Why is CNN wrong for using video game footage as an illustration?
I mean, it's not like the entire segment was based on it, the reporters didn't refer to it
Why is CNN wrong for using video game footage as an illustration?
I mean, it's not like the entire segment was based on it, the reporters didn't refer to it
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
techtimes.com
jpost.com
nbcnews.com
businessinsider.com
vox.com
dailydot.com
ibtimes.co.uk
rt.com
telegraph.co.uk
businessinsider.com
money.cnn.com
businessinsider.com
twitter.com
No it is perfectly okay for a reputable news source to use fictional footage to present real news
...
youtube.com
>the average documentary involving hacking scenes
Holy shit, is this real? Hahahahahahahahahaha
No
Yes, because they created a montage, and just like every other time the topic is about hacking, every news, documentary, film, etc. always use some stereotypical hacking footage
its called dramatization, even fucking commercials will say "acting dramatized" or something along those lines. a news organization shouldnt dramatize/romanticize something so false because it actually does affect some stupid people
*couple of seconds of, ready, high quality footage in 24/7 news broadcast
love this new meme
>FURRY\$
>furrys
What did CNN mean by this?
Because it conveys that they are childlike with little understanding of the subject they're reporting on. Journalism used to be a respected profession. Not so much anymore.
Why do you think using Fiction to illustrate a point is bad when people are demanding facts? Are you retarded?
Let me put it to you like this. I want to know if it's raining outside, if all that shows up on the news is video game footage of rain, it REALLY DOESN'T HELP ME KNOW IF IT'S RAINING OUTSIDE!
considering how retarded their viewers are, they weren't wrong at all for doing something so unfathomably retarded.
Agreed, they should use real hacking footage instead.
The people stupid enough to believe that this is real hacking would have already believed it
techtimes.com
jpost.com
you hacked for those trips
Because memes
>le spoopy real hacking footage
nbcnews.com
businessinsider.com
vox.com
>le spoopy image that proves putin is an AI with more spoopy images as you scroll down
dailydot.com
>le spoopy image of American government being hacked
ibtimes.co.uk
>official Russian government news outlet proof that the US are hacking
rt.com
H-he's fast!
How did he get so good? Are Russian hackers even human?
I can keep finding news outlets that "dramaticize" hacking
telegraph.co.uk
businessinsider.com
money.cnn.com
>businessinsider.com
This borders on fucking superstition.
>If you wear a horseshoe the evil hacking ghosts will leave you alone
"Hacking" meaning I guessed your password is 'PASSWORD1'....
Actually, Podesta's email wasn't even hacked, someone gave the password to a phishing site for some 'free porn'...
Its FURRY STOPS actually
Yes because it's stock footage and cheesy 'hacking' footage gets used all the time in stories involving 'the cyber' as the US President calls it
They didn't say "we have exclusive footage from inside the Kremlin cyberwarfare operation center, here it is"