Find a flaw

Find a flaw

Other urls found in this thread:

econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/spain.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=EZehl3GsmH8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The flaw is that sqaure 1 can't ever be implemented.

this
plus square 4 doesn't work

Square 4 works, it's just horrible.

it always fails eventually

Fair point, but square 1 can't even begin to exist.

Square two is best square

agreed

They all work.
>We terrorized your country for years and you dont even care
>What iz Years of Lead
Without constant aggression from capital, communism would've worked out just "fine".

Name one socialist country that had social freedoms. Just one.

>you

Any extreme fails miserably, but 2 is the worst. Who the fuck wants lawlessness?

>citing the Years of Lead
you seem to forget that we were dealing with both commies (Red Brigades) and fascists (Black Brigades), terror attacks were pretty much the new fad for the cool kids
and it's fucking pathetic to need terrorism in order to form your poor excuse of a state

Wouldn't have failed if Stalin hadn't had his legacy destroyed

You mean 1?

What does this mean

...

I do not forget anything. you seem to ignore that the fascists were NATO backed, and did false flags and blamed them on commies.
Why? "Do they work" is relative. Northern Euro countries have freedoms and are quite socialist.

1 cannot exist in absolute anarchy. 2 can (well, thats what it is after all).

Square 3 is best all others are degenerate

Spanish anarchists would have flourished during the revolution had it not been for you fascist faggots

and the commies were backed by the USSR
they had pretty much different MOs, the only one blamed on commies was the 1970 bombing, but it was the first high profile one on their part

also:
>EU
>freedoms
this meme needs to die

Voluntary tribal collectivism only works on super small scales, like families.

Wew, just realized that even Kek agrees with me.

Good.

4 is the highest form of human policies.
Sadly we have not reached such a level yet.
If aliens every visit us they will be at square 4.

purple is Right
green is naively utopian
blue is respectably pragmatic
red is literally the borg

Norway
Sweden
Denmark
Finland

calling 1 "libertarian" is an oximoron they are just economical authoritarians and collapse into himself slowly through debt and unemployment

2 will move in between 2 and 3 when the degenerate will die out (they dont have welfare to support their lifestyle)

3 is the natural human societies

4 collapse into himself

>"Do they work" is relative
I'm pretty sure that saying that a political system that cannot exist, does not work, is not very relative.

>Northern Euro countries have freedoms and are quite socialist
There are 50 countries in Europe. In economic freedom:
Denmark ranks 5,
Iceland 10,
Finland 13,
Sweden 14,
and Noway 16.

Even the worst 5, Ukraine, Russia, Greece, Croatia and Slovenia are predominantly market economies.

See

fug off gommie! :DDDD

Left Anarchism works without interference. However in today's society, there would need to be some military to defend any left anarchist or libertarian country since the U.S. would probably want to rape it up the asshole with a coup. Otherwise, left anarchism would fall due to it's fragility

>anything but non-Euclidean politics
>Not fnord-tier

2+3=5

Give that a read, the spanish anarchists were pretty horrid.
econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/spain.htm

Except left ''''''anarchism''''' isn't anarchism at all.

>Economic freedom is authoritarianism
Nice

youtube.com/watch?v=EZehl3GsmH8

economic freedom + cultural authoritarianism is blue

market anarchism theocracy is blue corner

neither is "anarcho" capitalism
but these are just labels interpreting different approaches to anarchist society

in practice anarchism is anarchism whether you decide to share with a community or not is up to you

The difference between economic freedom and economic control is that one takes into consideration the welfare of all humans and the other does not. The preference for one or the other rests in one's own perception of the world; Do all people deserve to live happy lives, or do some exist solely to remain as labor forces for the ruling class?

It can be if you pre condition a population to be accepting and turn away from their morals as is happening to the US. They're changing the social construct with big government and then shall shrink it once the social justice has been reached. We are witnessing the largest political experiment in the history of the world.

Anarcho-capitalism is definitely anarchism, as free markets do not require state intervention. This differs from left "anarchism", that actually requires a state to redistribute wealth and restrict free markets.

Also why aren't you allowed to share with a community in an anarcho-capitalist society?

This fundamentally does matter. The market mechnism quite effectively lines up the want of profit of the producer and the needs of the consumer.

Producers don't need to produce with the intention of public good for the public to be benefited.

They won't ever shink it.

You think the leftists that are in charge of their social justice movements will just give up their reigns of power if their goals are met?

So the workers own the means of production in said Northern Euro countries?

I did not know that.

Maybe you should brush up on your definition of "socialism" if you want to hail Scandinavia as a bastion of socialist thought. Moron.

no you just have to be efficient at suppressing. also you can make the argument that nothing can work indefinately