Guns are for cowards

As human beings, we are the most intelligent life form on this planet. We are able to think, and come up with intelligent ideas. We have dialogue with each other to discuss problems and come up with solutions.

Then there are Americans. Weak, cowardly people who use guns to solve their problems instead of using intelligence and dialogue. The gun culture in America is absolutely disgusting. Americans use guns for only one thing, to kill other Americans. Do you guys not see the problem? It's crystal clear. Evidence shows that if America put common sense gun laws into place, that firearm violence would go down enormously. Firearms are a thing of the past, no one needs them anymore. The only acception are police and military who NEED them to safely do their job. Ordinary people should be forced to give up their guns because they don't need them.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/aW8sbCTNomE
youtube.com/watch?v=dt6PWuvlNhM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bait...

Big muscley guy is pissed guns make his muscles useless for intimidating people - wants to ban guns because guns keep people polite and he lacks the brains to get away in a polite society.

Henry Rollins may not like guns but he is not averse to the idea of men shooting in his mouth.
Oh... and OP is, for the record, a raging faggot.

...

Go away Leaf Shill!!! By the power of Charleston Heston I abjure thee begone!!

You have no reasonable arguments! We love our very useful guns!

Also if you had any sense you would know no one gives a shit about henry rollins.....

have a you, bait leaf
>Guns are for cowards
i agree, weapons generally are
world would probably be a better place if people would use their fist to carry out "disagreements"
thats not ever going to happen, there will always be someone using arms for their cause

It's no different from knights whinging about how the Dirty Peasants with their arquebii rendered them obsolete.

Henry Rollings is such a douche.

Then give up you guns and your military Canada...

>do it
>no guns for everybody in canada

"Remeber kids, mind bullets > real bullets."

I could never understand how someone so buff could still be such a raging faggot.

...

Day of the rake soon

>The strong don't need guns
Then I guess the US military can turn in its guns and use harsh words to maintain its power.

Canada is a beacon of hope for the mental illness that is America, especially the fairness doctrine in media

>be woman
>get attacked by a large, strong man
>he rapes me
>could've defended myself if I had a gun, but some celebrity cuck told me I'd be a coward if I owned one

T-thanks, Henry.

This quote is so retarted and classic liberal actors with shitty political opinions

>if you disagree with me you're wrong

as an american currently residing in Canada, I can tell you most of you cucks are so brainwashed you don't know whats good for you faggots. It's quite sad actually and makes me angry since there are many wonderful people in Canada but you want to ruin it by letting all the Muslim retards in :) let me tell you, they don't give a shit about you or your country and they literally laugh about rape, litter fucking everywhere and are pedophile losers

Yeah an what about the weak? What are they gonna do when i smash their front door in with me musles?

*sees flag* Didn't read your post. :)

>you're wrong

My .45 disagrees, Rollins.

>Guns are tools of the weak.

God created men, and Sam Colt made them equal.

It should be 'Fewer bullets', not less.

>be liberal
>hate guns
>believe you are a master of diplomacy and that you can solve any conflict with words
>encounter problem you can't solve with diplomacy
>impotently try to talk your enemies out of existence
>doesn't work
>become increasingly frustrated
>doesn't work
>become increasingly frustrated
>doesn't work
>become increasingly frustrated

US has let in 6x as many Muslim refugees as Canada. According to your logic, you are 6x as brainwashed as me.

Low quality bait. Sage.

>I can't see the advantages of a weapon that can put holes in people nearly instantly at a large distance

There's nothing "cowardly" about using any advantage you can get to protect yourself and your family

>You have locks on your door? Fucking coward! The strong don't need locks! Locks are the tools of the weak!
>You have a fire alarm? Fucking coward! The strong don't need alarms! Alarms are the tools of the weak!

Adapting to the world as technology advances doesn't make you "weak", it makes you "not retarded"

When you are a psyker you can stop bullet with your mind.

...

>As human beings, we are the most intelligent life form on this planet. We are able to think, and come up with intelligent ideas. We have dialogue with each other to discuss problems and come up with solutions.

Niggers and mudskins aren't capable of any of that. Only language they listen is one of violence.

Henry Rollins is a fucking pussy faggot.

Leaf how long have you been making these threads, at this point?

Honestly, this. You could turn this against him so easily

>What's the matter, meathead? Don't like the fact that women can use guns to stop your white hetero beefcake ass from raping them? Check your privilege.

sword master race

Guess what I'm a "nigger" so you can fuck off you racist fuck

Yeah but the problem is when 15 niggers gang up on me, no matter how physically fit i am i'm fucked if i have no gun.

The gun is what allowed the west to conquer the world.

Glory to the Emperor!

he's a homosexual, how can i take a man seriously who has had dicks in his mouth? real tough

Its true.

Real men carry swords

Op corrected.

Yeah sorry but I don't wanna be shot by some coward

Tools is the exact reason that separates us from animals

Nah bruh, big muscley guys all have guns. Its the weak effeminate Jewish types who want to ban guns so we can't defend ourselves from packs of roaming niggers.

Jews belong in the gas chambers.

Hes been all over the world and never needed a gun.

Honestly, his anti gun ideas are the only reason I don't like him. Other than that he's pretty BASED
youtu.be/aW8sbCTNomE

Not really a gun issue.

Notice how AAS are outlawed?

Notice how Andro became a similar issue?

Notice how nearly everything contains Soy Lecithin and Soy-based products?

Notice how easily some guys become MTF trans?

Notice how elementary schools don't teach first-order logic, despite the simplicity of the subject?

It has nothing to do with health, dignity, or public safety.

A weak, badly-educated, unarmed public is subject to arbitrary governance.

>Henry Rollins

That guy is fucking retard

>some tatto fuck face
Who is this faggot?

>someone breaks into your home with the idea of robbing everything of value and killing any witnesses
>you're supposed to debate them, not shoot them to defend yourself

Ook ook eek

>tfw too smart to not let my fists do the talking instead of my intellect

guns keep the neanderthals from running the streets. chads watch out

God made men and women. Samuel Colt made them equal.

>said nobody with a bullet hole in them, ever

*BANG* Somebody shot OP in the face for no reason.

OP speaks the truth, we should accept rape sooner than murder.

guns make all men equal. nukes make countries equal

>Guns are tools of the weak
Yeah, NO FUCKING SHIT SHERLOCK. Ever heard the saying "God made man, Colt made them equal"? That's what guns are, the great equalizer. This is why Americans are so crazy about them as a self-defense weapon: it makes a stringy little faggot a credible threat to a musclehorse. That's why they're self defense weapons and that's why all Americans don't just take kung fu classes instead.

The strong don't need weapons, and that's why a society needs weapons: to keep the strong away from the weak.

>i'm strong and can punch
>i have 30 bullets in my kalashnikov
Which one would you rather have in case of a home invasion?

Guns are tools for the WEAK MINDED not physically weak

Nice digits

You know pic related is a joke, right? You can't actually crush threats to your home and livelihood with your mind.

A strong man doesnt need a gun until some limp-wristed fag pulls one on him
A strong man doesnt need a gun until theres a government with an army, decked out with guns, at its disposal to suppress the people
A strong man doesnt need a gun until theres a fucking bear

>day of the eagle when

Guns by essence are for everyone.
The strong minded you think of always have someone to back them up, preferably someone with a gun. You can't stop bullets with rhetoric.

Sure you can, there are literally millions of cases all around the world where home owners were able to talk down home intruders and have a peaceful outcome to the situation. Using a gun and shooting at your problems is for fucking cowards.

Only a nignog trying to steal would want to keep little ol' granny from packing heat.

>lol someone broke into my home Ill just will him away with my mind
>h-hey wait dont take my tv
>oh my god dont shoot

>if you disagree with me, you're wrong
(((TRIGGERED)))

>Guns by essence are for everyone

The unarmed should fear the armed.

How does she keep her shotgun in her grocery bag?

>guns are the tools of the weak
Tell that to the Navy Seals. Go ahead, Rollins. Go tell them.

>Make it voice activated
Ain't nobody fucking with the nugget anymore

You tell them, millions of women being forcibly raped in their own homes while helpless to resist is certainly worth the dream of a better world.

>guns are for the weak
That's the point.

Arms shift the balance of evolutionary selection from the strong to the smart. That's why we have space ships and shit faggot.

So do your fucking duty; go out and get a gun, or sell your space ship and go live in an african mud hut.

It's one of life's greatest mysteries.

I always thought guns are for cowards because it gives power to anyone, even a little child, an old person or a crippled could kill anyone with a gun. They are tools for weaks, they do all the work.

And people find using guns badass, even a hired killer than shoot someone by surprise is somehow badass because it did it in cold blood or something.

It infuriates me when I see someone smug and menacing others while remaining calm only because he's safe on the right side of the weapon.

A shotgun, then I just have to rack the slide and watch as they run away. Best of both worlds I'll tell you what, they leave and I don't have to murder anyone.

>>humans are intelligent, are able to come up with ideas
>Humans come up with an idea to manufacture a complex, intricate machine that is effective in defense and offense
>>No I don't like that, that one doesn't count.

Shut up bluelip porchmonkey

>clearly has a toe

I don't see a problem here

So you have no problem with little kids taking guns to school in their backpack and shooting other little kids.

You sick fuck I hope you enjoy hell

Or for people without an appetite for risk that they did not invite.

You're talking about something subjective, about values. I can, and have, won physical fights. I'm a licensed clinical psychologist and I have deescalation training thanks to working in locked wards so I'm better equipped than almost anyone to talk another person down. The question is: why should I put myself or my family at even negligible risk in order to protect the life of someone who threatening me without provocation? Why should I wait to see if a home invader has a gun or violent intentions? Why should I announce my presence? Why should I give them any opportunity whatsoever to do something violent?

I have a family, I have a mortgage, I have people who depend on me. I'm not going to put that at risk in order to protect the life of someone who cannot abide by so basic a part of the social contract as "don't attack others."

The same is true on the street. Can I win a fight with a mugger? Almost certainly, but why should I chance not winning the fight? Why should I risk an accidental head injury that could end my life or career? Why should I put myself at further risk in order to protect someone who's unprovoked actions are already putting me at risk in the first place?

Why should my wife, who doesn't have the physical size or deescalation training, put herself at greater risk by talking to an intruder or mugger?

Blame the ATF for classifying any fireare he can use as an AOW and restricting it from the market.

>mainstream views
>tough guy statements

Women being physically weaker than man is a sexist myth. Your argument has no substance.

dialog with a burglar:

"hey, we're both human beings. let's talk about this"

"fuck u bitch suck my dick"

>gets raped

we've come so far

I get my opinons from a knockout game tier degenerate who spent his youth assaulting people at bars.

/k/ here

It's good to know you tough guys won't be armed when you try to start your civil war. Have fun telling Tyrone and his friends how much of a pussy they are when they are raping your boipussy with a gun to your head.

Actually being good at shooting in a self-defense scenario is a challenge.

To stay effective at even 10m, you need to practice weekly.

It is an exercise in self-control and concentration. This goes without saying that actual combat is a thousand times more stressful than plinking a target.

Even if you were right, my wife is 5'4" and barely 100 pounds with no fighting experience. She's physically weaker than most people. Why should she put herself at risk when there is a tool which gives her the ability to successfully repel any animal on the continent short of a moose?

>getting dropped by a small piece of metal
>>>strong

Probably bait, but find me one strength-based Olympic competition where women outperform men

This thread confirms that Op truly is a faggot..

this guy's wife is allowed to leave the house unattended

youtube.com/watch?v=dt6PWuvlNhM

I'd argue that a Glock 29 counts as an escort.

Gymnastics/wooden spring horse thing/balance beam

Amanda nunes could take on you and four other burgers at once and beat the shit out of all 5 of you

Less Rollins, more Pantera. The strong don't need Rollins. Rollins is a tool of the weak. This is true. If you disagree with me, it's OK, you're wrong." -- Henry Rollins