Who is worse?

who is worse?

Merkel, because she has power

Merkel, she actually runs a country. Clinton is a wannabe hack. That said, if Clinton had the power Merkel had, Clinton would be way worse.

Merkel by far. Destroyed Germany forever.

Hillary would have been worse if she wasn't such a fucking loser

Merkel seems to just be a well intentioned brainwashed dummy who is being handled from behind the scenes.

Clinton is the one who handles.

Is there any question?
Of course it's the one who's been ruling this country and is realistically impossible to depose for another 4 years.

Clinton, Merkel isn't a war criminal who takes saudi money, become rich doing public service and charity work and has her own plane (on a government salary). Clinton is literally third world African-tier politician, the only thing she didn't do was kill her opposition.

>he hasn't heard of Vince Foster

...

Only one of them has actual, long-lasting power.

The other is but a blight on yuropoor history.

Merkel. By a big margin. Hillary just represents the previous American status quo and she only ran for the job itself with no ideological agenda.

>who is worse?
Merkel for sure but Hillary would have been just as bad if she'd won the election.

Hillary

Merkel, but only because she actually found herself in control of something.

Clinton, for destabilizing North Africa and Middle Earth sovereignty. Merkel gets the "blame" wrongly for welcoming refugees made by US Intervention: Syrians, Afghans... Where Gandafi helped on border control. We europeans are guilty too but the major player never assumes their responsabilities or takes the majority of refugees.

>who is worse?

they look like clones.

Merkel because she will win the election.

This

People underestimate Merkel

am I seeing double

Why do non-europeans hate Merkel more than Europeans do?