Hey Sup Forums. Tell me in the shortest terms possible why rightism and conservatism as a whole is good for the world

Hey Sup Forums. Tell me in the shortest terms possible why rightism and conservatism as a whole is good for the world.

Hard Mode:
>don't mention race
>don't mention the jews

Impossible Mode:
>don't mention morals/degeneracy
>don't mention continuing the human race
>don't mention intellect

>conservatism
using rules that have been proven to be good

> Less divorce

> Less fatherless households (Helps nignogs)

> Ending mass immigration lowers unemployment in native populous.

For the conservative, the present is the last moment that the past has approached, while for the "progressives", the present is the beginning of the future.

The conservative worldview is based on facts, whereas the leftist worldview is based on empty theory. Consequently, the conservative has a healthy stance on family, religion and nation, unlike the regressive left that wants to destroy everything in order to attempt to fulfill their perverse desires, a hypothetical society that cannot be achieved, and even if it miraculously happened, it would be a full-blown dystopia.

Keep in mind that by conservative I don't mean degenerate alt-right faggots

Because We say it is.

The strong prefer right wing politics (unequality), the weak prefer left wing politics (equality).

If you're strong willed, work hard for what you want to seek, are able-bodies then you are extremely likely right wing.

It's as simple as this, the strong, the aristocrats are naturally right wing (prefer unequality). This is not about which is better, but in which group you belong, whether you are inferior or superior in the organic class system.

I don't support conservatism though, conservatives are cucks that try to get back what's dead and gone, the past. I'm a futurist.

>OP here. I'm a collosal shilling fag. I don't actually give two shits what you guys think, but I want you to summarise an entire political movement in a couple of words.
>Also, here are a bunch more random and stupid rules I pulled out of my arse to make this exercise even more pointless.

here:

Do not fix what isn't broken

>give me a good reason
>but you're not allowed to give good reasons

Checked

Game theory.

Liberalism rejects game theory and therefore reality. The right-wing knows that the more games you play, the more successful you become.

The same word says it all, conservation, conserving the things that worked. Not just replacing what worked for the sake of being progressive, for no actual reason (progress should be always change to positive, not negative). For example, the views of marriage our old ancestors had, there was less divorce (or separations), more children per household, when there was less wealth and luxuries. You can see celebs that have literally all a man could want and they still have divorce after divorce.

Conservatism is built on a tradition of doing what has worked. Where as progressives have no problems with radical upheavals of society and systems because they view society not as it is but as they deem it should be.

Conservatism is built on trying to preserve whatever nonsense is active at the moment.

It's cuck tier, while the left is pushing something new, the right is just trying to slow it down. It's an unwinnable battle.

We have to turn the left into conservatives.

The thing about that is that most people skew conservative the older they become. The only old liberals I know are atheist and fucking insulated rich whites that never feel the cost of their actions.

You got it wrong lad, the dichotomy of conservative-liberal is false, they are not opposites. Soon the conservatives will be the ones that want gender equality and rest of the platform of the left nowadays when we get to power.

And of course people skew more conservative when they get older, the older you get the harder it is to also learn things. You are used to a certain way of life and it's not gonna be easy with radical change, especially when you are old.

liberalism: city people

conservatism: rural and suburban retards

...

Leftist policies incentvizes people to work and shape their own future. A welfare state means that people will just not be as keen to work, knowing that there is constant flow of welfare and food stamps coming their way on a regular basis. The step ahead which now many socialists are propagating for, is a "citizen salary", i.e being paid for simply existing. People are thus discouraged from striving for greatness if they know their income is just served to them on a silver platter, even if it would greatly improve their life in the long run. The notion that the state provides for your every need will just cement your belief that other people owe you something and you´ll always feel entitled to the fruits of others' accomplishments. People thrive when they are given the freedom, the ability and the incentive to become the masters and architects of their own lives and future. Giving the people what they need for the moment eliminates the striving for progress and keeps them in an perpetual cycle of non-improvement. People need to know that no one owes you anything except for yourself, and the only thing you owe yourself is the will and actions to improve your life. Socialism leads to sloth, self-entitlement and halts progress, improvemt and development, both on an induvidual and national scale.

leftist policies incentivizes people to NOT work*

Fuck your impossible mode, those ARE accurate points to use, the other 2 you listed aren't always part of rightism and conservatism.

Kill yourself if none of these are of any importance to you.

(((equality)))

...