Did Americans just not get it?

Did Americans just not get it?

Other urls found in this thread:

capitalresearch.org/article/hillary-clintons-big-donors-want-to-know-what-really-happened/
youtu.be/H51HuNX41Fg
hewillnotdivide.us/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That's pretty much what happened. Only rural and suburban retards voted for Trump.

it was too abstract

>tfw too intelligent to become President

The DNC did not get it.

>it was HER TURN WAHHHHHHH

All that money down the tubes

capitalresearch.org/article/hillary-clintons-big-donors-want-to-know-what-really-happened/

She is a criminal. You cant shove a criminal of that caliber down the throats of the average American and not expect the kind of uprising contrary reaction that happened.

I don't even know what she was campaigning for every time I saw her on the BigBlackCock news she was just saying how bad the Donald was and how she would be the opposite offering no solutions to the problems.

As opposed to the enlightened urbanites. They're so smart they realize that high crime is a good thing when it comes from minorities because diversity is our greatest strength. Plus a huge number of city dwellers are POC and Jews anyway.

She scored the same in every city (around 90%) regardless of crime rates and demographics.

> tfw to intelligent to competently defend extremely important digital assets and get taken advantage of by rookie retard hackers

I guess not. She ran on nothing so what was there to get?

...

>not intelligent enough to get Lena Dunhams comedy

youtu.be/H51HuNX41Fg

...

>tfw to inteligent too become the president

That's precisely how Obama ran in 2008. "I'm not Bush. Bush bad" I guess Hillary's camp thought the same strategy would carry her.

As opposed to inteligent youth of urban areas?

hewillnotdivide.us/

ALL american big cities are high crime.

What exactly was her platform other than "I have a vagina"?

about 50% of Americans are very dim-witted people. Simple minded. They like their pickup trucks, football, and their god. It's these people that voted Trump in. Such an embarassment.

>tfw too intelligent to fall for reverse psychology

>Too smart.
I think it might have more to do with the whole being an unlikeable cunt who's been in politics for 30 years and has a ton of scandals including several ongoing ones.

Having your party rig the primaries for you and get caught doing it.

Insulting half the electorate for not supporting you.

Pandering die-hard to small minorities while disparaging the majority.

Focusing on social issues at a time when people are sick of them and want a focus on the stagnating economy.

Running as part of a party that has constantly mocked the white working class for years now, while still relying on that working class to win states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

Being the most establishment candidate possible at a time when people despise the establishment.

Having little message beyond "more of the same" and "it's my turn" and "it's me or Trump".

Ignoring states like Michigan because 'lol there's no way we can lose it, let's keep our operatives in Ohio despite having accepted we won't win it, just in hopes of confusing Trump'.

Championing Islam at a time when Muslims have committed several terrorist attacks in the US and the West.

Having your most visible supporters being screeching college kids who spew buzzwords and people and act like arrogant entitled shits to the working class you need the support of.

Barely doing rallies yourself, instead getting everyone else to campaign for you, leaving you even less appealing to people since you don't even seem bothered to want to deal with the 'little people'

Being ill and constantly seeming on the verge of collapse, then collapsing at a 9/11 memorial ON 9/11.

Courting celebrity endorsements and doing donor events instead of actually trying to appeal to people.

The Clinton campaign wasn't 'too smart', it was the most hilariously tone-deaf, stupid, arrogant campaign in a while. That it even got close is a miracle, not the result of being smart.

It's the dumbest statement you could make, and literally the second Sup Forums meme genuinely supported by her follwers after she literally tweeted "Delet this" at Trump and liberals thought an insult we use ironically was the height of wit.

It couldn't be she was too smart to win because not playing to your audience is dumb. There's a good amount of retards in America, on both sides, and they're on all parts of the Bell Curve. If I try to teach 5 year olds quantum mechanics it doesn't mean I'm too smart for them when they don't get it. It means I'm a fucking retard for not recognising who I'm speaking to.

Maybe you're too dumb to read. The headline made it clear Clinton was just TOO SMART to be POTUS. CNN did a fact check on this, it all checks out. #facts #science

Well said, Italy

about 50% of Americans are very dim-witted people. Simple minded. They like their beards, latte, and flannel shirts. It's these people that lost to Trump. Such an embarassment.

Honestly, I couldn't give two shits.

Nobember was, what, two and a half months ago?

She lost already. She is a dank meme. She does not elicit the same gut-reaction of hatred as before, only just lesves wondering if the poster posting it is posting shit posts.

You gave an excellent speech, grain monitor Clinton

Perhaps a touch too cerebral for that audience

Man, you fucking knocked that out of the park. Nice post.

>rig your party's elections
>cry it's unfair and you should have won

'member

>New York, San Diego and Seattle have the same crime rates as Buffalo, St Louis and Detroit

...

t. rural and suburban retard

>be a politician for 30 years
>completely and utterly fail at it the entire time

The fact that this woman was nominated at all is proof enough that Donald Trump, for all his bravado and lack of actual political experience, was a well-needed and well-deserved kick in the pants.

And what was the alternative to her? A socialist commie crackpot? I don't like Cruz or Robot, but at least the Republican side presented actual fucking candidates.

...

Pokemon Go to the polls

>That's pretty much what happened. Only rural and suburban retards voted for Trump.

Right, and all those poor as fuck counties with non-english speakers who have to be bused in and given signs that say "Vote HILLARY (D) she's the one with free gibs!" should be the ones running the country instead.

Says the retard who gets stuck in traffic 3 hours every morning to drive to the city.

>tfw too smart to beat Drumpf who everyone called a literal retard

Perfect

...

fuck off leaf

user it's bait. Please refrain from biting

This is what happens when a genious with a IQ of 367 tries to lowers her cerebral power to the ones of the common man to crack a joke.

I bet that even this joke has some hidden message that if cracked, could unleash a new ear of wisdom.

ID: You ho Y DP?

t. a leaf.

t. rural and suburban retard

>tfw too testosterone-action-filled to vote for women

...

Smart people succeed. Smart plans work.

Neither of the above applies to her, ergo, she wasn't smart. I'm getting real fucking sick of people ignoring the definition of words, or just outright redefining them, when they become inconvenient.

I can just see the brains coming out of the back of her head to form her own chair

>tfw to smart to be president

kek

>campaignin in 5 of 51 states
>to smart to win
>legit

Reminds me of about a decade ago, when that show Lost came to an end. If you didn't absolutely love it, then you "didn't get it," as if it was literally impossible to both understand the ending to Lost, and not like it.

I'll say the same thing about this that I said to those people who thought Lost's ending was impossible to both understand and dislike:

If you honestly think that, then I have lost respect for you. She was perhaps the most horrible candidate in US history, who got caught breaking the rules multiple times, as well as lying about breaking the rules, whether it was the DNC literally handing her the nomination, having the media almost universally back and push her, Benghazi, or the email server showing that she was allowing Pay for Play.

Her politics are utterly irrelevant to the argument at hand: if you are caught cheating, you should lose. She could have spent her career stating everything I wanted to hear, and I would still think that.

Thing is, what they're TRYING to say is actually true, but they're spinning it badly.

Her campaign's message was too political and "complicated". Her campaign's message didn't resonate with voters like Trump's did because she preferred to give long, robotic political responses. There is no denying that Clinton was a superior politician and orator. She spoke better than Trump, she was better in her talking points etc. The problem is that message is very drawn out for the average voter. They prefer simple, straightforward and strong points.

Trump ran a more intelligent campaign, but it was more intelligent because it was simple.

>most horrible candidate in US history
>got more votes than any candidate in history

Nah, she lost because rural and suburban retards are too dumb to understand complex issues, period.

...

...

...

>not the most horrible candidate in history
>lost to trump
alright then mate :^)

>Thing is, what they're TRYING to say is actually true,
It really isn't, and you're making the same mistake they are. If someone knows only Spanish, its stupid to speak Portuguese to them. If someone cares about jobs, chances are they want to know whether you're going to address that problem, or berate the working class.

A smart person recognizes what issues their political base wants to see addressed, and addresses them. They learn how to speak to their voters, in a manner they can both understand and are likely to find charismatic. Trump did that, Hillary did not.

>There is no denying that Clinton was a superior politician and orator.
A mediocre politician would speak to the voters as they speak to other politicians. An intelligent politician would recognize that voters and politicians are two very different groups, and speaking to one as though they were the other is like speaking Portuguese to a Spaniard.

As I said, smart is literally defined by what succeeds. Posturing and pandering to pseudo-intellectuals by acting intelligent is not intelligent.

90% of city people voted for her.

Only rural and suburban retards voted for Trump.

>i live in a city cuz I'm so smart
lol

...

>rural and suburban retard thinks he's smart

>some peoples votes should count more in a democracy

so how much should rural peoples vote count? Does 3/5ths sound ok?

...

Nice shoop but still laughed.

well that is basically how it works in the states...people from densely populated locales have less individual voting power

2deep4America

They said the same about Batman V Superman.
No, it was just a shitty movie/campaign

Her party is also partially the reason Trump got as far as he did. They were playing odd games with the Republican party on the assumption that Trump would be an easy target later.

We are a confederation of states. In some situations the people vote on things, and in others the states vote on things. The presidency is a hybrid of the two.

How dumb do you have to be to lose a rigged election?

The most compelling sign of a high IQ is the ability to build complex and successful societies.

City people can do it. Rural and suburban retards can't which means they are subhuman waste and their opinion shouldn't count as much.

>smart is literally defined by what succeeds. Posturing and pandering to pseudo-intellectuals by acting intelligent is not intelligent.
/thread

put some effort lads

sure :P

This. The poor cuck working for Hillary that had the "pied piper candidate" idea must have been tortured and sacrificed to Moloch by now.

And exactly which part of fucking Saskatoon did you build, leaf?

I 'member

>3/5

Dumb enough to take the "nazi pepes" bait and doubling down on it.

they should've went with Joe Biden.

that reminds me of when they said that about Batman vs Superman

Isnt Donald the antivaxxer?

Liberalism is that sorry state of mind where you're not dumb enough to blindly trust the instincts and intuitions that humans have evolved to stay safe, but you're not smart enough to have a coherent and informed worldview that can supersede those instincts. And so you are a malleable and easily manipulable tool.

If one wanted to manipulate the republican, they would be somewhat constrained by having to appeal to his conservative, traditionalist and risk-averse nature. However, a democrat can be made to believe in literally anything simply by exploiting his intellectual and social insecurity: just propagandize your agenda as the "intellectually enlightened", the "scientific", the "moral", the "humane" thing to do... and make sure to show how it contrasts with the worldview of the republican commoner (to which the democrat incessantly compares himself so as to come out on top) and he's yours.

We got it.

lawl, hivemind

When did he claim that vaccines were a big pharma hoax?

What did they said?