Why do I have to pay taxes to sluts???

Birth control chemicals/medicines are a non-essential. Why do I have to pay for it via taxes? Furthermore, why are my taxes being used to abort babies?

Doesn't make sense at all. Birth control is ridiculously inexpensive as is Plan B/morning after pills.

One has to TRY in this day and age to catch HIV and become pregnant.

Explain to me, without sperging out; why I (as a man) should have to pay for these things EXCLUSIVELY utilized by women?

Should new taxes be imposed exclusively on women to pay for this?

they aren't

it is MUCH cheaper to abort a black baby or keep it's mother on the pill than to raise the nigglet with your taxes

Really doesn't explain why any of those issues are my problem, should be the womans problem...no?

most medicine is non essential.

>EXCLUSIVELY utilized by women

Last time I checked getting pregnant involved both a woman and a man.

>Should new taxes be imposed exclusively on women to pay for this?
Yes and women should pay for the viagra too.

It's their fault men can't get it up.

>Really doesn't explain why any of those issues are my problem

If you pay taxes you end up paying for the welfare and food stamps of all the single moms and unwanted children.

Better to pay a little tax now than to pay a shitload for the next 18 years.

Progesterone blockers are exclusively for women, toothpaste.

Right, only women should be paying taxes for these goods/services. Makes sense to me.

We're living in a world where you have to pay for every single human life that comes into this world one way or another. And you propose removing a very inexpensive subsidy that dramatically decreases the amount of children who are born that would cost you shitloads of money?

Birth control costs nothing compared to taking care of a child. Arguing that birth control shouldn't be subsidized in a world where you are forced to pay a thousand times more to take care of children who didn't have to be born is completely retarded.

Do I really need to explain to you where babies come from?

eliminate welfare

Not me no, the people in need of birth control and abortions, yes.

Your argument is retarded. In all of the western world, women are the sole deciders of whether a child is born. A man never has a say in whether a child is born or not. It doesn't matter if he impregnated her or whether it was done through coercion, or whether she lied to him about being on the pill or not. A man never has a say in whether a child is born or not.

I agree with this, no more free shit to special groups of people

She will show the world her sad neglected starving baby and you will be forced to pay for it. It IS your problem whether you like it or not because too few have the balls to let it die.

Our tax policy is structured for social engineering.
Raising money is only a secondary function.

Won't happen. They will parade around sob stories and there WILL be welfare.

Baby shouldn't exist in the first place, it's common knowledge how babby is formed. These goods/services should be the exclusive burden of women.

Point is birth control is a means to have sex without having children.

Half the people having said sex are men.

nobody starved to death in this country before welfare
let the people that care take care of her baby rather than some retarded single mom
If the baby was white I would adopt it

Great.

And until the day we actually do eliminate welfare......let's have a lot more welfare!
Fantastic plan there!!!

Only if the baby is the exclusive burden of women. As it is not, then I am more than happy to provide these cheaper alternatives.

Welfare fucks 'should' all up.

let the government go bankrupt
I dont give a shit

There were never so many people dependent on it. ( since it did not exist )

Also people had more balls for allowing suffering.

It's not that way anymore.

I should actually have said : AT LEAST half are men.

For every birth control pill there could very well be multiple men enjoying it, but at most one women.

Women singlehandedly own their babies, men don't have a say so in the birth process outside of dispensing money ergo it's the sole responsibility of the woman to pay for birth control before any of that happens.

Easy for you to say, since you don't have a job and don't pay any taxes.

What you do not support the freedom for the woman to have absolutely no sense of responsibility and do whatever she wants with no repercussions ?
You're such a mysoginist.

>There were never so many people dependent on it.
and without welfare prices would come down so less people are dependent on it
>Also people had more balls for allowing suffering.
It was more they took care of their own communities

What does it matter? The man has no influence over the birth of the child either way. There is no coherent moral argument as to why men should have to pay for birth control, only a pragmatic one: Being forced to pay a little money for pills is a lesser injustice than being forced to pay a lot of money for unwanted children.

Who said women are responsible? As they are not, I am more than happy to provide alternatives that will spare me having to raise her ill-begotten spawn.

Yes I do
I also have plenty of land and guns to fall back if society goes to shit

checked. Women can't be held accountable or taken to task.

Don't waste your time OP.

>women are the sole deciders of whether a child is born. A man never has a say in whether a child is born or not.
this is demonstrably false, you are confusing "sole decider" with veto power; women don't produce asexually. Moreover, without these mechanisms that give women the power you seem to be complaining about, then men would essentially become the sole deciders. Which I'm assuming you'd also view as a problem if you are consistent.

Hey I am all for getting rid of welfare. I just accept that it is not going to happen.

Better yet make welfare contingent on sterilization. You want welfare? Fine. But not if you can make babies.

>women aren't responsible for their own actions
>I'll pay for their mistakes

Okay...

No, your daddy has land.
You have nothing.

Denying birth control to poor people is stepping over dollars to pick up pennies.

>Why do I have to pay for it via taxes?
The gender pay gap.

Men have absolutely no legal rights to their children.

or just let single moms shit out so many kids the welfare state collapses

ok weedman

>denying

That wouls imply it's a human right, it's not. They should have to pay for it. $60 isn't a lot of money per month.

Then we are left with millions of degenerates and we all pay for it by living in Venezuela. Collapse goes too far down for me thanks.

not only is that false, but its not really relevant to the point.

Birth Control is used for alot more then actual birth control. Alot of girls use it for hormone regulation and to prevent irregular periods. I've known about 3 chicks who've had to do this or they'd bleed for 2-3 weeks out of the month.

collapse is inevitable
its not a matter of if but when

The only reason that birth control is even that expensive is because it isn't over the counter. OTC cost would be 7 dollars.

you didn't really address what he was saying at all.

Well with that attitude how did you manage to crawl out of the compost heap?

Let's not accelerate the timetable by creating hordes of poor people who will have to do whatever is necessary to survive.

>i'd rather live to see it

Untrue, men have no reproductive rights.

Why should men have to pay for it, is the more pertinent question.

are you saying the welfare state is sustainable?
every generation it gets worse off
if we would have been allowed to collapse and cleanse durring the great depression we would be in much better shape now

Your taxes also pay for roads that you cannot enjoy from your basement

Society shouldn't have to pay for a man's irresponsibility. I did the easy thing. Got a vasectomy at 22, screwed a lot of women and never got one pregnant. Married chicks love guys with vasectomies.

limited =/= none, and you are talking about state laws, not federal. If you know any men that have custody over their children, then some reproductive rights exist.

And once again, that's not really relevant to the thing you responded to initially.

>population on planet too high
>birth control
>birth rates decrease
>holy fuck we need a new generation to keep our country alive and collect dem taxes for jobs
>we need more immigrants immediately
>birth rate increases
>loop

Sure at a set level. We keep the level constant by making sure it cannot perpetuate itself. By requiring sterilization we ensure the population of welfare parasites cannot grow and must inevitably shrink.

Never thought I'd live to see the day sven makes a decent post.
Nice digits

>We keep the level constant by making sure it cannot perpetuate itself.
that is not working now
> By requiring sterilization we ensure the population of welfare parasites
this is no more politically feasible than cutting it entirely

>A man never has a say in whether a child is born or not.

Yes you do. Its simple

Don't want a child with a particular woman? DON'T HAVE SEX WITH HER.

Just don't stick your penis inside her, I know it sounds hard but just don't.

I can agree that sterilization should be a condition before receiving state benefits.

Vasectomy. Works great and you don't even have to tell them.

No men have rights to terminate a pregnancy, hence why statfuckers have careers simply by squirting out kids with wealthy/famous people. There's a reason people call it the "parent trap".

I'm sure our Christian friends (who are the ones that don't want birth control, laughable economic agruments aside) have reasons to deny it still. God's plan for women, it's The Fall, women must bear Eve's responsibility, etc.

Surprised intact hymens haven't been mentioned yet.

>deny

Stop using that word. It implies it's a basic human right, which its not. It's a luxury that should exclusively be the buren of the person seeking it.

The religious right has little in common with Christianity. They are just Bible thumping fascists.

Wear condoms then

> not working now
That's because we do not ensure the welfare population cannot perpetuate itself. No welfare without sterilization is what we need to do.
> Not politically feasible to require sterilization
But it is not forced. Nobody forced to be sterilized. It's a quid pro quo. A deal. You can remain fertile and shit out all the babies you want, but nobody will help you with them.

If you want help you get sterilized.

We already bypass 4th amendment by requiring welfare recipients to be drug tested to get paid.

Nobody is forcing them to be drug tested. But they volunteer to be drug tested to get paid.

Now in the case where someone has too many starving babies, they have committed the crime of neglect. For that they should be forcibly sterilized and also incarcerated.

But nobody feels sorry for them because they are criminal child abusers.

*tips fedora*

>Bible thumping fascists

Poor people will have sec no matter what. Since most poor people do not think about the long term, they have sex without protection leading to more welfare rats. By providing free birth control to these people you prevent pregnancies that would cost us much more than the cost of the birth control. You suffer from the same problem as poor people, too short term thinking.

NEETS don't pay federal income tax

Disability benefits are taxed before it gets deposited into the NEETs bank account.

I would add stupid teens to poor people here. I have a nephew who gets girls pregnant and will likely never have the means to support them.

do you understand what NEET means?

because women and weak men fucked the laws and nobody cared

I would say the best course of action would be to change welfare so that once you start receiving it, if you have another kid you will NOT get more money. Keep abortions legal but semi-expensive, so that they are an option but not ideal.
I do know several girls that are on BC for other things, like regulating heavy/painful periods or controlling acne outbreaks and wouldn't want to take it from them.
The most important thing would be to also start pushing the idea of the family unit, or marriage and successful people having kids that they can afford, to counter the whole crazy, frontal-lobe damaged feminism movement.

these goalposts sure seem to be moving a lot for a tangential point.

so you don't think the country being filled with niglets is your problem?

when they come to culturally enrich you, it will sure as hell be your problem.

a few dollars for birth control is a helluva lot cheaper than tons of bullets for the ensuing chimpout, having your daughter get raped, and the country going to shit.

this
its control of the masses
1.control the sluts from breeding /eugenics
2.control the tax payer to pay for whatever they want you to

what do you have rights or something why so uppity

Exactly, we don't need farmhands or cannon fodder. A smaller population is a better population.

Do you understand the benefits they claim are taxable income as designated by the Federal government?

I have nothing to do with nigger sex, no. Should be their burden exclusively.