It should probably be noted that almost every single major figure in the atheist movement is Jewish...

It should probably be noted that almost every single major figure in the atheist movement is Jewish. You could make a compelling argument that atheism is specifically being pushed by Jews in today's society, and they seem to largely be targeting western Christians and only them.

For example, Sam Harris, Chapman Cohen, David Silverman, Michael Newdow, Gregory Epstein, Sherman Wine, Bill Maher, Eric Kaufmann, and of course, Richard Dawkins's mother has a Jewish surname and was stated to have lived in the only Jewish suburb of the city she grew up in. But he hasn't explicitly named her religion.

But that's only a tiny part of the list. We could discuss the Jewish atheists who aren't pushing atheism so much as atheism-enabling political views like Marxism. For example Soklonikov, Trotsky, Deutscher, Lenin, Uritsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Sverdlov.

And what about atheist Jewish public entertainers that constantly run down Christianity? We can go ahead and recycle Bill Maher here and also include Jon Leibowitz, Stephen Fry, Woody Allen, Rob Reiner, Daniel Radcliffe, Larry David, David Silverman, and... I'm sure I'm close to the post cap, so rather than just name the rest of Hollywood, you get the point.

PURE COINCIDENCE though.

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin.com/9cxmXPCB
ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/buddhist-practice/kalama-sutta.html
psychologytoday.com/blog/psyched/201205/does-autism-lead-atheism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Atheism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

There is no "atheist movement", people just don't believe in magic anymore because doctors perform "miracles" every fucking day.

The single most important figure in Christianity is also supposed to be Judaic. It literally worships Yahweh.

>Jesus
>Jew

This fucking kike....

During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves "Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies a person living in Texas.

In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as "Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees". "Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.

Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".

It's literally a Judaic religion stemming from Abraham.

On the on hand you have Roman Paganism, on the other Christianity. Which one has more Judaism in it?

>muh jooz
pastebin.com/9cxmXPCB

Or how about this:

>Kalam Cosmological Argument
>Anthropic Principle
>no evidence for multiverses
>Miracles
>Fulfilled predictions in the scriptures

>implying that nothing can explode
Which violates the Laws of Conservation of Mass and Energy; Quantum physics cannot explain the creation of matter from nothing

>implying that sentient, complex life can evolve from algae/bacteria (or that life can come from a lack of life)

Let's face it; Atheism is so 2006. It's been kicked to the curb by everyone.

Atheists just can't get over the fact that they lost the culture war.

Let me take you under 18s back to the year of 2006:
>atheism on the rise on the internet with their voices getting more heard everyday
>atheist leaders like Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens are respected voices in the community
>r/atheism is one of the top boards on bleddit
>corporate stores trying to push things like "Happy Holidays" and having "Holiday Trees"

Cut to today:
>Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchen (may he RIP) viewed as complete psychos for their insane political/social views
>r/atheism moved to the basement of bleddit because it was embarrassing euphoric garbage
>things like "Reason Rally" draw less than a Hitler impersonator at a bar mitvah
>atheist communities tear themselves apart over things like elevator gate (giving rise to New Atheism, and Atheism+, which are less successful than just regular Atheism)
>constant rape and sexual assault allegations at atheist conventions (even atheist leaders like Lawrence Krauss are accused...by other atheist leaders)
>"Happy Holidays" and "Holiday Trees" are a distant memory
>liberal atheists in Britain crushed by Brexit

And quite frankly all this bad stuff wasn't even needed. All it would have took was one euphoric quote and a couple of fedora pictures. Christianity is still kicking 2000 years later, and atheism is at it knees because of a jpeg of a fat guy in a fedora. Sad

Atheists just don't care what you have to say. They don't believe in magic, you can't prove shit, take your cult peddling elsewhere.

Jews are behind the Athiest movement just like they are behind everything anti-white christian male. Been like this for over 100 years, are you just waking up?

Atheists literally believe the atheism fairy exploded everything into nothing for no reason and had it magically form sentient life.

No they don't. They just don't believe your Judaic deity did it. Everything else is theory and conjecture under current research.

You're forgetting the evidence and scholars that support the story of Jesus

>His birth
>His teachings
>His followers
>His baptism
>His arrest
>His death

All without a doubt happened as the Bible states.

That all means that the multiple prophecies written (according to historical scholars) centuries before Christ was born all happen to be correct on the time, place, and person.

>let me guess: lucky guesses ayyylmao

Jesus was a Stoic philosopher that your Judaic religion co-opted to shove fairytales down Europe's throat. Your Yahweh worship disgraces him.

Bait thread. Studying natural sciences and/or mathematics is the path to true enlightenment. These subjects create a more powerful mind, which is what jews, christians, and muslims fear the most. Studying these subjects will more likely than not make people question themselves and their beliefs. I am non religious, the most profound of redpills, leaning heavily toward atheism. When you allow true knowledge to unlock in your mind, then you will understand.

Tldr: read a real fucking book. Try some advanced mathematics.

>Studying natural sciences and/or mathematics is the path to true enlightenment.
Good man. Atheism is the simple lack of belief in a deity. Agnostics are atheists for that reason.

After you have rejected the belief that you 'know definitely of a deity', you can begin to research how things really work without prejudice.

Newsflash athiestfags, Jesus wasn't a Jew he grew up in Gallilee "The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim, by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles"
>Lean Mcadoo should be my girlfriend.

In your religion, he is said to be the prophet of the Judaic deity Yahweh. You cannot avoid the Judaism you espouse. You fight sects of your own belief. Perpetual schismatic warfare.

>Yahweh
Show me where it says "Yahweh" or "Yeshua" in the bible. He calls the Jews the seed of Satan. You have been heavilly Jewd son.

>Show me where it says
The Old Testament.

Because being an atheist is being intelligent.

Now I wonder which people are known for being intelligent?

My response to this is:

Thomas fucking Aquinas

I know he's a priest, but he said something along the lines of (And in paraphrasing here) "Use science to understand the nature of the world and use religion to understand the nature of God."

>where
Ok faggot the correct answer is nowhere in the bible.

The Aristotle plagiarist? How about we just use science since there is no Judaic deity.

Oh I see since he's considered to be second only to Aristotle he's a plagiarist

The correct answer is everywhere in the Bible. Next thing you'll tell me is that the deity referred to is actually Zeus or Amaterasu. Get back to your Abraham and Moses supplications.

Nah, it's because he verbatim copied the prime mover argument and tacked on Yahweh at the end. Still can't prove a damn thing, so science wins again.

That is completely not true

>advanced maths can disprove God

Oh the fedora on you...

It's well accepted by modern Christians that God caused the Big Bang. It was first devised by Catholic Priest and Physcist George's Lemitre you understand.

Fedoras of the day hated the idea, because it points to the idea of a creator. All the cool atheists back then thought the universe was eternal. They had maths 'proving' it and everything. But then they realised LeMotre was right, and have spent the last 50 years trying to show how a Big Bang can happen without a creator. They gave up in the end as said 'well it's impossible to know how it happened, but we know what happened 0.0000002 seconds AFTER, so obviously it doesn't matter how it happened'

Can you see the irony?

>I have never read the opening paragraph of Matthew

Jewish Hatred and Murder Attempts on the Life of Jesus Christ:

Matthew 2:16 - As a child Herod tried to kill Him.
Matthew 12:14, Mark 3:6 - Pharisees held a council with the Herodians to discuss destroying Jesus because He healed a man on the Sabbath day.
Luke 4:28-30 - Attempted to throw Him off the hill because of His sermon.
John 5:16 - The Jews persecuted Jesus and sought to kill Him for healing the impotent man on the Sabbath day.
John 5:18 - Jews sought to kill Jesus because He claimed equality with God.
John 7:30-32 - The Jewish plot to arrest Jesus with intent to kill Him for claiming He was from God.
John 7:25 - It was common knowledge that the Jews sought to kill Jesus.
John 7:40-44 - Some people desired to arrest Jesus with intent to kill Him.
John 8:59 - Jews attempted to kill Jesus by stoning Him for claiming that He was God.
John 10:31 - The Jews again attempt to kill Jesus by stoning for claiming His Deity.
John 10:39 - The Jews sought to take Jesus for proving His Deity.
John 11:47 - The chief priests and Pharisees plot against Jesus.
John 11:53-54 - The Jews make a determined effort to kill Jesus.
John 11:55-57 - The Jews sought Jesus even at the Passover Feast.
John 12:9-11 - The Jews even desire to kill Lazarus because of their hatred for Jesus.
John 18:3, 10, 12 - Jesus was arrested by Jewish soldiers.
John 18:13-14 - Jesus was tried by Jewish leaders who had already decided on his guilt.
John 18:36 - Jesus acknowledges that it was the Jews who would kill Him.
John 18:38-40, 19:1-7, 12-15 - The Jews are adamant in their desire to kill Jesus.
John 19:11 - Jesus acknowledges a lesser and a greater sin in those who condemned Him to death.
John 19:16-18 - The Jews led Jesus away to be crucified.

>he thinks life is Science Vs Religion

You're either 14 or autistic

There is no reason to believe in religion in the face of the newly revealed truth of science. It is a handicap not an aid. We could have done so much more with science all along.

If you don't like Judaism so much, what's The Old Testament about? Why aren't you following Jupiter and the Roman Mos Maiorum?

But the fact is that there is no Judaic deity, that's why prayer doesn't work as claimed. What is said about the deity has been proven false by that alone.

Thus it's simple, you don't know what caused the universe, nor do you know if it isn't cyclical. Science doesn't have to disprove your false certainty, science has its own theories and research.

>only looks at the top-tier atheists
>pretends this means most atheists are jews
Jews are more successful than goyim at everything. This includes some things you personally dislike. Get over it, bong.

You don't seem to understand, Science shows us HOW God does something, but not WHY.

You can't prove or disprove God with science simply because you can't physically measure the metaphysical. You can try, but it makes you look autistic. You might as well claim that as you can't find a molecule of mercy that mercy doesn't exist. You can't grind everything up and find an atom of justice, but you know justice exists and changes the way people act. Silly fedora.

The problem with that argument is that no natural laws can explain the existence of anything. There is no cause for a beginning or the organization thereafter.

If there is a beginning there has to be a cause. We know there was a beginning. We also know that nothing creates nothing. So why is there anything at all?

Not only does the universe exist but it is finely tuned for our existence.

The multiverse and computer simulation theories exist to explain away this paradox. They are based on zero facts. There is no evidence that supports these theories.

Occam's razor would suggest it was created by intelligence that exists outside of time.

>You can't prove or disprove X with science simply because you can't physically measure the metaphysical.
>You might as well claim that as you can't find a molecule of X that X doesn't exist.
>Silly fedora.
Insert any made up X of abstract nature.

>You can't prove or disprove
The Judaic deity has been disproven by the Null Hypothesis. All that is unproven is untrue until proven.

It's basic scientific philosophy not to believe in fairytales that supposedly "explain the universe" without reproducible evidence.
Fact is, an omnipotent creator wouldn't NEED the big bang, which no "prophet" knew about in the first place.

>All that is unproven is untrue until proven
That's patently false and ridiculous. By this logic, the theory of relativity was false until it was "proven" (not that anything can be proven in the strong sense about the natural world) and then the universe magically transformed to accommodate this change.

That is ridiculous fairytale reasoning. Smash a brick with a hammer and say you designed each piece.

Science admits to not knowing, thus it is humble and curious, and through such virtue does it research the truth alone. All else is hubris and solipsism. You don't know yet pretend to. Science finds out where you stagnate in false certainty.

>By this logic, the theory of relativity was false until it was "proven"
The theory of relativity was false until evidence demonstrated its accuracy.

If its formulas didn't work, it would have remained false.

You say a rock is on the table, it is false until the rock is in evidence. Basic skepticism, my indoctrinated man.

>science admits to not knowing!
>it is humble and curious
>but let me tell you about my totally scientific opinion that god doesn't exist
I hope you can see the problem here.

Yes, you are the arrogant one to presume you know of an omnipotent deity that controls all our lives.

...

...

>The theory of relativity was false until evidence demonstrated its accuracy.
>it is false that the universe did abide by the laws described in the theory of relativity before "enough" evidence (to my liking) has accumulated
So where did this evidence come from if the theory of relativity was false and the universe did not operate in the ways it describes? I can't believe I am talking to someone this blatantly stupid...

...

...

it says in the bible that lean mcadoo is a coalburner

The universe operates as it does without any human theory.

Human theories are considered false until proven true, like guilty until proven innocent. That is how our modern society survives.

>you are the arrogant one to presume
>he then presumes that i presume to know of an omnipotent deity that controls all our lives
You are a prime example of why atheists are a hated bunch.

>WORLD FAMOUS MEN of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosopy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish “TALMUD” which is the “bible” of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christan Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the “NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN” of February 3, 1949.)

...

>You are a prime example of why atheists are a hated bunch.
You hate and persecute all unbelievers. Yet their truth is superior in ability to your pleas at the sky.

Atheism predates your religion. Reason predates your religion. And from it comes all material good without exception.

I can understand if people don't want to believe in God
But I hate being attacked or shamed these days, being called an idiot etc because I believe in him, while they let Islam and others off scott free

...

arabs are animals though. they aren't conscious and they cant help it

>human theories are considered false until proven true
First of all, that's an entirely different statement from "human theories are false until proven true". Any statement I can come up with about the universe is either true or false regardless of any evidence. I just don't know which one it is. If you were to dream up some theory about the universe and fail to provide any evidence, it would be rational for me to disregard your theory, but if it turned out to be right in the end while I claimed it was false, I will obviously have been wrong. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp?

>while they let Islam and others off scott free
As if Islam receives any better treatment.

All men have the right to preach their ways to the world, with freedom of religion, and freedom of speech. Your religion does all the same, except it always plays the victim, afraid of criticism.

>he unironically makes more presumptions about me
>after claiming that presumptuousness is arrogant
>and being called on it once

>is either true or false regardless of any evidence
Not regardless of the evidence. It is only because of the universal evidence that any theory may be true.

You can imagine and claim anything you want, it will never be true without evidence. And thus without evidence, you shall not ever be believed. Thus we are freed from deception, our chains unbound, to live at peace with the universe through physical understanding.

Fucking christfags always forget their cucklord is literally called the fucking "King of the Jews" If he's your king, what does that make you??

>fairy tales

Look out boys we got a live one here

There is only fear of death. We are conditioned to manage the terror of what only humans know is true. Death is inevitable.

All you need do is prove your deity exists. And that all the trillions of dollars shoveled into golden idols and fancy dances thus isn't wasteful parasitism.

>All you need do is prove your deity exists

New Teatament is eye witness account of God's time on earth. There you go. If you choose not to believe that then you're literally fooling yourself.

>relativity is false until evidence is provided
>therefore the laws of relativity are false until evidence is provided
>therefore the laws of relativity do not accurately describe the operation of the universe until evidence is provided
>therefore the universe operates in the way that is inconsistent with the the laws of relativity until evidence is provided
>therefore it is inherently impossible to collect evidence for relativity, since the universe doesn't work that way
>and yet relativity is true because there's evidence for it
>this is what atheists actually believe
You are either mentally retarded or a troll.

>New Teatament is eye witness account
And Naruto is an eye witness account of feudal Japan. We just lost all those ninja powers due to human immorality.

Sorry, but your fictional books are irrelevant. You can't prove a damn thing in the present, that's why your religion is irrelevant to the human good. Science cures the sick and feeds the hungry, not you.

> there is no "atheist movement"

Then what's up with the army of atheist disciples and proselytizers on YouTube? Face it man, the atheist community is now every bit as religious in their lack of belief as any theologian is in their belief.

>are more successful
really?
which jew invented the light bulb?
which jew flew the first heavier that air plane?
which jew started the New York Times?
jews started to really insert themselves in the Upper Echelons only after WWII.
and that's just when Western Art, Culture, Business and Intellect began to go DOWNHILL

I expect insults and ignorance from the religious; I try to help them see the beauty and freedom of science nonetheless.

It's just how theories work:

"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s really true. Then we compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare the computation results to nature, or we say compare to experiment or experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works.

If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it." -Feynman

Theories are wrong until the evidence agrees with them. I only hope schools have better scientific education in the future, to avoid such misunderstanding.

There is plenty of supporting evidence. The fact Christ fulfilled several prophecies is one, more recently you can look at miracles happening to this day, such as the Miracle of the Sun, or Sister Marie Simon-Pierre being cured of incurable Parkinson's disease.

Tell me, what eveidence do you have showing how the atheism fairy exploded nothing into everything for no reason.

>Science cures the sick and feeds the hungry, not you.

Yeah sorry but atheism and starvation go hand in hand fedora.

Are you an actual fedora or just a very good troll?

Not an argument. I've given you a logical proof by contradiction that clearly shows you to be wrong. So far you have not shown any fault with it so it stands. You're either a troll or a retard. I rest my case.

It's certainly convenient for you to put a fedora-wearing face to your foes so you can demonize them.
Perhaps you should start with the atheist Gautama Buddha:
ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/buddhist-practice/kalama-sutta.html

>There is plenty of supporting evidence.
If there were, you'd be able to in the present show your prayers and rituals working. The fact that they don't proves your scripture wrong.

You can cite your own revisions of history and cherry-picked vagaries all you want. You can't do a damn sight of physical proof. Your own books are nothing to that, like math book with the wrong formulae.

>I've given you a logical proof by contradiction
That you actually believe that is your own flaw in reasoning. You still stand unable to contend with basic skepticism.

>or just a very good troll
I'll take the complement. But these people are indoctrinated cultists. They've had their ability to reason logically removed, so they must appeal to unseen forces.

I see you're citing a bunch of people raised to be religious that only later claimed to be atheists. Stalin was priest.

A good trick for you to craft for the people of Earth though, false-flag attacks like that.

>cherrypicks a tiny number of inventions
>makes some random angry assertion
>fails to back it up with evidence

But your logically saying there is no God with no way to prove it. How is that logical?

>Hurr well they can't prove it

That doesn't make your position more logical, you realise.

I think you think you're much cleverer than you actually are...

>repeatedly fails to address the argument
>if you still believe that your argument is valid despite my utter inability to show that it isn't, your reasoning is clearly flawed!
Troll or retard? Which one is it?

>That doesn't make your position more logical, you realise.
But it does. Skepticism guards us from the deception of charlatans. No claim is accepted as true without proof.

If it cannot be proven, it cannot be true, and thus shall not be acted upon.

When you realize this, you'll see the genesis of all religious wars in the irrationality of their followers.

We're at the stage in the argument where you ignore the proof that you're wrong to try to claim the same of me.

While you do that, think about all the money and energy used on religion that isn't used on cancer research.

>you ignore my self-contradictory assertions
>ignore them by proving them wrong
>therefore i can ignore your step-by-step logical proof that they're wrong
>so i win the debate
The trolling is just too obvious at this point. Nobody can be this stupid. 5/8

You only believe they're self-contradiction because you don't know basic skepticism.

It is the foundation of innocent until proven guilty. Did he not commit the crime before he was proven guilty of it? He did, but shall not be considered so without proof.

Hence nothing is considered true without proof that it is. And since there's no consistent demonstration of a deity, there is no deity considered real.

So it's true then

psychologytoday.com/blog/psyched/201205/does-autism-lead-atheism

>still fails to address the logical proof of him being wrong
>muh innocent until proven guilty
The defendant either has or has not committed a crime, regardless of the evidence presented before the court. If I get away with murder due to lack of evidence, it does not render false the statement that I'm a murderer. The fact that you rather let a criminal go free than punish an innocent man doesn't change the truth value of the statement.

So tell me, because you don't seem to understand it, do you believe everything you are told without proof? Why don't you believe in Zeus, if you don't?

Simple epistemology, if you don't have proof, you can't rightly claim it's true.

You're just arguing your own ignorance of the scientific method to presume truth can arrive certainly in the human brain without the logical chain of empiricism.
The fact remains, you may imagine or claim whatever you want, you can NEVER call it "true" without evidence. See: 'Solipsism' while you're at it.
So while Russel's Teapot could exist in theory, even that possibility is based upon the evidence of other teapots.
It still shall never be considered to exists without proof that it does though. Without proof, for all intents and purposes, it does not exist.

One day, empirical philosophy will be included more in education.

bullshit there is no atheist movement

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Atheism

You seem to be under the impression that science and religion are two opposing forces. They're not.

Are you autistic?

Pure coidcidence that Bolsheviks who killed Millions of Christians were mostly atheist Jews?

None,because they are both anti Jewish.

Liberalism and Atheism has most Judaism in it

Please, more insults, they are certainly helping your case.

Science is a superior description of the universe in every way. It is proven through human capability upon it. Knowing that, religion is naught but the chains of arrogant myth upon the human mind.

Freedom, true freedom, comes with the loss of prejudices that lack evidence.

Yes, many movements have "Atheism" in the name. The basic concept itself predates them all, as one may see in Carvaka Hinduism.

Atheism is just a-the-ism, a lack of theism, a lack of deities.

It doesn't matter who is behind it, you merely have to go after how they spread their ideology to our children.

That is Hollywood, schools, and the media.

Fix those, fix the problem.

>Atheism has most Judaism in it
How can you possibly believe that?

Why don't you recognize that as the obvious trick of your Judaic religion to defend itself?

>do you believe everything you are told without proof? Why don't you believe in Zeus, if you don't?
Do we really need to go through this again? The truth value of any statement about the nature of the universe has been set long before anyone capable of collecting evidence even existed. It doesn't matter what I believe in. There are things such that it would be irrational for me to believe in them at the moment that are nonetheless true, and there are things such that it is rational for me to believe in at the moment that can nonetheless turn out to be false when new evidence is uncovered.

>if you don't have proof, you can't rightly claim it's true
That's correct, and you just shot down everything except for pure mathematics. None of this is relevant, however. A theory is either true or false regardless of whether you can rightly claim it or not.

>You're just arguing your own ignorance of the scientific method
We're not talking about the scientific method. We're talking about your statement that "every theory is false until proven true", which is self-contradictory for reasons I've outlined in detail in my proof above.

French revolution where modern atheism/Anti-God started was work of the Jews and Masons.

Christianity started as Anti-thesis of Judaism so it was quite the opposite.

Because most Jews are atheists?? Because most atheist leaders here in past were Jewish?

There are Orthodox Jews but even they don't believe in hell.

God exists

Spritualoty is important

Christianity and atheism are both manipulative belief systems

>and you just shot down everything except for pure mathematics
But this is why you just aren't well understanding of scientific philosophy. You're being arrogant about your own ignorance, something religion encourages.

No theory can be true without proof, since without proof you can never know it to be true, and thus it cannot be true in human understanding.
'Proof' colloquially means 'evidence in support of'. A man proven guilty in court cannot disprove the contention that powerful aliens framed him. Yet the evidence stands.

It's a very simple understanding of empiricism that leads one to know that belief in a deity is false, since there is no supporting evidence which exclusively concludes that. End of story really.

That's why the Null Hypothesis disproves divinity, along with everything else not yet proven. They have no physical evidence, and are therefore irrelevant. See Feynman's description of the scientific process above.

>as Anti-thesis of Judaism
You worship the Judaic deity, not any deity of your ancestors. It's an obvious trick.

If everyone were atheists, there would be no Judaism. If everyone was an atheist from the beginning of time, Judaism would never exist. Thus your claim is false.

>most jews are atheist

literally makes zero sense

Atheists are level zero Satanists. Jews love hogging up anything that's free, even souls for Satan.