White woman and black man in a relationship? >Kill them People complaining that Trump didn't win the popular vote? >Kill them Hillary wins presidency? >Armed rebellion against her
Of course nothing ever comes of it, but the fixation remains regardless
>Inb4 implying pol is one person
You know exactly what I mean about the Sup Forums zeitgeists fetishization of use of violence against enemies who embody "degeneracy." Don't be disengenuous.
Adrian Ward
People can't change op You can't reform them So if they need removed You must kill them
Nicholas Robinson
Sometimes people get angry at life and at their state of existence and they need an outlet to release all of that raw hatred, lest it continues poisoning their soul.
Personally, I'd rather have Sup Forums romanticizing violence on a neo-nazi japanese image board than chimping out against innocent people.
Just let them have their fun
Michael Gomez
Didn't you change into the form you have today, though? It's certainly a different case with regard to the elderly, but that's a different conversation altogether.
Owen Jackson
Those incapable of rational thought and reason can only be dealt with using violence.
Jacob Nguyen
White woman and white man in a relationship? >Kill them People celebrating that Trump won the presidency? >Kill them Trump wins presidency? >Armed rebellion against him
Of course nothing ever comes of it, but the fixation remains regardless
>Inb4 implying lefties are one person
You know exactly what I mean about the lefty zeitgeists fetishization of use of violence against enemies who embody "privilege." Don't be disingenuous.
Christian Diaz
Kek, I imagine you find their approaches distasteful/disgusting don't you?
Something something stooping to their level
Brandon Baker
good thing we're the ones in power, huh?
Brandon Turner
>"We're" the ones in power
I'm kind of curious what you think that actually means, especially given the recent revisions to his platform (ie removing Dodd Frank, not prosecuting Hillary, etc)
Lucas Smith
Also you know damn well the whiny sjws aren't doing shit(minus pointless protests that serve to change nothing except their FB cover pictures obv), ever.
Hunter Johnson
that would mean we control the presidency, the house, the senate, 33/50 governors, we're going to get 1-3 supreme court picks
eat shit
Carson Bell
Sup Forums strives for maximum chaos and death
Anthony Rodriguez
The only violence I'm seeing is by tolerant lefties, though.
Words never equal violence.
Only violence does.
Camden Bennett
So "we" means cuckservatives and a (impressively capable shit talker) fellow who can say what you like to hear?
I'm honestly sorry you've been pushed so far that you genuinely feel that way m80
Sebastian Thomas
It's a way to blow off steam and be outlandish. Most people here are either functioning members of society or cut off from it. You can't say shit like this in public, so better to air it out here so people don't get offended and attack you
Ayden Hall
...
Nicholas Myers
oBoma doeS the maMbo
Thomas Taylor
You mean anarchofags, people that lolbertarians would largely agree with, who saw an opportunity?
Have the emus gotten to you? Blink twice and we'll know, you're safe here.
Ayden Butler
Pic related
Don't you feel that says something about the participants, that they can't vent their desires for extreme violence publicly, so they have to skitter here like roaches? (Not to mention that society at large has rejected their knuckle dragging ways...)
Julian Perez
Pretty much this
It's ugly, and you should never have to threaten violence against your own countrymen, but they cannot simply be left to continue their destructive behavior, that oftentimes isn't even their own, but that of a foreign aggressor who has subverted the minds of the people. Like a misbehaving child, it sometimes comes to beating the stupid out of them in the hopes they will never do it again. Scared straight, if you will.
Isaac Kelly
You can be as smug as you want, enjoy being legislatively fucked for at least the next 4 years.
Gabriel Williams
When one is too stupid to argue your own side effectively and convincingly enough they must resort to violence to get their message across to the masses. What a fucking role model you are.
Liam Campbell
"My biggest regret about the Western dictators and regimes is that they forever turned off the West from thinking violence was ever the answer when in reality the problem of Western degeneracy would be easily solved by internal violence towards those within the community that destroy it.
Russia is already a perfect example of this. They are the last Western country not to accept the degeneracy internally among the people and will use violence among citizens to shame or beat it out of the culture. And it's working wonderfully. They're not a perfect system, but they're showing exactly how society is meant to work. Undesirable behaviour is shamed out of the gene pool and the community."
- Some user on Sup Forums
Blake Peterson
Doesn't this realization, that you are incapable of convincing those who fundamentally disagree with you, highlight the inferiority of your rhetorical/logical tools moreso than it does the existence of subversive adversaries?
Think about what you're saying here, which is that some of your countrymen have been so thoroughly convinced by mysterious and dangerous adversaries that all your logic and reason is helpless against them, thus you must discard your "enlightened" pretenses and resort to literally beating your "truth" into them.
kek
Xavier Jenkins
The other side is often not interested in reason or debate in the slightest. You can make the most flawless, airtight argument against them, and they will simply take a fat, greasy shit on all of it and throw buzzwords or insults at you en masse without even taking the time to consider your position, or theirs or anything that has been said in the course of the argument. In their eyes, they are always infallibly right and you are always wrong because 'YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE, ARE YOU KIDDING ME?' or the like.
There is no convincing them no matter how reasonable you try to be, and their ideology and behavior is far too dangerous to leave alone. What are your options against that?
Xavier Johnson
Lol I don't really have to worry about, being a non-minority, areligious shitstain. However, I'm not discussing the new President (fantastic as he is) so much as the fixation with violence here. Presidents come and go, but large zeitgeists of individuals stick around shitting influence on everything they touch for generations.
Eli Gutierrez
>There is no convincing them no matter how reasonable you try to be, and their ideology and behavior is far too dangerous to leave alone. What are your options against that?
That you're making a straw man that doesn't actually exist outside the realm of memes and your imagination..?
You seriously believe some ideologies are so powerful that they make not just individuals, but everyone it contacts, immune to "reason" and "rhetoric"?
Fucking go outside once and awhile and talk to someone, it'll do you well.
Julian Price
A desire for practical ruthlessness. There's not enough of it in the west anymore.