Before 1965, the United States was 85% white. Today, racial and ethnic minorities make up one-third of the population. Before 1965, the immigrant stream was largely European. Today, most new arrivals to this country come from Mexico, China and India.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act, changed the way quotas were allocated by ending the National Origins Formula that had been in place in the United States since the Emergency Quota Act of 1921.
>Previous laws restricted immigration from Asia and Africa, and gave preference to northern and western Europeans over southern and eastern Europeans. In the 1960s, the United States faced both foreign and domestic pressures to change its nation-based formula. Abroad, former military allies and new independent nations aimed to delegitimize discriminatory immigration, naturalization and regulations through international organizations like the United Nations
Senator Ed Kennedy claimed:
>The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1-3.)
After Kennedy's assassination, President Lyndon Johnson signed the bill , the bastard who destroyed the west.
REPEAL HART CELLER
Other urls found in this thread:
sli.mg
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
cis.org
thealternativehypothesis.org
thealternativehypothesis.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
pastebin.com
pastebin.com
realjewnews.com
kevinmacdonald.net
youtube.com
archive.fo
archive.fo
archive.fo
vox.com
youtube.com
ontheissues.org
ice.gov
twitter.com
Timeline:
>1921
Emergency Quota Act establishes National Origins Formula to slow down immigration from outside Western Europe
>1964
White percentage of USA - 88.6%
>1965
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 AKA Hart-Celler Passes, eliminating quotas and requirement that immigration mainly come from Western Europe, and introducing family reunification or "chain migration".
>1970
White percentage of USA - 87.7%
>1976
President Carter Backs 'Legitimate Status' for Nation's Long-Time Illegal Immigrants or "Undocumented Workers"
>1980
Presidential contenders George HW Bush and Ronald Reagan debate who will be more 'humane' to the 'family-loving people' counter-signaling 'putting up a fence' and 'make it possible for them to come here legally on a work permit' and to 'open the border both ways'
>1986
Ronald Reagan signs the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 aka into law. It allowed '3 million people in the country illegally to gain legal status' aka granted amnesty. It's restrictions, that it "required employers to attest to their employees' immigration status, and made it illegal to hire or recruit illegal immigrants knowingly" were never sufficiently enforced, and were never intended to be sufficiently enforced.
Americans would together outnumber non-Hispanic White Americans
>1990
Immigration Act (IMMACT) signed by George H. W. Bush, immigration cap increased to ~625,000
This act expanded the number of family-based immigration visas allotted per year to 480,000 but to do this it also made the definition of family more exclusive by limiting it to immediate family members
Introduced the Diversity Immigrant Visa "a new, important facet of the amendment that had never been instituted in national immigration policy before. "Starting in 1991, every year the Attorney General, decides from information gathered over the most recent five year period the regions or country that are considered High Admission or Low Admission States" "
>1996
Bill Clinton signs the IIRAIRA, instituting some greater border security, deportations, and restrictions, but largely security theater and ineffective. 40 mile border fence installed.
>2016
White percentage of USA in 2016 - 63.0%
>2042
At the current rate, White people not referring to themselves as Hispanic will no longer be a majority but rather only a plurality of the population of the United States. Minority groups, led by Hispanic Americans (mainly Mexican Americans), Black Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Pacific Islanders
>INFOGRAPHICS
sli.mg
>REQUIRED WATCHING
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>REQUIRED READING PART 1
cis.org
thealternativehypothesis.org
thealternativehypothesis.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
>REQUIRED WATCHING AND READING PART 2
>Some ideas floating around
pastebin.com
pastebin.com
>Some Jewish elements to mass immigration
realjewnews.com
kevinmacdonald.net
youtube.com
>How the Jews Opened America's Borders
>The wages narative
The big 'Why?':
Why were federal agents provocateur infiltrating and smashing Black Nationalist and White Separatist movement from the 50s to the 80s?
Why was union desegregation pushed so heavily?
Why do modern union heads support mass immigration and amnesty?
Mass Migration Driving Down Wages
archive.fo
Increasing the Supply of Labor Through Immigration: Measuring the Impact on Native-born Workers
archive.fo
All Employment Growth Since 2000 Went to Immigrants
Number of U.S.-born not working grew by 17 million
archive.fo
Mass immigration drives down wages to the LCD, and provides jobs for an army of social workers and rent seekers.
I'm going to start listing some narratives I've succesfully used on normie Levin/Limbaugh/Hannity/Stossel conservatives and Libertarians:
Careful, though, these are just for providing some insight into a different point of view, not an endgame. We do not meet them halfway. We do not ultimately capitulate. The name of the game is get them to our side.
>"root and branch": weak roots lead to sickly branches
This is more geared toward normie conservatives that don't want to hear about the heritability of cognitive and behavioral traits, so the idea is the """"culture"""" is rotten, and so to may be the people that come from there.
E.g.
>Brazil
>Deep in the roots of corruption, neptotism, "anti-capitalism", fatherlessness, increasing godlessness
>Leads to the current """"liberal"""" problems it faces today
>Leads to branches such as crime, proverty, moral decay, drug use
>Transplanting some branches to a different tree is not the same as fixing the problems at the root
>"insurance pool vs charity" a country needs to be run like the former not the latter, taking into account different aggregate risks
The idea is
>An insurance company can only take in a limited amount of people into its risk pool
>A nation can only take in a limited amount of people before carrying capacity is reached
>An insurance company looks at factors such as income, credit score health risks, whether one falls into a high or low risk age/sex group etc to make sure premiums are paid often and on time, while it pays out as minimally as possible
>A nation should similarly look at factors such as welfare usage, birth rates, crime rates, etc vs how much certain groups pay in taxes
>"cheaper to help 10 over there than 1 over here"
>"carrying capacity is limited; if we limit by quantity we thus have to limit by qualifiers"
>"brain drain from the third world worsens the third world"
>"stopping the boats stops unscrupulous mules from jeopardizing the lives of refugees"
>"refugee safe zones+population transfers+ethnic self determination+border restructuring+strong man dictators+education+infant industry protection+birth control is better than sending fugees to the US and Europe"
>"Front of the line or back of the line doesn't matter, letting illegals on the line for citizenship at because they hopped the border by virtue and luck of their proximity to us while some Ukrainian who follows the legal process may take years to get here undermines the system"
>Stricter immigration?
Well yeah, the idea is
>The US can only take in X number of people before shit starts falling apart
>If it is limiting people by quantity anyway, there is no greater or lesser ethical judgement for taking them from one group of people, or another.
>(7 billion-x) will always be disenfranchised from coming here
>Therefore, the US could establish stricter immigration controls, to take the same quantity of people, but with different qualifiers, and come out none the less evil to Liberals and Cuckservatives
(Watch Immigration Gumballs if you haven't already for the same narrative)
>You think immigration restrictions in the US are bad? You should see what they do in [country]!
>Mass immigration is not free market in the current system. Immigration is currently a government program. It's run by the government. It largely helps firms that lobby the government. It largely helps a rent seeking civil service sector that works for governments. It votes in bigger government.
>If you don't think Cultural Integration is important, check out the Yugolslav Balkan wars. Same genetics, different cultures. [Haplogroup map.png]
>One of the reasons we got rid of quotas in the first place was that Western Europeans were disproportionate in number in the US and that was unfair; since Hispanics are disproportionate in number in the current system, we may have to "fix" that again to be "fair" to other people
>Preferably both the welfare state and immigration can be scaled back, but if one has to go it's the former. It's easier to stop people not here already and with little affinity from the host population than to gut a system used by many and with a good deal of affinity from the host population
>Many people from the former USSR brought nepotistic and kleptocratic elements due to their coming from a failed GAWDLEZZ GOMMUNISM
This is the foot-in-the-door
>Many people from the Islamic world bring their arranged marriages, incest, Sharia zones, FGM, and culture not to go to the police even when there is abuse in the home
This is what pries the door open, especially for basic-bitch Conservatives already redpilled on Islam
>It's not therefore unreasonable that people from Africa, Mexico, South America, and Central America wouldn't bring those [solely cultural] problems with them
last one for now:
>Which side of the hyphen are we on? We're CIVIC NATIONALISTS here, like TR. Why are [group] then happy to self-segregate? If they wanted their own enclave, they could have stayed in their own country!
>Low birthrates - problems that solve themselves
Blacks
Asians
Liberal Whites
>High birthrates
Hispanics
Conservative whites
The US mainly has a bean problem, that can be taken care of with carrot and stick.
>What about raising the White Birthrate without being explicit about it?
I would include tax breaks for engineers and scientists that do their work from home, for farm families, financial incentives for stay-at-home moms, for white children, which get increased with every child they have. Higher financial and social incentives for marriage. Remove no-fault divorce to prevent broken families. Incentives for Oil workers, Miners, rural growth (to take pressure off urban growth) etc.
while amping up "proactive policing", reducing or eliminating the Affirmative Action, Jobs, Amnesty, Birthright Citizenship, and Benefits magnets, and helping to instill a nativist culture, we will basically increase the quantity and birth rates of Whites- Anglo-Saxon Scots-Irish whites- while decreasing the quantity and birth rate of everyone else.
We don't have to get it to 100%, just to what things were around 1964.
Get #RepealHartCeller through to pic related
#RepealHartCeller
@realDonaldTrump @SenateMajLdr @ChuckGrassley @SenatorSessions @SpeakerRyan @GOPLeader @RepGoodlatte @TGowdySC
#BuildTheWall
@realDonaldTrump @SenateMajLdr @ChuckGrassley @SenatorSessions @SpeakerRyan @GOPLeader @RepGoodlatte @TGowdySC
tinyurl/50pointplan
@realDonaldTrump @SenateMajLdr @ChuckGrassley @SenatorSessions @SpeakerRyan @GOPLeader @RepGoodlatte @TGowdySC
Quoting internbro's plan of attack:
Like I previously mentioned, I'm an intern at a Republican Congressman's district office in Jew York State.
I'll lay out a few tips if you want this to be heard based on how these offices operate. For some, if not many of you, these will be common sense but I'll lay it out anyways.
>1.
Let's get a Hart-Celler Act general going to keep this effort going. Daytime Sup Forums could really propel this.
>2.
Don't just call your local Congressman once about this. Write a letter. Sup Forums needs to get a form letter going and spam that shit with a thousand different names. Quantity is the name of the game here. If you play dirty, do NOT use the same name twice.
>3.
Check out which House committees and Subcommittees your congressman serves on. If they serve on the Immigration and Border Security House Judiciary Committee, your voice counts more because your Congressman has extra clout.
>4.
There's a huge drive from Conservative constituents sending in letters urging the Congressmen to end birthright citizenship. If you can tie that into your letter as well, fucking kudos. You give the Hart-Celler Act grievances AND the birthright citizenship grievances legitimacy via numbers simultaneously. Killing two birds with one stone.
>5.
Don't contact any Congressman outside your district. They can't do shit for you and your letter goes into the trash.
>6.
If your state has a senate, FUCKING CONTACT THEM. All Sup Forumsacks from, for example, Virginia can contact a state senator about this. No, I'm not talking about the two senators from each state. I'm referring to the senate that states sometimes set up (I know NY has one)
>5.
But DO contact your Senator about this if they are Republican. In your letter to the Senator, mention you're contacting your Congressman and vice versa.
>1
If you're in a blue state, find out what seats are up for election soon in your state and find out if any republicans are running for it. Send them letters saying you'll support them if they promise to repeal the Hart-Celler act.
Even blue states should have Republican local, state, and federal representatives that can be contacted.
>2
Warn the Democratic local, state, and federal representatives of consequences of what may occur if sanctuary status by governmental or academic institutions, or employment of illegal entrants and visa overstays, or harboring of them continues. Ask what is it worth to them to have grants, appropriations, subsidies, services, etc cut? Is this the hill they want to die on, or would the prefer to work with Trump on auditing the US' FTAs?
>3
The unions are the wallet of the Democratic party on all levels- however one richfag can outspend an entire union.
Try to call up local union heads, posters in union shops, talk to people in unions and ask why the HQs all support amnesty, mass immigration, and 'immigration reform', which atomizes the American worker, why they supported the current trade system, and why they support the current Democratic party.
Also ask what happens when the interests of a few richfags ("free" trade/mass immigration) runs counter to millions of union members, when the former's donations to democrats far outweigh the latter's.
>4
Point out the traditional Democratic view on mass immigration (even though more Democrats than Republicans voted for Hart Celler, that's because they were greater in number. A greater PROPORTION of Democrats than PROPORTION of Republicans voted against Hart Celler.
The Tipp O Neill house at least payed lip service to greater employer fines and restrictions to get amnesty through.
The Bill Clinton WH at least payed lip service with the IIRAIRA on illegal immigration restrictions.
Even Bernie Sanders said
>Open borders? No, that's a Koch brothers proposal.
vox.com
youtube.com
Among other choice words
Point out even HRC's comments on a border fence. Point out that
>if they want to win, they can't fall to the lunacy of the Hard Left. That's how we win. """"We"""" are the """"pragmatic"""" party
Play to their egos.
Point out that Democrats popular with Unions, like Webb, were at least a halfway point between HRC version 2016 and Trump on the issue of immigration.
ontheissues.org
Point out how devastating losing the rust belt was.
Oh, and immigration gumballs.
Let's get a daily Repeal Hart Celler going
>Why not restrict immigration to Western Europe again?
(((They))) flooded Europe with shitskins. This way if we go back to the previous law they'll move a mass of shitskins from Europe to the US.
Which is why I tell pure Ethnonationalists
>You know and I know that a Black Swede or a Turkish Finn is an oxymorin
>However, politicians and the text of the law do not make the same distinctions between White Europeans and Europeans of other races. They just see people from Europe
>It is thus important that we add elements to the new immigration system, such as no family reunification, "extra vetting", highly meritocratic "labor integration" etc.
>Combine this with domestic efforts to "make the people feel safe in their communities"
>Combine this with foreign efforts, esp with Russia, to bring order and strongmen into the Mideast, and sort out the shit proxy wars
>Combine with with pushing Europe to get stricter policing, border patrol, immigration, deportation, and repatriation programs
This is why I said be careful with narratives. Ultimately, don't capitulate to cuckservative narratives or meet them half way. We push them, not the other way around.
Jews or Cucks?
Why not both?
Any questions?
...
Welfare usage and immigration status
More on Obama and his illegal immigration policy
More on welfare
Even more on welfare
More on BHO's immigration policies
>Average Joe?
ICE loves citizen reports.
When Trump gets in, feel free to call them and they will kick up operations.
>So anyone have twitter?
#RepealHartCeller
@realDonaldTrump @SenateMajLdr @ChuckGrassley @SenatorSessions @SpeakerRyan @GOPLeader @RepGoodlatte @TGowdySC
>Live in the States?
Write, call, and tweet your reps.
tinyurl/50pointplan
>Live outside the states?
pastebin.com
@ukhomeoffice @trussliz @BrunoLeRoux @JJUrvoas @justice_gouv @BMI_Bund @angealfa @johanssonmorgan @Ygeman
or whoever deals with your immigration, justice, policing, and security forces.
>Going to the inauguration?
Bring some signs.
>Know of any bean activity in your town?
Call ICE.