Wikipedia? Wrong? No.
Wikipedia? Wrong? No
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
youtube.com
The White House has already pointed out that the liberal media intentionally framed photo's in order to create a false narrative. In fact the inauguration was the biggest one yet, just that they took photo's early on before people had arrived and and targeted specific sections of the mall and parade route to make it look like people weren't showing up.
It was all bullshit and fake news that the media was using to try and bash Trump. As usual.
Obama's inauguration also had the record for the highest turnout ever, comparing Trump's inauguration to Obama's is completely unfair. When compared to other inaugurations, he had comparable if not better turnouts. DC is full of unemployed niggers who all flocked to the Mall to see Obama get into office so they could say "WE PRESIDENT NOW"
Trumps fans are white, and have jobs.
Obamas fans were/are niggers who live off the government with no jobs.
Hmmmm make sense now OP?
White house can not be trusted.
youtube.com
>multiple angles show empty spots
>timelapsed footage shows empty spots
>somehow these are all fake/manipulated/distorted by every media outlet in the world and only BREITBART and trump himself can corroborate the story that it was the biggest inauguration turnout ever
>retarded shills keep putting up same pictures that show a long-angled shots to make it look like it was packed
I don't know what to believe anymore.
>Based on the rights imagination
Nothing you said is true, except that the right are much heavier in welfare recipients. Sup Forums is literally full of NEETS, and they like to go
>muh conservative job
Fuck off commie
Definately not the shills on Sup Forums
I like that they keep using that image even though the source is known. Makes it easier to show what "fake news" is to friends.
What the fuck are you even talking about? There is no way you are old enough for this board
nice myth. He ran on job creation ROFL. Coal country, rust belt, walmart towns, fucked over farmers.
>trusting the (((media))).
Go shill somewhere else shlomo.
Why does the size of the crowd matter? 62,979,636 people voted for him.
I like how nobody points out that D.C. is a liberal shithole with terribly authoritarian laws and they all like to drive non-American cars while smelling their own farts. Basically, why would a bunch of commies come out to see an American become president? Surely the majority of people who come out live in/around the city normally. There's no way millions of people could just flock to the city in one day. There wouldn't be enough parking or hotels to fit them all.
I don't get why people care really about the size of the crowd so much. Isn't this the kind of dick measuring contest that "progressives" are so highly critical of?
Many things could influence the size of the crowd. The weather, the day of the week, they type of candidate i.e. Republicans tend to have workers vote for them where as Dems tend to have a large proportion of dole scroungers vote for them so they would have the time off work, Washington is overwhelmingly Democrat so there was a greater number of people who could just turn up. Lots of Trumps supporters are (rightly) worried about the violence from the reactionary left wing also.
Or most likely Obama was just a token black president and people wanted to see the novelty of it all. Like I know people from here in Ireland who flew out to his inauguration simply because they never thought they would see a black become president.
>commies
Have you ever been to DC? The whole place is a low income warzone. The people that turned out for Obama weren't a bunch of pretentious liberal arts majors, it was literally a million unemployed niggers with nothing better to do.
Ah geez you guys, it's ANOTHER FALSE LIBERAL NARRATIVE...
*laugh track*
I want to see the time lapse all the way up till everyone is gone. How do I know it wasn't still filling up?
>There's no way millions of people could just flock to the city in one day.
And yet they did for the protest, go figure citys have infrastructure to support lots of people trying to get into/around it.
>8:20AM
It is the same reason Left Wing hate groups can mobilize more numbers for street protest all the time. Because Conservatives have jobs and families. It is much harder to simple drop everything and go break windows in the streets for days. It means nothing. The Leftist hate mongers are desperate for ANY little sliver of info that pushes left wing hate group narratives.
I've never been to DC but is it true that if you literally go a few blocks away from the White House and you're junkie gangbanger territory?
I remember one of my friends went there as a kid with his family to visit the WH and they took a wrong turn and got lost on the drive back to their hotel and ended up getting hijacked in the some chimp territory.
That's how it is even anywhere in the country. Urbanisation leads to crime in inner cities.