Rate 1-10

The Official Presidential Photo.

Other urls found in this thread:

change.org/p/donald-trump-declare-january-20th-as-trump-day-or-change-mlk-day-to-djt-day
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

9001

They could have done better.

Why is everything so fancy but the name part looks like a five year old did it

Trump is a Nazi, Whats wrong with you?

Pretty badass desu

3/10

He needs to stop trying to look like Clint Eastwood

3 of his 5 kids are married to jews. tiffany is dating one right now as well.

Oh leaf, if only you were actually right.

>no smiles

Badass 10/10

> a leaf

He looks like he could shoot fucking lasers out of his eyes at any minute, and he's not smiling.

Badass/10

Chain of command at this moment.

Wait a minute, did they just photoshop his twitter profile pic and call it his presidential photo? Jesus Christ, Don. I love you but you could do a lot better.

trump is just another establishment republican who just happens to disagree with free trade, i don't get why people even think he is fascist.

I think he needs to quit trying to look so intimidating. It doesn't suit him.

4/10
Looking >:[ does not mean you have gravitas

new golden name tag thing isn't in yet so it looks like they put a labelmaker label over obama's

It was Probably a matching metal plate that said Obama they weren't able to immediately replace.

Are you in an NJROTC?

>establishment Republican

If he were, you wouldn't have seen the animosity from McCain, Bush, and all the other neocon vermin.

You are correct. We just got the photo yesterday. We gave away Obama's photo.

It just looks like any other pictures of him
I'm struck by how unremarkable that picture is. It looks like it could be his facebook picture from 5 years ago or something someone photoshopped, or from a promo for the apprentice
it's odd

Navy.

well his political positions are pretty similar, except for the free trade part.

They couldn't have made that in the two months they had to get ready?

I wish he didn't look so angry, I have to walk past his picture every day at work. This picture is kind of big brotherish.

Also - why do none of our presidents have facial hair? I'd love to see a president with a sweet stache.

You don't know our supply dept...

/p/ here. Fill lighting is inadequate and for some reason they made the WH look cold as fuck. Eyes look hardcore though. 2/10 wouldn't hang in my residence.

And foreign interventions, and subservience to corporate donors, and his openness to gay rights. Establishment Republicans absolutely hate him. You saw how quick they were to abandon him when the pussy video came out. I voted against Richard Burr because of that shit.

epic

>I wish he didn't look so angry
Serious times call for a stoic attitude.
>Also - why do none of our presidents have facial hair?
It's become outdated for some reason. We don't really have that frontiersman culture anymore, unfortunately.
>I have to walk past his picture every day at work.
Paul Ryan, is that you?

establishment GOP supported gay rights, it was largely grassroots conservative christian types who opposed it

trump has said he wants to intervene with ISIS and for being against corporate power, he sure has nominated a lot to his cabinet (mnuchin, tillerson, puzder, etc.)

No, I just have a government office job. The President and VP have their portraits right above the security area in the lobby.

Looks like shit in OPs pic, the image itself is different.

WH is 6 million times better. But why did they have such a shallow depth of field? I want to see detail on his collar and American flag pin.

Establishment GOP hates gay rights because it undermines the conservative wing of the party. Trump was literally the first person to ever talk about gay rights at the RNC.

Trump will intervene against ISIS, he has to. A large part of fighting ISIS is restricting the CIA from flooding the region with weapons. Once Trump gets behind Assad, the rest of the world will follow and ISIS will be gone within a few months.

>cabinet

His cabinet is fine. Mnunchin has been with him from the beginning, Tillerson has divested from Exxon, and Puzder was only ever CEO of a relatively small fast food chain.

Commander in Chief is an inaccurate term.

commander in chief is a title that congress gives to the president. It isn't constitutional to call him commander in chief.

Still prefer this, just shop a picture of the american flag somewhere

...

Yeah, you're right, only thing in focus is his head. Would look much better if the rest of his body also stood out.

big surprise, it's all fucking white males. literally shaking right now

Look at all those FUCKING WHITE MALES

>tfw Trump has a portrait on the same wall as Lincoln
>tfw Trump is literally getting the same honor as Lincoln and George Washington

Kinda weird to think about

Are you literally retarded?

>The Constitution (Article II, section 2) specifies that “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several states, when called into the actual Service of the United States.

>mfw you realize those are Obama's appointees

v 3005

sign this petition to get daddy trump to deport all niggers from the world after their final chimp out due to this petition kek

change.org/p/donald-trump-declare-january-20th-as-trump-day-or-change-mlk-day-to-djt-day

At least they didn't do the faggy "dual side soft boxes and an 85 1.4 like 2 feet from his face."

cuck leaf. Fuck off to reddit

"Merely labeling some situation a “war” cannot call the President’s rightful powers as “Commander in Chief” into operation, let alone boundlessly expand those powers. The so-called “war on terror” is not the unique example of such martial political hyperbole bombarding this country today. "

No, I am not retarded. My understanding is that the title only applies when the armed forces are engaged in an act of war, and only congress has the right to declare war.

But seeing as how you are rude about it, why not embrace democracy and open discussion.

Finally, one that isnt smiling. 10.

>no smile
Nice

He is considered commander and chief when and if the congress declares war and utilizes the services of the Armed forces.

You are so far gone from understanding the constitution and its purpose that you are laughable. And I don't even fear idiots like you voting in this country because this country is protected by God.

9/10. That's a hell of a stink eye. Someone's getting fired.

What are you quoting? It's indisputable that the President is the leader of the military all the time. Are you suggesting that his powers are tiered based on whether we are at war?

Oh, well if it is indisputable, then there is no point arguing. You are correct, and I am wrong.

You know, the constitution is really a beautiful piece of writing when you look at it.

No you are simply illiterate. The statement itself place the President as commander in chief of the army and navy and of state national national guard units (the milita) when these units are called to federal duty. Nothing in the clause suggests he is not commander in chief of the army when the nation is not at war and it would absurd to conclude otherwise. For example who the fuck would be commander in chief of a peacetime military?