Daily reminder that our soon-to-be President is too dumb to understand science

Oh, and he just appointed an anti-vaxxer to be in charge of his vaccine panel. Which surprises nobody

Other urls found in this thread:

skepticalscience.com/10000-years-warmer.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=5c4XPVPJwBY
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I know right? It was like 70 degrees yesterday....

Vaccines cause Autism, dumbshit

>an anti-vaxxer to be in charge of his vaccine panel.
it's about time

This is a stealth "to smart to win" thread FYI

>tfw Too autistic to realize vaccines cause autism

>2014
>presidents don't have advisors
Okay.

Good thing he's not appointing Global Warming deniers to his cabinet, then we'd all be fucked, right slant eyes?

Oh shit, wait...

Fake science. The holy trinity of the left is going DOWN. Fake news, fake science, and fake economics.

he reaffirmed his science denialism during the campaign, and is appointing science denialists to his cabinet including to the head of the EPA

>God controls the earth's temperature
>vaccines cause autism
>Evolution is a lie
yeah you're right, that's the real science

>a gas that makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere drives the temperature, not the 700,000km wide nuclear fireball in the sky

>something with a small concentration is automatically negligible
>he would inject himself with cyanide because it's a relatively small quantity
well that's my first cue you're an idiot. Then we have this:
>700,000km wide nuclear fireball in the sky can cause the lower atmosphere to heat up while simultaneously causing the upper atmosphere to cool down, all without changing it's own intensity
please explain the physics behind this
Also please explain why during the summer, a car can become significantly warmer than the outside air. Because scientists say it's because of the greenhouse effect, but you obviously have some reason to believe the greenhouse effect doesn't exist. Does this 700,000km nuclear fireball magically decide that the car should be warmer than the air?

>People on Sup Forums love to use science to prove that black people are stupid
>These same people don't believe in global warming and that vaccines cause autism

That's different science bro, I can observe stupid black people but it was totally cold today. You probably went to liberal college too, fake education!

Just don't engage with climate denialist. They're like people who think cancer isn't real and doctors just make it up so money is spent on treatment and cancer research.

It is a hoax. We only have about a 125 year sample period of temperatures taken with accurate thermometers.

Most of the world CO2 measurements since the 70s, global CO2 measurements since thereabouts the 90s.

Ice carbon measurements and tree ring measurements are only very rough approximations and not at all reliable estimates of past temperatures.

We're drawing conclusions from such a small sample period that it isn't even funny yet they make it seem as though it's settled science.

Denier implies it's true.

yes. That is correct. We are implying that reality is reality. Here, let's stop implying and make it explicit:
Science is real

>car warms up
>better go live in the Stone Age
Fuck off

>there's something I don't understand
>better claim it doesn't exist

Yeah just like the flat earth, geocentric universe, alchemy, and spontaneous generation were real.

you realize you're the flat-earther here right? Like you're making claims about something in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary and your unable to make any sensible argument in your favor

Keep clutching your hockey stick graph and signed copy of an inconvenient truth there gaea worshiper. I'm sure if you just make a few more doomsday predictions one of them will be correct any decade now.

Keep insulting people, surely this will win them to your cause.

You're the one supposing causality to a correlation without any real evidence. Show me the climate model you think will accurately predict the warming trend for the next 20 years.

>Have no accurate information for global warming being true
>Still pretend it is

Well we tried explaining the science for a hundred years or so. At some point it becomes obvious that anybody still insisting it's fake simply doesn't have any interest in learning about it, and in fact is going out of their way to be ignorant.

Like Do you really think there is any possible way to reason with somebody that dense? Do you think they have any interest in learning about this? They could research it if they want to, they could simply admit they have absolutely no fucking clue what they're talking about, but instead they go out of their way to convince everybody they're a complete and utter retard.
One can only try to explain things to idiots for so long before calling them an idiot is the only response left. If they get tired of being called idiots, they can feel free to stop being such fucking idiots any time they want

>drives the temperature
>drives
read before you react

>he would inject himself with cyanide because it's a relatively small quantity
strawman (and I'll ignore your ad hom)

>700,000km wide nuclear fireball in the sky can cause the lower atmosphere to heat up while simultaneously causing the upper atmosphere to cool down, all without changing it's own intensity
>all without changing it's own intensity
Solar activity changes, which is my point.

>Also please explain why during the summer, a car can become significantly warmer than the outside air. Because scientists say it's because of the greenhouse effect, but you obviously have some reason to believe the greenhouse effect doesn't exist. Does this 700,000km nuclear fireball magically decide that the car should be warmer than the air?
In both cases the sun drives the temperature. If the sun wasn't there, the car would be cold inside and out. The effect of carbon dioxide as a "greenhouse gas" isn't linear, and has long passed the point where it would have any measurable incremental effect. For your example, replacing all of the glass with thicker glass (analogous to adding more CO2 to the atmosphere) will make negligible difference to the inside temperature. Add some extra solar activity or take some away, however, and the effect will be significant.

I fucking wish they were right, it's been solid 60's here in Tennessee.

>Solar activity changes, which is my point.
>solar activity goes up, temperatures go up
>solar activity goes down, temperatures still go up
>but only in the lower atmosphere, the upper atmosphere keeps cooling for some magical reason that you seem to be ignoring

>Because scientists say
>This is the extent of liberals "understanding science"
Oh yeah, you're real smahht.
"scientist said so" is literally all the Climate Change argument is.
There is never any actual science behind it, it's literally just Appeal to Authority fallacy vs Appeal to non-authorities fallacy.
There is no way this argument will ever end.

I'm pretty sure the cold temperatures has something to do with the good old ice melting up north.

>Claim Antartica will melt by 2010
>Doesn't, but still worships Al Gore and believes his lies

fuck me. this board sometimes

its 65 degrees out

Jesus fucking christ I cant imagine how you go through life

vaccinations are good, they cure neurotypicals

>Not understanding Trump using satire to draw support to a serious issue that has been largely ignored by both the left and the right.
>Hes the hero we need not the one we deserve

Science shmience.

Polar vortex is what I was thinking.

>climate science

if global warming is real then why is it cold inside of my refrigerator, checkmate atheists

...

>overwhelming scientists consensus with hard evidence says AGW is real
>J-Jews!!!

>a couple biased charts say le blacks are stupid xD
>ITS THE TRUTH JUST LOOK AT THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE

Really makes you think

Not an argument

skepticalscience.com/10000-years-warmer.htm

>with hard evidence
Please enlighten us

Correct. It's a dismissal of a crazy person that misinterprets basic concepts because he can't possibly admit liberals were right about something.

U N C O M M O N
N
C
O
M
M
O
N

>scientists say X, therefore X is wrong!
>"Okay, why are the scientists wrong? And what's the right answer? Or even an answer that could be fucking plausibly correct?"
>ummm.... LOLOL DUMB LIBRULS!
brilliant

Im not here to spoonfeed you. Youre free to challenge your biases with an open mind any time though, racist.

post this again in 50 years, it will look much different

>temperatures still go up
>but only in the lower atmosphere
when you add fudge factors to your raw dataset because the observations don't fall in line with what your inaccurate model says they should be.

If you can point me to a "CO2 driver" climate model that can accurately "replay" even the last 30 years of surface temperatures, I'll happily give the AGW argument its due. But I've been looking at this stuff since my undergrad (environmental engineering) 15 years ago, and it's all still as sketchy as ever.

>the planet is cooling down
>shit that didn't work
>the planet is warming up
>shit that didn't work
>the climate is changing
>(You are here)

One of the greatest scam jobs of all time.

>literally nothing

Checked

how to meme this to the public taxcucks funding these initiatives?

I should not have an erection right now.

When science proof nigger are dumb you were anti-science.

Everyone know (((science))) is just a psyops created by kikes to trick us into taking vaccines and outsource jobs to China, stupid faggit

What are you on about? Fucking retard

Is threads like this that make me doubt Sup Forums is always right

>im literally shaking right now

They don't, senpai.

As a Floridian I have a good range of heat year round but winter comes like a wave for 2.5-3.5 months and its start has shifted from mid November to January within 10 years.
I know its not exactly hard evidence so you'll probably screech but I'm not the guy that has been arguing with you.

>Scientists say X, that's what I heard on tv, so that means we objectively need to raise taxes, which means we objectively have to vote a Left wing government, it's Science!
>>Ok, How did they come to that conclusion?
>They did like science and shit, it's too hard for any of us to understand just take their word for it and vote Left
>>Who conducted these researches?
>Scientists bro! they got grants from left wing government organizations to prove why voting Left wing is objectively correct
>>And where is their research data that "proves" this?
>Are you stupid bro? It's science! Stop questioning things and SUBMIT!!

youtube.com/watch?v=5c4XPVPJwBY

>mfw both sides make regular use of extreme strawman
when will this meme end

>if I keep repeating this lie, maybe somebody other than idiots will start believing it!
nope, sorry. With a bonus
>I don't understand the difference between "global warming" and "climate change" so I'll just smugly insult the people who do

I fucking hate the phrase climate change. The climate was changing long long before even our earliest homind ancestors existed

Yeah, pretty based how he's BTFO you lying liberal cumdrinkers. Going to be fun as fuck to watch you scream and bitch as he breaks all of your fingers one at a time.

that pic is fucking disgraceful. Regardless of the reasons it was built in the first place, I hate seeing infrastructure allowed to ruin like that.

Do you just say anything and hope no one calls you out on it?

cynanide is not natural to living organism, carbon dioxide has been in our atmosphere long before humans ever existed.

The interior of a car doesn't have to factor in wind. Also the glass and metal body of the car are much better insulators than carbon gases. It is the greenhouse gas effect, but note that greenhouses are made out of glass, not bags of air.

>be me
>before vaccine
>healthy, normal baby
>get vaccine
>now autistic

Explain???????????

MOLOCH OBSERVES

MOLOCH INFLUENCES

MOLOCH PREVAILS

He wants to get rid of vaccines because poor people and stupid people will die.

>I fucking hate the phrase extinction. Species were going extinct long long before even our earliest hominid ancestors existed
wow you're right, I guess it's impossible for humans to be responsible for either climate change or a species going extinct

>carbon dioxide has been in our atmosphere long before humans ever existed.
it hasn't been present at the current levels in millions of years, and it hasn't risen as fast as it's rising now for at least 300 million years
Oh, and fine, if natural is what your problem is then substitute cyanide with iron: A natural substance in your body, that can kill you if you ingest a relatively small quantity

it's not autism, it's retardation, and you've always had it

>>I fucking hate the phrase extinction. Species were going extinct long long before even our earliest hominid ancestors existed
Jesus Christ that is the worst false equivalency I've ever heard.

is that a character from the new Mass Effect movie?

I used to find his global warming tweets mildly annoying but now they're my favorite. With the exception of the Holocaust, nothing sends liberals into a blind rage more than denying global warming.

...

>singles
>Moloch having any power at all
>check'em

Global Warming is a hoax. Only a potatoe believes otherwise.

Vaccines probably do cause Autism. Which is why no serious study has ever been conducted because the Government believes the benefit outweighs the risk...but admitting any risk would cause people to forgo getting them and risk outbreaks.

Looks like we're going to find out the truth soon, and be allowed some control back over our lives, consequences be damned.

Those still work. It's a huge field. Needs o&m.

How awful do you feel that the trump administration means ending government funded climate change research, gutting the epa and ruining the environment?

Why is lefty bait always such nuisance bullshit? like a swarm of mosquitos with self deluded visions of Stuka. "say it with me, dear" bullshit patronizing mother/baby talk that I'm sure makes them feel like intellectual giants (they have a shelf full of books they barely read or whose contents they cannot retain.)

It's like some sad clown faggot trying to interpretive dance you to death, and failing that, they imply violence. Do they have any idea how fucking laughably naive that is?

mfw global temps rising 2 degrees over 500 years == cancer

except it's not. Saying that humans can't be causing climate change because the climate changed before humans existed is exactly as dumb as saying humans can't cause species to go extinct because species went extinct before humans existed

>We've tried explaining the Science for over one hundred years or so.

False.

40 years ago the claim was that overpopulation was going to cause another ice age. Then it turned into "rising sea levels." Then it turned into "global warming." Then it became "extreme weather will wipe out humanity." Now it's "global climate change" because you can't get your models to work. According to Al Gore we should all have gills and live in Waterworld.

The problem is your models claim the world is warming. But it is predicting data that is totally random.

>40 years ago the claim was that overpopulation was going to cause another ice age.
How long are you people going to continue repeating this lie before you realize anybody who's not an idiot won't believe it?

Except it is, because the definition of extinction remains the same no matter what the cause it.

>Oh, and he just appointed an anti-vaxxer to be in charge of his vaccine panel

>appoint anti-vaxxer to chair panel
>all findings of the actual working members show that vaccines don't cause autism
>anti-vaxxer has to come out and say that vaccines don't cause autism
>it comes off as more credible since he was an anti-vaxxer
When you learn to look beyond the first step of things, you might not be surprised by life

The problem is that our models dont warm fast enough

>too dumb to understand science
Reminder that God made and is the controller of science whether you smelly fedoras like it or not

>>Evolution is a lie
The whole idea is the most laughable shit. "We adapted from monkeys", just fuck off with this already.

...

one extra pixel is much different?

woohoo what a change.

>Science is real
I'm not an anti-Vaxxer, even I thought Trump's vaccines cause autism comment was stupid, and I certainly don't believe to "pray diseases away", but what I do believe is that life's unanswerable mysteries that not even your precious science can answer, can only be answered through a divine spiritual being.

And that's the thing with you lefties, you're all so certain there's no such thing as God when there's zero real concrete evidence behind it, same with the other way around of course. If you're an Atheist that's fine, if you're a nihilist twat you can go fuck yourself.

>global warming cucks predict many events
>none of them become remotely true
>they get called out
>"SCIENCE DENIER!!!!!"

definition of climate change remains the same too. There's anthropogenic (ie, human-caused) climate change, which is what's happening now. We just shorten it to "climate change" when talking about the current change because sometimes we forget people like you exist who are too retarded to figure out context