DAILY REMINDER THAT ANGLOS SUCK AT WAR

I'm tired of the digusting anglo lies and revisionnism when it comes to history.
Every single "glorious british victory" was built on german back or the ones of their allies, there is not a single glorious achievement in anglo military history.

Remember to laugh at anglos when they claim that they defeated Napoleon in Waterloo, or that they have beaten France in the Seven years Wars or that they crushed Russia in Crimea.
Eternal anglo only military successes were against a bunch of bronze age savages that they killed just by bringing diseases, their "Empire" (a funny word when you know that it was at 95% a human desert), nothing more.

The redpill is that anglos adopted the lion as an emblem when they are just a bunch of hyenas.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>The redpill is that anglos adopted the lion as an emblem when they are just a bunch of hyenas.

That's actually very well thought Hans.
Also everyone know here that Wellington is a meme and Blucher the real winner of Waterloo.

Anyone got that info-graphic of the Anglo kill count for old Hans here?
It's the one in the hundreds of millions.

...

>a fucking roach

this.
and 90% of Sup Forums fags worship hitler.

Have you got the template for the borders version of this?

Oh shit yeah I forgot about all those German ships at Trafalgar.

Thanks based Kraut.

No shit op. Even the emus beat them.


They can only conquer with help from others.
French and Indian war
Ww2
Ww1
War of 1812
Slave trade colonies.


Even white infrastructure is not possible without help from others.


Meanwhile China went through its own shit and ghangis Khan conquered Russia.

Are you insane, compare the British dead to all your wog participants.

>implying Trafalgar was decisive against Napoléon

It saved your own asses and made you gain time but it had no impact on the continent, France just went to not controlling the seas to... not controlling the seas, in fact it convinced Bonaparte to stop trying to play the admiral and focus his strategy on ground military.

...

Oi! What's going on 'ere!?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II

...

...

Allying with the Eternal Anglo against Napoleon might have been our greatest mistake. On the other hand Nap fucked up in Russia anyway and was doomed from this moment. He should have invested in consolidating his power and ensure his legacy, instead of getting greedy and invade Russia.

Why are you in an ARYAN thread?

Anglos are not allowed in here.

Cheeky bastard, this is a multicultural Mongolian Image website, all are welcome.

This. Hitler destroyed Europe

being victorious isn't about how many men you use or how many die, it's about how you survive and come out after.

take ww1: british win but lose hundreds of thousands of good christian men

take ww2, the british won, but at what cost? the destruction of their empire and a new world of usa & ussr

the other sides won but at what cost? they lost hundreds of thousands of men? pyrrhic victories

Nobody won in WW2, except the (((USA))).

also no British man celebrates 7yrs war as a Glorious British victory like waterloo, dunkirk, the battle of britian, etc. the British won the 7yrs war because everyone else lost

it destroyed the big european powers: austria, spain, france, russia + germany, leaving us in the driving seat

hapsbergs: 145k dead
french: 168k dead
russians: 138k dead
prussians: 180k
english: 20k

So, when can find you all come The Harvest.

Bide your time, cattle.

We lose every battle except the final one.

Stay mad cuntinent fags

Stop falling for this Shit, these are fake posts designed to cause a rift and stir up trouble on pol and in the alt right be careful there are a lot of Lefty Shills infiltrating.