>We've noted repeatedly how Trump's incoming telecom advisors have made it very clear they not only want to gut net neutrality, but defund and defang the FCC. That means rolling back all manner of other recent FCC policies, like the agency's recently approved broadband privacy rules. They really were relatively fundamental; simply requiring that ISPs not only make it clear what's being collected and who it's being sold to, but requiring they provide working opt-out tools to broadband subscribers.
>ISPs and the advertising and marketing industry are already getting a running start on rolling back these new privacy rules. In a joint filing by all of the major advertising lobbying and trade associations, the advertising industry this week was quick to submit a petition to the FCC claiming that the new rules aren't necessary because the marketing sector already adheres to a "self-regulatory" regime that delivers all the transparency, choice and benefits that consumers could possibly handle.
>The FCC imposed rules specifically thanks to the lack of competition in the broadband last mile, a lack of competition that lets ISPs and advertisers impose draconian new consumer surveillance policies the consumer can't vote to avoid with their wallet. The FCC was particularly nudged to action by the discovery that Verizon and its ad partners were covertly modifying user packets to track users around the internet.
>At no point did industry, or any of its self-regulatory apparatuses, stop and think they'd taken things a bit too far, which is why the FCC, agree or not, felt it was necessary to lend consumers a hand. The FCC was also concerned about a growing push by some ISPs to make opting out of data collection a pricey, luxury option for consumers, "self-regulatory safeguards" be damned.
Is there anything Trump can do to where you say you're against it and it's wrong? Or will you suck his cock nomatter what because its edgy and contrarian
Brandon Walker
DELETE THIS
Leo Martinez
Trump cult of personality. When you combine that with the fact people don't want to admit they make a mistake you have huge amounts of people doing mental gymnastics to justify the actions of the God Emperor.
Parker Gomez
>What the heck has this place become?
It's a neocon globalist neoliberal board now. They are pro-whatever the GOP is in favor of. Trump could come out in favor of banning guns and everyone on here would agree.
Brayden Smith
It won't. You'll be forced to get a vpn, then your ISP will throttle that so severely you can't do anything with it.
Zachary Hill
>It won't. You'll be forced to get a vpn, then your ISP will throttle that so severely you can't do anything with it.
AT LEAST THAT BITCH SHILLARY ISN'T IN THE WHITE HOUSE AM I RITE GUYS?
Ayden Sullivan
Any data the ISP has can be hacked by criminals. I have no illegal activity to hide, but I wouldn't want my Sup Forums posts sent to my boss.
Blake Mitchell
I heard Trump say he wanted to 'close up that internet'.
But I still voted for him ( I am a burger on a vpn )
That is how bad Shillary was.
Connor Cox
she hates privacy too. There's no non-statist option in american politics.
Dominic Robinson
>be american >all the major ISPs are part of libtard companies that hate Trump
Trump needs to fuck these companies hard. Their internet branch uses their monopolies to screw over customers while their news branch keeps shitting on Trump.
If Trump gives them anything they want he's a bigger cuck than Obongo.
Joseph Diaz
>who is Gary Johnson >who is Jill Stein
Ryder Rodriguez
made a mistake? how?
Julian Roberts
People who were not going to build wall.
Let these fuckers in and we're not keeping any rights.
Protecting freedom means protecting our culture and people.
Jordan Hernandez
Allow news to be sued let net have competition
Leo Miller
>she hates privacy too wrong. she hates encryption and security i can tell you that
Levi Cooper
What freedoms are you talking about? What culture? What people?
Dylan Lee
The people coming in don't care about the Bill of Rights. They want gimmedats and have not learned to value our rights. They are used to rights being trampled. Even the middle and upper class ones don't come from cultures that value the enlightenment.
And poor people tend not to give a shit about rights. More poor people pushes politics in a certain way.
Also diversity breeds strife which will be the excuse for taking rights away.
Justin Rivera
Look ma, now I'm a burger again
John Green
Have you guys never heard of the expression: The revolution eats its own?
Matthew Wood
I supported Trump in the vain hope he will shut down Sup Forums
Please, President Trump, free us from this hell.
Lincoln Fisher
get real, trump is awesome! the internet is completely rekt because of money. i cant surf the web using ip blocking firewall like osx little snitch because of how bad the internet is tracked.
i say again, the internet is 1984's winston's tubes of edits and censorships. its ruined. mostly because commerce money, (have u ever paid google any money? or fb?) amd partly because political regulation (icann/un control. great firewall of china. iran wanting to de-link)
so yeah, Trump, throw some keking chaos into the mix. thanks!
ps streaming multimedia ruined network neutrality and brought the normies online. rekt
Thomas Torres
We were going to lose privacy with Hillary too. Made the decision easy. I don't regret my decision to vote Trump, and would do it again, but I hope he changes his mind on this.
He never would have been elected without Net Neutrality and this just hands all the power back to the MSM that has worked tirelessly to bury him and continues to do so.
Justin Nelson
Fake and gay
Landon Perry
looks like aol and compuserv
i edited the aol "u got mail" wav to "u got porn" because even on the gui shit u posted, i assure you, porn spam will get to you.
could find alot on the aol gui i am sure they didnt intend
Charles Anderson
Kek Still believing there will be a wall
Samuel Moore
...
Camden Cooper
Russian disinfo agent detected
Blake Gonzalez
>Is there anything Trump can do to where you say you're against it and it's wrong? if he stepped down and handed Hillary the presidency, maybe a few trumptards would have their select, few neurons rattling, but in the end they'd come out defending it, because what Trump does is right and righteous.
Christian Kelly
>id and integer
the wall could be digital like the great firewall of china. exclude illegal aliens from commerce(buying gas,food,hotels)
the wall was funded by congress almost a decade ago btw.
i prefer a drone wall. get heil hitlered for walking into usa. like a blitzkreig
Christian Phillips
>Latinos don't care about the Constitution >Latinos don't care about family values >Latinos don't value labor and hard work
Don't fall for that meme.
Sebastian Campbell
>made a mistake? how? voting for Dålan Blæmph
Logan Bell
...
Jaxon Garcia
...
Jaxson Stewart
...
Parker Lee
>Let these fuckers in and we're not keeping any rights. Mexicans gonna take away your internet anonymity? >Protecting freedom .. he wrote, and voted for the guy who wants to take his internet anonymity.
Jose Lopez
>People who were not going to build wall. >Let these fuckers in and we're not keeping any rights. >Protecting freedom means protecting our culture and people.
There is literally nothing wrong with legal immigration from Latin America.
Jaxon Perry
Thanks Sup Forums you guys sure are smart
For the lulz right guys
John White
>the wall could be digital yes, true.. Trump himseld said, he's gonna get tough on cyber and his son is real good with computers and such.
it'll be great, tremendous, believe me.
Colton James
Most Latinos on the west coast prefer their native flag to the American flag.
Latinos do not care about free speech, and Trump events on California were attacked by violent Latinos.
Justin Harris
those lulz are getting saltier by the minute, it seems.
Austin Williams
Heh.
Lucas Foster
Its fake because it's not pro putin or trump. Please pay attention
Jaxon Brooks
>a world without tumblr, reddit, Sup Forums, facebook >bad
Burn it down, Mr. Trump.
Sebastian Foster
Wouldn't that be a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Isaiah Davis
This is basically the reason why this will be the worst 4 years since ww2
Jason Lee
I don't know about Canada but here in the U.S.A. a huge chunk of the established white population doesn't know what the enlightenment is and thinks the Flintstones is historically accurate.
Isaiah Ross
>Donald Trump fixes USposter problem.
Sounds pretty based to me desu.
Christopher Barnes
Because it has nothing to do with Trump or members of his administration.
Jose Rogers
Burn yourself faggot
Caleb Wright
Yes, Mexicans would take my internet anonymity. Maybe to get my porn. Maybe the rage they would provoke would cause problems and I'd lose it from them dealing with that.
Kevin Campbell
Lolwut
Zachary Martin
>techdirt
Literally who?
Joseph Ortiz
Catholics would take my porn.
Criminals would take my freedom when the government cracks down on their shenanigans.
Ethnocentric others would make my (minority white) race into terrorists who would end up on a watch list.
Welfare dependents would take my tax money
Left voters and PC would take my freedom of speech ( and anonymity when they crack down on it )
Extra people would take my worth as labor and financial freedom
etc etc
Nathan Allen
We make eVerify real and they self deport.
But that would be lobbied to death, chipped away into meaninglessness by businesses that want to hire the people that walk across the border easily and are always available.
If there were jobs here, then a wall would not keep them out. But because there will be no jobs they won't bother getting past the wall.
Because there is no illegal labor to tempt businesses they don't lobby eVerify away
The wall is to keep the lobbyists out of washington.
Jonathan Nguyen
They don't. Maybe ones that have been here for some generations and have mostly assimilated, but assimilation is severely delayed by continued immigration and ghettoization due to that.
The American outlook is a product of history - ones recent immigrants don't have.
Maybe one out of many values these things, but this doesn't matter. The voting block values these things less.
Valuing freedom is already rare enough amongst Americans.
Parker Sanders
>net neutrality One of the worst propaganda names in history
Gabriel Hall
And it's worse amongst the immigrants.
Anyway I am the guy you replied to, I was on a vpn.
Jaxson Smith
>Obamacare caused almost 297,000 small business to close their doors Hang the nigger
Gabriel Green
Nothing. We need to uphold protections for users.
Camden Powell
... but WW2 was the best thing that the US has ever done, economically? Hell, it was so profitable even countries we bombed the shit out profited.
This country needs a good war. And to gas the kikes.
Benjamin Sullivan
>competition in the last mile The word monopoly has to be one of the most abused Words IN THE Lady Century.
As if competition must be manifested every step of the way to ensure the looming spectre of the self evident evil that is monopoly doesn't take shape
Chase Nguyen
Yes, competition must be manifested every step of the way or the one link that doesn't manifest it will use their valuable monopoly position to hold every other position hostage and reap insane rewards for doing next to nothing but collecting rent.
Jaxon Thomas
Don't let this slide Bump
Asher Torres
>I hold the monopoly on penis shaped pasta, cornering the market, therefore I should be broken up What retards actually believe
Nicholas Bell
Soon enough that VPN will be disallowed by your ISPs terms of service.
This is the future you chose.
Jeremiah Thomas
>all the major ISPs are part of libtard companies that hate Trump >Trump needs to fuck these companies hard
His transition team has cronies from those very same companies. Read the article. Retard.
Charles Cruz
What is there to slide?
It's an article from more than 2 weeks ago, linking to another article from 2 months ago about the personal beliefs of advisers Trump picked 2 months ago. It's not like it's news, so all we can hope is that Trump won't listen to them.
Daniel Collins
AND WE ALL KNOW WHY
Jaxon Jackson
...
Kevin Taylor
Literally Rebbit and Facebook-tier memes.
Joseph Morales
You guys made a mistake. He will make changes, and he will maga. But these will be changes you'll come to resent and he will not maga for you.
Kevin Flores
>what is a leppo
Kayden Morales
...
John Parker
If there were demand I would compete with you and you would lose your monopoly. This is impossible with last mile cable .
Colton Edwards
>trump is not a politician >trump is a corrupt politician
pick one buddy
Charles Jackson
True, but I would have gotten here just as surely with unchecked immigration and gimmedats. And I would be living in communist land and be an even more endangered minority.
Lincoln Carter
Here, actual real news as opposed to assumptions about what Trump will do because of advisers he picked months ago.
>That’s a huge and troubling shift in the way those intelligence agencies receive information collected by the NSA. Domestic agencies like the FBI are subject to more privacy protections, including warrant requirements. Previously, the NSA shared data with these agencies only after it had screened the data, filtering out unnecessary personal information, including about innocent people whose communications were swept up the NSA’s massive surveillance operations.
>As the New York Times put it, with the new rules, the government claims to be “reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.”
>Under the new, relaxed rules, there are still conditions that need to be met before the NSA will grant domestic intelligence analysts access to the raw streams of data it collects. And analysts can only search that raw data for information about Americans for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes, not domestic criminal cases.
>However—and this is especially troubling—“if analysts stumble across evidence that an American has committed any crime, they will send it to the Justice Department,” the Times wrote. So information that was collected without a warrant—or indeed any involvement by a court at all—for foreign intelligence purposes with little to no privacy protections, can be accessed raw and unfiltered by domestic law enforcement agencies to prosecute Americans with no involvement in threats to national security.
Kevin Jenkins
Because the competition should be upstream and last mile competition is fucking meaningless
Monopolies aren't inherently wrong either
Isaiah Flores
>Putting his hand over trumps mouth to stop him from tweeting.
Oliver Peterson
You say that, but then they jack you prices. because who else are you gonna turn to?
Charles Hernandez
Trump isn't perfect. He made it clear he considered Snowden an enemy to the state. But nothing he says or does will convince me he wasn't better than Hillary.
