About to start my "diversity in society" class in uni. It's a required credit and it's probably going to be pointless...

About to start my "diversity in society" class in uni. It's a required credit and it's probably going to be pointless. I don't want to hide my Sup Forums beliefs, but I also don't want to come off as a nazi to my classmates. What should I do?

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/url?q=http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0pYKLcYy82EAIlMkgtskGOcn6ERg&nossl=1&oi=scholarr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_t--Uo7jRAhUGOyYKHb3uCmEQgAMIGSgAMAA&usg=AFQjCNFmSIwgmLBuZBMvxXGUJkkydfai7Q
youtube.com/watch?v=mkPe1wF_37A
youtu.be/dSP_n_BIe0w
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Start small and slow. Innocuous little questions that point out hypocrisy help a lot. Asking WHY also helps.

Phrase all your points as questions.

Do yourself a favor, and NEVER talk, ever.

Came to say this. You start with the small "why's" and soon enough you're asking "WHY" is equality important and other such fundamental questions and it'll seem more natural

Educate yourself and come prepared to argue. Be prepared to receive hate, insults, maybe even physical attack.

You must not respond in kind, however, show restraint and take the high road, while providing facts.

This, don't hang yourself for no reason. At most, poke light fun here and there at the most absurd shit to relieve tension, otherwise SHUT UP.

>What should I do?

Come off as a Nazi, it's OK.

Don't worry, daddy will protect you.

You should learn what the Socratic method is.
The guys have the right idea - you ask your opponent questions while not presenting an argument. Given time (a couple minutes if you know what questions to ask) youll will have them showing their cognitive dissonance.

The only way you can change peoples minds is to make them come to their "own" conclusions

You should follow this advice, and have this lead up to the point where you present Robert Putnam's diversity research to the class:


google.com/url?q=http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0pYKLcYy82EAIlMkgtskGOcn6ERg&nossl=1&oi=scholarr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_t--Uo7jRAhUGOyYKHb3uCmEQgAMIGSgAMAA&usg=AFQjCNFmSIwgmLBuZBMvxXGUJkkydfai7Q

In which it's empirically demonstrated that diversity is a net loss for a society.

That's not how it works in college buddy. Anyone questioning the party line get stares.

where the fuck do you go to college?

>stares
the humanity

Take it but keep a closed mind about it all.

>God-forbid, you actually LEARN something.

Have in mind it is the colleges where this whole shitshow on race began, and you're likely to learn something useful as much as your teacher is likely to radicalize you into hating yourself and a scapegoat race.

In short, don't let the get under your skin, and remember we're fighting for REAL equality, not some double-faced, disguised racism.

...

Pretend to be as radical as possible and advocate revoking human rights for white male invaders, record the conversations and redpill people on YT

Power through the stares OP. Keep asking questions, their almonds will fizzle eventually with your words

Ask why. Anytime you disagree or notice a hypocrisy, don't say they're wrong, ask their opinion about it. They'll end up tying themselves in loops, and it will be less confrontational.

Honestly to avoid looking like a total autist ask lots of 'why' questions and if it gets awkward just say you like to play devils advocate. That way you can ask all the questions you like however this doesn't work if you turn up citing anti-diversity studies from memory.

It's exactly how I did it at University, how I do it at work and how I do it in social groups. I've subtly managed to red pilled more than 50% of the people I have regular contact with.

I understand your point, but it does work, especially when it's being presented as the explicit topic of discussion (as per OPs circumstances).

Keep drawing attention to the fact that Europeans have lived under diverse confederations for millennia. Do this early on and restate it wherever it fits in casually.

This is essentially "agree and amplify" on an issue we're supposed to misunderstand. It sets up the premise that we have an informed, educated rejection of (((diversity))) as Marxists view it because their version villifies and marginalizes Europeans, the people it just so turns out happen to be the best equipped to shepherd non-europeans into the concept of diversity.

Your AmRen/TRS/Stormie types might discourage this but I say why not have some fun attempting to rehtorically put white men at the top of the Progressive Stack. Turn that classroom on its ear, playfully. Just turn in A grade blue-pilled course work they want to see form you and don't get kicked out. Be socratic and good-humored.

>Keep drawing attention to the fact that Europeans have lived under diverse confederations for millennia. Do this early on and restate it wherever it fits in casually.

Can you explain this point to me ?

>Go to class
>grab the teacher by the pussy.

Europe IS diverse.

Germanic tribal confederations were predicated by Roman ventures across the Rhine. From the Lusitani of modern day Portugal to the Cherusci of on the other end of the continent; from the Varangians of the Modern Baltics and Russia to the Corsicans down by the tip of the boot Europeans of contrasting cultures have been co-existing alongside one another for two thousand years.

We practically invented diversity and confederation and we're expected to constantly justify ourselves to shitty people who are not even 100 years into the concept.

There is also a subtext to this rhetoric which serves to illustrate the premise that whites thrive under any system, while non-whites ruin any white system.

> - why do I need this diversity thing again?
> - herp derp its 2017
> - wow thats a nonargument

Works with every other discipline too.
So if they want to switch point to some shit like "herp derp physics", let them explain the lack of humanities (aka "how do i work with humans?") - i.e. no leadership training, no small business training, no corporate business training, no nothing, glass celling is defined from the start;; to literally make people slaves and then enforcing "diverse" owners over them
> because if you hate your boss, you are raycis/sexis
Of course owners are only middle-management, there will always be the white anglo on top.

They push for the same system as pre-emancipation proclamation.
- 5% of whites are land-owners (80% of them are small land-owners like a personal patch without any slave labor)
- 85% of whites are indentured servants (literally slaves)
- 10% of whites are slaves
---- blacks is shit-hurricane starting topic, the info about indentured servitude existence would be enough, so if they try to argue from "only 95% of whites where slaves and 100% niggers" that will be another nonargument

inb4 professor btfo
so if you want to have education (if you still see any value in it), better just keep your mouth shut and be passive-agressive

It`s worth to learn how to keep your mouth shut in presence of swines. So you can just play dumb making dumb questions like. "Oh I`ve read on this site on internet, that there where like 6 gorillion of white slaves in meddle age in turkey, why dont they have diversity classes? Are they like totally dumb, right? derp"

>not going to class dressed as a nazi

I really missed that chance cause I'm black so it would be double weird

I like to lead with asking why it's bad to be racist.

> would be double weird
You are just not choosing the correct uniform.
But anyway you have to understand, that nationalistic socialism is still socialism.

what shitty subject to you study for it to require to have diversity education. wtf.

Piss everyone off

Some universities require such courses regardless of degree. I'm studying computer science, and a quarter of the credits for my degree are diversity bullshit.
It's fucking awful.

National socialism is the only kind of socialism I could get behind. I have no problem helping my family and close friends/inner circle, so if there were an entire country made up of people whom I regarded as my inner circle, I wouldn't mind helping them a bit

>I also don't want to come off as a nazi to my classmates.
why?

drop out

It's actually a pretty good concept, afaik, racism is seen to be morally reprehensible because it is (presumably) making a judgement/discriminating without cause. Just because someone is black doesn't mean that they will be more violent and less intelligent etc. Etc. Where the train falls off the tracks though, is the refusal to acknowledge that while individuals cannot be judged until their action have been seen, groups can and should be judged for their actions/trends. That's why libs try to get around this by saying that minorities can't be held responsible as a group, because as a group, they are being acted upon by outside forces (structural racism, prejudice etc.)

Basically, they get the cause and the effect mixed up. They want to argue that blacks are violent/dumb/malevolent because they are discriminated against, while the Sup Forums perspective is that they are violent/dumb/malevolent due to biology and culture (which is also an outgrowth of biology and history), and then are judged as a group because of that.

If it is a required course, learnthe "correct" amswers to give in tests and keep your head down. Dick-munching "professors" have been known to maliciously flunk students who do not toe the line, and ruin their chance at continuing their education.

You do not have to believe any nonsense they spew, but when you signed up to go to their university, you agreed to learn how to repaeat it back to them.

just don't do this, if you're earning a worthwhile degree just hide your power levels and play along

youtube.com/watch?v=mkPe1wF_37A

I never went to my indoctrination class. Wrote the faggy paper and took the exams but never attended otherwise.

Not even ashamed of the C-

Re-read 1984 during diversity class.

> National*istic* socialism
As any socialism is based on marxism. No such things as "family" has any place in it.

You are into nat-soc memes, that`s understandable for weak minded individuals. But what you should really look into is nationalism aka classic liberalism aka "people rule themselves trough government established by their political nation" aka republic (as implementation of the concept).

If that were me, I'd be raising hell. If I'm going to pay a lot of money for a degree in a particular subject, then I expect that money to be spent on educating me in that particular subject, not for a quarter of the course to center around a subject that has absolutely zero relevance to my subject that is being paid for through my tuition fees and now I have to spend time studying to pass a second course instead of further tuition/studying in my chosen degree because this completely unrelated subject inexplicably contributes a significant portion of the credits in my main subject.

Fuck that noise.

youtu.be/dSP_n_BIe0w

Don't give away your position.

Unless you plan on blowing people away or are super popular and can form a mob, wait until you're in position.

Then we strike.

Like a storm.