"Intolerant of intolerance"

One of the most parroted phrases of the left is that it is morally right to be intolerant of the intolerant. This is the mindset that gives them their justification for being hostile to anyone on the right with vitriol and violence. The flaw with this thinking is not the phrase itself but how they apply it. This essay by a leftist goes over it very well: slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/30/i-can-tolerate-anything-except-the-outgroup/

>It seems to me that you only pardon the sins that you don’t really think sinful. You only forgive criminals when they commit what you don’t regard as crimes, but rather as conventions. You forgive a conventional duel just as you forgive a conventional divorce. You forgive because there isn’t anything to be forgiven.

>If I had to define “tolerance” it would be something like “respect and kindness toward members of an outgroup”.And today we have an almost unprecedented situation.We have a lot of people boasting of being able to tolerate everyone from every outgroup they can imagine, loving the outgroup, writing long paeans to how great the outgroup is, staying up at night fretting that somebody else might not like the outgroup enough.

>So what makes an outgroup? Proximity plus small differences. If you want to know who someone in former Yugoslavia hates, don’t look at the Indonesians or the Zulus or the Tibetans or anyone else distant and exotic. Find the Yugoslavian ethnicity that lives closely intermingled with them and is most conspicuously similar to them, and chances are you’ll find the one who they have eight hundred years of seething hatred toward.

So when ever a leftist tries to give themselves the moral high ground of claiming themselves tolerant to do not let them take it. The person that thinks there is nothing wrong with being homosexual is not tolerant, the person who does see the wrong in it but does not act wrongfully against them is the tolerant one.

thats a nice pic

That car is either massive or she is fucking tiny.

There is a bulge in the crotch area.

Could be a puffy vulva

I dont care either way.

>One of the most parroted phrases of the left is that it is morally right to be intolerant of the intolerant.

I am intolerant of the intolerance of intolerance because it is another form of intolerance.

Will not work as an argument against a leftist. You have to show how they are not actually tolerant. Liking diversity and the other things they parrot are not tolerance because it is part of their ingroup. Read the essay

As if they will accept any argument at all.

it is morally right to be intolerant of the intolerant and there are no bigger intolerant fuckers than kikes, christkikes and hadjikikes

>she

True

Yeah, I was going to say something like this.
One should indeed not be respectful or kind to an outgrou that does not respect you and is not kind to you. It is good to be intolerant of intolerance.

These intolerant incompatible groups need to be kept out of proximity as much as possible.

And those intolerant of this point of view who wrongly think me intolerant, well I am intolerant of their intolerance too.

you stupid kike

Christianity has been infiltrated and subverted just like everything else European.

you stupid christkike

Atheism is even more Jewish than subverted Christianity mate. What do you suggest Pagan LARPing?

you stupid cunt

All females have a bulge. Go fuck a human female once and you will understand.

Way I try to make them see tolerance is:

You don't tolerate something you are indifferent to, curious about, or somewhat like. You tolerate something you are not a fan of or actively dislike because not tolerating it will cause you more trouble than it is worth or he who is without sin cast the first stone. The west didn't tolerate other western ethnic groups or different Christian sects because they liked them, they tolerated them because we were so fucking exhausted with sectarianism and strife that it was better in the long term to just begrudgingly accept them. Colonists up in the north didn't necessarily like the catholics in Virginia or the quakers in Pennsylvania or the whatever. They just tolerated them.

It's fucking easy as shit to tolerate something that doesn't bother you at all or that you like. You don't tolerate ice cream or puppies.

When something reaches the point where tolerance is more onerous and heavy than not tolerating it (whether intolerance takes the form of civil disobedience, discrimination, bigotry or straight up armed violence varies) then you cease to be tolerant.

...

why aren't you a nazi?
because you're a kike

Fascism had it's time and it failed. We need to take what we can from it but not wholesale try to copy it.

you are so stupid
fascism isn't nazism
and you have no say in nazism
you're just a jew-worshipping retard

You are the stupid one. The Nazi party was Germany's form of fascism. Mosley's party was fascism, Mussolini was fascist, and Hitler was fascist. They were not identical as different nations should not have identical rules, but they were all in the same vein.

so you are a nazi now? then why do you worship a jew instead of hitler? why do you place the filthy dirty kike jesus above hitler?

Nazism worked - it only lost after it was forced into a war by the allies. and even then, this one nation held off the armies of 5 nations for an incredible amount of time.

I'm not an idiot LARPer like you.

>fascists regularly talk about exterminating socialists and minorities
>islamists regularly talk about exterminating infidels and gay people
>have precedent that they will carry out these threats
>just be tolerant of the people that will murder you if they get the chance :^)
No. I will not do these things. I do not want to see people come here who want to toss gays off buildings, I don't want to see shari'a patrols, fascist marches. I want to see them on fire.

so you are a "real nazi" and i am not? how will you prove this?

This is a good article. More leftists should read this.

There are no real nazis. Also only idiot LARPers call themselves Nazis, someone that was serious would call themselves Nat-soc.

The left only hates white people who are traditional.

They hate no other group and will excuse even the most awful of crimes done by such a group.

Their actions don't make sense until you realize that in their minds, White = Bad, Male = Bad, Anything Not White Or Male = Good.

Do not show mercy on them or treat them with kindness. They will only see it as weakness to be exploited.

It is my opinion that they have forfeited their right to life by persisting in their hatred of everything white and male.

Big balls are what I see.

>There are no real nazis.
yes there is: me
>Also only idiot LARPers call themselves Nazis, someone that was serious would call themselves Nat-soc.
the nazis weren't nazis?
you are nowhere near a nazi
you're just a kike-worshipping dirty jew
you're a filthy kike

another get wasted by a fucking leaf

I bet you think anne frank actually wrote a diary too lmao

>leaf doesnt know what a national socialist is

Yes. If you read the essay it explains why white males are their outgroup.

The Germans spoke German. Speak English and call yourself a national socialist or you are just an edgy LARPer

the germans also breathed oxygen and drank water. So do I. checkmate, leaf.

Virgin

fuck off you stupid filthy kike

They're just intolerant of the white.
Muslims and blacks can be as intolerant as they want to be, they don't care.

>tripfag can't into arguments
Unsurprising

Look how mad this fedora tipper is that he got blown out by a leaf. Genuinely pathetic.

I agree there is something very suspicious going on.

it's too puffy