SELECT

...

>Driving
>Water
>Food
>Patents
>Insurance
>Air travel
All of these can be/are privately owned you twit.

Corporate Subsidies, Big Bank Bailouts and mandatory insurances.

>What are subsidies and regulations?

>something called occupy defending money, bank bailouts and corporate subsidies

Where is the welfare option?

I'll take
>things that ruin the market equilibrium and inflate prices
for 800 Alex

>if our regulations didn't create these monopolies, it wouldn't exist!

Half of these aren't government - heck most of these don't require you being a socialist at all to have
Even more don't require a government

>money

I can't stand this ridiculous argument. Really, if it's regulated, then it's democratic socialism?

By that argument there can only be two kinds of government: democratic socialism or anarchy.

ancaps BTFO

...

>Please select all items you wish to give up

All of it

>being this autistic

Parks are lame as fuck though

They forgot to mention the wheel. Or was that Neolithic Socialism? I forgot.

FREE SOCIETY BABY!

>every time the government does something it's socialism

>some shit that is defined in the constitution
>a lot of shit that is provided by local governments
>the rest can be done without

Liberal straw manning at its best

u fucking moron, your cell phone is not made by the government u autistic piece of twat

>your cell phone is not made by the government

not only that, government tax usage of mobile phones, so without them they would cost less overall

>implying all of these things could not be private services that you choose to pay into with all the extra money you have from not paying taxes

*almonds activating at incredibly high speed*

>having a state or government is socialist.

srsly who comes up with all these tripe pics that your middle aged socialist relatives share all the time on facebook.

Creates some dilemmas though, doesn't it?

A house catches on fire. They are not subscribed to the fire service, and nobody comes. The fire spreads to two neighbouring houses. They're subscribed, and two fire trucks move out and douse the flames. End result, 2 houses damaged, one burned to the ground, two fire trucks dispatched. Is this efficient use of resources?

We already have homeowners' associations for this. It would just extend responsibilities of being a community member to a more fundamental (logical) level
>"In order to own a home in this area, you have to pay a little bit to cover fires, insurance, etc."
>Nah senpai I'd rather be a financial liability to my neighbors
>"K go live somewhere else then"

Neighbors can't tell me to move off land I legally own. I stubbornly refuse to pay the fire service bill. Now what?

You don't legally own the land if you don't abide by the rules set forth by the community. Good thing the homeowners' association has mobilized a private police and security force to handle scoundrels like you.

Are they trying to imply we can't have those things without democratic socialism?
That's total horseshit are they retarded?

I thought the right of private property was a thing with you guys. Guess not.

>water only exists because of democratic socialism
???

You have a right to defend your property. You can try to kill them for attempting to evict you, but they also have every right to put a brick through your dome for making your property a fire hazard. Who says you don't start that fire intentionally and get your neighbors killed? They can't be sure.

So you can own private property, but you don't actually have a right to hold jurisdiction over your private property? Your neighbours can still tell you what to do?

Shit this is already getting complicated, we're gonna need courts and lawyers. Fuck! Who's gonna pay for those? Not me!

Ancap is about coming to agreements directly, through one's own volition. Think about any time you've negotiated something with another person without third-party intervention, and extend it to things like infrastructure, defense, etc. In an ancap society, you have the option to opt out of any service you like--just move away. In the scenario you describe, it's legally and ethically impossible for anyone to live in a guaranteed fire-safe community. How is that freedom of choice? Are you too autistic to predict how people would deal with others without help from the government? Fuck I just got b8ed

Apparently, I don't have any options at all. If I don't accept what my local microstate forcefeeds me, I can just fuck off.

How the fuck is this anything but a decentralised version of what we have today?