Bernie would have easily beat Trump, he was so much more likable

>Bernie would have easily beat Trump, he was so much more likable
>couldnt beat the almost equally unliked Hillary
What is the logic here?

Other urls found in this thread:

realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bernie redpilled a lot of white democrats

They claim that he lost solely because the primaries were rigged.
Trump could have easily beaten a literal socialist, but he never had a need to take shots at Bernie.

Just because the Giants beat the Yankees and the Yankees beat the Red Sox, it doesn't necessarily follow that the Giants would beat the Red Sox.

They're just bullshitting. I think Trump would destroy Bernie, and I also suspect Obama would handily beat Trump. Doesn't matter and no way to know. It's like saying, "well, if we'd raised taxes to 70%, then here's exactly what would have happened in the 80s."

You can guess, but it's too many people and way too many unknowns. 80% of the information needed is missing and filled in with your assumptions.

>yfw liberals don't understand the basic law of transitivity

Trump would have beat his ass. Dems would come to Trump in droves if Bern was the nominee and Trump would have more of the Republican vote.

OP is a dumb son of a bitch.

A FUTURE TO BELIEVE IN

They rigged the fuck out of the primaries brah.

But he a shill now anyways.

polls showed he was ahead of trump

realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html

Sanders would've easily beaten him in the rust belt

If you look at the states where Bernie lost, it was primarily states that almost always go red in the general anyway. She basically beat him in the "conservative" democratic states that never vote for democrats anyway.

He probably would not have lost the blue states in the general that Hillary lost because no one fucking likes Hillary.

Also in general there was a LOT of DNC rigging trying to occur so shillary could win.

Given the turnout we witnessed, would it be a blowout like I used to assume? No. But I feel Bernie would have beat Trump in the end.

Regardless, it would have been magical. Would have loved the debates.

Lol that reminds me of pic related edits

It would take a while but Sanders economic plans would eventually get looked into seriously and be seen as retarded.

...

Reminder that we were robbed of the greatest election in history. What could have been :

>alt-right vs radical left
>Sup Forums vs reddit
>the ultimate businessman vs a fucking commie
>nu-males vs NEETS

...

This faggoty is hard to look at.

>Commies and Leftists
>Logic

Pick one

>polls showed he was ahead of trump
polls showed hillary way ahead of trump lol

Clinton was always despised among the working class. Socialists warned liberals from the very start.

Bernie appealed to rural and suburban retards.

Hillary only appealed to city people.

>ultimate business man
>commie

kek

>bernie
>radical left

oh burgerland

...AFTER I HAVE A NAP

To be fair, he kinda got cheated out of the nomination.
I wasn't really in support of his policies anyway, but he completely lost me when he let those two angry black women take over his stage.
And then
>white people don't know what it's like to be poor.
immensely pissed me off.

Overall he was a communist dipshit who wanted to give free university to a bunch of fuckwits, while those who had just paid off their loan would be punished immensely for working hard to do so.
Not for me, and I think Trump would have had an easier time with Bernie. But I don't know for sure.

The reason is...

and this is a good bit of knowledge to remember in order to redpill liberals

The DNC actively worked against Bernie
As revealed by the emails.
The DNC as well as the GOP are supposed to stay neutral until it's decided who their candidate will be
but DNC emails provided by wikileaks showed that the DNC was working for Hillary against Bernie from very early in the election.

a lot of Bernout fags were raging about this when Hillary was nominated.
It's also a good thing to bring up when people try to tell you about how Russia "hacked" the election
>so you would rather that no one ever knew that DNC was actively working against Bernie Sanders before Hillary was even nominated?

>Overall he was a communist dipshit who wanted to give free university to a bunch of fuckwits, while those who had just paid off their loan would be punished immensely for working hard to do so.

lel don't be ridiculous

Everything Sanders is proposing is standard in most European countries. He's hardly advocating a centrally planned Stalinist economy.

>but he completely lost me when he let those two angry black women take over his stage.
And then
Literally the work of Soros.

>>white people don't know what it's like to be poor.

he clarified that, he meant that they don't know what it's like to be poor and in the GHETTO with almost no chance to get free of it. he talks on and on about how white people are poor as fuck every single day getting screwed by the rich, misspeaks about what his point was and now people quote it without realizing the context.

With or without context it's a fucking stupid thing to say
>ya you can be poor just not NIGGER poor
My friend of afrikan decent said that's basically what he hears when they add the amazing context.

Bernie is a literal communist you falseflagger

>What is the logic here?

Leftists. Logic.

Do you see the problem with the assumptions behind your question?

>They're just bullshitting.

Oh, I think a lot of them believe it. A lot of Bernistas, like a lot of Paulists before them, and so on going back at least to Gene McCarthy, are young folks or otherwise brand new to politics and think that because they and everybody they know like their fringe candidate, his victory is inevitable and when it doesn't happen, they wuz robbed.

Hand it to Hillary, though -- only she was a crappy enough candidate to not only elect Trump, but make Sanders look like a Movement.

Stay in politics, once you get the hang of it you will come to enjoy it for what it is, not for the fantasy you imagined it was.

Try laughing really hard while you look, it worked for me.

But there is nothing the American working man loves more than a communist.

...

Sanders would have gotten the Jeb treatment, no way he wins a general with Trump.

>It's also a good thing to bring up when people try to tell you about how Russia "hacked" the election


If you don't want Russians to hack your election, don't nominate an idiot who keep her shit on a non-secured private home-brew server, and whose campaign guys fall for obvious phishing shit.

If you do not want the FBI director to decide to talk about the investigation into your candidate days before the election, don't choose a nominee being investigated by the FBI.

Etc.

The Dems fucked up, not when they tilted the playing field towards Hilalry at Bernie's expense, but much earlier, when they worked hard to keep any decent candidate from opposing her, leaving her with no real challenger (though she is so awful, Bernie made a run at her) and letting her be the nominee without vetting her with a strenuous contested primary.

>whitesplaining.

Too bad the Clinton Crime Org. stole the election from him. Oh well.

The point of an election is to win it. If they tried to "steal" it, it was up to him to "steal it back."

Politics ain't beanbag.

>DUDE ORANGE LMAO

totally not tired at all mang

This logic is stupid, but Bernie would still lose, and probably get less votes than Hillary. Hillary had a tad bit more older supporters (old enough to vote) and Trump would destroy Bernie in the debates.
Not only that, but like what Trump said about the popular vote, he would have planned his campaign differently.

I saw that quote, and thought it was unusually reasonable and smart for Sanders.
Then I realized it was a Hitler quote.

Hitler > Sanders confirmed

'When the people find that they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic.'
fuck socialism