If you earn less than 20 dollars an hour, there is an 83% chance that your job will be automated.
What should be done about the robotic jew? No matter how many jobs are being brought back from China/India, there is a big chance that job will just be automated.
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
newatlas.com
youtube.com
ghr.nlm.nih.gov
telegraph.co.uk
twitter.com
Basic income with population control ( one child policy )
Get a new job
>Falling for the current number of jobs is the total number of jobs that will ever exist fallacy
New World Order. Plus mass depopulation via the third world war foretold by Albert Pikeyboi. ´Member the Georgia Guidestones. ´Member Agenda 21 now 2030.
You have nothing to worry about. You will be dead in the great war far before you die from unemployment starvation in socialist scandinavia.
robots will one day do any given job better and more cheaply than humans. there is no technical limitation for why robots can't be perfectly like humans, only much smarter and more efficient
Trans-humanism, we can only get people higher paying jobs via gene therapy. IQ is 40%-60% genetic according to some studies done on the matter. The rest is practice.
>niggers being able to stick to that
It's like you want to be overrun
$20 in NYC or San Fran is monkey work while $20 in most of the country requires some kind of education. Wonder how they came up with the data.
>Developing AIs
>Developing smart cities with smart grids
>Developing Internet of Things
>Leaving millions of there own people jobless
>Everything will be AI operated.
>AI either destroys everything or is destroyed by "Russian Hackers"
>ISIS will be the most advanced civilization on Planet.
Well done white people! Well fucking done!
Wouldn't there be slightly more demand to automate higher paying jobs?
>Now I know why we would be a super power in 2050, since most of the developed countries will look like pic related due to mass unemployment.
The automation meme is retarded. Every time automation has been done in a field there is a short term loss of low paying jobs followed by a long term increase of high paying jobs as well as a stabilization of low paying jobs, typically in customer support.
When every industry went to fully automated phone customer support, it sucked for literally everybody. Now, people are willing to pay top dollar for American voices behind those lines because nobody likes automation.
That day is at least another century away. Not even worth thinking about at the moment, even your kids won't have to deal with it, your grandkids maybe
>This is how retarded these people Sound
horses have been almost completely replaced by cars because cars do everything better and more cheaply.
humans will be almost completely replaced by robots, because they will eventually do everything better and more cheaply
you're probably right.
when farming stopped employing 90% of people, 90% of people starved to death
Except the arts. Finally, checkmate STEM fags.
>basic income
>abolish all other welfare
>more niglets are now a liability
Not that I approve the idea of badic income but this way only those who have other income would be able to have more kids.
elon musk and stephen hawking have asserted that we have to be conscious about the issue now, so that humans can continue existing alongside robots
we need to be in complete control of AI and how it's designed, not blindly push forward
>tfw working on automating my job so I can become self-employed, lean back and watch the money pile up
...no they didn't. whats your point.
also competitive games like football. people still prefer watching humans play chess for example, even though any smartphone can beat any living human
Thats just plain technology.
So far its difficult but not impossible to replace humans.
Also 20 dollars an hour doesnt mean shit, it depends on the country and city.
As a chef i earn less than that but i dont see automation of my work anytime before the invention of AI
Kek
>Not to mention the number of jobs created just to make the cars, and the fact that it takes at least one person to operate each car...
>German automates his forklift job so he can play forklift simulator for more hours each day
Automation doesn't necessarily get rid of jobs. Someone has to build and maintain the robots.
cars are self driving and built by robots. self driving cars are ALREADY more reliable, and robots more efficient at building them
you are blind
>there is a big chance that job will just be automated
Nothing will be automated as long as there are chinese who work 18 hours a day and are paid 50$ monthly. Robots can never compete with such cheap workforce
>As a chef i earn less than that but i dont see automation
>Implying
also you miss the point, the car analogy was agaisnt horses. horses cant build or drive cars, so they were replaced
>If you earn less than 20 dollars an hour, there is an 83% chance that your job will be automated.
There is no historical precedent for this change but what I can cobble together by looking at the past is at it follows :
We have steadily developed social nets aimed at reducing poverty for the last 200-300 years now.
From pensions to unemployment benefits, from scholarships to affordable healthcare and education.
So it stands to reason the new wave of invalids will receive the monetary protection needed for survival.
The alternative is food riots.
I am not sure how the modern economies will come up with the vast additional funds for it however.
>automation replaces loads of female jobs with electronics related jobs
>women do not have degrees in these fields
>women no longer have all the cushy office jobs they used to
>state cannot afford to create gynocentric laws to please women on a country-wide scale
>women can no longer find work worth a damn and goes back in the kitchen
>men actually don't need a physical woman to make him a sandwich, as her vagina is less pleasurable than the sex robots they use in conjunction with VR headsets
>women start begging for men to marry them and do everything to please the men around them like the parasite they are
>too bad for them, the artificial womb already replaced their last possible asset
The future sounds good.
Are you a retard? Even without advanced robots, most of the car is built by a robot.
Basic income can't work for two reason:
1) lack of materials and space. Even if we get free energy and fully automated workforce, we simply can't recover all the materials used for recycling let alone create new stock. people will have money, but scarcity will drive the prices up so the only way to afford anything is to have a second source of income
2) if humanity ever achieves a state were basic income is actually necessary, I bet the people that own the robots, the AI, the energy production means, will just kill all the unnecessary humans. You have way too much faith in rich people.
Trades are still good to go, I'm telling you. Maybe not all of them, but I assure you by the time a robot can do service work on an AC system (installing I admit could be done during 3d printing a building) we are only a handful of years from superhuman AI taking over anyway
Ive seen that. Its just a robot that has been programmed to copy a real chefs movements. It isnt actually a chef, id be surprised if it could even cook more than 1 thing at a time
Have you seen how much demanding an average millenial is? They want the latest most pricey tech without jobs + the hysteric child laws in your cunt (can't even slap your kid).
Have fun even raising 1 child.
>there is a big chance that job will just be automated.
cool, more free time to invest on studying, reading, travelling, getting fit and practicing sports or arts.
people who defend 40 hr/week jobs are cucked as fuck
See
encourage sterilisation to the unemployed and those 83% of the population and scrap welfare
>good for the environment
>no more poverty related problems
>less crime
>better wages through less labour competition
Ok and who designs and builds those machines?
Until extremely advanced AI is built humans will always be involved.
Go back to shitting in the streets desu senpai
Become a robotic technician
Are you retarded? No human can ever compete with a robot.
Every single job will get replaced by robots which will crash the economy and that will show how capitalism is truly flawed. All the "muh capitalism" retards will be begging for socialism and equal wealth distribution.
>1) lack of materials and space
Although I agree we live in a finite world, we literally haven't scratched the surface of our planet for resource extraction.
The planet mantle have more than enough material for the humanity needs.
What we actually lack is indeed "free" energy, or at least accessible one.
Provided we solve that, I see no reason why massive underground mines/factories, fully automated - producing massive amounts of goods.
The main problem is who will own the said manufacturing capabilities and would the owner be inclined to provide basic income.
> 83% chance that your job will be automated.
> IQ is 40%-60% genetic according to some studies done on the matter
These numbers, Jesus Christ... Post the source, post how this stuff comes up.
Automation is not limited nor defined by hourly wage, a bunch of high paying jobs can simply vanish. I
No, IQ is 100% genetic. Genes are Turing machines, they are not that simplistic model you picked up in high school or some popsci place.
You are talking about old machinery, automation will effectively take all jobs, 100%. You don't know what you are talking about.
>food riots
>mown down with air cooled machine guns like Zulus
all is good
>would the owner be inclined to provide basic income.
Will never happen.
I earn 6 per hour but i fail to see how they will automate the job of a unity developer.
ghr.nlm.nih.gov
This one says 75% but the general trend of all the studies is 40%-60%
telegraph.co.uk
Well, unless you do have access to home manufacturing and energy production.
Home solar powered 3d printers for example and some form of exchange for resources.
Then the state would become less needed, not more.
However we are talking out of our asses as no one know how things would actually turn out.
Borgerlonn or bust.
As an engineer who is currently working on automated control systems I can say this is 100% true. Any basic factory labor will be cut completely. There's no reason for a man to waste his life away repeating the same 4-5 motions in repetition any more.
You tax the use of robots so that wages for human labor are competitive.
porque é que tás aqui a meter montagens de amp ops
I know, and it is wrong. Intelligence is 100% genetic, there is no non-genetic human intelligence. Training, effort, and learning is all determined by genes. Of course, you need to know what a Turing Completeness is to fully understand how genes work.
But then what do those men do to pass the time? If they no longer need to work then what? Judging by how they spend their time outside of work right now I'd assume that they would just just sit at home drinking beer, watching sportscenter, and porking their fat wives. How is that an improvement?
2-3 engineers and 3-4 shift supervisors are usually responsible for an entire production floor. This is far more efficient than a staff of 100-150 working who each have regular variability in their work.
>Ok and who designs and builds those machines?
Humans will be involved, but you won't need hundreds of thousands of people in 1 firm. There will be mass poverty, mass poverty will increase crime rate. Only department able to employs big numbers of people will be the police department.
Pica não relacionada
I don't care what they do. If they want to succeed they'll have to learn how to work within modern production and business areas.
You are not thinking in perspective.
Let's say a small elite have the means for survival and mow down the unnecessary humans, what is there to protect the now majority from being further culled due to the ever growing rate of mechanization.
With the logical conclusion of total human elimination for the sake of productivity.
Even the genetic diversity for the sake of eugenics is worth saving the swaths of humans
So, I am not convinced a mass purge is to occur any time soon.
When the productivity of men is taxed at the highest rates, the productivity of money at a lesser rate and the productivity of machines is taxed not at all... you know something is wrong with your economic system.
That would only work if we limited it the basic income to a maximum of one child per couple. Minute someone has two they are taken off of it until they correct the issue.
that is something most agree, provided war or ecological disaster do not end us, or turn the clock hands back
what is to be done to prevent the looming crisis is something I do not see much consensus on
It only affects retard, not my problem
20$ x 8 = 160$ a day
160$ x 30 = 3800$
Tfw when you live in a country where average paycheck is 700$
btw
>By removing the problem of waging for a home and food and having leisure as a primary, you restore the value of work being a duty.