These kikes could end world poverty

Eight billionaires ''as rich as world's poorest half''.

The world's eight richest individuals have as much wealth as the 3.6bn people who make up the poorest half of the world. These billionaires could end world poverty.

In Swaziland, it would cost $85 million per year to reduce the poverty rate from 41% to 0%.

Swaziland's richest man, Nathan Kirsh, is worth $4,300 million. Kirsh companies are registered in tax havens.

Kirsh is the largest shareholder in, and is a director of, Magal Security Systems. Could a Few Billionaires Close the World's Poverty Gap?

Jews are disproportionately represented on the list of the world's wealthiest.

Other urls found in this thread:

order-order.com/2017/01/16/it-would-take-150-years-for-oxfam-to-raise-as-much-as-8-billionaires-they-attack-today/
youtube.com/watch?v=exnaY0l4XsM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Warren iz giving away all his money you dimb nigger, so is gates basically

Funny... I only see one Jew. Sup Forums was wrong again!

>Warren iz giving away all his money you dimb nigger, so is gates basically

>give Africans money
>they end up buying guns with it or smoking it

>These kikes could end world poverty with their wealth
no, they could end some nigger hunger for some ugly ass shoes but no matter the ammount of money given could end poverty

Philanthropy used to be quite a big thing, it's be nice to see it make a comeback.

>Ellison
>Zuckerberg
>Bloomberg

Does not name Rothschild or central banking shitty bait op.

you can't take the poverty and crime out of their brains. pic related

I can vouch for Bill and I like what Bezos is doing but I have no idea about the rest...

We don't need philanthropy now that it's govt mandated via tax and gibs.

No mention of the Bogdanoff guys...

yes and making 50K a year i'm as rich as 5% of Americans i assume

work harder

i plan to be part of the 1% in the next 15 years and every year i make another small step

Well I don't agree with greedy kikes amassing these fortunes, they can't end poverty by giving money to people.
People are generally poor due to stupidity, hence lottery winners and washed up rappers who are now broke.

Idk about Ellison and Ortega, but the rest of those cucks are leftists

Dot they believe in paying their "fair share"??

Really makes you think

426 billion $ divided by 3.6 billion people equals 118 $ for each of them.

Concentration of wealth is not the problem.

How to solve the world's poverty problem? Should start by ending the intellectual property.

If Bill Gates would give away his money to all Americans (325 mil.) every American would get $230.

Together they have a wealth of $427 billion

divide that by the poorest 3.6 billion = only $118.61 for each person

that's like giving them 33 cents a day for a year until it runs out

commie faggots would literally destroy the world's most successful corporations and put millions of people out of good productive jobs so some worthless shitskins can have an extra 33 cents a day for a year for sitting on their asses and producing nothing

Seen a couple of threads about this. Why is Rothschild not on the list?

Could end poverty tomorrow by culling off the worlds niggers

>Give the world cash in hand
>They spend it on stupid shit and it goes straight back up the line to the jews

Thanks, but the majority are still white non-Jewish males. Explain this.

Gates may have voted for Hillary but he supports a number of Trumps policies.

Alright fine. We take all 8 of those people and give every one of the 3.6 billion people who are poor 118 dollars leaving those 8 with nothing. That will solve the problem.

I think there isn't one specific Rothschild who makes the list, it's the family's combined wealth that dwarfs everything else.

That or they're just good at hiding it idk.

>tfw my inbreed national mate got this from kikebook

>no rothchilds

Really made my neurons fire up

are you autistic? obviously every person wouldn't be getting some envelope with money in it, instead infrastructure/aid would be provided to poor communities. at least have a reasonable strawman prepared, faggot.

If the world's GDP (or rather GWP) were distributed per capita, it'd have a similar standard of living to somewhere like Costa Rica or Thailand.

Commies want to lower us to that level.

a little bit of both probably

Because these Forbes rankings are all fake. They exclude people who got rich with dirty business.

>have a lot of gold
>give a lot of gold to the populace
>gold is now 100% worthless, nobody is rich

>have a lot of money
>???

This is
LITERALLY
the fucking core of economics. This is what they teach little babies.
Redistribute wealth = 0 wealth, not only do you end up poorer but all your job makers are now poor too.

>liquidate all the assets and debts of the 8 richest [less than US$427 bn] - including patents
>transfer all the cash to the poorest 3.6bn, equally
>every loser gets US$118,61
??? one month later?

>hateful get some good life getting jobs as CEOs, advisors, writing books, managing investment accounts, making commercials and later start leveraging on their own cash again

>on the other hand the 3.6 bn shitheads are asking for cash again

Problem solved

>post tfw you discover that income over $105,000USD is 90th percentile of individual incomes in US

Fuck the fuck off with this meme you commie faggot!

even if we deal equally all the cash and assets AND property in the world, it would take couple of years to idiots lose all their wealth and smartasses get millions again...

Just look at post-URSS Russia. 25 years later they got insanely unequal. Millionaires own 60% of the wealth

you dont understand the difference between wealth and income

YOU JUST FAILED AT COMMUNISM.

Lenin didn't shared the money of the richest. It just cancelled the money.

Seizing the mean of production != sharing the money of the rich.

cancer gtfo

>ending the intellectual property
Yep, the chinese would love this shit, while engineers, scientists and innovators would suck dicks for a living.

All democrats, except the Mexicans, who don't matter.

HMMMMMM....

just teach us on what infrastructure could help 3.6 bn people with 427 bn dollars, and who would manage the cash.
govts would probably build soccer stadiums pocketing half the cash.

Assuming that's even true, say you divide up their money among all the poorest people. Then what? Will those poorfags suddenly have a grasp on how to create wealth and infrastructure? Or will they continue being tards with a couple more bucks to their name?

"Humanitarian aid" is such a bad meme, when will we stop trying to force evolution?

hmm, yet Rockerfellas and Rothschildes not on there

>Not listing the Rothschilds

Why isn't Vladimir Putin on here? He's worth $60b at a conservative estimate.

infrastructure isn't just roads you dumb monkey faggot

it's shit like schools

have you heard of carnegie melon?

go research how that was founded

and get aids from a tranny

>this
with we make a huge lottery with all the assets, properties and cash in the world, the dumbest would still have to work for the smartest or get crushed even harder...

>carnegie melon
is this a farm?

Jews are basically 0.01% on the world population yet there are couple in this shortlist.

>carnegie melon

I knew this was going to be the edgy response

xDDDD IS DAT EVEN A SCHOOL WUT A STUPID NAME IM A BRAZLIAN XD IM SO WITTY LOL

sad that the joke's on you and your retarded country

Hello hillary

>only the poorest of the 8 richest are jews
OY VEY THIS IS ANUDDA SHOAH

Nope. Around 12 mil Jews on 7 nil world population that's almost .2%

Why they never mention the Rothschild family that has a networth of over 500 trillions?

...

The common excuse is that these lists exclude dictators or nobility.

its conveniently left out soros and the rothchild gang

The only thing you need to know about jews is that you're not allowed to talk about jews.

>set of royal families and dictators who derive their forture from positions of power
>a handful of african warlors with a few billions
>a handful of middle eastern poetrol emirs with maybe dozens of billions
>and 8 all Rotschilds with more than 2,000 billions
What a joke

Gee its like a leftist dream team of billionaires. I wonder if they are part of that nasty 1% that leftist love to wring their hands about.

thread number 435345 about this article and "inequality"
fuck off leftypol

SAGE

I'm no socialist and obviously "lol give their money to the poor" wouldn't help as much as one might thing... but we can do a lot better than a system that creates that kid of disparity.

We'll deal with this once we establish the ethno-state Lebensraum I guess

that investopedia claim of the family having 2 trillion dollars is completely unsubstantiated btw.

>I knew this was going to be the edgy response
pol, we have a wizard here

>literally destroy the world's most successful corporations and put millions of people out of good productive jobs

assuming we were taking their wealth we would also be taking the factories and land they own too. production wouldnt halt because some overpayed fags are jewed to irrelevance

>WORK HARDER

>Concentration of wealth is not the problem.

imbecile

at least half are, but Cuckerburg and Bezos are two liberal powerhouses

Why are you suck a cuckold for your masters?

lel no, they have to go

ALSI IMBECILE

Nice meme

WHY IS THIS THREAD FILLED WITH IDIOTS

>""""""leftists""""""

I lack information on investopedia. Is it generally a bad source? Is there a better source that invalidates the claim or that the method used to acquire the claim is invalid?

...

>the fucking core of economics.

no
its merely the core of the status quo

the 8 are merely an example mr shitbaiter

Once you control for cost of living being lower in a lot of the country (so a small income of like 30k is fine since you're just living on the farm anyway) and nearly half being non-whites, it makes sense.

Not really but okay.

so you give no shit about billions of poor people but all of sudden a mere 8 poor people is some crime against humanity? note that i dont think giving everyone in the world 118 bucks will solve anything, but be consistent you fucking faglord

>"world's poorest half''
We're literally talking about inherently useless and unproductive third world shitskins and niggers. What is even your argument?

So let's tax the rich!!!

(even though you'll never get that money from those billionaires through taxes since they'll never make it liquid)

Strawman much?

Leave amancio ortega alone

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

All of their assets are tied up in stocks.

If they started selling, the economy would take a hit.

>see also, what happened when Soros wanted to "prop up the ruble".

Not defending them. More of a criticism, actually. Accumulation of wealth like this is just irresponsible. You need to draw the line at some point and just retire...

>le ebin nigger meme

lol wtf where is soros. he's fucking poor as shit.

>the provably low iq of shitskins is a meme
But it isn't. Being productive in the modern world requires a significantly higher IQ than they have on average.

...

order-order.com/2017/01/16/it-would-take-150-years-for-oxfam-to-raise-as-much-as-8-billionaires-they-attack-today/

>Oxfam this morning launches an attack on eight billionaires whose wealth they label “grotesque“, claiming this “super-rich elite are able to prosper at the expense of the rest of us“. Guido has done some cursory digging and found that the eight billionaires lambasted by Oxfam have made at least $60 billion in charitable donations. By contrast Oxfam spends around £300 million a year on charitable causes. It would take more than 150 years for Oxfam to raise as much for charity as the eight billionaires they condemn today.

>Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft: More than $27 billion dollars in charitable donations, some 48% of his net worth, saving some 6 million lives fighting malaria and polio.
>Amancio Ortega, founder of Inditex: More than $95 million in charitable donations.
>Warren Buffett, CEO, Berkshire Hathaway: More than $21.5 billion in charitable donations.
>Carlos Slim Helu, owner of Grupo Carso: More than $4 billion dollars in charitable donations.
>Jeff Bezos, founder, Amazon: More than $25 million dollars in charitable donations, invests hundreds of millions in not-for-profit ventures.
>Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook: More than $1.6 billion in charitable donations.
>Larry Ellison, co-founder, Oracle: More than $564 million dollars in charitable donations.
>Michael Bloomberg, founder, Bloomberg LP: More than $4.22 billion dollars in charitable donations.

How much did YOU donate to charity last year OP? Faggot left-wing retard.

...

The Rothschilds and other prominent banker families have under centuries mastered the art of hiding their wealth and influence from the masses.

Most of the wealth is tied to various firms, trusts, holding companies which don't publish any figures to the plebs

>Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft: More than $27 billion dollars in charitable donations, some 48% of his net worth, saving some 6 million lives fighting malaria and polio.


throwing away money at niggers who will never amount to anything instead of doing anything truly useful. wow so inspiring.

gates is fucking hack

3 jews
5 goys

Fixed that headline for you OP

>Oxfam launch an attack on eight billionaires whose wealth they label “grotesque“
>claim this “super-rich elite are able to prosper at the expense of the rest of us“.
>these 8 people have made at least $60 billion in charitable donations
>Oxfam spends around £300 million a year on charitable causes.
>It would take more than 150 years for Oxfam to raise as much for charity as the eight billionaires they condemn

>Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft: More than $27 billion dollars in charitable donations, some 48% of his net worth, saving some 6 million lives fighting malaria and polio.
>Amancio Ortega, founder of Inditex: More than $95 million in charitable donations.
>Warren Buffett, CEO, Berkshire Hathaway: More than $21.5 billion in charitable donations.
>Carlos Slim Helu, owner of Grupo Carso: More than $4 billion dollars in charitable donations.
>Jeff Bezos, founder, Amazon: More than $25 million dollars in charitable donations, invests hundreds of millions in not-for-profit ventures.
>Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook: More than $1.6 billion in charitable donations.
>Larry Ellison, co-founder, Oracle: More than $564 million dollars in charitable donations.
>Michael Bloomberg, founder, Bloomberg LP: More than $4.22 billion dollars in charitable donations.

Doubling the 'wealth' of the poorest 50% will not end world poverty

youtube.com/watch?v=exnaY0l4XsM

Read Celebrity Humanitarianism by Illan Kapoor. It exposes modern celebrity humanitarianism for what is - a brand building technique. "I'm not like those evil conservative koch brother types, I care about starving phillipino children and stuff! Please look the other way when I play footsy with your electoral system!"

>stealing condoms from a free dispenser