What does Sup Forums have against Marxism?

What does Sup Forums have against Marxism?

Zizek was pro-Trump

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=b4vHSiotAFA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Zizek was pro-Trump

Americans had two choices, it doesn't say much about their opinions.

He was pro-Trump for a very different reason than most Sup Forumsacks.

>Zizek
literally who?

nice meme

>Trumptards are pro-Trump cuz he gonna save us
>Zizek pro-Trump cause he's gonna fuck your shit up

wew lad, final showdown!

/lit/ meme

>Zizek was pro-Trump

because he wants "acceleration"

still a coke addicted gommie bastard but every once in a while he has a good thought

accelerationism.exe

why does Sup Forums hate Marxism though?

Thanks guys!

Glad we all can agree that the UN resolution on Israel was a good thing, and they had it coming.

Zizek is *sniff* a Hegelian *sniff*,
But really *handwave*
Zizek is a Lacanian.

why does Sup Forums hate Marxism though?

I enjoy individuality, wealth, and being unashamed about personal achievement. Also, race exists and is important in defining the physical and mental characteristics of an individual.

Who was this trampy looking faggot agian?

no he's a Sup Forumsack at heat, he wanted a massive happening he wanted the day of the porker rather than day of the rope

Hate? Its just irrelevant. You cannot have a revolution in the first world, and Marx predicted capitalism would evolve into communism anyway. So what exactly does being a 'marxist' entail and why does it seem to have so much crossover with anti-fa/internationalists, even when Marx himself didn't think all nations would be able to communism?

And scho on

I listened to him quite a while before I learned he was Marxist.

He's a crypto-marxist, but mostly I think he's a windbag that wants you to listen to him spit and drool at you.

Because Sup Forums knows jack-shit about Marxism.

You think, ok, what's he on about, and he makes you listen to him suck up a gallon of saliva waiting for him to make a point.

Noam Chomsky does this too, but with less liquid.

I know enough to know that it should be destroyed, along with it's followers, if we in the west want to survive as a people and culture.

Chomsky doesn't like him

Memezek is an accelerationist

It's so disappointing to find the thing you were waiting for him to communicate was Marxism.

I want to shoot the TV.

>Because Sup Forums knows jack-shit about Marxism.

You dont need to know everything about cancer to understand that you dont want to have it.

Ok, but Chomsky is the same sort of windbag.

No he wasnt

Yeah

Who is less windbag-tier? I've listened to talks from both, never dived in deep though because I'm either too dumb to get through all the content, or it's just so fucking self-indulgent I just give up

They both have a lot to offer in terms of perspectives

youtube.com/watch?v=b4vHSiotAFA

Eh, whatever

They need to be summarized cut up and clipped together. They will probably hate it, but fuck em. My time is too valuable.

Not actually knowing what a thing is, and yet being opposed to it, is a fucking textbook example of brainwashing. Normally I'd consider it laziness but when it gets to something as large-scale as Marx, especially given the general mindset towards Socialism and Communism.

You're outright admitting you don't know what something is, and you hate it anyway. Nothing good can ever come from that mindset in life.

Sup Forums and basically al the anglo-saxon wave are so much triggered about marxism they can't deal with it. It's Pavlovian.

They can't admit that marxism doesn't actually mean nothing. It changes all the time, it's moving with the economic situation of "today".

That's the reason Marxists could easily vote for Trump, because of re-localisation and real devellopment like construction and industrial. Which is obviusly good for low class and specially middle classes. All the fucking poor (obviusly the blacks of the getto) are excluded. They are dangerous class, reserve army of capitalism. That's the reason they are protected by the trans-national capitalism, not the national capitalism.