Fascism

Is fascism any good? I know it definitely killed less people than communism.

What are it's pros? What are it's flaws?

Discuss.

Other urls found in this thread:

mises.org/library/omnipotent-government-rise-total-state-and-total-war-0
youtu.be/wmLcj5tpPuk
mises.org/library/end-socialism-and-calculation-debate-revisited
soundcloud.com/butchleghorn/propertarian-podcast-007-market-fascism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

...

Fascism is a shitty ideology that lives off people's fear, than censor the people.
It's a shitty ideology like communism, it's gonna get corrupt by greed either way.
It's just another Utopia, but when made, it becomes a dystopia.
All ideologies suck.
All humans suck.
The only solution is death to all Humans.

>I know it definitely killed less people than communism.
>still unironically believing this

Just like with economic and social capital, all lefties can do is steal the jokes of others and still somehow manage to make them less funny

Would is be fair to say that facism is tribalism applied to a nation-state?

It like all collectivist centrally planned economic systems is shit.

mises.org/library/omnipotent-government-rise-total-state-and-total-war-0

>mises

Fascism is not the answer to our problems.
It rests on the very same assumptions that underpin other modernist ideologies, namely Liberalism (democracy, egalitarianism, secularism) and Socialism.

youtu.be/wmLcj5tpPuk

Yes he triggers Commies and fascist faggots.

Portugal though is a poor shithole

>doesn't believe in empirical evidence
>implying this shouldn't trigger just about everyone

>allow free market
>allow accumulation of capital
>totally not capitalism guize :^)
>we'll just have a regulatory state based on what's """good for the nation"""
>promise no corruption :^)
Holy fuck, and people give socialism shit about being nice in theory, unworkable in practice.

pro: Sometimes a race of people gets gassed

con: Sometimes a race of people gets gassed.

Much thought on the matter of which system of government is best has led me to the certain belief that the system of government that I most desire is that which most rapidly and efficiently removes fucking kebab.

Pros: if you are an elite you get even more rich and powerful

Cons: everything else

...

>>doesn't believe in empirical evidence
Then you haven't actually sat down and read Mises and would rather read a single quote without the rest of the context.

Economics isn't a science and never has been. Systems like fascism and Socialism have claimed to make economics scientific but that is precisely why they fail.
See
The misean calculation problem.
mises.org/library/end-socialism-and-calculation-debate-revisited

>Is fascism any good?

No.

Also I hhave absolutely zero doubt that you wouldn't be able even summarize praxeology to criticize it other than a shitty image from /leftypol/

You piss off the entire world and they attack you.

That's the flaw.

Unlike socialism, every time Fascism was applied it made the economy and the nation both stronger.

See examples in Germany and Italy, and out of countries that went to war we have Spain's dictablanda with Primo de Rivera and Rome's dictators which fixed what democracy and bureocracy destroyed.

>All ideologies suck.
>All humans suck.
>The only solution is death to all Humans.
>digits
This is Kek's endgame isn't it?

Market fascism is better than discretionary fascism.

soundcloud.com/butchleghorn/propertarian-podcast-007-market-fascism

>unlike socialism
>rapid industrialisation of USSR didn't shit on Nazi Germany
>German armor wasn't over-engineered garbage from start to finish of WW2
Are you basing this on something substantial?

...

Hahaha yeah people don't have nothing to eat but at least we sent a dog to space, amirite?

Last major famine in USSR was in 1947, what do you mean?

Don't try to pretend that life in USRR was anything but terrible unless you were a member of the party

>Someone takes that image seriously enough to save it
>Someone actually thinks the Red Army was worthwhile

>killed less people than communism

Communism never killed nobody.

Nothign terrible about it you dipshit. Much better than now. Actually it is terrible if you do not have some relations in some high grounds of government.

Who's that slut?
Was she born a female?
Is she white?

Actually now*

Well, considering USSR had to rebuild itself after the war, it certainly was harsh. Nevermind the constant threat of nukes from the West.

>Actually it is terrible if you do not have some relations in some high grounds of government.
Sounds familiar

National socialism is better

>Republic gets separated from a big ass country
>Becomes poorer

Gee I wonder why, you never had the standards of a living that people had in democratic states, don't even get me started on fascist ones

For some smaller meme countries like Azerbaijan, the Soviets helped create a lot of industry.

The only solution and only inevitability

>Strasserism is better

FTFY.

Ohohohohoho

Thanks to Uncle Joe screaming at Azerbaijan about Muhammad being a pedophile, they are now muslim atheists, with 74% of the population being irreligious.

I'm not really sure if he's saying that they are worse off now, and you actually HAVE to have relations to government officials to have a decent life.

The whole "communism kill 6000 trillion" meme is based on some pretty lousy methodology (i.e. attributing all deaths under the USSR to "communism"). Sure a lot of reactionaries died but that's to be expected and should be celebrated.

...

Yeah i corrected it
I missed "Now have to" there.

I bet you think Jews aren't evil, too

Mass starvation due to centrally planned agricultural policy is 100% the fault of communism, you genuine retard.

>Sure a lot of reactionaries died but that's to be expected and should be celebrated.>>

This is why nobody likes /leftypol/

thanks for making it clear why fascism sucks.

Hence it won't work and is merely utopian. You can do it with 150-300 people, not 80million to sustain a healthy and just society for your people.

I generally agree

I still don't really see what makes the best of a governing system.

All I can tell so far is that it needs to allow freedom of individual creativity and thought, while providing a foundation for families, strong moral guidelines/religion, and courts to settle disagreements. Military especially to protect the country/people foremost (not the government).

I think it should have a hierarchical system with a dictator, but meritocratic systems of gaining position within the hierarchy, and democratic methods of figuring out a course of action or a goal. How you do this I wouldn't even begin to imagine.

Basically a system where the public says, "This is what we want" and the dictator uses his position of power to enact that as intelligently and responsibly as possible. Maybe it's just all too conflicting and muddled to ever create an effective system that doesn't inevitably succumb to corruption/evil.

It was applied to your society and it worked so well that several others hand to band together to destroy you.

And now all we have is beta-male cucks like you who are the lesser sons of grater fathers.

You are correct, user.

this, although fascism is also based. May not have a consistent history with winning wars, however its sucess on a country's economy, morals, and stability is shown throughout all fascist/NatSoc nations. Also, NatSoc and fascists are different from white power. They all supported having pride in your race and ethinicty, even if you were black, indian, or white. Just not jews

>I think it should have a hierarchical system with a dictator
Who succeeds them?

There were only like 2 actual famines during the USSR. One of them was likely caused by grain hoarding kulaks (rich former peasants.)

>"Beta male cuck"
Go make some white kids, I'm ahead of you.

Read "A Squire's Trial"

When people are bullied and see their cultural identity in decline they're bound to grab towards more core values, more völkisch standards in society which resemble a more wonderful world helping to cope with the pain they feel inside.
Russia and Germany did this pre WW1 and 2 after they had copied France for so long which was considered the main European powerhouse back then in terms of culture, art, literature, style, architecture, etc.

all dictatorships are amazing if the leader is not a corrupt piece of shit, is educated, and deeply cares for his people.

unfortunately, that never happens.

also Fascism has historically approved of militarism. Not a good idea.

>Oh Amygdala, oh Amygdala! Forgive this poor bastard! bhahahah