What's with the fixation on violence here?

White woman and black man in a relationship?
>Kill them
People complaining that Trump didn't win the popular vote?
>Kill them
Hillary wins presidency?
>Armed rebellion against her

Of course nothing ever comes of it, but the fixation remains regardless

>Inb4 implying pol is one person

You know exactly what I mean about the Sup Forums zeitgeists fetishization of use of violence against enemies who embody "degeneracy." Don't be disengenuous.

People can't change op
You can't reform them
So if they need removed
You must kill them

Sometimes people get angry at life and at their state of existence and they need an outlet to release all of that raw hatred, lest it continues poisoning their soul.

Personally, I'd rather have Sup Forums romanticizing violence on a neo-nazi japanese image board than chimping out against innocent people.

Just let them have their fun

Didn't you change into the form you have today, though? It's certainly a different case with regard to the elderly, but that's a different conversation altogether.

Those incapable of rational thought and reason can only be dealt with using violence.

White woman and white man in a relationship?
>Kill them
People celebrating that Trump won the presidency?
>Kill them
Trump wins presidency?
>Armed rebellion against him

Of course nothing ever comes of it, but the fixation remains regardless

>Inb4 implying lefties are one person

You know exactly what I mean about the lefty zeitgeists fetishization of use of violence against enemies who embody "privilege." Don't be disingenuous.

Kek, I imagine you find their approaches distasteful/disgusting don't you?

Something something stooping to their level

good thing we're the ones in power, huh?

>"We're" the ones in power

I'm kind of curious what you think that actually means, especially given the recent revisions to his platform (ie removing Dodd Frank, not prosecuting Hillary, etc)

Also you know damn well the whiny sjws aren't doing shit(minus pointless protests that serve to change nothing except their FB cover pictures obv), ever.

that would mean we control the presidency, the house, the senate, 33/50 governors, we're going to get 1-3 supreme court picks

eat shit

Sup Forums strives for maximum chaos and death

The only violence I'm seeing is by tolerant lefties, though.

Words never equal violence.

Only violence does.

So "we" means cuckservatives and a (impressively capable shit talker) fellow who can say what you like to hear?

I'm honestly sorry you've been pushed so far that you genuinely feel that way m80

It's a way to blow off steam and be outlandish. Most people here are either functioning members of society or cut off from it. You can't say shit like this in public, so better to air it out here so people don't get offended and attack you

...

oBoma doeS the maMbo

You mean anarchofags, people that lolbertarians would largely agree with, who saw an opportunity?

Have the emus gotten to you? Blink twice and we'll know, you're safe here.

Pic related

Don't you feel that says something about the participants, that they can't vent their desires for extreme violence publicly, so they have to skitter here like roaches? (Not to mention that society at large has rejected their knuckle dragging ways...)

Pretty much this

It's ugly, and you should never have to threaten violence against your own countrymen, but they cannot simply be left to continue their destructive behavior, that oftentimes isn't even their own, but that of a foreign aggressor who has subverted the minds of the people. Like a misbehaving child, it sometimes comes to beating the stupid out of them in the hopes they will never do it again. Scared straight, if you will.

You can be as smug as you want, enjoy being legislatively fucked for at least the next 4 years.

When one is too stupid to argue your own side effectively and convincingly enough they must resort to violence to get their message across to the masses. What a fucking role model you are.

"My biggest regret about the Western dictators and regimes is that they forever turned off the West from thinking violence was ever the answer when in reality the problem of Western degeneracy would be easily solved by internal violence towards those within the community that destroy it.

Russia is already a perfect example of this. They are the last Western country not to accept the degeneracy internally among the people and will use violence among citizens to shame or beat it out of the culture. And it's working wonderfully. They're not a perfect system, but they're showing exactly how society is meant to work. Undesirable behaviour is shamed out of the gene pool and the community."

- Some user on Sup Forums

Doesn't this realization, that you are incapable of convincing those who fundamentally disagree with you, highlight the inferiority of your rhetorical/logical tools moreso than it does the existence of subversive adversaries?

Think about what you're saying here, which is that some of your countrymen have been so thoroughly convinced by mysterious and dangerous adversaries that all your logic and reason is helpless against them, thus you must discard your "enlightened" pretenses and resort to literally beating your "truth" into them.

kek

The other side is often not interested in reason or debate in the slightest. You can make the most flawless, airtight argument against them, and they will simply take a fat, greasy shit on all of it and throw buzzwords or insults at you en masse without even taking the time to consider your position, or theirs or anything that has been said in the course of the argument. In their eyes, they are always infallibly right and you are always wrong because 'YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE, ARE YOU KIDDING ME?' or the like.

There is no convincing them no matter how reasonable you try to be, and their ideology and behavior is far too dangerous to leave alone. What are your options against that?

Lol I don't really have to worry about, being a non-minority, areligious shitstain. However, I'm not discussing the new President (fantastic as he is) so much as the fixation with violence here. Presidents come and go, but large zeitgeists of individuals stick around shitting influence on everything they touch for generations.

>There is no convincing them no matter how reasonable you try to be, and their ideology and behavior is far too dangerous to leave alone. What are your options against that?

That you're making a straw man that doesn't actually exist outside the realm of memes and your imagination..?

You seriously believe some ideologies are so powerful that they make not just individuals, but everyone it contacts, immune to "reason" and "rhetoric"?

Fucking go outside once and awhile and talk to someone, it'll do you well.

A desire for practical ruthlessness. There's not enough of it in the west anymore.