God is real.
>Dr Gödel’s model uses mathematical equations that are extremely complicated, but the essence is that no greater power than God can be conceived,
>and if he or she is believed as a concept then he or she can exist in reality.
express.co.uk
>inb4 hurr durr science deniers(athiests)
>inb4 (((((((((express)))))))
THIS DEBATE IS OVER.
Redpill me on flat earth nigger, that is clearly a fish eye lense
So does this mean our lord, Lord Kek is real?
>Dr Gödel’s model uses mathematical equations that are extremely complicated,
does that mean if I believe my waifu can become real?
>theorem of incompleteness has something to do with god at all
Burger education, I guess.
>They run some calculation on computer
>Proves god
How ?
No wonder it was so easy for you guys to rig their election
108297811
i love flat earth shit for all of the perception science stuff... dubay, odd, jeran.. but i am just not convinced... i still respect you guys tho keep up the good work/truth seeking
You're goddamn right.
Given the right conditions, purple elephants can exist.
Doesn't mean they do.
Yes.
That's a CG image, it's on the corner
Yes.
>confirming something that's not falsifiable
nigga please
plz no h4ckz0r me
non-falsifiable
let us ask the sacred numbers.
OP is a fucking retard.
wait
>science deniers(athiests)
????
108297850
>and if he or she is believed as a concept then he or she can exist in reality.
Absolutely!
How can the earth be flat if rainbows are curved?
It's already over.
Assuming direct control.
also:
>no greater power than God can be conceived,
tautology
lol
>god
>he or she
God is pure energy, god is everyone and everywhere
Complicated math is complicated user.
Only if you [spoiler]GET[/spoiler]
>>she
Kill this 90's meme already
...
all it takes is realizing that you are looking at a disc not a sphere.
Oh come on off by 3, but still a nice palindrome
Not even mad about ctrl+s not working anymore
This is incorrect. If you read the modal-ontological proof, it states that if all of the properties exemplified in a being "God" are consistent, then it must therefore exist.
In plain English it would be closer to: If there is a maximally perfect being to which belongs all perfect qualities, it would be made more perfect by its existence, and therefore must exist."
Of course, when I type it out like that, it sounds much less convincing. If you are into philosophy at all, it is actually a pretty sound argument. Not one I subscribe to, but it is certainly not a joke.
Obviously Kek is real, just checkum'.
you must be new here, left-click their numbers to respond.
>kurt godel
>failed and discarded dead scientist
>.express.co.uk
>EXPRESS
>THIS DEBATE IS OVER
MFW
Look at all these ass ravished athiest ITT btfo by a Brotestant logician's math and science.
Sit down deniers the grown ups are talking
What is God's bow?
>Incompleteness theorem has anything to do with God
American education
>thinks you can spoiler on Sup Forums
fucking newfags
Kill me, Pete.
>and if he or she is believed as a concept then he or she can exist in reality.
>''Thou shalt have no other gods before me''
>tfw you realize God wanted to prevent this way birth of other deities
Gods War when? Where is my sword? Where is my helmet?
>picard
there is some irony here, your hero was named after a scientist and adventurer, August Piccard.
express.co.uk
first man to reach the "stratosphere" into an aluminum ball. That's what they have to say about the shape of Earth seen from above
>Through portholes, the observers saw the earth through copper-colored, then bluish, haze. It seemed a flat disk with upturned edge
If Earth is flat, and it is, it was created.
therefore God exists.
>THE MAN SAID WIV FANCY WERDS DAT GOD IS REEL, ATHEISTS BTFO!!
I bet you think the cosmological argument is impressive, too.
Atheists BTFO forever
I dont even doubt that existence of a God in this sense, but the fuckers just use mystizism to convince people.
His "equasions" are senseless, nothing is defined...
Axiom 1.
P(phi) and for all x there is a function from phi(x) to psi(x) and all of this is a function to P(psi)
what is that supposed to mean? seriosly?
correct wikishit link here
en.wikipedia.org
Godel wrote a modal-ontological proof of the existence of God. He didn't JUST do the incompleteness theorems.
American education
>Dr Gödel’s model uses mathematical equations that are extremely complicated, but the essence is that no greater power than God can be conceived
>If the system is consistent, it cannot be complete.
I could take that to mean many things. For instance: If something works, there must be an instance in which it will not work. Seemingly reasonable, but not necessarily true.
Also
>Religious scientist
I am inclined not to trust those who already have predetermined answers in mind.
It is symbolic logic. It uses similar notation to mathematics, but they differ considerably in application and interpretation
...
>those who already have predetermined answers in mind
you mean like atheists?
Boy, I sure wish such proof could be found, but nothing of the sort has come forward.
Let me explain this to you: That theory is laughably bad, becuase it misrepresents the multiple-worlds argument. It states that if god exists he must exist in all worlds, when in fact if god exists in any world there must be one in which he does not, because of the mathematical principles of the theory itself.
Athiests are retarded.
thanks man. ive lurked for years but this is the first thread ive started
dude believe me i have studied the shit out of it. i'm just not convinced. btw did you see dubays history of the flat earth? it just came out this week. pretty good stuff.
also, GAS THE KIKES RACE WARE NOW
...
Swing and a miss, frog
...
...
...
...
You are incorrect in that it involves multiple worlds ontology. It does not. I am also not saying it is 100% valid, just that he wrote it as a proof.
...
>The earth is flat, and it was created.
I can see where you got the flat statement from, but the creation one is pulled from your ass like all of these arguments.
...
tru dat tbhfamalamadingdong
...
>If god exists IN ANY WORLD HE MUST EXIST IN ALL WORLDS
What other fucking world would they be talking about?
...
desu senpai you're a KEK
...
>Therefore this means the Christian god is real
Then he curled up, stopped eating, and died.
Dr. Shekel used evidence to proof his hypothesis. Mathematicians need not apply
...
some say that 4,200 have one thing in common: GOD IS REAL
...
Typical tricks schlomo
>>Yo muh shit be rilly compaleekated so dat meanz it's true y'all
k.
nice proxy abul
>abdul
>muslim name
>promoting atheism
are you retarded son?
Some say that those 4,200 contradict each other, and make absolutes.Not all of their gods can be real user.
>Science is complicated, goyim! Let me sum it up to you: God exists! Now don't forget to donate to your church next Sunday goy.
>filename
In modal logic, you have possibility and necessity operators that describe states in which a given atomic proposition might hold a value of true or false. This is often interpreted as multiple worlds and accessibility relations, but at the time Godel wrote this proof, the most common interpretation of necessity and possibility referred to states separated in time, i.e., what is true today might not be true tomorrow.
Necessity and possibility do not have a fixed meaning in normal conversation--they do not strictly mean separate worlds or times--they only have significance in modal logic.
...
>god created this to....
>????
>profit
>God-el exists!
clearly you can't accept that there are and will be consequences for you (and your people) for your disgusting, pedophilic, genocidal ways and choices.
gas yourself you piece of shit
Turned into pencils and ground into dust.
Unironic geocentric earth theory confirms the bible
the principle of non-locality wrote the bible, as well as most scriptures.
where should i even start....
Look at the digits and now praise him
Wow, that's even more dumb than I originally thought, considering it drops all mathematical logic of the standard MulWorld theory.
>autistic screeching
not an argument brainwashed god-cuck :D
A quick rundown would help
your inability to read doesn't invalidate scriptures.
nice strawman faget
There is a reason modal logic is not very popular.
And I suppose there is a reason it is picked up by those wishing to validate their own points. It's unfounded subjectivity gives it room to accommodate all sorts of illogical theories.