There are people on this board who unironically think that winter disproves global warming

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Flint–Beecher_tornado
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
breitbart.com/search/?s=Data
breitbart.com/london/2014/06/23/global-warming-fabricated-by-nasa-and-noaa/
breitbart.com/california/2016/12/14/fake-news-alert-climate-scientists-save-data-from-donald-trump/
almaghribtoday.net/37/134805-موجة-قاسية-من-الثلوج-تقتل-3-أشخاص-في-مدينة-شفشاون
washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/11/07/check-out-the-giant-snow-boulders-that-washed-up-in-siberia-last-week/?utm_term=.aeff1a7b3e47
youtube.com/watch?v=Kya12aGaD00
youtube.com/watch?v=NbR03YGc0HU
youtube.com/watch?v=63QOaNji1QQ
skepticalscience.com
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No, I just have a brain and don't follow the dipshit liberal rhetoric.

First it was impossible for man to change the climate.
Then it was "bu muh magazine title said "global cooling", scientists are hypocrits!"
Then it was "it's definitely happening but we aren't the cause."
Next ti will be "It's happening, we cause it, but it's too late to bother doing anything about it."

You would have a point if climate credulists didn't claim that every hot summer is proof that global warming is going to kill us all.

Member when the global warming alarmists said there would be no more snow by 2014? I member!

Leaf post best post.

A leaf that I agree with

What the fuck is going on?

I live in Alaska and I think it's funny when they used to describe glaciers as "advancing" or "receding". We have both. But now they ignore the advancing glaciers and call the receding ones "sick". Fucking stupid fucking hippies.

>tfw too smart to believe in science

they don't. They claim that the summer being warming than previous summers is proof of global warming, just like winters being warmer than previous winters is proof of warming

>Member when the global warming alarmists said there would be no more snow by 2014? I member!
no, I don't member. And neither do you. Can you side a credible scientist saying that snow would stop by 2014?

You're an idiot and therefore agree with other idiots?

Why are liberal political cartoons drawn like shit? Ben Garrison's drawings much better quality, and use metaphors more effectively.

>can't refute the point
>"oh yeah, well conservatives might be complete fucking retards but at least we're good at coloring!

Caricature strawman I see. Can I play too?

the GOP is stupid just like the Democratic party.

the difference is your comic is just making shit up, whereas the other comic is basically just quoting the President-elect and other well-known conservatives, like that Senator who brought a snowball into Congress last year to "prove" that global warming isn't real

Back in the 60's, climate scientists said nuke testing was causing hurricanes.
In the 70's, they said we were going into another Ice Age
In the 80's, the ozone layer
The 90's deforestation was going to remove all oxygen
Same shit, different decade.

>if I keep making shit up, maybe it will distract them from how clueless I am!
no user, sorry but it just makes it even more obvious that you're fucking retarded and have no idea what you're talking about

I would like some global warming please.
t. Minnesota

It's not that I don't belive in it. It's that I don't care

>2017.03
>global warming

Isn't 'climate change' a more correct term OP?

The Western character has always contained a deep fascination with apocalypse and the end of the world. The climate alarmism of today is just the latest version of Medieval doomsday cults.

Whatever, it's all about energy, peak energy, energy depletion going forward combined with population overshoot and the moves by the powers that be to maintain control, control energy and thus control life. Sheit, what else would carbon based taxation on carbon based life be about? Saving the planet? That was a good one!

How about you stop hiding your american VPN and show us your flag? You scared?

Maybe instead of smugly asking that question rhetorically you should try asking it seriously. Because they're different terms. Increased GHGs is causing global warming, and then global warming in turn causes climate change

Is climate change even falsifiable? What would actually disprove the theory?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Flint–Beecher_tornado en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling

shit, you caught me!

The real danger about global warming. If winters become less cold. And less long. This means the earth cant balance itself. That is when global warming becomes bad

Now it's all about the money.

excellent cartoon

>its a shame that all these ridiculous claims aren't cited - i remember a few of them

if temps stopped warming? Or if you could show that GHGs do not actually trap heat in the atmosphere (doubtful given that there's a lot of experimental evidence showing the greenhouse effect is real). Or, if you could come up with an alternative explanation for the warming that is even plausible, you wouldn't even need evidence to at least have a case. Because right now there's literally no other alternative explanation that isn't disproven.

>I'm too dumb to read but I hope these wikipedia articles make me look smart!
why are you doing this to yourself user?
> In the scientific papers which considered climate trends of the 21st century, less than 10% inclined towards future cooling, while most papers predicted future warming

>there are liberals right now who say that snow proves global warming.

There are people on the left who unironically believe that having coal power plants has a major effect on the activity of the sun.

actually, the upcoming mini-ice age disproves it you cunt. also, university of east anglica email-gate and club of rome 1991- "we came up with global warming" also disproves it. anyone who talks about global warming is a idiot.

Global Warming is fake news.

>there are people on this board right now that I'm replying to who unironically believe the greenhouse effect isn't real
oh user, it's like you go out of your way to make yourself seem stupid

>NOAA data manipulation created global warming

this

>science is fake news
you're right, thank god the all-knowing Trump is appointing anti-vaxxers to positions of power!

>tfw too smart to believe in science

More like
>tfw too smart to believe liberals
breitbart.com/search/?s=Data

breitbart.com/london/2014/06/23/global-warming-fabricated-by-nasa-and-noaa/

breitbart.com/california/2016/12/14/fake-news-alert-climate-scientists-save-data-from-donald-trump/

I can at least respect that. Having a shitty opinion about global warming isn't as bad as being objectively fucking stupid like the science denialists ITT

Vaccines cause autism, I bet you're a braindead Vaxie.

I know this is bait but
>implying global warming is science
It's not.

No, no it's literally just you being too dumb to believe in science
>OH, but Breitbart also says science isn't real, that PROVES that science is fake!
now you're just embarassing yourself

Could you please get your punctuation up to a third grade level? Thank you very much mystery flag worthless subhuman.

>implying science is science
yes? How is it not science?

Because it's Fake News.

I sincerely hope you go out and get every vaccine that's legally available to you. I'm sure you'll be fit as a fiddle.

Glaciers have been receding for the last 10,000 years. Are we to blame for that?

Enjoy your rickets

>science is fake news
you're right, thank god the all-knowing Trump is appointing anti-vaxxers to positions of power!

The mercury in your childhood vaccines gave you brain damage and now all you believe is fake news. Many such cases.

>science
Science is corrupt as most of the funding is private.

Basically, Science is a tool, do I think a Hammer is inherently corrupt? No, of course not, but the person holding the hammer is human, and humans are corrupt.

>Vaccines have ruined my life. I'm 31 years old!

It's hot here lads. Hotter than it usually gets. Come visit. Tell me its not TOO hot. 42c on Saturday. Hopefully I survive.

rape yourself, climate change faggot.

Actually they haven't. Where I live they found thousands of year old stumps in some ice caves. That meant that the glacier receded, a forest grew, then it advanced and wiped out the forest, then it receded and exposed the stumps. When they ran the story in our local paper a lot of the comments were "global warming BTFO!!" Then they removed the comments.

>Actually they haven't.
Fuck off you dumb faggot, I mean how fucking retarded can one be?

What discredits the global warming agenda is that we know our own government uses Environment Modification Techniques.
See the US Air Forces, HAARP program. Russia admitted to altering weather, years ago as well.

...

Sorry kid but when the story broke I ran out and got pics. Lots and lots of pics. Global warming is the new Scientology.

It's that I don't believe that the Earth is getting warmer. I just think it isn't that much of a threat liberals think it is. Technological development will eventually solve this.

Have you walked to the ice caves recently?

Seing as the lakes frozen?

It's certainly taking the form of a new age pop religion. The thesis is a green earth living under natural law, the anti-thesis is the evil fossil fuel used to power modern life. The synthesis will be a fossil fuel powered global totalitarian carbon rationing regime operating under the iron hand in velvet glove model. Horrifying really and why the Catholic Church is a major player with all their cult building experience. A Papist will be heading up the UN starting this year, by extension the IPCC who manifest the new age carbon law.

*it's not that...

Yeah sure.
Last four years they've had to hall in snow for the iditarod.
You're stupid if you don't believe in climate change.

They do that for the phony photo op you retard. After the news media gets their ride a backhoe pushes it away to open up traffic. Then when the next idiot wants a ride they push it back. Transplants are full on retarded

It's not that I don't believe climate change, I just don't give a shit. Liberals destroyed western civilization, why should I care if it continues?

almaghribtoday.net/37/134805-موجة-قاسية-من-الثلوج-تقتل-3-أشخاص-في-مدينة-شفشاون

Apparently you've never been to the iditarod.
You ever have had to wait hours for them to stop spreading the snow so they can start the race.
Even parts of wasilla had to have snow halled in.

i remember when i was in middle schoool
we just had to go downtown no halling in snow.

Yeah and democrats go "see global warming" every time there's a hot year.

I'm interested, can you please show me the science behind climate change?

Doesn't it tho?

If you want real data instead of being a full on retard why don't you look at the Nenana Ice Classic ice depths and dates the flag fell through transplant hippy stoner

It already is. That was Rubio's response to all global warming questions in debates.

>21,000 years ago
humans started migrating 40,000 years ago, their migrations coincided with retreating ice sheets due to chopping down forests and lighting fires

Global warming and science are mutually exclusive concepts, y'know.

Lol do conservatives even think Brietbart is real news?

>They claim that the summer being warming than previous summers is proof of global warming, just like winters being warmer than previous winters is proof of warming
>tfw my summers will be warmer and the winters will be colder
I'm good with this. Fuck mild winters and fuck rain.

I don't think most people here would even know what the iditarod is...

i thought they shout all of them down?
because it was receiving to much business. lol

Global warming or "climate change" is so gay. They blame climate change for Islamic terrorism. If that was really true wouldnt those stupid countries stop drilling for oil and do ((("green" energy)))? Liberals are so insane. Natural selection needs to take them out.

>i thought they shout all of them down?
>because it was receiving to much business. lol
i thought they "shut" all of them down

there are people like you and weak crazy bernie sanders who think climate change will destroy our kids lives

fuck off

>science and science are mutually exclusive concepts
no actually they are not

>The science is settled!
>Science
>ever settled
To even imply that such a thing as scientific fact even exists is inherently anti-science.

how'd they cross the bering straight?

If you think global warming is a big problem, you should 100% lynch yourself. The Earth will cleanse itself until it dies, which is inevitable. If anything theres too many fucking people. So unless you want to kill half the population stfu. Typical sheep peasant.

Im not liberal at all yet I believe in climate change. I feel like some conservatives are so anti-liberal that they buy into conspiracy theories like the earth is flat, anti-vaccination, and shit like global warming isnt real. Granted, when it comes to the latter there aint much we can do bc India and China fuck up the environment 100x more then we do, but that doesn't mean it isnt real.

Im a marine biologist, so much of Australia's coral reefs are bleached already because of the effects of global warming. I can't be in the same room as someone who refuses to believe whats going on, makes me fucking mad.

>2008 has one of the coolest summers in history
>Libtards took to the evening news to announce that this 100% doesn't prove anything
>Next year is one of the warmest
>Same fucking evening news tells me that this is irrefutable proof

>But no, it's the other guys who are spouting reactionary bullshit

I dont get why Sup Forums is so anti-global warming. Only thing on this board that i really disagree with.

Yep, wasn't New York supposed to be under water by now?

Where's the science in global warming? Climate change is a natural process.

Proof that Global Warming is real:

washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/11/07/check-out-the-giant-snow-boulders-that-washed-up-in-siberia-last-week/?utm_term=.aeff1a7b3e47

I haven't seen anything like this personally, but user might have.

If global warming is real then could we change it? Do we know enough about how it's happening that we could, at will, raise the temperature (over a period of time obviously) or lower the temperature?

It's essentially MUH GREEN HOUSES GASES when the easiest observable and most drastic changes in our Earths climate, Anartica and the Sahara, happened thousands of years before the Green Houses Gases conspiracy meme

Youtube:

youtube.com/watch?v=Kya12aGaD00

youtube.com/watch?v=NbR03YGc0HU

youtube.com/watch?v=63QOaNji1QQ

skepticalscience.com

Good explanations. I was undecided but this site convinced me

remind me again which side of the aisle supports birth control and abortions and sex ed and porn and sodomy?

A single year doesn't prove anything. A long-term trend does. The last decade is the warmest decade. The decade before that is the second warmest.

it happens naturally for natural reasons. Right now none of those natural causes are responsible.

>i'm too dumb to understand climate science so I'll just mock those who do
Nobody is saying that all climate change in all of earth's history are caused by increases in GHGs. Some is caused by changes in solar intensity, some are caused by milankovich cycles. But the CURRENT warming, you know the one that we're actually talking about, is caused by an increase in GHGs

>Natural selection needs to take them out
Hang on, isn't evolution a lefty lie too?

Frame this and give it to your kids