For those who don't know, Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi was a mixed japanese/austrian ideologue whose work found a lot of echos among european leaders and intelectuals (like Freud, Einstein, Churchill, Schumann, Briand, etc...) before and after WW2. He is considered one of the fathers of the today European Union and has advocated for Paneuropeanism during his whole life, his teachings are still considered as a reference among pro-european leaders.
Here you have the script of Practical idealism from Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi: archive.fo/QGdrU
Kalergi on the "man of the future" and destroying diversity >The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.
The comparaison with the british: >The precursor of the planetary man of the future is the Russian Slavic-Tatar-Finnish mongrel of modern Europe; because he, among all the peoples of Europe, is the race of the typical multi-soul people with a wide ranging, encompassing soul. His strongest antipode is the insular Briton, the highly bred single minded man whose strength typically lies in the character, in the will - he provides modern Europe with the most closed, perfect type: the Gentleman.
On philosemitism and antisemitism >The prominent position held by Jewry these days is owed to its spiritual supremacy which enables it to win the spiritual battle over enormous superior numbers of favored, hateful, jealous rivals. >Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomenons of the mediocre against the supreme; it is a new form of ostracism applied against a whole people.
On the jewish leadership >The highest requirement demands that aristocracy coincides with nobility, and leadership coincides with a model: that leadership falls to the perfect man. From the mass of European humanity, two quality races stand out: blood aristocracy and Jewry. Separated from each other, they both hold firmly to the belief in their higher mission, of their better blood, to human differences in rank. In these two heterogeneous and preferred breeds lies the core of future European nobility: aristocracy in the feudal blood, as far as he did not let himself be corrupted by capital or the court, and aristocracy in the Jewish brain.
On the future jewish aristocracy >Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.
About the intellectual « jewishness» of Europe >Christianity, (John), through the ethical Jewish Essenes and spiritually Jewish Alexandrians (Philo) regenerated Jewry. As far as Europe is Christian, it is (in the ethical and spiritual sense) Jewish; as far as Europe is moral, it is Jewish. Almost all European ethics are rooted in Judaism. All champions of religious or irreligious Christian morality, from Augustine to Rousseau, Kant and Tolstoy, were Jews by choice in the spiritual sense; Nietzsche is the only non-Jewish, the only pagan ethicist in Europe. The most prominent and the foremost proponents of Christian ideas which are present in its modern reincarnation are pacifism and socialism, and these are Jewish.
Jacob Sanders
>mixed japanese/austrian the devil incarnate
Joseph Powell
I advise to read at least the chapters: - 4. INBRED - CROSSBRED -10. JUDAISM AND THE FUTURE NOBILITY
All french and german speaking posters should read this book (it doesn't take long, two hours at best) to understand the diseased utopic delirium of our pro-europe leaders. It's basically the very core of the ideology behind the EU.
List of the winners of the Kalergi prize during the last years: >2010: Angela Merkel >2012: Herman Van Rompuy (here you have his speech) europa.eu/rapid/press-release_PRES-12-476_en.htm >2014: Jean Claude Juncker
Cooper Martin
Bump. With the coming dutch, german and french elections this year everyone on Sup Forums should be on point with the Kalergi plan. A thread like this should active every single day to redpill newfags and lurkers.
Kevin Cook
Paranoid bullshit. And you're probably a Russian shill too. Russians want top break up the EU to gain more influence over the nation states. Anyway, 2017 will be decisive. Will this project survive, continue and evolve? Or will it die? I think it may not survive unless its external borders are completely secured and the free movement of people gets be reformed.
Julian Baker
>Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.
He only said this because he advocated dividing the world into different blocs, and he saw it as the White mans burden to colonise the negroes and bless them with superior white genes. He was a white supremacist plain and simple, except it's useless to try and exterminate all the non-whites, and much more useful to bless them with whiteness.
t. actually studied Kalergi
And if you think this: is advocating FOR Jews instead of just pointing out what the ostracization of Juden has resulted in you're a moron
Austin Harris
Yeah, so much paranoid that everythin Kalergi campaigned for is being slowly implanted: - removing the sovereignity of the states (and so self determination) - building an union that doesn't only relies on shared a economy and currency (basically the opposing of what anglos wanted and why they left) - common army (which we are slowly moving to)
Fucking leftist degenerates who would sell the sovereignity of their nation that their ancestors spilled blood for.
It doesn't matter what I think, the thing is he was a philosemite and jews are nation wreckers like they always proved it, just look at USA today 56% white. I don't want me or my children to live as a dhimis or be genocided. Also he has nothing of a white supremacist kek, he said himself jews must rule the goyims.
Julian Nelson
>trusting the jew to rule you >ever
He didn't give a single shit about whites as a mutt, he was basically the very definition of a globalist before the definition was invented. His entire ideology is just the projection of its own inadequacy and absence of real roots, no wonder he loved the jews, he was just like them.
Sovereignty is better shared. I despise nationalism and find it inspiring that Frenchmen, Dutchmen, Spaniards,Germans, Italians, Poles etc all share the same supranational governing body. This is called teamwork. I would rather have the ability to vote for the president of EU than the prime minister of Britain. And I wouldn't mind the European army. Why are right wingers so much against it? You're afraid to be protected or what? European Union has the potential to be the greatest project on this planet but eurosceptic scum just wants to ruin it instead of working to change it.
David Cruz
Sup Forums BTFO
Cooper Cox
Replace the EU flag with a mark indicating the advent of nuclear weaponry in that pic
If you guys are so worried about non-whites coming to your country, nothing is stopping you from voting for Le Pen, Frauke Petry, Geert Wilders etc. It's such an evil and unstoppable plan that it can be stopped with literally one election. Don't blame some dead jews for your own faults.
>"It will be the moment of new action and it will be the moment for new people: the moment for a free and united Europe", Altiero Spinelli >new people
May be of interest regarding the topic.
Anthony Williams
I suppose you haven't visited london in a while
Aaron Scott
I always had this gut feeling that today's world is not capable of working on grand projects like this anymore. Selfishness and consumerism dominate the western mindset. These days we would sooner jump to each other throats than cough up some money to protect Europe's borders against a common threat (refugees).
Jonathan Gomez
This is probably bait but I will answer.
>Sovereignty is better shared. I despise nationalism and find it inspiring that Frenchmen, Dutchmen, Spaniards,Germans, Italians, Poles etc all share the same supranational governing body.
Kek, the level of naivety from leftist will always amaze me, it's like you never opened a fucking history book and know nothing about human nature. Sovereignity is never "shared", there is a dominant and there are the dominated. Today the dominant is Germany and I don't want germans to control the way of living of my people for obvious reasons, 1,6 millions of my people died (2 of my great grandfather) prevent it, I won't shit on their grave for a dirty self hating commie utopist dream.
It is fundamentally stupid, we are different people with different interests and different culture, that's the real diversity, homogeneization is destruction.
Also the goal of the EU isn't to create the USE, it is to create UESR, basically a Nomenklatura ruling the people but without the risk to be overthrown since they are not rooted in any country, it's already happening. Noone really know who have the power in Bruxelles, it has been voluntarily created to be confusing and at the same time easily controlled by shadow groups. The EU is quintessentially anti democratic: commissioners are not elected but named, the parliament can't even propose a law and anyway they are controlled by lobbies: youtube.com/watch?v=DhkocrEpaak Good luck for an irish or a greek to protest a law voted in Bruxelles, they will never fear any reaction since they are disconnected from the population.
Ayden Anderson
The EU is working on ending the European peoples with mass-immigration. They are the enemies of all of us.
Jacob Cox
>And I wouldn't mind the European army. Why are right wingers so much against it? You're afraid to be protected or what? Because that's oppression, if the italians are protesting against the EU tomorrow they woud just have to send a bunch of poles to repress it, that's much more easy for a soldier to open fire on a bunch of foreign civilians than on their own people. It's a tool for tyranny, it is what european monarchs used to do when they repressed an insurection by hiring mercenaries, just look at the history of Netherlands.
So many fucking shills. You know when a thread is important.
Adam Hernandez
The only redpill you need for the EU is to realise they are trying to change the demographics in order to federalise Europe. They are importing non natives by the boatload as they have no connection to European countries, homelands such as germany, france et al and as such will not oppose a federalised Europe.
They want to turn Europe into America, a large land mass of one civic nationalist country but that cannot happen as those who go to America, those who founded it renounced their citizenship and national idenity as a swede, a german, an englishman and so on in order to fully devote themselves to building a new country in a new world.
This cannot and will not happen in Europe EVER unless as we're seeing, we have a new demographic that arrives in abundance and as such as voting power. We can only hope that they do not see them selves as european otherwise we are well and truly fucked.
Ian Torres
Fuck off anglo. The EU advocates for the destruction of european peoples via race mixing and demographic replacement. The sooner Eu collapses, the better.
William Walker
>implying there isn't a war on europeans today
The difference instead of having our leaders fight over a bunch of clay once in a while we have our leaders trying to genocide us: youtube.com/watch?v=bDaKFE_J_ug
France was 0,5% muslims in 1950, it is 10% (low estimation) today. It's the same fucking thing with Germany and Sweden.
Julian Miller
You might have had a point if importing people by boatloads was a continuous process that happened since the foundation of the original union and was sponsored by it's money.
What we see instead is a backlash of American binge trips in the Middel East, the consequences of which Europe has to bear even though it wanted to have none of that shit.
Leo Martin
There were a lot of European nations involved in removing Ghaddafi. Just blaming the burgers is pretty unfair.
Bentley Phillips
Except you have to remember the EU started off as a trade agreement and has slowly evolved into much more. They're merely exploiting the calamity that is the middle east right now, I wouldn't be surprised if they exploited colonial rule instead if they middle east didn't get destroyed. I can easily see the EU starting a rule like 2% of immigrants must come from commonwealth/colonised areas in order to further their plan.
The main reason why the EU was invented was to prevent war in Europe and you can bet they believe the best way to eliminate war is by making one singular European race like America has Americans.
Aaron Adams
he was a hapa ?
Mason Garcia
Okay, but what does the EU have to do with it?
Blame your own country for shitty immigration politics, not the EU, which doesn't have an authority to set immigration standards among the memeber states. Even the USA would be a better target considering they forced you to accept all those Turkish gastarbeiters some 60 years ago.
Gabriel Scott
/rage, gtfo you fucking traitor
Ethan Brooks
This.
Ayden Hughes
All the globalist institutions are working together in flooding the European countries. As a Pole, you should know best. After all, the EU just recently started pressuring Poland into taking in muslim immigrants.
Jason Gonzalez
Europe has to be pan-Germanic with only the Aryan race on the continent to survive and thrive.
Connor Sanchez
Lybia has been orchestrated by zionists and globalists (with Bernard Henry Levy as leader and initiator, he said it himself that he did it for Israël and zionism: identitejuive.com/bhl-sur-la-croisade-anti-kadhafi-ma-fidelite-au-sionisme-et-a-israel/), Sarkozy and Cameron. Sarkozy especially did it to cover his dirty deals (Gaddafi funded his 2007 campaign). Obongo and Clinton just jumped on the occasion.
By """pure coincidence""" that opened the path to a massive immigration influx of blacks (because the dictator wasn't in place anymore to contain them). There was absolutely no real reason to remove Gaddafi other than flooding Europe with niggers/muslims and eliminating a regional rival of Israël.
Blake Smith
What is Schengen ? What is the fucking European Court of Human Rights ? What are the threat of sanctions against Hungary and Poland ?
All of this shit is aimed at making immigration from Africa to Western Europe easier and to penalize the countries which would want to fix the problems. It's another layer on top of the already existing one to genocide european from their land.
Brandon Long
Yeah removing Ghaddafi was pretty dumb but the refugee wave that goes through Greece/the Balkans was mostly USA/Russia using Syria as a proxy state for their little wars, plus a bunch of opportunists from Iraq and the -stan countries whose countries got destabilized a decade earlier.
>The main reason why the EU was invented was to prevent war in Europe and you can bet they believe the best way to eliminate war is by making one singular European race like America has Americans. I don't think that would work. People tend to self segregate a lot. Even though they're less of a taboo than they used to be, mixed marriages are still a novelty rather than a norm and will remain that way for many centuries to come. No anti-racism/pro-diversity campaigns will be able to change that, you simply cannot force people to breed against their own will and the fact is most of us are attracted to the members of their own race. Not even America, which was a melting pot of cultures and races for like 500 years turned into one brown homogenous blob. There are less whites than there used to be in the last century, yes, but that's primarily due to the falling white birthrates and large immigration from Mexico and Southern America rather than race mixing.
Ian Bennett
I'm telling you making a 'European' race for a federalised Europ is their end goal. I'm not saying it will happen but that's what they want, thank god people are still segregated like you said (brexit) but lets face it, all major cities are rife with liberalism and race mixing and americanisation is inevitable, and now that the melting pot meme has spread through Amreica then Europe is next.
Zachary Morgan
>NUTS Region
Jaxon Kelly
Sweden decided to try to become a post-racial society in the 1970s. While I'm not saying my shitty government isn't involved (because it is) blaming it on the Middle East is stupid because these plans have been in motion for a long time.
Bentley Allen
exactly, canada has done the same thing civic nationalism is cancer
Adrian Sullivan
Civic nationalism isn't cancer, per say. The Swiss prove that, but has to be done with whites. I don't give two fucks about Ranjeet from India or Mugguo from Tanzania. They provide me with nothing and are not my kin.
Connor Cruz
Civic nationalism only works when creating a new nationality like America as you have to forgo your previous affiliations and so on for another in it's entirety.However, ethnic ties are just too hard to break especially when the civics start to view themselves as the same as ethnics which doesn't work as the ethnics actualy built the place and have a real ancestral bond to said country.
America is probs the only country in the entire world where civic nationalism didn't fail and actually worked due to the land having no ethnicity at the time other than red indians but who gives a fuck about them. Sorry if this was a bit hard to read or makes no sense, tramadol has kicked in kek
Aiden Scott
Bump
Jaxson Edwards
Read, bumped and rolled goyims.
Levi Kelly
roll
Asher Kelly
Bumpin and rollin
Brayden Bell
So does anyone have any theories about the future of the EU?
Michael Flores
...
Josiah Lee
Explosion, hopefullly. I'm more curious about what will happen after the EU, if there will be another union but only based on trades with no common currency or political structures.
Blake Carter
What do you think will happen to eastern europe if the EU dissolves? They seem heavily reliant on eu gibs right now
Ryder Bennett
Pan Europa without monarchy and aristocracy will lead to a downfall of values and the loss of regional culture.
