Did Hitler Want War?

I have recently discovered Pat Buchanan and think that he is true American and the kind of politician you would have needed. I still cannot understand why you did not vote for this man and why he lost so horribly. He embodies the better angels of the American nature, is at the backbone that builds the European man and his civilization. Why you would choose a crypto-Jewish, reality TV star and "extravagant" billionaire over him is beyond me.

But I really wanted to highlight this article by him which is not from Stormfront, but of his website and public common knowledge.


>On Sept. 1, 1939, 70 years ago, the German Army crossed the Polish frontier. On Sept. 3, Britain declared war.

>Six years later, 50 million Christians and Jews had perished. Britain was broken and bankrupt, Germany a smoldering ruin. Europe had served as the site of the most murderous combat known to man, and civilians had suffered worse horrors than the soldiers.

>By May 1945, Red Army hordes occupied all the great capitals of Central Europe: Vienna, Prague, Budapest, Berlin. A hundred million Christians were under the heel of the most barbarous tyranny in history: the Bolshevik regime of the greatest terrorist of them all, Joseph Stalin.

What cause could justify such sacrifices?

>The German-Polish war had come out of a quarrel over a town the size of Ocean City, Md., in summer. Danzig, 95 percent German, had been severed from Germany at Versailles in violation of Woodrow Wilson’s principle of self-determination. Even British leaders thought Danzig should be returned.

>Why did Warsaw not negotiate with Berlin, which was hinting at an offer of compensatory territory in Slovakia? Because the Poles had a war guarantee from Britain that, should Germany attack, Britain and her empire would come to Poland’s rescue.

>But why would Britain hand an unsolicited war guarantee to a junta of Polish colonels, giving them the power to drag Britain into a second war with the most powerful nation in Europe?

>Was Danzig worth a war? Unlike the 7 million Hong Kongese whom the British surrendered to Beijing, who didn’t want to go, the Danzigers were clamoring to return to Germany.

>Comes the response: The war guarantee was not about Danzig, or even about Poland. It was about the moral and strategic imperative “to stop Hitler” after he showed, by tearing up the Munich pact and Czechoslovakia with it, that he was out to conquer the world. And this Nazi beast could not be allowed to do that.

>If true, a fair point. Americans, after all, were prepared to use atom bombs to keep the Red Army from the Channel. But where is the evidence that Adolf Hitler, whose victims as of March 1939 were a fraction of Gen. Pinochet’s, or Fidel Castro’s, was out to conquer the world?

>After Munich in 1938, Czechoslovakia did indeed crumble and come apart. Yet consider what became of its parts.

>The Sudeten Germans were returned to German rule, as they wished. Poland had annexed the tiny disputed region of Teschen, where thousands of Poles lived. Hungary’s ancestral lands in the south of Slovakia had been returned to her. The Slovaks had their full independence guaranteed by Germany. As for the Czechs, they came to Berlin for the same deal as the Slovaks, but Hitler insisted they accept a protectorate.

>Now one may despise what was done, but how did this partition of Czechoslovakia manifest a Hitlerian drive for world conquest?

>Comes the reply: If Britain had not given the war guarantee and gone to war, after Czechoslovakia would have come Poland’s turn, then Russia’s, then France’s, then Britain’s, then the United States.

>We would all be speaking German now.

>But if Hitler was out to conquer the world — Britain, Africa, the Middle East, the United States, Canada, South America, India, Asia, Australia — why did he spend three years building that hugely expensive Siegfried Line to protect Germany from France? Why did he start the war with no surface fleet, no troop transports and only 29 oceangoing submarines? How do you conquer the world with a navy that can’t get out of the Baltic Sea?

>If Hitler wanted the world, why did he not build strategic bombers, instead of two-engine Dorniers and Heinkels that could not even reach Britain from Germany?

>Why did he let the British army go at Dunkirk?

>Why did he offer the British peace, twice, after Poland fell, and again after France fell?

>Why, when Paris fell, did Hitler not demand the French fleet, as the Allies demanded and got the Kaiser’s fleet? Why did he not demand bases in French-controlled Syria to attack Suez? Why did he beg Benito Mussolini not to attack Greece?

>Because Hitler wanted to end the war in 1940, almost two years before the trains began to roll to the camps.

>Hitler had never wanted war with Poland, but an alliance with Poland such as he had with Francisco Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Miklos Horthy’s Hungary and Father Jozef Tiso’s Slovakia.

>Indeed, why would he want war when, by 1939, he was surrounded by allied, friendly or neutral neighbors, save France. And he had written off Alsace, because reconquering Alsace meant war with France, and that meant war with Britain, whose empire he admired and whom he had always sought as an ally.

>As of March 1939, Hitler did not even have a border with Russia. How then could he invade Russia?

>Winston Churchill was right when he called it “The Unnecessary War” — the war that may yet prove the mortal blow to our civilization.

It is horrible to be cursed, having to live with this truth. Having to live with the fact that the only man who could have saved the European peoples and nations from the encroaching globalism and its financial capitalist order of the (((international elements))) is demonized as the devil himself and worse.

It is horrible to know that the only order that was able to revitalize our German birthrates is demonized as the worst regime of all time. - A necessity in the logic of the current world order.

And it is horrible to know this and live in a state, that is designed against you individually as a German and against the very existence of your people. Facing a future in which over a thousand years of German history will be erradicated in almost an instant and the German people themselves disappear. Like the French, the British and even the Eastern European peoples. With losses by birthrates worse than through all the wars, genocides and tyrannical regimes of the 20th century combinded.

But even the greatest victor of WW2, the USA, face an all too similar fate. With their white European population in dramatic decline and on the verge of becoming politically marginalized through mass immigration and the simple power to vote. They too can lose their culture, their traditions and values and their very people. A fate suffered by generations, that never fired a single bullet at an innocent man, never held slaves, never tortured or exploited anyone. Especially the poor working class and declining middle class will pay the highest price. Not the billionaires who profit of mass immigration from the 3rd world.

Not a single reply...

Sup Forums is officially dead then

Thats gay

He ran for president in 88 I think and was on his way to winning but then they called him a nazi and it was over. Trump is the first person who was able to overcome the judenpress.

Hitler definitely wanted war with the Soviets to end (((Bolshevism))).

Agreed on all other points. British should have allied with him.

BRITAIN SHOULD HAVE ALLIED WITH HIM
THEN AMERICA THROUGH PATTON

I WANT AN ARYAN WIFE

Poland belonged to the Preussian empire (Germany). Poland was stolen from Germany after WW1, as was a lot of other areas as i.e. the land that was given to Denmark (who didn't even attend WW1). This was due to the Germany being blamed for a war they didn't start but which they chose to redraw from after Keiser Wilhelm abdicated. Germany wanted to declare peace but England and France was being dicks. So WW2 is where Hitler reclaim rightful German clay which was stolen from them (Poland and some parts of Jutland). Through propaganda (see King Georges speech) England uses this as an excuse to retalliate against Germany. When the jewish deportation begins the allied that to strengthen their propaganda, even England was in fact the first country who theoretized about deporting all jews out of England.

Germany was never the villian. Germany was always just the bullied kid.

Also, Germany knew that the communist russia would try to steal Poland and invade through that passage. The Germans were stuck in a no-way-out situation.

its the ayyyylmaoos fault

I had to spend a long time on a reply to a long question. Don't be so impatient.

Sure he wanted war. Not with England and France though.

Come on OP, you post enough material for me to spend a lot of time reading and now you want a reply right away?

>Why did Warsaw not negotiate with Berlin, which was hinting at an offer of compensatory territory in Slovakia?
Because Czechoslovakian government negotiated instead of going to war before and we all know how it ended up.

Pat is right about many things, but this one isn't it.

>nazi regime lies cheats and kills way into power
>night of the long knives and shit
>aggressively pursue any territory with Germans
>Czech crisis occurs
>take czech lands in a provocative way
>Italy invades Albania(why tho?)
>nazis attack Poland and then turn and attack Denmark and Norway.

Yeah nazis wanted peace. If you had lands in Europe they wanted then wanting peace involved giving yourself up or getting shot.

Peaceful my ass. If the nazi regime had just sat on Poland and tried to make this out to be a misunderstanding they might have survived.

Nazis didn't want peace though.

>why did he spend three years building that hugely expensive Siegfried Line to protect Germany from France
Because French built Maginot Line too and everybody and his dog expected static warfare on the western front.
>Why did he start the war with no surface fleet, no troop transports and only 29 oceangoing submarines?
Because he couldn't afford holding up any longer. He was going bankrupt by 1940, had to figure out something.
>why did he not build strategic bombers
Germany tried strategic bombing during WW1 and it didn't do much, which is also why they started the war from the east(securing peace with Soviet Union and getting rid of Poland) instead of starting it from the west(attacking France) like it happened during WW1.

Seriously as I've said, Pat was wrong about it. When Hitler promised that he'll stop after getting Rheinland back, he quickly turned his eyes on Austria, when he said - well Austria is the last thing in Europe, I promise! - he started agitating Germans in Sudetenland, when he got Sudetenland, which he begged for in front of Great Britain and France pleading that he won't want an inch of land if he'll get this, he decided to get rid of Czechoslovakia all together. Give kraut a finger and he'll take whole hand.