Why are artists almost always leftists? Really, it doesn't matter if they're a painter, musician, poet, sculptor, actor...

Why are artists almost always leftists? Really, it doesn't matter if they're a painter, musician, poet, sculptor, actor, author, whatever, they're all leftists and usually into some identity politics shit.
What's the reason for this? Are right wingers not interested in art?

Other urls found in this thread:

libertarianism.org/publications/essays/why-do-intellectuals-oppose-capitalism
poets.org/poetsorg/poem/you-make-culture
youtube.com/watch?v=TRS9Bz0IH54
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

there are right wing artists, they're just less likely to shove their beliefs down your throat at every possible moment.

Because (((modern art))) is subversive as fuck.

It's very simple. Most artists are basic normies. They never really learned about politics so they have the normie view which can be sumed like this:
left: good, everyone united and sharing
right: bad, racist
That's it OP.

Because the only art jews pay and promote is degenerate shit.

Infiltration and subversion. The boomers had enough money and space to spend all their time fucking around doing not very much and going to see leftists make shit quality art/music (some good stuff too). It sold, therefore it has value.
The culture industry then just wrapped around them and now you have the fake Hollywood liberalism you see today across the world with the modern artists these people help write songs for playing in McDonalds and slave labour utilizing shoe shops.
It is all more corporate than it ever was thanks to boomers.
They killed folk and replaced it with "pop".
Hence that guy who called Bob Dylan a Judas.

Because they were beaten and bullied by white (often Christian) heterosexual males their entire lives - for being nerdy and artistic - and they dream of a communist-like system where everyone is treated equally (by force if necessary) and there can be no "alpha" that takes advantage of "betas" in their fantasy worlds.

They hate authority, patriarchy and the idea of justice. They want to be sinful degenerates all their lives and never receive any kind of punishment for it. God represents that punishment. He represents order and morality and their way of escaping their crimes is by rejecting his authority and pretending he does not exist.

woops i read that as atheists, not artists. There are plenty of right-wing artists, it's just the ones who get (((pushed))) are all leftie shills who hate beauty.

an equally valid point about atheists though.

It's the work of Cultural Marxism to corrupt our traditional art styles in place of these subversive ones.

I disagree.

Funny because the man in the picture would agree with me.

Because art is LITERALLY about feelings you twat. Liberalism and art go hand in hand, it's the same thing, art has no objective purpose, its only value derives from how it makes you feel, and leftists are people who let their feelings rule them over logic and reason.

>Art school close its door to him.

Because they're touchy feely types with rich parents to support them financially. Therefore they never have to do real work or value people who do have to work.

Listen to this user.
Went to art school, its the most irrelevant thing you can do with your life in current year. Honestly that crowd is below sjw even, don't waste your time fellas, art fags are faaaar beneath you.

Jews control art and don't allow right leaning people to become famous.

This. Right wing artists tend to be those who live in isolation, dedicating their lives to their craft while caring little about external success.

Not exactly artists but related:

Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?
by Robert Nozick

libertarianism.org/publications/essays/why-do-intellectuals-oppose-capitalism

im an art student
can confirm 99% of artists are lefties

poets.org/poetsorg/poem/you-make-culture

^ This is what passes for beautiful poetry nowdays. This is what all the poetry books look like in current year. "I wish I could sculpt a healing street
from a blanket of guns. The way the sun drops
behind a one-armed cop & we default
to believing in voices."
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN

Be the change you want to see in the world

Nothing has objective purpose. But even a purposeless thing can be an useful thing. Art is the only form of immortality any culture can reach. It can guide the society towards greater ideals.

because contrary to popular opinion artists are not very educated people
at best they are open to new things but they approach them superficially
add commercialization of art to the equation and you'll understand

im just a simple potter
i have no interest in changing the world

Totally untrue, although if you are referring to 'identity art', then yeah, it's 100%.

This is the degenerate sort that use art to voice an opinion on gender or justify degenerate sexual persuasions

There are a shit ton of "red" classical artists. Artists of actual breathtaking talent and scope.

There are a shit ton of leftists in today's (((art.))) The connection should be easily made. I'm not saying modern art doesn't have any brilliance exclusively. I'm just saying that as someone who studied art, that 'modern art' is a largely subversive crock of shit fueled solely by profit. Literal nothing with dollar signs attached for posterity.

Strong individualist here. I also play guitar and love the arts, but I can attest that a majority of "artists" are special snowflakes who think they are edgy and so hip. They make shitty, cookie-cutter art that is no different from their peers, and they don't dedicate themselves to specializing in their craft. They think they should be paid thousands for the awful drawings that they shit out now. They also love to tear down anyone that is original, stealing what they can without remorse. Truly they are street-level communists.

>be statist transhumanist far-centrist
>listen to anarchist punk music and there's nothing they can do to stop me
youtube.com/watch?v=TRS9Bz0IH54

The only tolerable right wing genres I can think of are vaporwave, retrowave, future funk, synthwave, etc
I mostly listen to folk punk, cloud rap, and acoustic punk which are leftist as fuck, sometimes to the point of lyrics like "property is oppressive"

>Are right wingers not interested in art?


I'd like to present an alternative comment / question. Just because we haven't seem impartial (or even right-wing) media and higher education for a century, give or take, doesn't mean it's categorically impossible for it to manifest. So how will Sup Forums embrace right wing artists now that the establishment institutions are rapidly dying? It's not that art is inherently left wing - that's why the left came up with postmodernism, which was a tool for actualizing their hijacking of art. Art has been held captive by extreme leftists. They do not have a monopoly on art and literature as a whole. To believe this would be to fall for their tricks. They've merely concocted their own corner, and convinced everybody that it encapsulates the whole. Make art great again. Free it from its authoritarian enclave of Marxist critics, theorists, collectors, and lackeys.

Artists aren't really good at political definition.

They just go for the most trending opinions, art it's beyond all of that anyway.

Right-wing people generally prefer Stem-oriented jobs. Besides, most right-wing artists are hiding their power level out of fear of being ostracized

arts is all about feels, and that makes them suspectible to irrational thinking and fall for propaganda

they think artists are undervalued in society, when the fact is most of them are useless and untalented

they dont realise art is a hobby and they need someone who does a real job (right wing legit job) to pay for it, so concepts like communism and 'wealth redistribution' appeal to them

Because having real jobs and paying taxes turns people into conservatives.

This is a very simplified explanation
But it's true

I too, disagree.

>Modern art
Broken toilet with a 20 page essay on art theory taped to a plaque for the viewers to read (they never do) instead of something with substance.

Because you need an artistic mind to be able to delude yourself that much.

and hitler was the original SJW, nat SOCIALIST

had a tantrum because (((they))) didn't like his watercolours, got obsessed with identity politics and did cringey autistic shit like wear a cape in public

still, he did have a good eye for design and did nothing wrong

I'm waiting until the appropriate moment to unveil my holohoax designer jewelry line.

also since artists are 'right brain' oriented, they suck at anything logical, and totally lack critical thinking skills which means most of the shit they say is poorly thought out nonsense, often just repeated from others

An artist indulging in escapism. Like pottery...

The exception that proves the rule

Drugs, degeneracy and government gibs are all vital components of """art""".

This is a good point, I write a lot of poetry and I'm soon going to be self-publishing my first collection, this is part of what inspired my original post. But I have an actual career and no aspirations of being a "professional" poet

Because artists have no actual marketable skill, so it makes sense they want the government to foot the bill for their lifestyle.

You have to be a truly talented artist to be successful on the open market, so of course they want big brother to subsidize their own personal mediocrity.

The right wingers are usually more into fixing broke shit than breaking the already shitty "art" world.

>2017
>not wearing a cape in public

what are you doing user? Capes are coming back hard

right wing politics are a lot more pragmatic while leftist politics tend to be compassionate (read:emotional)
so what do talented rightist do? do they throw all their energy in to something subjective a that has a very low chance of being profitable?
no, they pursue something with a low cost-to-benifit ratio that's sure to make them a lot of money, they go in to stock trading and finances, they build businesses

a left wing business owner is about as common as a right wing painter

>Yoko Ono
>Artist

Nah, she's just a junkie who piggybacked on the fame of John Lennon.

You hit it pretty neatly on the head. Art has been controlled and hand-picked by the Jews. Only useful idiots are risen above the masses and given any popularity. After a few decades, Art becomes synonymous with being a Marxist peasant, not the produce of an individual's dedication and focus. No SJW can conceive of crafting anything of real importance, reason why they project their view of all humans as being as incapable as themselves.

With that, you're wrong to think that good art can ever be a "hobby". After all, Bach didn't only compose symphonies on his down time.

The liberal art scene has a lot more money in it, also a lot of good artists are only considered good since they have connections. All this modern shit isn't really art, it's just a manifestation of liberal wealth an egotism.

>implying artists exist in the 21th century
it's just a bunch of pseuds that are a part of (((their))) money-making scheme

Art circles, despite the whole image about free thinking and all, are actually extremely conformist. Unless you fit the mold you are excluded and maybe even sabotaged. Doesn't take that many venue rejections to render an unacceptable artist, a former one...

I'm a politically conservative minded artist. I don't consider myself special, I just do what I can.

Also art student, so much this.
And along with that, I have a bunch of jew professors and jew classmates, disproportionally so. One of the professors was actually a great professor but I had (((another))) that shilled lgtzxbbq to the point of fetishization and told me that my redpill experience based work was a waste of my time. They pretty much came in their pants when a female sjw classmate wrote a fictional holocaust account.
If you're not an idiot, art school can be its own redpill

are you speaking from experience, friend?

Pretty much. She was in a band of literally who's before breaking up the Beatles, and then pretty much provided nothing of note to his later work.

the higher your iq the more likely to be liberal

because they use predominantly the right side of their brain where touchy feely stuff is which appeals to leftism

classically liberal*

very right wing artist here. used to be on the left. the true artists will figure out its a scam. most artists are echochambers of the art school elite which is mentally shutdown groupthinkers

I don't think that artists are almost always leftists. It's just that the leftist artists are very vocal about their politics.

Many of us think that politics has no place in art, or at least high art. Some faggots use their medium as a soapbox to scream their inane political views from.

Others of us are very apolitical, or at least obfuscate our true political leanings. This is my case. I see the white race as the greatest creators of beauty and meaning the human race has ever seen, stretching all the way back to the paleolithic cave paintings in Europe. Some of us view art as a transcendental expression of the human spirit.

Most of the greatest artists were very apolitical.

It wasn't until the kikes started to hijack Western art in 20th century that you began to see politics become a relevant factor in fine art. And true to their natural form, as the Hebraic serpents strengthened their stranglehold on Western fine art, you can observe a clear correlation with deconstruction, mockery, ugliness, vacuous conceptuality, political agendas, and reductionism to the point of absurdity: see post-modernism.

there are layers and levels. when it goes up higher they swing back around

You forgot about Ben "My gun makes niggers run" Garrison

>art has no objective purpose, its only value derives from how it makes you feel
I agree. Art is just another form of entertainment like video games and TV. Glorifying it is cucked.
Propaganda can be an objective purpose, though.

...

Being creative involves intelligence.

Right tards lack both.

Thank god no. I was warned early enough not to an hero like that. The environment here is even more nepotism reliant.

Don't know about him, but I can attest, wanted to take a blow-off elective for my associates so I took a drawing class.

Teacher was pretty based, only cared for the craft but there were a lot of lefty special snowflakes in there except for me and a body-builder guy who wanted to make a painting for his mom for valentines day.

artists live in bubbles, there isn't anything more to it.

Because all modern art is about "muh feels" and pseudointellectualism; both of which also happen to be main points of leftism.

one of my recent sketches for proof and so someone can see them. deleted fb recently. want an ethno state for each culture including whites to protect the diverse cultures. any culture that goes against this but keeps their own identity should be boycotted or sanctioned.

Neat. Willing to post more?

artistis are typically less capable of rigorous, logical thinking and so will jump to whichever conclusion most blatantly stimulates their sense of empathy without thinking about practicality.

>art has no objective purpose

I think that you are somewhat correct. High art, or fine art, should not have purpose outside of itself. High art has no other function outside of its own structures. This is why political 'art', if it even qualifies as art, is merely another form of propaganda or lowbrow art.

Non-objective art, while not explicitly depicting anything, is by itself the pure expression of the human mind and all the ethereal layers endemic to this mind. You might call this 'feels' but it is actually one of the only things that separate mankind from animals.

>leftists are 99% of the population
>99% of artists are leftists
it's simple

Silver spoon nepotism and far leftist group-think, and some variation or combination of those two - you definitely sound like you know what you're talking about. The right wingers stay silent, and typically end up illustrating underground comic books or designing video game art assets. Or they start obscure, one-man-bands like Varg. They're no less dedicated to or passionate about art. The art establishment is comparable to Hollywood. It doesn't mean that non-Hollywood thespians don't even exist, or that they're in any way comparable to their mainstream counterparts in terms of politics and or lifestyle. It just means that they're silent. And cheers, buddy - I appreciate your comments.

That's cool. Kinda reminds me of Max Ernst + Bosch.

But here's a tip: delet this.

Don't connect yourself to Sup Forums if you know what's good for you.

I'm telling you this as a friend.

heres a painting i was pretty happy with. older stuff tho

The gate keepers to the masses are lefty Jews.

Listen to Patrice O'Neil. He said it more clear than anyone so far.

It has to do with a personality factor called "openness to new experience", which tends to be high in artists and which primes you to prefer new, novel solutions to traditional methods. This is also the reason most scientists are leftists, they likewise tend to be high in "Openness to Experiences".

Czech artists are mostly right-wing liberals...
(in my country, liberals are pro-capitalist and rusophobes, while conservatives are socialists... there was nothing like LGBT lobby or greens in real socialism...)

Actually, most contemporary artists are liberals. Contemplate about political compass, they (modern artists) are at bottom part, regardless if left or right. Trump and eastern Socialism are at left-top part, National Socialism is at top center. Soros "left" is bottom center (liberal), not much "left" actually...
That, what you despise on color-hair SJWs and Feminazi and LGBT decadence, is actually them being at bottom (too much liberal) and not about them being "left" (social), which they usually are not or it is just a pure coincidence™...

Which is more rewarding in your opinion, drawing or painting? I watched all the Bob Ross episodes when they were streamed on Twitch a year ago and his effortless style made painting look so fun.

timestamp or i don't believe you

I suppose you could just say that someone else posted your paintings here, but there is only so much room for plausible deniablity.

If you want to do this professionally, you have to realize the power that the kikes have over contemporary art. If you become associated with Sup Forums, it might close a lot of doors for you.

Jus sayin

people say bosch all the time and i love that comparison. let me post something im working on RIGHT NOW. sorry for rotation and quality just took this

their are right wing artists but its hard to see them in hiding bec the left is so agressive. theyre easy to convert if not part of the inner circle

um for me......drawing comes out more how I want it bec ive been doin it longer but painting is so full bodied and colorfull. it can really suck you into a scene. easier to go big with paint which is helpful for that "reward"

Why? Most could draw similar stuff after a few years of dedicated learning. His art is pretty cool but his skillset is not rare.

cringe, please learn how to draw

>it might close a lot of doors for you

but it's reached the point where the very nature of being a white, straight male makes you persona non grata. 99% of these professional art doors close based on that alone - political views needn't be a factor, because they've already profiled you

These guys get it. Also modern art is based on promoting change in thinking and culture not celebrating it.

believe me i'm almost exploding wanting to talk about how jews have made art a lie. All art now is trying to convince people to think your art is good when you half assed it. just like how the jews had to convince kings to take on their debt money system. the art world is crumbling just like the economy. artists are dangerous and can see past the high verbal IQ and twisting of reality. thats why the jews want them neutered

Yeah it seems to be easier to create a real ambience or vibe with paint. Unique ambience is perhaps what I personally appreciate the most in any kind of art

>believe me i'm almost exploding wanting to talk about how jews have made art a lie

Do a thread about this if you feel like it. I and probably many others here would be interested.

thanks sweetheart

maybe one day . Its in my head and its not going anywhere

What, how are those generes you listed right wing?

the dragon is shit and he couldn't even finish it lmao. the guy sucking himself off is way better.