>>107465802

Did she just call drug prices small potatoes?

I thought the democrats were all for cheaper healthcare

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jqQPTxo_voo
youtube.com/watch?v=QNfBo8biMiE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

bump for tucker

>"Hey this lady said some stuff about white people, how do you feel?"
>avoid race-baiting question
>he keeps pressing
>she answers the question that
>entire convo revolves around race thanks to Cucker

>call Democrats race-baiting

Every time I'm told Cucker BTFO of someone I watch the interview and he's really just being an asshole while the interviewee maintains poise and gets exhausted.

Now he's trying to holder her accountable for what Obama did. This interview is bullshit. None of the questions actually involved her. The entire interview was "so-and-so did this. How do you feel about that?"

well he tries to find one point where the other person isnt capable of responding and then sticks to that for as long as possible.
it's not extremely fair but then again, why shouldnt he do it like that?
whats the point of wasting airtime on points that you kinda agree on anyway and where you see that the other person has a sorta reasonable view anyway.. there is no point.
Tucker wants to find one of the liberal nutjob views and drive that home and there's always a crazy view that these ppl have.

liberal show hosts have done the same for many years and in a much worse way.

This woman wants to be the LEADER OF THE DNC

As someone who lives in an area that's controlled by dems it's worrying that she refuses to acknowledge that powerful democrats are making statements that are racist towards whites. Any time he tries to goad her towards the middle she goes back to a classic defensive stance. It shows the democratic party is not learning anything, they will keep destroying themselves by starting useless battles and losing

Fuck you whitey. Fuck drumpfh and fuck white peoples. Yaaa

>why shouldnt he do it like that?
I don't know what he should or shouldn't do but I'm just calling it like I see it.

He's trying to corner people into some kind of philosophical contradiction but it's not really for the purpose of reaching some kind of greater truth but just to tear them down as an individual and make them look dumb on TV. It's like some clever twit in 9th grade saying "oh ho professor but if there are no absolutes then that statement isn't true checkmate atheists". Basically he straddles the line between interviewing and just unabashed trolling.

It's clearly the intention and it kind of works but it's still gay as shit when you analyze it. I'm sure the target audience loves it.

>liberal show hosts have done the same for many years and in a much worse way.
That may be the case but I wouldn't be the one here saying BTFO. Actually I would shitpost that on Sup Forums but only because I knew it was dumb bullshit that will make people mad.

/r/ing the Tucker Carlson pepe.

>"white people don't know what its like to be poor"
>"these people are deplorable and irredeemable"
>"we don't need white people leading the DNC"

You were probably one of the liberal faggots going around saying Trump didn't denounce the KKK. These people need to answer for these statements. I don't care if they don't but it's at the core of why they LOST THE ELECTION.