Brit/pol/ - There is a mole right at the top of Brit/pol/ edition

>Thread Theme
youtube.com/watch?v=3vzeUaB_CbI

>Thread Speech
youtube.com/watch?v=PO6Zk5qkYcA

>Theresa May promises 'active' industrial strategy
bbc.co.uk/news/business-38713327

>Brexit: Australia eyes relaxed UK immigration under trade deal
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38704325

>Theresa May will meet with the President on Friday
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38707524

>"Brexit constitutes a hostile action and will destroy the Good Friday Agreement", says Gerry Adams
theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/21/northern-irelands-eu-exit-will-destroy-peace-deal-says-gerry-adams

>Brexiteers in warning to German business
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38694465

>Milkman rules out LAB-LIB Pact - "The people will never forgive Corbyn"
independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-latest-tim-farron-labour-party-jeremy-corbyn-theresa-may-opposition-divisive-a7536516.html

>23/02/17 - Labour's double by-elections in Copeland and Stoke
news.sky.com/story/labour-planning-double-by-election-on-23-february-10734971

>Previous thread

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tOqYmHu08KI
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38711418
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/22/police-officer-shot-northern-ireland-terrorist-attack/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4143932/Theresa-use-Trump-summit-tackle-sexism.html
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/21/theresa-may-promises-frank-importance-eu-nato-donald-trump/
theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/21/northern-irelands-eu-exit-will-destroy-peace-deal-says-gerry-adams
independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-latest-tim-farron-labour-party-jeremy-corbyn-theresa-may-opposition-divisive-a7536516.html
hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2017/01/magical-realist-or-iron-lady-mrs-mays-speech-on-the-eu-examined.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4140148/Corbyn-insists-NOT-whipped-MPs-Article-50.html
news.sky.com/story/labour-planning-double-by-election-on-23-february-10734971
theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/21/cross-party-mps-group-plots-to-halt-extreme-brexit
youtube.com/watch?v=R91_mXrzwEQ
youtube.com/watch?v=Ajn9e5AFqos
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/fdb484c8-99a1-32a3-83be-20108374b985
youtube.com/watch?v=TvI_TLZ6Wuc
youtube.com/watch?v=TKp6GV69MT4
youtube.com/watch?v=mQVrMzWtqgU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Imperial Leather

youtube.com/watch?v=tOqYmHu08KI

It is too late, isn't it?

free minds, free market, free will

>Sharia May in hot water over Trident cockup as the nervous-looking old bag refuses to answer FOUR TIMES when asked if she knew that the out-of-date and useless nuclear deterrent system had malfunctioned BEFORE a Commons vote on whether or not to renew it
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38711418

>Paddy Policeman in NI shot in the arm by republicans
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/22/police-officer-shot-northern-ireland-terrorist-attack/

>SEXIST DRUMPF BEWARE - Theresa May will meet with the President on Thursday to tell him to stop making sexist comments and to stress how important the EU's success is in the wake of his anti-EU comments
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4143932/Theresa-use-Trump-summit-tackle-sexism.html
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/21/theresa-may-promises-frank-importance-eu-nato-donald-trump/

>"Brexit constitutes a hostile action and will destroy the Good Friday Agreement", says Gerry Adams
theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/21/northern-irelands-eu-exit-will-destroy-peace-deal-says-gerry-adams

>Milkman rules out LAB-LIB Pact - "The people will never forgive Corbyn"
independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-latest-tim-farron-labour-party-jeremy-corbyn-theresa-may-opposition-divisive-a7536516.html

>Setting up landmines for Eurosceptics - Theresa May's Brexit speech examined
hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2017/01/magical-realist-or-iron-lady-mrs-mays-speech-on-the-eu-examined.html

>Corbyn changes his mind again, this time on whipping Labour to trigger Article 50
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4140148/Corbyn-insists-NOT-whipped-MPs-Article-50.html

>23/02/17 - Labour's double by-elections in Copeland and Stoke
news.sky.com/story/labour-planning-double-by-election-on-23-february-10734971

>Cross-party coalition set up to thwart leaving the EU
theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/21/cross-party-mps-group-plots-to-halt-extreme-brexit

>woods
>ponies
Yes?
youtube.com/watch?v=R91_mXrzwEQ

(You)

The most vital bit was her pledge to put any deal to both Houses of Parliament.

Why, in that case, fight a case in the Supreme Court to keep Parliament out of the process?

It was when she said this that the pound steadied, because the Europhiles in the City knew what she meant. What a weapon this places in the hands of the EU.

For decades, British Ministers in Brussels talks have been puzzled by the way in which their secret final negotiating positions appear to be known to the Superstate’s officials. Who can guess why that is?

Now the EU’s functionaries will also know that their allies in the Lords and Commons can undermine the British team at any time.

The mere knowledge that the deal will have to get past both Houses (where the majority of Lords and Commons wish we had voted to stay in) will mean constant pressure to give way. The EU’s salami-slicing machine will be whizzing, night and day.

She says she doesn’t want ‘membership’ of the single market. But that leaves room for keeping many, if not most, of its provisions.

As for her plan to leave the Customs Union without giving up its benefits, experts tell me this is simply impossible. One or the other, not both.

There was also a miserable section which suggested to me that she wants to keep the ghastly European Arrest Warrant. This is one of the very worst aspects of our EU membership.

It gives the courts of various squalid, half-free EU members the power to seize British subjects and carry them off.

Chairman May was very keen on this measure when she was at the Home Office, keeping us in it when she was free to leave it.

This process has only just begun. Confident speeches before battle are all very well. But resolve is not tested until the first blows are struck.

Of course.

It makes me angry but it's an impotent anger. Nothing can be done.

youtube.com/watch?v=Ajn9e5AFqos

26:23

THE
ABSOLUTE
STATE

>impotent anger
I don't really have much else mate. Hate is a powerful thing desu. Gives me hope and something to strive for.

I don't know how you get that from it. Just makes me depressed and hopeless.

Let's get back to the real issues, brit/pol/

>Churchill bust back in oval office
>EU army being attacked
>Nigel Farage an adviser to Trump

We're going to get one fucking glorious relationship, I tell you.

Mike Pence will keep him on the straight and narrow

>That subtle tap on her leg telling her to let him handle it
Kek, but also wew

What's Brit/pol/ reading?
Personally, I'm reading the Essential Keynes. Reading this, I can say for certain Keynes was one of those legendary figures, born from entities greater than our own. Hayek fags are just uninspired, unintelligent cretins who rely on conformity and populous opinion, may it be wrong; it's pretty obvious why the free-market can fail so don't bother arguing.

Not a fan of the new links I see

European arrest warrant also gives us the right to deport foreign criminals, so it's a give-take. We get more criminals here than we have abroad. See your point tho

...

>Animeposter
>Thinks Churchill as good
>Still thinks that Alan Partridge 2.0 is at all respectable after abandoning his country in what, for him, should be its most vital hour to go off and spread his arsecheeks for the most anti-British country of the 20th Century

Checks out!

Is the audio scrambled for anyone else?

>nothing can de done
Wrong. Prepare for the Race War

>We're going to get one fucking glorious relationship,
If by glorious you mean USA will use us to damage the EU and we become their lapdogs even more than we already are, then sure, it will be glorious.

Scotland would side with brown people

transition can work wonders
honestly, you're only -really- fucked if you're 6'5 or something
HRT is reported to actually shorten you by a few inches (due to pelvic bones rotating)

under 20 you're almost confirmed to transition well, it's only 25+ that transitioning becomes risky
either way, finding a boyfriend as a transwoman is easy shit
cis girls are the only ones hard to attract

Posted it here before. Trump wants Ivanka to get a buck negro lover

>Milkman rules out LAB-LIB Pact - "The people will never forgive Corbyn"
Will go into coalition with Tories, won't go into coalition with Labour, alienate your liberal voting base why not

Do Lib Dems dislike winning?

Gonna use that to trigger yanks

>Glasgow and students*

The Milkman is tired of winning

b-but it's a cybernetic market that can't fail
*encourages swathes of "think tanks" designed to repress thought instead of stimulate it*
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/fdb484c8-99a1-32a3-83be-20108374b985

>Nothing can be done.

And this is why you Brits lost your empire.

Pretty sure that was because we DID think we were invincible

>wins London seat where no other major party was running
Wew lad, a bit optimistic there

ANYBODY UP ITT EVER HAD THE PLEASURE OF A MMF THREESOME WITH 'DIRTY' LOUISE MENSCH?

This is my fear

>Terrorists' fast train to Britain: Mail exposes security loophole that allows ANYONE to get to the UK on Eurostar without a passport

Hasn't this been known for years?

>the entire central belt isn't pozz'd

Doesn't work - I tried. Le god emperor was le protecting her from le embarrassment
Use this
youtube.com/watch?v=TvI_TLZ6Wuc

What's that Brexitard?

Yeah, her books are pure filth.

>Le god emperor was le protecting her from le embarrassment
Gotta give it to the yanks, they are capable of some incredible mental gymnastics

...

I don't know why you'd take pleasure in upsetting them

>I'm no stranger to losing
t. milkman

>Confusing state intervention with state control
Parliament just saw that all as an excuse to obtain more control, whilst burdening off the responsibility and duties that Keynes outlined necessary for the govt. to accept.

My post was for

Upsetting other countries is great fun though.

At its peak it probably seemed like it would last forever, at least to the common man. Then it began to rapidly unravel and slip through our fingers mid 20th century.

Yanks are incredibly fun to annoy. They are very easy to wind up, and very insecure about their nation and themselves. It's beautiful.

Fun but flags were still a mistake

I bet she flicks her bean about the time me and Marion le Pen tied her up and shagged her rotten in Blackpool.

For the most part

CAMPUS HOME ABOUT COURSES WORKS LEXICON BLOG PEOPLE DONATE NEWSLETTER SIGN INREGISTER
Back to Lexicon
MYSTICISM
Philosophy: Who Needs It
What is mysticism? Mysticism is the acceptance of allegations without evidence or proof, either apart from or against the evidence of one’s senses and one’s reason. Mysticism is the claim to some non-sensory, non-rational, non-definable, non-identifiable means of knowledge, such as “instinct,” “intuition,” “revelation,” or any form of “just knowing.”

Reason is the perception of reality, and rests on a single axiom: the Law of Identity.

Mysticism is the claim to the perception of some other reality — other than the one in which we live — whose definition is only that it is not natural, it is supernatural, and is to be perceived by some form of unnatural or supernatural means.

You attending our nations funeral?
youtube.com/watch?v=TKp6GV69MT4

Ever visited the rest of Sup Forums?

It's an endless cesspit of countries arguing against one another, whilst doing nothing to work together to achieve a unifying goal.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like some of the goals which the liberal countries of today aim for - but that doesn't mean I disagree with the underlying principle of countries, remaining free and unique, unifying with one another to achieve a goal for the common good.

wtf


I am now a #JewMissile

>Michael
We all know who she had in mind

But if you look at all of human history they you will see that is almost impossible.

>Portilloposter

Anything but full restoration of the Empire isn't good enough for you.

I admire American and love Britain as we have collectively almost entirely contributed to the most significant advances in human civilisation in the last 500 years.

That's no insignificant feat.

it looks like a fucking war zone.....

A nation, like any other group, is only a number of individuals and can have no rights other than the rights of its individual citizens. A free nation — a nation that recognizes, respects and protects the individual rights of its citizens — has a right to its territorial integrity, its social system and its form of government. The government of such a nation is not the ruler, but the servant or agent of its citizens and has no rights other than the rights delegated to it by the citizens for a specific, delimited task (the task of protecting them from physical force, derived from their right of self-defense) . . . .

Such a nation has a right to its sovereignty (derived from the rights of its citizens) and a right to demand that its sovereignty be respected by all other nations.

“COLLECTIVIZED RIGHTS”
The Virtue of Selfishness, 103


how can you object to this?

...

Almost certainly, because she later says this about him:

>Michael had carried a full condom pack in his hip pocket at all times. But now, the girls just looked more tired, less appealing. When he woke up with one, it felt cheap, maybe a little dirty. Like when you ate a full box of Cracker Jacks out at a ball game and then felt sick later.

Ay-up lads - about to make myself a tinned crab sandwich

Oh, I wasn't genuinely defending Hayek. I just think the story of how such ideas have become so widespread on practice while Keynes was only turned to in the most watered down form - keeping most neoliberal tenants - after the 2008 crisis is fascinating.

It bares thinking over and over and over that the policy solutions proposed by think-tanks are motivated strongly by ideology instead of by free thought. The most radical of solutions you'll find are essentially those designed to fail, but to also achieve other aims. (i.e. abolish the NHS not because it will improve healthcare, but because the money can then be dispersed to causes which someone has personal investment in.)

Keynes was spot on with his review of "The Road to Serfdom"
>What we need therefore, in my opinion, is not a change in our economic programmes, which would only lead in practice to disillusion with the results of your philosophy; but perhaps even the contrary, namely, an enlargement of them. Your greatest danger ahead is the probable practical failure of the application of your philosophy in the United States

anybody up itt like shagging the missus on a saturday night?

also why they lost their cod

Wrong, empire LARPers are even more annoying
I don't understand why anti-EU people are intent on making us a vassal of the USA and why anti-USA people are intent on making us a vassal of the EU

Is independence really that hated by both sides

>A nation, like any other group, is only a number of individuals
Wrong, it is a collection of tradition and memories too. Or was, before both were abolished. We're seeing your sort of ideal nation-state now. Grey. Uniform. Bland. Take out that loan goy

>not admiring based Ayn Rand

literally how can you disagree with objectivism?

youtube.com/watch?v=mQVrMzWtqgU

>tinned crab sandwich

AIDS

hayek was spot on full stop

>420 reinforcements

Blaze

>Anything but full restoration of the Empire isn't good enough for you.
Not true.
I want a self dependent, independent, and strong nation that does not sell itself and its dignity to America to improve our global positon.

Indeed. Watch this one That one is incredibly depressing

Just had a curry myself and got a few tins

>Not using actual clips of her because she's such a vile-looking kike

I think it's about time to admit that Trump is a globalist puppet after all, isn't it lads?

>b-but at least it wasn't coercive

A state has the right to enact the will of its people. If the people's will is that the state should create social programs for the common good, then this should be done

>strong independent empire that don't need no yank

>supporting a Jewish Atheist that fully supported globalism and corporatism

free trade with amerika and oz

free movement with amerika and oz

>fuck yes, USA

Not just yet

The fact that the FIRST thing he did was throw money at the military to stop Iran is hilarious though

Wrong. The Brave New World was written as a utopia.

You're a shill, what would you know?
The tripfagging doesn't fool anyone

>Is independence really that hated by both sides
The problem is one of an imperial psyche.

We must be part of something bigger. It's a need we don't want to confront. So we're always looking, because the alternative is to accept that no - actually, we're just an island of 60 million people sitting in the sea.
It would be an admission that in the present world we're not particularly special or remarkable, and to a nation that once ran the world those are painful words to hear.


I'd quite like an independent Britain that simply minds her own business while building a nice place for her own citizens to live, but it runs completely against the grain of our "punching above our weight!!!" identity of the present day.

nice - mine was an impulse tin-buy from the £ shop

kek

free trade with amerika.
Good luck getting a trade deal with America that will replace our trade deal with the EU.

>free movement with amerika
No. The 40%ers and SJW's will move here when Canada gets rid of their cuck leader.

not a argument and she was cute

Tldr go die

>Tldr go die
How coercive of you.

>free trade
Yes
>free movement
No. with America it'd result in an inflow of niggers and with Australia it'd result in an outflow of whites

...

violates the right of the individual and makes the great constrained by the small

>from the £ shop
Sorry mate, things can only get better right?

>free movement with amerika
No way, they have far too many niggers and wetbacks.

>it's my INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to exploit people and let the poor die
Fuck off

Even if some call it impossible, I'd rather have countries occupied with something useful - instead of doing nothing except exploiting their own peoples (and in turn other peoples).
There are conditions which I'll accept where this ideal is worthless, such as if there is a strong possibility that the attempt to work towards a common goal will dissipate and become destruction, or bear a heavy cost; or whether the goal is noble and truly good; or whether a state will sincerely aid it's people and nation without aiding in a global project.

It's because for the masses Hayek is easier to understand; Keynes was very much a man of specifics; Hayek simply advocated for the free market since he (falsely believed) that all agents and actors of the market would want it to remain stable and prosperous, thus it will, and that all agents of the free market were designed deliberately like organisms were.
Whilst Keynes argued that wasn't the case, and his philosophy his proven to be true; the nations who solved the 2008 crisis were the quickest were those willing to allow the state to intervene *properly*, as opposed to allowing the actors who caused it to solve it.

Furthermore, Hayek's alluring simplicity hides the deeper truth of those who wish to dominate the free market, and usurp and enslave the consumers and producers: Keynes exposed the fact that the free market wasn't perfect and that economic actors weren't perfect.
Now, Sup Forums likes to call these people Jews - but they're not all jews. But they certainly are people who do not care about our freedom and prosperity - thus they're our enemies.

not gonna lie, these are good places guys.

>white mans places.