Aside from "Joos" and oil...

Aside from "Joos" and oil, what is the practical rationale for "maintaining our influence and dominance in the Middle East"?

Neo cons flip out at the thought of us not having our dick in the sand all the time

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jilA-ZeBUI4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>oil
Really, there's not a lot more to tell

there is no reason to be there

Weapons sales.

>Aside from "Joos" and oil, what is the practical rationale for "maintaining our influence and dominance in the Middle East"?

Petrodollars.

>aside from the practical rationale for "maintaining our influence and dominance in the Middle East", what is the practical rationale for "maintaining our influence and dominance in the Middle East"

You can't remove the variables and expect the statement to remain true. It's illogical.

she put on some weight

Did she go topless yet though

What right do we have to the resources of another nation? Either conquer and consume them or get the fuck out.

I'm sick of this "we need to help the poor barbarians achieve civilization for our own national security

> giving Russians/Chinks hegemony over the West's energy supply
> losing petrodollars

are you retarded, OP?

Nobody ever actually says this though. They try to sell it as "fighting terrorists" or ousting dictators

Americans are generally and historically isolationist, so it takes a lot of fucking bleeding heart yellow journalism to swing public opinion towards interventionism.

Remember that it took two whole years of drum beating after the Lusitania to get Americans to declare war on Germany.

normies can't into geopolitics

>Nobody ever actually says this though.

Why would they say this? What do you expect that to sound like?

>Guys, we have to invade Iraq/Lybia because Sadaam/Gaddafi is threatening to sell his oil in rubles and that would stop our 40-year-long gravy train propped up by artificial demand for T-bills
>Guys, we have to invade Syria because it's the site of our new pipeline for oil from the Middle East to Europe

As long as we are all on the same page that we are being duped.

There is no reason besides those and it's a disgrace. Fuck the kikes, let them die fighting sandniggers. Idgaf.

So you're saying you hate America?

is the Syria mess really about an oil pipeline, and not just cutting off Russia's access to the Mediterranean?

Hear it from their own mouths. Literally Jews and muh Israel:

youtube.com/watch?v=jilA-ZeBUI4

>What right do we have to the resources of another nation? Either conquer and consume them or get the fuck out.
When the interests of the nation were overridden by the interests of an internationalist class. That was the beginning of globalism, and the instilling of universal morality that will destroy the species through 'cannibalism'. It's why we are where we are today.

Natural law gives anyone and everyone the right to the resources of any and all nations, if you can take them.

If it were up to me, I would decisively and ruthlessly conquer inferiors, as they're no longer any evolutionary benefit to the progress of life. European civilization would be conditioned and advanced under the natural law of life, to rival the ancients and for the European people to achieve a state of immortality, to begin the journey of forging men into gods. That is the purpose of life, the absolute truth above all things. What we have now is a society built upon lies, inevitably destined to crumble as the path forward is artificial, false.

If by America you mean Zionists then yes.

If NATO wanted to cut off Russia's access to the Med, they would retake Constantin—

>deus vult

this is the correct answer
encircle russia, control mackinder's "world island"
maintain petrodollar hegemony

holy fuck remember when she was young and cute and not fat?

Involvement in the Middle East is a relic of the Cold War. The logic is that if we don't have control then Russia will.

And if russia has control we will be worse off because....?

Wait, does the dominant world power actively go out of its way to fuck over other countries? We would never do that right? Only Russia.

>because?

Because the country with more resources has more war-time capability

And what reason would we in the current year need to go to war over?

I'm no globalist, and maybe I'm naive, but it seems like there is plenty to go around.