Why hasn't the government deleted Sup Forums yet?

Why hasn't the government deleted Sup Forums yet?

Other urls found in this thread:

wired.com/2016/03/isis-winning-social-media-war-heres-beat/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

1st amendment.

WE don't live in Greece

because hillary clinton didn't win

What does this op pic mean ? I'm so confused, pls explain

Free speech and we are one of the 3 biggest boards on Sup Forums

Because we are funny.

1) the US is not authoritarian
2) it would cause a backlash
3) some in the government might be sympathetic to Sup Forums
4) better to have Sup Forumsacks talk openly here so they can be tracked and studied by the NSA/FBI rather than have them talk in greater privacy somewhere else

It's easier to have us in one place instead of spreading this stuff on facebook

I'm just following the other rasshoppers.

Unironically this, this place's posts makes me giggle like a little girl

Record it and post it now right now

Because we're being experimented on.

Because it makes it easier to track people who need to PAY DENBTS

Shutting us down would require acknowledging our existence.

>he thinks the people behind the curtain give a shit if society is 'left' or 'right'

as long as people are fighting they're happy

So if a website praising ISIS goes online in the US, will the government allow it?

Yes.

However, the government might have a court make out some documents that force the site owner to let the government look at their servers. See the case of Lavabit

because it's a joke

I should have added: the interesting thing about Lavabit is it shows that the government can demand to see your servers and threaten you with legal action *if you tell anybody that the government is looking into your business*. So the Lavabit company owner decided to shut down his company rather than complying.

/thread

You seriously believe Clinton would have shut down Sup Forums?
Kek

A combo of first amendment backlash and having the ideal place to farm data and build profiles on people.

Sounds tinfoil as fuck but we've been monitored forever, and I suspect half of the threads at any given point in time look to weed out the lonely role players and the people with actual intent to cause hard.

I'm more surprised Sup Forums has survived to be honest, place has been and will always be a shithole. You know it's a bad day when you cruise over there for entertainment which I've found myself doing less and less over the years. I pop in every once in a while and it's all penis and cuck porn and some of the most autistic edgy fucks I've ever seen trying to get (you)s

Can't upload but here's the transcript:

[author reads an ironic 'good goy' post in a thread about Jews]
Author: "heeheeheeheehee" *audible snorting **heavy breathing*
[author urinates into his pants]

-End of transcript-

absolutely

Yes. Hatespeech and anonymity are terrible things. [insert buzzwords and snarkuments]

Because they come here for education just like the media comes here for news.

Sup Forums is the center of the Internet

Twitter lets those accounts exist for some time, so yeah

>Governments and internet
A structure ran by 60 year old boomers can understand anything about technology?
>Fucking kek

Because they are afraid we would go outside and do the things we talk about.

Didn't they used some a watchbird or whatever it was called. I remember that they would automatically post some text on Twitter and if they would stop that would mean that they got compromised by the gubmint.

It's called a canary.

>Not posting the updated version uncovered from pizzagate

Ur chart old brah

>5d bumpercarts
thats deep user

You might think we are kidding, but yes, that would be fine in America. It will be filled with FBIAnons, but it is fine.

Yeah, that's the name thanks. What happend to them? I just know that they stop posting tweets but told everyone it was just a technical problem.

we're useful idiots

Because Obama is a beta cuck.

But Trump will shut this cesspool down.

I find it unlikely. What mechanisms do you think she have used to do such a thing?

This

In Europe you'd just pass a law to say that so and so hatespeech is not allowed anymore. In America you'd have to ammend the constitution or something? I don't know how that works.

for the same reason the matrix didn't kill Neo, he was part of the prophecy

her army of delusional leftists is all she'd need. our savior donald trump is why we still exist

Hate speech is not protected under the first amendment. Because the freedom of speech has been abridged so as to not include it.

Sup Forums could probably be shut down with various dirty tricks, but to do it legally would be very difficult, probably impossible. The first amendment plus the 14th amendment protect free speech, and to get rid of the first amendment would be almost impossible in the current system of government - it would require the cooperation of a majority of all branches of government, plus the consent of most states, and besides it's one of the most popular amendments, so there would be an uproar if anybody even suggested getting rid of it.

Tbh it would be easier to subvert and would probably would cost less too.

this is false. Hate speech is protected under the first amendment

because the NSA are /ourguys/

it has been foretold

yes, no doubt... that's the dirty tricks i mentioned. heck, you could probably just offer the owner a mountain of money and then nuke the place

Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).

I expected this to happen before the election. Have no idea why they didn't go through with it. There must be something going on.

>american education

this subforum is a containment site for the mentally unfit. in other words, the more time u nerds spend online, the less time you spend outside influencing normies. consider this place government-approved, maybe even created by in order to quarantine you deviants

I think that this is about giving money or guns to terrorists.. Not just saying you support them.

However I did come up with a devilish trick, which would be to establish the whole of the alt-right as a domestic terrorist organization.

we are the goverment

we are the intellect agency

we are the jews

Because Sup Forums is the government

People are sympathetic to ISIS on facebook every day. For fucks sake, its their #1 recruiting platform.
wired.com/2016/03/isis-winning-social-media-war-heres-beat/
Not only do they use it themselves, not just supporters, but they are reporting that ISIS IS WINNING WITH IT!

AND I'M SUPPOSED TO FUCKING CARE ABOUT HATE SPEECH?

Give a fucking break...

that's irrelevant. you can't shut down Sup Forums just because some individuals *using* Sup Forums violated that law - unless the owner also knew about it and supported it

why they didn't go through with it? probably because the establishment isn't as ruthless and monolithic as Sup Forumsacks fear and because it wouldn't really change anything, since everybody would just move to some image board that's hosted overseas and can't be touched by the US gov't

You can support peace talks between know terrorist group,and be imprisoned under such law.
You could if you show that a majority of individuals were in support of terrorism,and vocal about it.Post video ,and support and it could happen,maybe not permanent since as you said only a few,but for sometime yes raid the servers.

It is vague as fuck for a reason

Probably this. It's better for them to have it on US-based servers, so why scare people away when you can keep up with the pretenses of "free speech" and monitor everyone at the same time?

The only drawback is that a few teens will be radicalized, but you can also use them with your controlled opposition movements.

GG

more realistically, probably 99% of the establishment has no idea what Sup Forums is. They are mostly old people who don't understand Internet culture.

>provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so,

Wouldn't surprise me that a spic can't read English, though.

IF pol out of satire become pro ISIS,and posted ISIS video.A a known terrorist came here without knowing the satire then came and was watched they could throw material support on Sup Forums.

your freedom of speech is a resource fag.

Her problem is small tits.

More than a handful is a waste

they did worse and flooded us with normies

last I checked this wasn't a terrorist forum.

>implying hitler isnt code for muhammad

>Some of you guys are alright, don't go to x if you live city,state.

Will it happen to pol ,no if it did pol chink moot would take the dick,or fight and lose. He would sell us to our ((new)) owner.

It would only happen in an extreme case. Maybe it shut down Sup Forums for a week while they have the servers,and see that is only a few rogues.

weaponized autism is extremely difficult to control