HITLER WAS A FUCKING KIKE

Nazis were socially conservative and economically liberal. Prove me wrong faggots. Protip: YOU CAN'T

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way
youtube.com/watch?v=x-Ll5-xj8lg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_Honour_of_the_German_Mother
twitter.com/AnonBabble

but he was our kike

No such thing as a kike on our side. Kikes only have their own side. NEVER TRUST A FUCKING KIKE

>economically liberal
>all industries either nationalised or forced to subjugated to government production plans

So? I'm not autistically fixated on economics. Whether we have a more laissez faire system, or a moderate socialist system like in Scandinavia, the standard of living will be good if the country is populated with whites.

AKA under government control = socialism

The problem with retarded libertarians like yourself is that you don't understand that your libertarian paradise is not strong against external threats. Authoritarianism is a necessary evil to sustain our civilization and culture while we transition to a position of utter supremacy.

Libertarians would watch as the world burns, Western civilization crumbles, and Islamism and China overtake us.

But hey, at least your taxes are low.

>economically liberal

corporate profits of foreign companies werent allowed to leave germany and had to be reinvest. his entire economic view was pure keynesian theory - compared to todays neo-lib that is pretty much communism in american standards

> hur dur I don't care about money
Fucking dumb scum

...

Okay then. Explain why Danes, Swedes, etc. have an excellent standard of living, despite being a "socialist" state? Economically, I'm a moderate libertarian myself, but regardless of which system you live under, it will fall to complete garbage when you populate the country with low IQ violent savages.

>masturbates to women with cocks
>claims Hitler was the TRUE enemy because... uhh....
Only on Sup Forums™

In other words, the difference between both systems in terms of standard of living is marginal. However, the difference between being 95% white and 50% White is enormous.

Priorities.

newfag

Socialism works for a short period of time. Denmark is the best socialism can do, Sweden is how it unravels and Venezuela is its ultimate destiny.

It actually is an argument, schlomo. One you've failed to address.

I don't know if you realize this but external threats actually exist in the real world

Ironically molyneux recognized this long ago

I'm not arguing for full blown retarded Socialism, more like a mixed economy like Denmark. IE: The market is relatively free, with some services socialized.

Read

Also, the reason Sweden is failing is because they are importing low IQ sand-dindus that are abusing the 'commons'.

It always goes to the extreme moron. The government constantly yearns for more and more power.
>pic related

i don't follow

Because the local aryans aren't reproducing due to having a bleak economic outlook

Take the black pill. Behind every "Hitler did nuffin wrong" comment there's a kike hiding in fear that you don't dig deep into the banking dynasty and their quarter kike puppet.

Anyone reading Mein Kampf knows that Hitler was a self-hating jew.

Are you implying socially conservative and economically liberal is not the optimal political position you kike?

Fun fact, the poorer people are, the more children they have

The government constantly yearns for more and more power REGARDLESS of what system you are under.

>flag related

Honestly, you're really reaching. Again, we have to have priorities. What is more harmful to a nation, a Denmark style economy, or being 50% Black / Muslim?

>implying kikes are socially conservative

National Socialism is economically in the middle
Similar to this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way

They were economically very conservative until the war.

Their currency was non-inflationary and not debt backed, but instead backed by labor in the form of a labor treasury certificate. Labor treasury certificates acted like gold in that they were redeemable in marks and vise versa, but could only be issued by the treasury for the labor of public works (the autobahn is an example of something initially built by issuing the labor treasury certificates.

So instead of backing their currency on debt (what you promise or expect to do in the future, and easily and often defaulted), gold (assets, how much you have), they backed their currency on labor (what you have done or are doing).

Their monetary policy alone was EXTREMELY conservative. Read "the magic of money" by Hjalmar Schacht (former nazi chief economist).

The war changed all that.

Does not address the problem why socialist heaven Sweden is forced to bring in immigrants

>socialism

Wish you fucking retards on Sup Forums would get it into your thick skulls our market is free.
The only thing that is socialist is our welfare system which falls under democratic socialism.
Unfortunately low IQ savages abuse this system, which is why we would be better off with national ethnic socialism.

To expand, it basically catapulted germany from the poorest country in Europe to the 3rd richest in the world.

It took the might of 3 debt backed economies going heavily into debt to barely defeat 1 gdp-hybrid economy.

So, are you actually arguing that their market / social services would be worse off had they not brought in the migrants? What the fuck are you arguing?

low birthrate caused by high PPP

I'm using the term "socialism" in the murican way, not the real marxist definition.

also sweden isn't "forced" to bring in immigrants

you gotta drink some serious libshit koolaid to think that way, schlomo

>government always goes to the extreme
>moderate socialism is the best form of government
Pick one faggot

The only value are the national workers and laborers.
youtube.com/watch?v=x-Ll5-xj8lg

'real marxist'
Marxist "socialism" isn't the real socialism, national socialism is the real socialism.

Ethnic National Socialism. Otherwise there is always dispute, always divide, and the long term effects of those drivers.

I may have phrased myself incorrectly before; i'm not arguing for either system. I'm a moderate libertarian myself. I just think we have much larger issues than whether or not medical industry should be socialized or not, or whether the roads are paved by the government.

PRIORITIES

Sounds pretty based, familam

no such divide, there exists the nation state of the race and the state of the capitalist imperialists.

>Sweden is dumb enough to bring in migrants without a reason.
That's great m8

Tell me more. Did the banks love Hitler? How do we destroy the banks?

hitler banned usury, the state issued loans when asked, the state gave lands for houses, which you could write off payments by having children by the 4th child the debt is paid and the house is yours that fantastical party program was a success

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_Honour_of_the_German_Mother

Men recieve iron crosses for fighting and defending the HOME VOLK and VATERLAND and women are given crosses for having children and making sure the people can live on.