So...

So, I always keep my hair long and generally wear tshirts with artists like bob-marley or more "mainstream" "non-violent" video game stuff like mario or such, own no guns, and generally could be described as a "borderline hippy" with my beard and hair. I'm still even registered as a dem since I first got a liscence six years ago and the last time I spoke to anyone outside of immediate family and one friend who would blatantly lie for me at a hatdrop, was a staunch obama supporter to the ire of my conservative friends. How hard would it be for someone like me who is so publicly a leftie to infiltrate a group such as antifa and either leak info anonymously or work my way up through the ranks while sabotaging efforts. Are there any good books to read on such an effort, or any other sources that can help? I believe more Sup Forumsacks should use our autism to infiltrate and subvert, and believe in abiding by my own word.

well good thinking except Antifa is meaningless and nobody cares about it.

Maybe it's different in the US, but here Antifa was kind of a force in say 2004 but now it's completely gone

I say choose some actually influential organization

Please become CTR shill double agent for us

Well yeah antifa probably wasnt the best example but they're the one more talked about here as of recent so I just went with them.
I don't think I could get into the higher positions of any more central establishment organizations like the DNC or shit Soros funds myself as I'm going for a meme degree in comp sci and its far too late to change that course.

If I knew how the fuck to actually sign up sure

Isn't an easy way to di that just:

Product = a(b)
?

>trying to disrupt grassroots organizations because they disagree with you

utter cancer, might as well join the NSA or FBI now you statist faggot

the true conflict is the one against the establishment

I don't think that actually counts in compiling for most languages but I've never actually tried using it in code myself

yes that will definitely work

>Thinking any of those leftie grassroots are anti-establishment
not even the anarchists are anymore so long as the establishment has a D besides their name on the ballot, I should know I had a hige hardon for obama and was incredibly anti-establishment under bush but the moment Obama came into office I did a 180

the question doesn't want you to use premade product methods so you should do it with a loop

int product(int a, int b) {
boolean flipSign = false;
if(b < 0) {
b = -b
flipSign = true;
}
int product = 0;
for(int i =0; i < b; i++ {
product += a;
}
if(flipSign) {
product = -product;
}
return product;
}

For loop b times a=a+a

fuuuu let me fucking format my code!! reeee

int product(int a, int b) {
.....boolean flipSign = false;
..........if(b < 0) {
...............b = -b
...............flipSign = true;
..........}
.....int product = 0;
.....for(int i =0; i < b; i++ {
..........product += a;
.....}
.....if(flipSign) {
..........product = -product;
.....}
.....return product;
}

doesn't handle negative b cases

int product(int a, int b) {
int result=0;
for (int c=1; c

that does not handle the negative b case.

product(2, -2) returns 0

When all the pro-remain stuff started there campaign I enthusiastically joined to help them deliver leaflets, organise meetings and drive people around if necessary.
As soon as I was given a bunch if leaflets to deliver I dumped them in recycling bins. When I had to arrange meetings I always rescheduled the venues at the last minute to the worst possible venues to get to, and gave out conflicting information, so almost no one attended. The real money maker though was being the driver, i made sure all my trips expenses were covered + extra, i always arrived late if I arrived at all and almost nobody got to go to where they needed to on time often taking long needles detours.

It can be done.

>grass roots
>antifa
pick one.

literally jidf tier, didnt even scratch my noodle. try harder.

true. will yours handle *0 tho? need your iterator to start at 1

with mine if product(2, 0) was input you would get to the loop with:

for(int i = 0; i < 0; i++)

since i is not LESS than 0, the loop never runs so the returned result is zero.

but if you are *-1 b then the loop will never run with positive a

positive i i mean

stfu NERDS

if -1 b is given, then the first if statement will run which will change b to positive 1. since i 0 is less then 1 b the loop will run one time, then have the result flipped by the boolean that was set earlier when b was flipped.

>girls who code
>checks the code in the picture
>what is a loop?
Women are just that fucking dumb.

oh hey yeah that's pretty neat

i dont know why i missed what that was doing derp

thanks friend.

you're literally just a dumb faggot, obama is establishment as fuck

if you think the democrats have working people in their interests you shouldn't be allowed to vote

Get back to work peasant, that pallet of pasta won't unpack itself.

>t. brainlets
int product(int x, int y) {
..int k = y < 0 ? -1 : 1, s = 0;
..x *= k;
..y *= k;
..while(y--) {
....s += x;
..}
..return s;
}

Read rules for radicals

>Without using *
>3rd line uses *
>4th line uses *

Or even better:
int product(int x, int y) {
return x *= y;
}

>he thinks * and *= are the same operator.
>t. brainlet confirmed

Alternative without the *= operator:
int product(int x, int y) {
return (int)(x / (1.0 / y));
}

oh sure ok with these new rules then why not just do:

int product(int a, int b) {
....a *= b;
....return a;
}

idiot

>new rules
These were the original rules. It explicitly states "without using the * operator".

>then why not just do [...]
Because I wanted to see your retarded reaction first. Also I beat you to that:

>Because I wanted to see your retarded reaction first
>I WAS ONLY PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED
>HAHA RUSED AGAIN

>you were pretending to be retarded
>by understanding what C operators are
Whatever helps you dealing with the embarrassment.

>Leaf reading comprehension
I said I WAS a fucking retard back then, and that my mindset is mirrored in many of my former allies on the left

You can just use a for loop, whilst staying true to the 'primitivism' of the code:

int i = 1
int result = 0
for(i = 1; i = b; i++) {
result = a + result
}
return result

I'm not sure if you start at 0 or 1, but that's how you can do it really easily.

Neither does the bitch's, but at least it deals with b >10

>assuming that a is positive

if (a > 0 XOR b > 0) {
return -result
}
else {
return result
}

public int Product( int a, int b ) {
return a / ( 1 / b );
}

EZ

Product =exp{log(b)+log(a)};

> a / ( 1 / b );
The only thing that'll produce is a division-by-zero error.

yeah I need to cast the variables to float, and the result to int, something like:
>(int) ((float)a / (float) ( 1 / (float)b ));

>need cast the variables to float
You don't.

...

>generally could be described as a cuck

There I fixed it for you

so you would just keep checking the value of b and adding an A after each check until the number of A = B?

>her max function returns 5 if a == b
I would say this code is ready for production m8s.

Also
>else if(a > b && b < a)
>if(a > b && b < a)
>(a > b && b < a)

Why does an underwear model whose cache is a facial feature have an opinion about this?

Is this real. Looks way too trolly.

was this coded by a fucking child?

Put me in the screncap

>calling people nerds
>on a Taiwanese basket weaving forum

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

no way in fuck i'm reading all that.

To be completely fair, she took a better direction than the brainlets with the loops. This would do the job for the entire range of 32-bit integers much faster than a loop:

int.product(int.x,.int.y).{
....int.s.=.0;
....if(x.&.(1L.

SHE'S GOT CACHE OUT THE YING YANG, BABAY

This kind of subterfuge only works if you're a sociopath

You have to be able to believe whatever lie you're spouting while knowing it's false, which is a trait only sociopathic people possess