If we can meme Donald Trump's inaugeration into being delayed by a day, then >He will be 7 decades, 7 months, 7 days of age at his inaugeration >His inaugeration will be on the 21st; 21 is divisible by 7 >His inaugeration will be on 2017-1-21; the digits add to 14 which is divisible by 7 >His inaugeration will be on the 23rd day of the 4th month of the year 5777 in the (((jewish))) calendar; those digits add to 35 which is divisible by 7
It is crucial that this coincide with inaugeration day. Inaugeration day is a ceremony/ritual; gods love that stuff. Inaugeration day is also the day of the transfer of power. It has to be special.
Point is, Lord Kek demands that we meme Trump's inaugeration into being delayed until the 21st.
Several protest groups planning large-scale demonstrations have permits in place and have already held organizational meetings, among them the collaborative DisruptJ20. “We’re planning a series of massive, direct actions that will shut down the inauguration ceremonies and any related celebrations,” the group says. “We’re also planning to paralyze the city.” We just have to make this go viral, get the SJWs and globalists to shut down the inaugeration on the 20th. In doing so, the globalists and their servants will be unwittingly enhancing Lord Kek's power in memetic chaos magick. Them shutting down the inaugeration will also give us political leverage against them.
DEUS KEK VULT!
If we pull this off, I will truly believe in Lord Kek.
Joshua Martin
if it has to be it will be, no need to do anything.
Kayden Cox
what is the problem with the math question? It seems fine to me.
Adrian Watson
70
Hudson Perry
You can say the same thing about anything. Then you will do nothing with your life and the world will succumb to the parasites. We need to trick the SJWs into delaying the inaugeration by a day. >bonistani education
Jordan Gomez
I thought Russians were supposed to be smart.
Juan Sullivan
>this is the kind of bullshit that rural and suburban retards obsess over
Adam Young
Yeah, did it in my head real quick and it's fine, 70 something-metres squared. I know these problems are usually not drawn to scale but this one really hurts to look at, maybe it's that? Don't see what it has to do with common core tho.
Alexander Sullivan
By giving the hypotenuse of the trapezium, they have made and impossible shape, and it's very obvious if you work out the length of the triangles. 2 by 5 by 8. 4 + 25 != 64, but it has to because of pythagoras.
Jack Johnson
No it's not you fucking idiot
Noah Kelly
nvm, I'm retarded. I see it now
Nolan Hernandez
The two triangles on the side would have to have sides of length 2 and 5, yet have a hypotenuse of length 8.
Tell me how a triangle can have a hypotenuse longer than the sum of its sides?
Jace Garcia
alright chill out Dr. Burger, fucking hell, I admit I was being retarded tho
Aaron Robinson
How is the area not 70?
Mason Rogers
the problem is not the area, the problem is that the triangles, assuming right angles, are impossible. For each triangle, if the height is 5 and the width is 2 (16-12, then 2 for each triangle), the line claimed to be 8 on the test, cannot be 8. pythagoras.
They should remove either the 8s or the 16 on the drawing.
Nicholas Baker
there is no such trapezoid 12+8+16+8 with height of 5. Geometrically impossible.
Jordan Fisher
there is no indication of 5 being the height though since there is no right angle symbol there. logically, we should disregard the 5 and attempt to the solve with just the other dimensions?
Oliver Rivera
You forgot the fact that his first press conference was 77 minutes long.
Jason Powell
Kek, little did you know 12 is the magic number. 12 eggs in a carton, Jesus had 12 disciples, 12 months in calendar, 12 zodiac signs, the list goes on.
Leo Turner
going by this, the area should equal 16 times the square root of 60
Austin Taylor
or 123.9354670786373
Jackson Harris
Antifa protestors will help with this. Try to meme it for them, tell them it´s a plan to have "Trump failing on DAY ONE EVERYBODY".
Infiltrate their subreddits etc. Don´t sperg out just subtly hint at this using some nice commie subversion speak.
Levi Gomez
91.22498999 units^2
Andrew Gutierrez
Ignoring the bottom because that shape doesn't work with the bottom measurement of 16
Liam Flores
How IS it 70, dumbfuck? Yes it does work, you can't arbitrarily pick a random number and be like LOL IDK THIS NUMBER IS THE ONE THAT DON'T WORK CUZ I'M A KANGZ
Caleb Martin
Holt shit calm down prof. Burger
Brandon Flores
>yfw
Dylan Garcia
bahah this dude comes in with some kek operation and everyones goin on about his shit common core image
Logan Carter
>How IS it 70, dumbfuck? well depending which part of the blatantly false representation you wish to ignore, 70 is a possible answer. It's the one you get when you dismiss the 8 and assume the dotted line to be at a right angle to the lines labeled 12 and 16 (which we assume to be parralel). Then it's (12 * 5 ) + 2 * (2 * 5 * 1/2) = 60 + 2 * 5 = 70
Xavier Flores
>burger education
Adrian Roberts
So you have a quadrilateral with sides 12, 8, 16, and 8, with the two 8-length sides being opposite. Congratulations! Now go ahead and solve it, faggot. Protip: You literally cannot.
Cameron Howard
((12+16)/2)×5
(28/2)×5
14×5=70
Daniel Stewart
Oh, so in Switzerland you can just blatantly disregard some info given, and then make up some other baseless assumptions, and proceed to solve the problem? I'm surprised you guys aren't even more cucked than Sweden with that logic. At least I'm not getting raped by a sandnigger every day.
Josiah Taylor
FAKE SNEWS
Matthew Collins
well what's your result then, and how did you get to it? what's the angle between the line labeled 5 and the one labeled 12?
Landon Martinez
2x2 + 5x5 != 8x8
>flag not surprised
Austin Cook
seeIt is not solveable, the numbers are wrong.
a2+b2=c2 a2+52=82 a2+25=64 a2=39 a= ~6.25
Check the numbers: (12 + 6.25 + 6.25)!=16
It makes no fucking sense at all
Easton Phillips
I don't think Common Core really did anything. I think small town people use it as a channel for anti-Obama/anti-Federal sentiment
Aaron Hernandez
No, we must keep trump at 666
Kevin Cox
Fuck off common core shill
>It is not solveable Correct >the numbers are wrong. Incorrect
Xavier Rogers
>well what's your result then There isn't one >and how did you get to it? I can get a range of possible results though >what's the angle between the line labeled 5 and the one labeled 12? I don't know. It's not specified.
Jack Torres
He would be at 776 not 666 you fucking dumbfuck leaf.
Matthew Butler
The answer is 60. If you cant solve this simple problem you need to go back to 4th grade. Good luck.
Michael Price
ofc it's not solvable, that's why you have to ignore parts of it and state the assumptions in the answer. If you wrote "Unsolvable" into the test, you'd receive 0 points.
>I can get a range of possible results though Well then present it. And how?
Luke White
5*12 = 60
(16/2)*5 = 40 40*2 = 80
80+60 = 140
Jackson Flores
wait wrong
5*12 = 60
(2/2)*5 = 5
5*2 = 10
10+60 = 70
Henry Jenkins
>gods Your pagan rituals are fine everyone but I can't stress enough the existence of one God. Any other individual aspects are only that way to make little minded people understand God's scope.
Charles Perez
>arbitrarily ignoring random parts Stupid fuck.
The lower limit of possible areas approaches A=sqrt(1008)=31.749015733 from above. The upper limit of possible areas is A=40+sqrt[((20+sqrt(25+(16-sqrt39)^2))/2)(((20+sqrt(25+(16-sqrt39)^2))/2)-(sqrt(25+(16-sqrt39)^2)))(((20+sqrt(25+(16-sqrt39)^2))/2)-12)(((20+sqrt(25+(16-sqrt39)^2))/2)-8)]=82.684891941.
Noah Evans
I will not try to understand that. I assume this is some maximum/minimum form of analysis.
also how in god's name does the shape look if you don't ignore random parts? It is certainly possible to have a shape with 4 edges with the lengths 8,12,8,16 (in that order). What is not possible is to have a line of length 5 reach from the 12 side to the 16 side (regardless of angles). Quickly drawing this thing down makes this obvious.
