Gun Control Eternally BTFO'd

Bring it on, you Leafs, Britcucks, and Libshits, you cant refute this evidence that gun control is a FAILURE.

Europe? A third world authoritarian shithole, where criticizing the government lands you in prison but Muslims can rape and murder with impunity.

With guns? None of this would have happened.
Canada? Quickly catching up. Chicago? The most violent city in America. The common theme? Gun control. Gun control has only one purpose, to leave you helpless. History has shown time and time again that anyone who gives up their guns, soon gives up their lives.

Wake up Europe! The EU doesn't want to ban guns for your safety, they want you helpless.
youtu.be/nUmKT43j4Tc
This video was made by JEWS. They know better than anyone what happens when you can't defend yourself.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AKfcc2rM_xI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You know that you can own guns in Canada, right?

...

You can't defend yourself with them.

Check the stats as the # of gun owners rise, violent crime goes down. Chicago had more combined murders this year than LA and NY, and they are very anti fun
>makes you think

Yes you can

No you can't.
>no CC.
>no stand your ground law.
>can only carry to and from range in locked case.
>Have to have "reason" to defend your house.
Nigger with knife? Not enough threat.

If you jump through tons of permits and join some gun club right? Even then can you own a pistol and conceal carry? lol

>durr muh hunting rifle and shotgun
>sitting at home
>will protect me when I'm out and about
>going to the bank, to work, to the store
>defenseless as fuck

Can canadians take their guns to work like in OP's webm? How about driving home these other videos?

norinco will soon be number one in imports to canada, leaf

No, the law basically states that your reasoning for shooting someone has to be something that a jury would find makes sense in the context.

That's for restricted weapons, unrestricted ones you can take anywhere

This was the only post ITT that was actually rude

just breaking balls m8

Was this during the blm riots

IF I WANNA OWN A SCALAR CASCADE WEAPON I SHOULD BE ABLE TO

>unrestricted you can take anywhere

Yes, unloaded. And you can't do that in a city unless you want to get the cops called on you by a soccer mom because nobody except gun owners know the gun laws.

Canada's gun laws are cucked. There is no denying it. We don't have CC, we have mag restrictions, and handgun barrel length restrictions which makes a shit ton of handguns inaccessible.

>jury would find makes sense

If you look at the cases, like Chris Bishop who got 20 fucking years for killing a home invader with his SKS because he shot to kill even when they were running away, self defense in Canada is a joke. We should be allowed to kill people who break into our house. Full stop.

>he shot to kill even when they were running away
>self defense in Canada is a joke
>shot to kill
>running away
>self defense
lmao


>We should be allowed to kill people who break into our house.
This is how animals think. If you want to be an animal, move to the USA.

In most of the US you can use lethal force to stop a crime in progress, like rape, niggers being niggers, and niggers being niggers.

Why don't you think we should have Castle Doctrine?

In Chris Bishop's case, they were banging down his locked bedroom door, and broke it down, before he started shooting. He got TWENTY years for that.

Explain why it wasn't morally acceptable for him to kill them all.

>because you know exactly why they want to break in
>no one ever breaks in to kill/rape/torture, only steal

>can't shoot people breaking in.
Aren't houses supposed to cost like 3 million in Toronto?
>nigger breaks down door.
>"That's $70,000 worth of property damage you fuck!"

do you realize where most of live?
Literally trees all around me. A walk to the store and back could be warrant the safety of a gun if I walked through the woods (Which I can do)

> a fucking leaf

Literally nothing.

Any fucker who breaks into my locked and secured home is assumed armed and dangerous until they are a blood smear on the ground.

Last I checked 90% of Canadians live in cities.

sauce on this sexy footage

>people thinking they can break into my house and take my shit deserve to live

Probably..
So do Americans..
But, the thing is, I don't need a gun in a rural area unless I'm far in the wilderness (Where I'd probably be hunting anyway). I don't need a gun in town. If I had a gun in my house, at least I'd have the right to own it. If world war 3 broke out, I'd have a gun. I'm not worried about getting shot up, which is the entire point. Even people in the city own guns, but they don't worry about getting shot, because they have guns but don't carry them around.

>Gun control has only one purpose, to leave you helpless. History has shown time and time again that anyone who gives up their guns, soon gives up their lives.
Interestingly that forces that pushed for gun control in the past at the same time label some categories of society as evil. Long before the day of the rope, this things doesn't spring out of nowhere they were logical continuation of previous policies.

Obvious parallels with modern left that label white male as enemy of the humanity.

but I am pro-gun America

Reverse search it you dumb Dane

>but they don't worry about getting shot
Gun crime rate with legal guns is minuscule.

>Why don't you think we should have Castle Doctrine?
Because it elevates material goods to have value commensurate to human life. Your Xbox can be replaced, people can't. Comparing the two is inviting evil into your heart. Life is sacred.

Sorry, my Xbox is worth than a nigger's life.

no. most canadians live south. there's still rural areas in the south.

got any more of this justice porn OP? I'm almost fully erect

Lack of Castle doctrine first elevates life of criminal committing crime over life of law abiding citizen who now can't be safe even in the sanctuary of his own house.

You do not know the intention of the person stealing from your home, he could be there to steal your xbox or he could be there to rape your kid.

Your xbox can be replaced, your childs innocence cannot.

There is 0 (zero) onus on me to find out why someone is entering my home forcefully.

>he could be there to steal your xbox
Even if he just for stealing xbox how is he gonna do it? Were talking about robbery during breaking and entering. Obviously citizen and criminal have conflict, how criminal can persuade citizen to give up his property? Obviously with threats to citizen's health and life. So it is criminal who values material goods over other law abiding citizen life first.

good point this is why anti-castle doctrine retards like that leaf should be shot.

>Even if he just for stealing xbox how is he gonna do it?
You're already going too far with it, Russ-bro. You have no requirement to find out or question why someone is breaking into your home. You just defend it as though they're there to kill everyone and burn it down. Assume the worst and defend your shit. This is the most basic of human rights.

>Jeweler closing up for night.
>gang of dindus slam SUV through door.
>Owner emptys AR-15 at them.
>dindus scatter.
WHY DO YOU NEED A AR-15?
This is why.

Incumming.

I'm sorry you feel that way. I wonder, what is your life is worth to someone else? More importantly, what would you hope it is worth?

A house is not holy ground. You have no more right to murder someone for trespassing there than you do for shooting someone randomly in the street.

You're allowed to protect your child. But the best way to do that is to get them out of the house to somewhere safe. If you cannot, then you have the legal justification to stand your ground. Lethal force is always a last resort, never a first solution.

You're right, there isn't. That's for the police to determine.


Look, guys, I'm not naive. I understand that there are VAST differences in violence between the US and Canada. Canada has as many firearms related homicides as the US does in a week. So I'm not saying Americans shouldn't have Castle Doctrine - I'm just saying Canadians don't need it. And I hope we never do.

Shut up you cuck.

>Look, guys, I'm not naive. I understand that there are VAST differences in violence between the US and Mexico. Mexico has as many firearms related homicides as the US does in a week. So I'm not saying Americans shouldn't have Castle Doctrine - I'm just saying Mexicans don't need it. And I hope we never do.

Your sheeple thinking is baffling to us human beings.

because it's not the shootings, it's the noise

thanks for posting the whole thing

Kek, underrated

sweet. silencers actually don't do much, just spergs think it's like da hollywood movies duuhh

Mexico does have more gun violence than the US though. The analogy doesn't work.

yfw trump j is a lurker

one of the biggest problems america faces today
trump jr hasn't made his own fortune

>You have no more right to murder someone for trespassing there than you do for shooting someone randomly in the street.
It is criminals who have no rights to murder people in their homes over xbox. Killing criminal is self defense.
youtube.com/watch?v=AKfcc2rM_xI

Mexico does not have guns or castle doctrine though.

guns are legal in most european countrys burger

The analogy always works. In a world full of everything from small crime, to literal genocide, you are advocating victim disarmament to make us ? What?

".......WELL REGULATED......"

...

Listen you dumb motherfucker, its not about property its about SAFETY. A criminal BROKE into your house, to cause you harm.

Its like a fire, you grab a fire extinguisher to save yourself and home. You don't sit down and call the fire department and HOPE they get there before your house burns down around you.

yeah but they're going to get the manufactures involved. and just imagine being able to rob and kill someone and no one will hear. what a great achievement for the whole world

Do Canada's laws allow you to own autonomous/remotely operated weapons?

>ppl can't be replaced.
Because we need to replace criminals? Cuck logic.

Had a buddy in the army who escaped that shit as a child. Scary shit man.

The original name for suppressors was mufflers. Same principal as a car muffler.
>gun with suppressor.
>"Wow still loud but not EEEEEEEEE loud".
>Gun without suppressor.
>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

That's assuming they are there to steal ur shit. And not rape and murder ur whole family for fun. Which it is impossible to know which until it's too late. Hence shoot the motherfucker.

Takeaway is don't break into peoples homes and you won't get shot in the face.

Thanks for this. I am tired of that leaf shill trying to correct the record.....

I hope all you illuminati who see our threads know that there will have to be another civil war if its decided you want our guns that bad......

...

My xbox is worth more than a fucking criminal's life

What's the fucking point?

haha, I don't know

You're right, criminals don't have a right to murder people. But there's a difference between accepting self defense as a last resort, and accepting self defense as an unrestricted right.

I'm not advocating disarmament. I'm fine with people owning firearms, as long as they're trained in proper care and use of them. I'm not alright with people using them on other people indiscriminately. If society is so bad that the idea of turning a firearm on another human being has practical merit, then the society is profoundly sick.

The safest place to be is somewhere else.
And a fire has no right to life - it's not even alive.

Laws don't determine the value of life.

In either case it's always safer to go somewhere else than confront the intruder. Self defense only comes into play when the former is impossible and the latter inevitable.

I'm sorry you feel that way. How many Xboxes is your life worth?

Had a dude in Boot camp.
>From Sierra Leone.
>Black as Night.
>Told stories about walking past bodies in ditches, having to walk all night to safe zones to sleep.
>Guy from Guatemala.
>Dad legally immigrated.
>Command let us attend.
>shows us scars across back, no fingernails.
>got accused of being rebel.
>tortured, oops our bad.
Shit was emotional, watching that dude cry.

>I'm not alright with people using them on other people indiscriminately
Neither are we. We're talking defending one's self and one's family in one's home.

What's it like having a mindset of defending a criminal's actions while at the same time blaming and innocent person for keeping their home and family safe from a most likely violent intruder?

Luckily for us, most gun grabbers are as stupid, and condescending as you. Your arrogant and insulting comments just make us more sure that we were right in the first place.

>Replying to every post

of course it's a fucking leaf

I disagree. Running doesn't stop you being witness. Just means ur shot in the back instead of the head. Fighting back changes the culture. When the loss/gain calculation of robbing a house etc tips far into the loss realm due to the high chance of being shot by the homeowners suddenly the rate of occurrence sees a sharp decline. It becomes like herd immunity with vaccines.

>that's for the police to determine

"So what have we got, Ray?"
"Well Steve, looks like a robbery that turned into a double homicide when the thief discovered the family was home. Must not have wanted witnesses who could testify."
"That's a real shame. What's gonna happen to the kid?"
"We're checking for relatives now."
"So why do you think the homeowner didn't shoot the guy?"
"Well, it appears the father did get the draw, but according to the kid, the thief pretended to surrender, then waited for a moment of weakness to draw. Shot the father dead, killed the mother next. Guess he didn't know the son was there since he was watching from the shadows on the stairwell."
"Jeeeeesus. Wonder what made the dad decide not to shoot the intruder on sight?"
"You know that Bishop case has been in the news lately; must have been afraid of potential criminal charges. Real shame, that."
"No kidding. Now we have two bodies, an orphan, and an unknown homicide suspect, when we could have had an open-and-shut case of self defense against an armed intruder."

And... scene.

This is why castle doctrine exists.

I hate that video. The nerve of those animals to just walk in with a gun like that. Imagine if he hadn't been armed.

Even though he defends himself, the video still angers me because they get away.

>How many Xboxes is your life worth?
It's not about the value of something, it's about a stranger, whose intentions I don't know, coming into my house. That is a threat no matter what, and I will take appropriate action to defend myself against said threat.
I'm not going to politely ask what they are doing or what they want. I'm simply not taking that chance.
I'd rather have a dead criminal on my floor than me or my family harmed in any way.

Leftists always ignore the numerous occurrences of governments slaughtering unarmed people

No matter how much they want to pretend, liberals will never be leftist.

I agree man. We are all one spirit, one energy.

Nameste you raging faggor

yeah but the guy near his door got like 3 shots to the stomach

That's racist.

God dammit I want to punch you in the face. I hope you're trolling and if you aren't im sorry you're such a quer

>mentions criminal
>thinks that's racist

Found the actual racist

He deserved more. The smug look on his face as he goes to the vehicle door needs to be wiped off of his face. Permanently.

GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY COUNTRY REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Day of the rake can't come soon enough

>We're talking defending one's self and one's family in one's home.
We agree that these are important things, we just disagree about how best to do them. And I'm not trying to defend the actions of criminals. They should be arrested, punished, and if possible, rehabilitated so that they never re-offend. I just think there's a difference between keeping your home (an inanimate object) safe and keeping your family safe. They should have different degrees of response.


I apologize if I'm coming off as condescending or arrogant. I'm just trying to share an alternative viewpoint.
I'm also fine with people owning firearms. I think they should be trained in their use first though.


You make a good point. It's sad that crime has gotten to this point in (some parts of) the US. I don't think Canada is there yet.


But given a choice between your family being safe and no one dying, or your family being safe with someone else dead, why would you prefer the latter?


>I hope you're trolling
Just leafing

...

HE SHOULD HAVE SHELTERED IN PLACE AND WAITED FOR THE POLICE TO ARRIVE.

That's not true and you know it. There are a few stories every year where someone goes to prison because it's the Crown's job to make your life hell if you have to defend yourself.
Firing a warning shot is illegal because "why did you even have your gun if you weren't sure of the threat before confronting it"

"Why did you confront the threat at all"

"Why didn't you run out of your home"

"Why was your gun close enough where you could come into possession of it"

Dude, don't bullshit these people here, our laws are fucked and you know it.

YES!!!

>But given a choice between your family being safe and no one dying, or your family being safe with someone else dead, why would you prefer the latter?
The only thing I prefer is my family to be safe. Someone coming into my house at night or whatever has malicious intent. They are a threat and I will neutralize that threat.

I would rather have a dead criminal than a criminal in jail for rape/murder/theft etc. because that means someone innocent (like my family or me) got hurt.
Plus it will save tax money not having to house and trying to rehabilitate them. Honestly, to me, the less criminals the better. Our jails are already overcrowded.

niggers are not people.

just like fucking leafs.

day of the rake when.

Same. Every time I see one of those videos I think of the many times when the whites don't have a gun and the niggers rape/murder them

We don't even have the right to confront an intruded.
If someone breaks into my house, I do not have the right to:
Get my gun
Walk downstairs
Point my gun at the intruder
Demand the intruder get on the ground
Call the police if he complies
or
Shoot him if he charges at me.

I basically have to cross my fingers and hope the cops get here before he makes it into my bedroom, especially when, and the problem faggots like you don't understand is that EVERY SITUATION IS LIFE AND DEATH UNTIL YOU CONFRONT IT.
You do NOT KNOW if the intruder is armed
And if he is, with what?
You do not know if there are more intruders, or accomplices outside waiting to kick the shit out of you.
You do not know ANYTHING.

But it's illegal to confront him / them with a gun in your hand and make a citizen's arrest.

No one's talking about shooting on sight. Not even every state has a shoot on sight law.
But if you *do* need to kill someone, you should be able to.

Suicide is an option you raging bluelip porchmonkey.

>You're right, criminals don't have a right to murder people.
But they do have such right in countries with cucked self defense laws.