artificial womb birth would START at $250,000.00 dollars. This is a low figure. Do you have 250K in liquid funds to pay for this procedure right now, if it existed?

>Beyond that, large portions of the population would be wiped out. That is not a realistic solution I believe.
It's what's necessary, user. Lots of people need to be eliminated - with the first two things I mentioned mainly since those are feasible; the other was indeed more wishful thinking than anything else.

Now explain how your little compound would stem jewish media that would condemn your compound or the corrupt government that would probably not even allow your compound.

I do, but that's besides the point. Your gated community with like-minded peers is exactly the same bullshit fantasy as anarcho-commie communes. We need to win the culture war, not jack off to the thought of walled in political experiments.

You forgot to mention that David Koresh was fucking everyone's wife in that Waco compound.

>now he's starting to pull numbers out of his arse

Kek, what would your little Christian town cost? How would you get cunts to go on board with your idea?

>polygamy
hang yourself.

i love you

Well the wealthy elites who control the world also believe in wiping out nearly every human being on earth, except for a small few who are basically worker slaves.

>Now explain how your little compound would stem jewish media

We wouldn't allow it. Radios and television wouldn't be allowed. It may seem draconian, but if we let these devices in and allow them, we cannot control the content that is seen, and the content will come from a bad source because that is always the source. Civilization has only degenerated under the influence of television and media.

Vested members of the group might have restricted, off-site access to certain technologies for printing, and distributing newsletters and other managerial and accounting roles. But any misuse or abuse of these roles would have to be dealt with quickly. Such is the nature of these leadership roles.

don't need polygamy to survive. our ancestors never needed it. i honestly cant see any reason why you would want to have a society like that. small tribes of 100 people or so with families started from only 2 in the relationship would be fine

You cannot win the culture war because you do not produce the culture. The culture is produced by subversive groups that seek to either corrupt you and your offspring or outright destroy you. How are you blind to this?

It is not an anarcho-commie experiment. How do you think the United States got started? The most successful colonies were these christian colonies. The moral decay of America began rapidly accelerating during the final years of Puritanism. It's all there if you wish to read and connect the dots. I am sure you will have a smart-ass excuse and haughty reason why you don't believe that or have the time to inform yourself, though.

>Well the wealthy elites who control the world also believe in wiping out nearly every human being on earth, except for a small few who are basically worker slaves.
And they have the right idea except that you don't need worker slaves when you have machines doing a better job.

I don't see how you'd get people (especially females since your main issue is reproduction) to join your compound.

It's just a hypothetical number based on the exorbitant prices current of Hospital services.

>what would your little Christian town cost? How would you get cunts to go on board with your idea?

There would have to be appropriate land selection, with arable land, lumber, access to a river(s) and other such considerations. The price would be based off a multitude of factors including tools, startup supplies including food and other things. It would all be done very rationally but there has to be the expectation by everyone on board that it would be nothing like current generation life. You are giving up some of the comforts of modern day living for peace, morality, self-sufficiency and racial and cultural identity. If none of those things appeal to you, I would not suggest you give it any interest.

I mostly agree with

But this whole plan hinges on attracting women into such arrangements/communities, so start working on that, faggot.

>There is a reason the government hunts down and murders any peoples found practicing this lifestyle.

What about the Amish?

The Amish have been in legal battle with the government for a long time. There are Amish Lawyers. If you believe the government loves and appreciates the Amish and desires for their continued success, you are sorely mistaken.

>You cannot win the culture war because you do not produce the culture.

There's a simple solution for that. Did you miss Trump's campaign?
As for the rest of your argument; you're not settling new land and fighting off indian savages any more and creating puritanical colonies in nigger America is just shit retarded.
There are more pressing (and actual) matters.

>It's just a hypothetical number based on the exorbitant prices current of Hospital services.
Yeah, I already said that you're pulling numbers out of your ass. Maybe don't use your kiked up medical services as standard.

> It would all be done very rationally
Once more:
HOW'D YOU GET CUNTS (AS IN FEMALES NECESSARY FOR REPRODUCTION) TO SIGN UP FOR THIS?

>There's a simple solution for that. Did you miss Trump's campaign?

If you are naive enough to believe that a man who desires such power, who flaunts his wealth and lifestyle, has had several marriages and operates a global business empire is some kind of moral paragon and will enact laws, you are mistaken. Trump embraces LGBT, globalism, war, and a number of other damaging things like a parasitic relationship with Israel. Sure, Trump was the best candidate, but the whole system has been corrupt as hell for a long, long time.

>your not settling new land
new land can be purchased and acquired.
>fighting off indian savages
establishing the use of property owned can be done using legal means
>creating puritanical colonies
Why can't this be done, you have not given a reason.
>There are more pressing (and actual) matters.
Vague. You didn't list anything.

>complains about several marriages
>in his thread shilling for polygamy
Unreal

>new land can be purchased and acquired.
Yes, but within the frame of an existing system that has a pretty open problem with your type.

I never said anything about Trump. I asked if you missed his campaign. We are producing culture and we're making leeway. Why are you obsessing over your mind experiment when you can join the actual fight for a better America (and Europe)? We're tipping the scales and actually winning for once. It's not about Trump or Farage, LePen or Wilders or their personal morals. It's about what it means when they come into power.

>HOW'D YOU GET CUNTS

build it and they will come
you make it sound like posing a question to rational people is preposterous. How were any women of old times led anywhere? By men with confidence and morals. I'm sure most women would consider it madness since women love whoring around, gossip, drama, money, city life, etc. But there are I am sure, women who are tired of that lifestyle.

Do not expect the most beautiful of women to sign on for this. Your current values would probably prohibit yourself from joining if such a movement existed. Your mockery and derision is obvious.

This. They have brokers too.

Study up faggots; these G's have been resisting globalist kikes through sovereign sub-communities for a long time.

>build it and they will come

In the past they came because they were either dragged along or because the destination promised them something better than what they had back home.

You're not going to compete with what they had back home because even if they were tired of that lifestyle (which they aren't), they can just voluntarily opt out and choose a less restrictive option.

And you call my feasible technological progress used for the good of my people a "pure whimsical fantasy". Kek

This movie made me want to be Amish when I was a teen

It looked so nice

Trump isn't marrying and divorcing women for some cause. His goals are all self-serving. You are being purposefully obtuse if you are arguing that multiple marriages and divorces is the same thing as setting up a system for the proliferation of those of european racial origin and christian culture background. I do not advocate for anyone to get divorced, ever. And I am not enforcing polygamy. But if there are women who are childless and unmarried and who do not have a partner I see nothing wrong with them marrying into a household and being one of the wives of a man.

>Yes, but within the frame of an existing system that has a pretty open problem with your type.
Of course they have an open problem. I'm not saying it would be as simple as mailing off a letter. It might take one their whole life to just see something like this come to fruition. No where did I imply it would be easy.

I believe you are in delusion about what is happening. If twitter and Sup Forums were shut down in one day, your spring board of "power" would cease immediately. I don't believe Sup Forums will always be around, and even so this site adds nothing to birthrates or cultural/religious customs of the people who come here. If you would argue otherwise, I would counter respond that the percentage would be so low as to be negligible.

You don't read well. I never said anything about Sup Forums or twitter either.
You're on 'the spectrum', aren't you?

>And you call my feasible technological progress used for the good of my people

What technology though? Your drone fantasy? The only other example you gave was just the word "Automatization".

How can you argue anything when your examples are far-fetched or vague single word non-arguments.

dictionary.com/browse/automatization

"to make automatic"

to make what automatic, exactly? Where is your grand blueprint to counter anything I am saying. All you have is vague disdain as an argument.

What about "Automatization to remove any economical incentive foreigners would bring, artificial wombs so that women lose their standing in society" didn't you understand, user?

The first is already used in several industries, the other is right around the corner. The smart thing for Europeans would be to jump on board right now and use that shit to secure our future, instead of LARPing as Amish in some Jonestown knockoff.

You don't argue your points very well. What scales are we tipping exactly? Tipping the scales means leaning in favor of a previously balanced weighing.
If you are to imply Globalist Atheist Socialist Marxism + Elite Fractional Reserve Banking Usury + Widespread Hedonism and Degeneracy is on one side, and Morality in some form or another is on the other side and things are currently tipping in favor of Morality and a return to Traditionalism and whatever else you assume, that you have not given an example of...I WOULD SAY YOU ARE BOTH BLIND AND DUMB.

Technocratic Idealism is the name of your intellectual fallacy. The same things were said about Industrialization and Public Schooling and every measure we are currently plagued with. Your advocate a further removal between the bonds of Man and Nature as well as Family. What use is family when automization takes care of all needs? Who needs a wife when there are machines to do work. Who needs children when the farms are operated by a vast network of zero gravity solar powered drones, etc.

By doing these things you remove the bonds that people should have between each other. When people no longer need each other they become selfish and callous as well as isolated. If you cannot understand this and continue to cling to your high-minded idealization I can't do anything but pity you.

The connection of massive technological advances and social decay go hand in hand.

Jesus Christ, kid. You're just arguing with yourself now.

No, I was pretty much just linking back to a previous post you made here.
Your tone doesn't constitute an argument, fyi. I wish you would pay attention to yourself at least, otherwise what is the point of you even being here.

>what is the point of you even being here.

In part, triggering raging autists like you.

I'm not triggered or raging. I'm just really disappointed in your arguing capability.

But I am glad I was able to give your life meaning.

amish lawyers? Do they specialise on prosecuting the amish or are they Amish tryning to defend their communitys?

Both. Disputes do arise in any community regardless. They are well versed in law that has a religious background and conforms to the standards of their community and people. And there are those that do Both and defend their community using modern day legal methods and language.

>Your advocate a further removal between the bonds of Man and Nature as well as Family.
These things are already dead, they're not coming back unless we're either replaced by a culture that has these qualities already or have ours collapse so that reverting back to them comes out of necessity.
Which do you think is more likely?

Hiding away and playing in the dirt and hoping it somehow works out (which it won't, because let's be real) won't change this.
Making the culprits behind our current situation obsolete however could.

>But I am glad I was able to give your life meaning.

What does that even mean?
And then there's:

>I WOULD SAY YOU ARE BOTH BLIND AND DUMB.
> If you cannot understand this and continue to cling to your high-minded idealization I can't do anything but pity you.

Do you realize you come across as a raging autist?

what a completely nihilistic view of Family. Of life in general as you view the bond between man, nature and family as dead forever until a mass extinction event or as some quaint idea practiced by another species.

I'm not accusing you of being a sociopath, but that viewpoint is quite cold-hearted and hopeless and I do not agree that these things are dead.

>Hiding away and playing in the dirt and hoping it somehow works out
Uhh. We wouldn't be "playing" and we would not be idly sitting by and hoping it works out. We would be working hard.

Industrialization and Customization has only really increased the quality of life for the elite and corporate shareholders. In my opinion, you sympathize and align with the ideals of the global elite more than you do mine. So I am not sure what argument you are making because I do not believe in the quality of life improvements you propose to be coming down the line. I say that because we currently have all the promised quality of life improvements we had been promised for quite a long time now, nearly a century and it has done nothing to truly improve anyone's life, only stagnate and destroy lives, families and cultures in the name of materialism and profit.

Isn't this basically the Sister Wives TV show?

What does that even mean?

Well if you followed what I wrote and what you wrote you seem to place the part of your value of your current activities solely on annoying me.

I asked you:
>what is the point of you even being here.
And you said
>In part, triggering raging autists like you.
And then I replied:
>I am glad I was able to give your life meaning.

If you understand how two people express distaste for each other through sarcastically conversing together you wouldn't need me to explain every little thing. Again, you are very disappointing, colgate.

>Do you realize you come across as a raging autist?
Is this a point or an argument? All you've proven is you don't have the intellect to argue points or even understand when we are exchanging minor insults.

I accidentally corrected Automization to Customization. Oops.

>Of life in general as you view the bond between man, nature and family as dead forever until a mass extinction event or as some quaint idea practiced by another species.
Where do you get that from?

>I'm not accusing you of being a sociopath, but that viewpoint is quite cold-hearted and hopeless and I do not agree that these things are dead.
Well, good for you but as far as I can observe, where it matters it got destroyed by women and kikes and weak beta males and the only option for us right now is to either put our fingers into our ears singing lalalala or to embrace that fact and make the best of it.

At no point did in history did people voluntarily choose to revert their rights and technological progress and you're betting on the non-existant chance that this would change now, because you're offering something that already exists in an established form (see Amish) without being used in the way you hope for.

Your problem is that the change hasn't been to the benefit of the people you want to see benefit, and I agree with that. But like I said, hiding away and playing in the dirt (and that's what it is, because what could you work hard for what Hebe Shekelberger or Jose Gonzales couldn't do a hundred times better because they don't restrict themselves arbitrarily?) isn't going to change that. So we're forced to either continue or we start beating them at their own game.

I have no idea. I have not heard of this show, I don't own a television and its existence has never crossed me.

What's the premise?

It's about a guy with 4 wives and 20+ children who live in a compound in NV.
youtube.com/watch?v=juykxj3VhfY

So, to sum up: No, yopu don't realize you come across as a raging autist.

And about arguing points; I did that. I said we should focus on the culture war and not lose ourselves in mind experiments that will never come to fruition. You completely ignored that and REEEE'd on about your gated community like a sperg.
You're the one not convincing any one, so maybe you are the one not presenting your case very well. Or maybe we all 'lack the intellect.'

>Where do you get that from?
>unless we're either replaced by a culture that has these qualities already
>or have ours collapse

>it got destroyed by women
we gave them voting power and they were tricked into becoming a part of the working class by Jewish elite.
>kikes
Jews have largely and traditional and still to this day gain and maintain all their earthly power via the sin of Usury. Christians are forbidden from using credit and usury, and I am sure the evils we experience at the hands of the Jews are because we take part in this. I have no doubt.
>weak beta males
poor fathers, single mothers, poor family structure, poor community, poor morals. All things that would be remedied at a high if not outright complete percentage under a Puritan like commune-city lifestyle.
>At no point did in history did people voluntarily choose to revert their rights and technological progress

Explain the Amish then? And if you are referencing the Amish in your own argument how can you lead with that statement as you counter your own point?

>what could you work hard for what Hebe Shekelberger or Jose Gonzales couldn't do a hundred times better because they don't restrict themselves arbitrarily?
I agree with you here. The point is to cut ourselves off from their system as much as possible. The value of a man is the work he does, if we work only for ourselves for the benefit of ourselves and not for outsiders, how does the outsider benefit when he cannot join and cannot even benefit by proxy? His power doesn't matter in a world where he is invisible and powerless.

>we start beating them at their own game
I argue that we create our own "game" and "rules" and we do not let them "play"

>you come across as a raging autist
>sperg
again wow this has no effect on me

> I said we should focus on the culture war
How are you going to produce more culture than Hollywood? Do you think Pepe memes are a sufficient counter to movies, music, literature, television, articles, etc? I believe you are naive as to the extent of the victories currently happening and forthcoming.

I didn't "reeee" out i simply replied
>You cannot win the culture war because you do not produce the culture. The culture is produced by subversive groups that seek to either corrupt you and your offspring or outright destroy you.

I addressed your argument directly even though you now try to make it appear as if I completely glossed it over. You don't pay attention to what you yourself or anyone else writes. And my point still stands. Do you assume Sup Forums has the time, money and resources to counter Jewish Hollywood and AIPAC in Washington? I fear you don't understand the scope and reach of the net we are under.

>unless we're either replaced by a culture that has these qualities already
>or have ours collapse
Where does that say that it's dead forever? The way things are going you'll get your religious polygamous dirt farming utopia when Islam takes over is all I was saying, because our current civilization is too big to collapse BEFORE this happens.

>we gave them voting power and they were tricked into becoming a part of the working class by Jewish elite.
Correct. Your solution to this is hiding away in a compound while still being subjected to their voting whims. My solution is making women redundant which would allow us to force the vote away from them or expire them if necessary.

>Jews have largely and traditional and still to this day gain and maintain all their earthly power via the sin of Usury. Christians are forbidden from using credit and usury
You have to be a retard not to be able to understand how this is somthing that was destined to happen when these both groups would share the same living space.
I'm not taking part in anything they produce yet I'm still forced to experience their shit by proxy, simply because they control too much.
>All things that would be remedied at a high if not outright complete percentage under a Puritan like commune-city lifestyle.
The total Amish population is 308,030. I think they got the market you're looking at already covered.
>Explain the Amish then?
As 0,001% of your population they're irrelevant to the grand scheme of things. In the face of adversity you choose to fade out.

>The point is to cut ourselves off from their system as much as possible.
That's what I'm suggesting. Their system drives on women being degenerate sows influencing the males of society - which would be solved by having other means of reproduction and people in general wanting a comfortable life, which would be solved by the changes in industry.

> The value of a man is the work he does
A man that works against my interests has no positive value to me. A man that works against his own interests has no positive value to himself. Work itself doesn't make a man, his convictions do.

You'd still have to pay taxes in your compound. I can guarantee you that SOMEONE would benefit off of you, and if it's just the media smearing you as some white supremacist looney cult.

>His power doesn't matter in a world where he is invisible and powerless.
You'd still operate within an established system that might very well push some section 8 housing into your community, ruining your dream.

There's one unclaimed place on this planet right now where your thing could theoretically work, and that is Marie Byrd Land in Antarctica; but since you're against technology you wouldn't make it for long.

Why do you keep reducing our culture to Sup Forums?
>I addressed your argument directly
No, you didn't. You keep reading what you want to read and then you respond to what you think the other person said. You're arguing with yourself.
Again; you're not convincing anyone and all of your point are about something that exists only in your head, which you present with the arrogance of a hardcore autist. Sup Forums isn't your therapy group.

>you'll get your religious polygamous dirt farming utopia when Islam takes
I have no desire for Islam to take over. I don't think *all* technology is bad. But technology that has the potential for both good and evil is bad, because man will usually find a way to use it for evil.

>our current civilization is too big to collapse BEFORE this happens
I agree, which is why relocation and isolation as much as possible is necessary
>Your solution to this is hiding away in a compound
They are free to live their lives under certain regulations. I am not suggesting keeping them under lock and key for the rest of their lives.
>while still being subjected to their voting whims
We would do our best to be a self governing sovereign place, similar to the Amish.
>My solution is making women redundant which would allow us to force the vote away from them or expire them if necessary.
I do not believe it will work out like you say. Fertility is dwindling in males already with the xenoestrogens and water supply. Reports of the male birth control pill have been rapidly increasing with projected release soon. Pregnancy will likely only be capable in the future through use of chemicals and methods. Your robo-womb idea reinforces this idea and steals the destiny of a people away from them and places it in the hands of corporations and government entities.

>I'm still forced to experience their shit by proxy, simply because they control too much
It wasn't always like that. We submit to their authority by being part of their system. We must remove ourselves from THEIR system. It did use to be ours, but they have infected it, and it is no longer ours. How many centuries must go by before we wrestle control back if we even do?

>As 0,001% of your population they're irrelevant to the grand scheme of things. In the face of adversity you choose to fade out.
What do you assume the grand scheme is?

> imagine if low taxes

> also polygamy kek wills it

fuck off faggot

redpill is simple

LOW TAXES

ZERO AID

now get fucked you moral fag

>not posting the uncensored picture

Lacks charisma of Jim Jones. Would not commune.

>I have no desire for Islam to take over.
They don't really give a shit about the non-muslims' desire if you haven't noticed.

>I don't think *all* technology is bad. But technology that has the potential for both good and evil is bad, because man will usually find a way to use it for evil.
All technology has the potential for both good and evil. You wouldn't leave your compound unarmed for example, right?

>Your robo-womb idea reinforces this idea and steals the destiny of a people away from them and places it in the hands of corporations and government entities.
This is going to happen anyway - so what's better, to have your enemies control these means or to control them yourself?

>It wasn't always like that.
Who cares what it was, what's relevant is what it is right now and how it can be solved. You're not going to wrestle back control of the system by relocating and isolating yourself.

>The total Amish population is 308,030. I think they got the market you're looking at already covered.

There's no reason why many peoples can't start many commune style communities like the Amish. They don't have a monopoly. I see no reason why their can't be more. And I'm sure those 300K lives more authentic and happier lives than the many debt slaves and impoverished city dwellers of the world.

>That's what I'm suggesting. Their system drives on women being degenerate sows influencing the males of society
Agreed.

>which would be solved by having other means of reproduction and people in general wanting a comfortable life, which would be solved by the changes in industry.
I just think a woman is a cheaper and more readily alternative than some human robo-womb system. A comfortable life that's too comfortable can lead to boredom, depression, and hedonistic lifestyles to seek meaning and purpose. It usually does in all cases. Idle hands, etc. An affluent society with plenty of leisure time is not some paradise. I wish it were but there is no example in history of that ever happening. Robo-wombs and hover boards and instant food wouldn't even make it so.

his convictions do
you can't conviction yourself up a house, car or lunch with zero dollars in your hand.

>You'd still have to pay taxes in your compound.
Smaller collectively than what each man is forced to pay for in income tax, federal state and sales.

>if it's just the media smearing you as some white supremacist looney cult
Lawyers and member proclamation to avoid contact with camera men, decline interviews and media types.

>You'd still operate within an established system that might very well push some section 8 housing into your community, ruining your dream.
Well of course with legal teams we would fight that.

>Multiple wives per man IN MARRIAGE
>1 man per X wives. Each woman marries to ONE man

Let's sum it up shall we?

>ITT: V or probably even KV thinking polygamy is the solution to his ineptitude to find himself a sexual partner

Western civilisation's success was built on the fact that western culture accepted monogamous relationship or so called "single public partner".

Energy that would otherwise be wasted on seeking yet another sexual mate (in a polygamous society) was put to useful use.

>They don't really give a shit about the non-muslims' desire if you haven't noticed.
Being allowed to defend ones homeland against invaders who seek your death or submission isn't wrong.

>All technology has the potential for both good and evil. You wouldn't leave your compound unarmed for example, right?
This is mostly true. However, everyone knows a gun is a weapon. But Televisions are weapons, which is what MOST people do not know.

>This is going to happen anyway - so what's better, to have your enemies control these means or to control them yourself?
I believe this and agree with the first part, which is partially why I would seek to remove myself from THIS society.

As far as enemies and yourself, to who are you referring when you say enemies? I view corporations and such as enemies. So if you are a pro multinational globalist corporation I would view you as my ideological enemy.

>Who cares what it was
Not everyone is happy to live the way we are living now.
>what's relevant is what it is right now and how it can be solved.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to determine what's relevant for other people. You do not control the destiny of all peoples. The idea I propose is not enforced, people must willingly join and participate.

>You're not going to wrestle back control of the system by relocating and isolating yourself.
I never proposed to wrestle back control of the system. I proposed to leave the system and start a new, smaller one with minimal to no interaction with the larger one.

>There's no reason why many peoples can't start many commune style communities like the Amish. They don't have a monopoly. I see no reason why their can't be more.
You're right with that, but you're missing the point:
People do not want to live that way. Otherwise they already would since nothing's stopping them (besides personal resources: I doubt you have the money for your compound at hand).

Whether they're happy or not matters jack shit when the rest of the population enacts policies that'll see the country inevitably turned into a muslim third world shithole, because those muslims won't care for the Amish.

>I just think a woman is a cheaper and more readily alternative than some human robo-womb system.
Of course, but that system wouldn't be prone to corruption like the woman is and even at the off chance of women being decent they'd still be a valuable alternative for the case when women stop to be.

>you can't conviction yourself up a house, car or lunch with zero dollars in your hand.
Funny how you were complaining about materialism a while back.

the only point of polygamy in this instance is rapid repopulation and rapid culture growth of white europeans with a cultural background in christianity.

desperate times call for desperate measures. Under ideal circumstances I would agree that polygamy has no true need and might only exist as an extremely rare circumstance.

>the only point of polygamy in this instance is rapid repopulation and rapid culture growth of white europeans with a cultural background in christianity.
Or you could just make white monogamous couples fuck.

But yeah buddy dream on.

>desperate times call for desperate measures.
luv when homestucks abuse this quote.

Why stop at polygamy?
If we're in such desperate times that calls for desperate measures why we aren't legalize rape of white women by white men and outlaw abortion?

>Being allowed to defend ones homeland against invaders who seek your death or submission isn't wrong.
Never said it's wrong, I said that they don't give a shit and you living in your 10 people compound won't be able to defend against those muzzies when they come.

>I believe this and agree with the first part, which is partially why I would seek to remove myself from THIS society.
Nothing's stopping this society from coming after you unless you make what you have so undesirable that no one's going to bother. And when you're so undesirable you won't have much luck with the women coming there, so that reproduction thingy is off the table.

>Not everyone is happy to live the way we are living now.
Completely irrelevant, not being happy doesn't mean those times come magically back.

>I'm sorry, but you don't get to determine what's relevant for other people.
Feel free to go WE WUZ all you want, user. But you're a retard for doing so.

>I never proposed to wrestle back control of the system.
>It did use to be ours, but they have infected it, and it is no longer ours. How many centuries must go by before we wrestle control back if we even do?
Uh-huh.

We've already established what the current market for your little idea is: ~300k

Good luck.

>Funny how you were complaining about materialism a while back.
ideas don't equal results is the only point I was making. One must work hard even with convictions.

>People do not want to live that way. Otherwise they already would since nothing's stopping them
I'm aware. I'm not saying we would be a raging success or people would come in droves. I never believed for a minute very people would find the idea attractive. But I am sure some would.

>rest of the population enacts policies that'll see the country inevitably turned into a muslim third world shithole, because those muslims won't care for the Amish.

It isn't the muslims that ended up destroying Europe or even the Jews. It was the people's own corruption that led to the Muslims. The muslims are almost the final nail in the coffin. Sweden became and insane parody and 3rd world hotbed because the people kept enacting self destructive policies under the delusion of higher-minded ethics but in reality was lunacy and moral degeneration.

>that system wouldn't be prone to corruption
they've made several movies whose entire premise is the corruption that could happen to just such a system.
>a valuable alternative for the case when women stop to be.
When the women stop being decent, societal decay is around the corner. Your high tech society wouldn't survive the insanity of deviated feminist women with no need to ever give birth to children. The nightmarish possibilities they would unleash upon society would be more than enough to end what you propose and then some.

>If we're in such desperate times that calls for desperate measures why we aren't legalize rape of white women by white men and outlaw abortion?
Why stop at that? Force them into breeding farms. Continue Mengele's research in creating twins.

Fair point.
I think we just solved the problems of le white race.

rape is not a moral agreement. It is the violation of one party. It is not based in love or honor, it is based in fear and lust and violence. If we allowed rape and encouraged rape we would not be a christian society.

But I think abortion should be outlawed anyway.

>Your high tech society wouldn't survive the insanity of deviated feminist women with no need to ever give birth to children. The nightmarish possibilities they would unleash upon society would be more than enough to end what you propose and then some.
You wouldn't be forced to tolerate feminists when their sole purpose has been machinized.

What you call nightmarish possiblities is an efficient and functioning way to deal with that problem.