So this... is the power if modern socialism

So this... is the power if modern socialism

youtube.com/watch?v=P3BOd8vlRkg

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qYhlMsfOk_Q&t=8s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

bump

>brown people hurting brown people

Yawn

this video is nothing without context

Context is Venezuela today.

Socialism

NOT REAL COMMUNISM

Fucking Venezuelan Untermenschen

Chavez and Madura are Costa Rica´s and Panamás best finance ministers making all the money flow here

Civil war when?

It's Socialism for the 21st Century. Geez hombre, get with the times.

How in the fuck do you not have a clue about modern Venezuela?

They are falling apart at the seams. Hyperinflation is fucking them hard.

i hate how that faggot looks like a school gym coach

This is what you could have had

socialism hasn't been tried
Also: it's like the eighth time this link's been posted.

They're brown people. I think that's the bigger factor. Then it's the economic and social systems.

No way in hell does this work. Especially with brown people.

>Be Latino
>tfw a militia of anti-leftist Latinos will never form in order to kick the Socialists out of Latin America

Me duele..

I don't generally care about third world shit holes.

but elect socialism, get what you get.

Top Kek

You say that, but considering that they are sitting on the planet's largest oil reserves, there is no reason that it should fail no matter WHO is there.

The problem with socialism is that it centralizes power. On a long enough timeline, EVERYTHING fails. When socialism/communism fails, then EVERYTHING it has power over fails. Comparing this to a more capitalist country, this isn't true. If Walmart were to fail and die, then Target and other competitors will continue to live, and pick up the slack that Walmart left behind (and does so to their own benefit).

When you diversify power, you diversify risk, and enable better businesses to help consumers out when worse businesses fail. It's win/win.

That's fucking hilarious.
Jesus that picture's great.

You should probably say, when you diversify power, you centralize risk, that would coincide with your previous statement of how when
>socialism fails everything fails.

Why? Socialism centralizes power more than Capitalism. Granted, Communism (in every form that has ever existed) has power even more centralized, but the point still stands, so long as Capitalism doesn't involve monopolies.

Then you have two opposing statements.

>socialism is that it **centralizes** power.

>On a long enough timeline, EVERYTHING fails.

>When socialism/communism fails, then **EVERYTHING** it has power over fails.

Socialism/communism has power over EVERYTHING, therefore its power is diverse.

Socialism can only operate when power is centralized, then it becomes... not socialism.

when the center fails, everything fails.

Socialism entails power over everything which leaves it vulnerable to centralized AND diverse risk, almost like it's just wanting to break apart and requires exorbitant amounts of maintenance to keep the facade going.

Communism has power over everything. Socialism has power over much more than capitalism. When socialism fails, everything it has power over (usually everything that people argue is a "universal right" like healthcare, food, housing, electricity, water) fails.

Socialism still allows for privately owned businesses, which may or may not fail (depending on how much they rely on the government-controlled services to remain in business).

Well I guess you could make that argument.

but socialism is just the stepping stone to communism.

I kek'd and I cried.

How much suffering must socialism cause before humanity finally throws this ideology into the fire of history?

No argument there.

it will never leave.

it campaigns on the promise of fairness and equality for everyone (just like BLM and sanders) and then once it takes hold the virus is set.

only violent nationalism can overthrow it.

Like how Hitler beat the Soviets and eliminated Communism?

>communism LITERALLY SUPPORTED BY AMERICA

Yes, just like that.

Hitler was the liberator of the people, from the perspective of the rural farmers and church goers.

>communism needs context

No wonder those people are starving in the most dangerous place on earth.

Well I actually wanted to know what the trigger for the rioting was.

it doesn't just happen out of no where.

since a lot of the scenes had people scrambling for food, that's pretty clear.

but the cops beating on inmates I don't know what that has to do with it, are they dissidents?

People are literally starving there. There's a mid class user who posts here regularly that said he had to eat moldy bread.

LOL

Send bernie there, he must how know how to fix it, what they need is free college so they can learn to remove bacteria from the bread they eat.

It diminishes risk actually because there's other players in the pool taking risks.

When you just have one player, you either win or fail.

The reasons though socialism always fails are different: it's because it does not have a proper price system, so there cannot be real supply/demand of goods/services

watch this

youtube.com/watch?v=qYhlMsfOk_Q&t=8s

it's bluepilled but it should give you an overview of what happened.

Hayekian argument always wins.

The only feasable answer to it is a central computer doing all the math, but there's the issue that markets are NP-hard problems so there's no known way to do it efficiently, so you often go to solutions that are divide-and-conquer heuristics (such as capitalism).

:)

Hitler economy was a total failure too, he just masked the adverse effects of its policies by seizing other countries to counter its supply deficit generated by the innefective German oligopolies he promoted.

you could be the leader of the first one. im a sephardi from Puerto Rico, if you succeed enough ill go join you. pic related is me.

I'm not advocating NatSoc

I'm just pointing thats often what it takes to rid the nation of socialist cancer.

People united against the government willing to die for the land they love.

Socialism/communist inherently doesn't want to lose its power so you have to take it by force.

you can't kill commies. they'll always regenerate because they're like mlm/pyramid scams.

>0:32
>that pistol whip
Fucking kek and just yesterday I was in a /k/ thread with people saying pistol lanyards are useless. I'll have to see if the thread is still up and post this...

and facism is just another breed of a scam. its economy eventually creashes because it is a breed of central planning.

this is why i am concerned about a future with basic incomes

we will all be slaves to the state. we will be dependent upon them to eat, to wipe our ass, to clothe our bodies.

It will never happen. Things will just get asymptotically closer to free.

>because it is a breed of central planning.
Somewhat. Economic fascism is corporatist in nature. The infrastructure tends to get nationalized but private property still exists and industrialists are still allowed some decree of freedom. The state encourages certain industries with subsidies, economic stimuli, lower interest rates, etc so it is definitely intervening and seeking to direct the market. But regardless it is not quite as overly controlling as communism, which is 100% centralized.

But that makes sense once you accept fascism is the bastard child of communism and nationalism.

No. The Dominicans are destroying Venezuela, just like what happen to Costa Rica, and they are proud of it.

>The Dominicans are destroying Venezuela, just like what happen to Costa Rica
context? I'm not really familiar with south-american maymays.

It's called Dominicanism.

What is Dominicanism?
Dominicanism is a nationalist and political ideology that for Dominicans and Dominican culture only.

>What's wrong with Dominicanism?
Dominicanism can destabilize countries outside the Dominican Republic. Take example: Haiti. Haiti used to be the richest country in the world. It used to build the greatest empire in human history. Until the Dominicans created Dominicanism and destroy Haiti by becoming an independent country, completely destabilized and broke the empire into pieces. Venezuela is also an example because the Dominicans drains the entire resources in Venezuela. That's why Venezuela is bankrupt due to chronic shortages, famine, and mass starvation. Chile, Costa Rica, and Spain also got hit because of the mass crime wave around the country, mostly with murder, rape, and even street terrorism. The United States, mostly the island of Puerto Rico also hit by Dominicanism due to unpaid debt that destabilized Puerto Rico. Dominicanism can use leaders and politicians as their puppets. Example Russian President Vladimir Putin and Republican Party Nominee Donald Trump.

>When Dominicanism was formed?
It was formed before the Dominican War of Independence from 1844 to 1856. It was formed in 1833, when La Trinitaria (The Trinity) was also formed by a racist terrorist named Juan Pablo Duarte. It became more powerful when the Jews migrated to the DR during the second World War. The Jews teach Dominicans how to jew people.

This is why Dominicanism is bad and Dominicans are spreading it like a virus.

>La Trinitaria
Damn that is pretty dank, thanks user

Which is why heavy authoritarianism is the answer-- rather than totalitarianism.

Looks like a twink.

the context is the shithole called venezuela

a friend i have is very similar to you, except he's darker skin

I personally have no issue with the government using force against the people that cause chaos, specially in a third world shithole with a low trust society. Can't say i feel sympathy for Venezuela tho, they fell for the communist jew.