Violence is O.K.! - NYT

nytimes.com/2017/01/21/us/politics/richard-spencer-punched-attack.html

archive.is/1mzV5

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9P9tMXWyjUI
youtube.com/watch?v=Jrb-IbUs-Js
youtube.com/watch?v=HECRyW4b4QI
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Don't even include the NYT link next time.

What fucking tripe.

"Spencer is anti-x, y, and z."

Later on, "For the record, Spencer says he is not anti-x, y, and z."

I'm guessing this woman was also a Nazi?

why not include NYT link?

I saw three separate libcucks and one journalist use the INDIANA JONES AND CAPTAIN AMERIA PUNCHED NAZIS SO IT'S OKAY AND PATRIOTIC AS FUCK line.

Imagine being such a brainfucked manchild you base your personal values on actions of fictional comic book and movie characters created by Jews.

...

so why not start punching back

Yet they show none of this attitude to communists. Let's face it, they don't hate evil they just hate Nazis because they're simpletons who have no capacity for independent thought. They love their whole lives hearing about Nazis boogiemen that haven't existed for almost 100 years but celebrate actual murderers like Castro who were still relevant. If they're that fundamentally stupid then we should expect this to manifest in their actions too.

NYT are acting like patriots.

WW2 veterans will roll in their graves if they seen what the Americans spout on pol

>Americans don't hate communists
Wrong.
>Castro was worse than Hitler
Also total and objective bullshit.
>American media celebrate Castro
Are you fucking blind?

>punching nazis is american as fuck

Most americans in ww2 have never seen a nazi in person, let alone punch or even touch one.

The problem with this is the left labels everyone a nazi. They consider everyone who voted trump a nazi, every red blooded american straight male a nazi etc. So where does it end?

No one is going to click it and give them advertising money

this is a good thing

It will make RWDS come sooner

That's bait

...

...

Please do.

I would love to see this movie happen to the Alt Right

...

...

...

>le everything I don't le like is le bait meme

...

...

Not the problem I was addressing but whatever.

Yeah Spencer isn't even a nazi so it makes the situation even more retarded. He is literally just some random pacifist preppy guy saying white people should have their own countries and they equate him to Hitler for this.

>nazis are afraid the moment some anarchists him them in the head
how sad and pathetic. The idiot you like to worship, Hitler would kill you for being useless

WW2 vets fought for nothing

...

So basically Sup Forumsacks can punch SJWs and Antifa as well? They want to restrict thoughts and freedoms.

can we make a giant list of all the crazy attacks from the left over the past year?

im too lazy to start

Milo organized a raid on some feminist bitch that's why he's banned and Spencer isn't.

He's conflicted because a "united Europe is a strong Europe" and he's some pan European lover if the Eu wasn't cucked and shit countries couldn't move to good countries it would be nice.

It has Greeks and Romans fucked all the time and immigration and white nationality is the topic not homo sex.

This quote is saying that super left Whites in Sweden are getting into conflicts with conservative Muslims so ironically being a cuck is a White stand for culture is Sweden

Anything else?

Because 99% of the "alt-right" are sheltered nerds like spencer.

Get the fuck out of this country

sand like a whole lot of pan Europeanism cancer and alt right faggotry! it speaks for itself

Most WW2 vets agree at this point.

Not really. They fought to give power to the Rothschild, Soros and etc.

sounds

AUTO CORRECT

>Jewish propaganda
>American

Makes sense, enjoy being a minority.

You're shilling too hard.

Keep making em. I'll make sure to hide them. Let's save this board.

hi Dickie! I liked seeing you cry over that weak Antifa punch

Im happy he got punched. He just seems like someone the media picked to be the leader of a bunch of anonymous people.

...

World war 2 vets would fight instead of giving their homeland over to spics niggers and mudslimes

I guess the thing about it that bugs me is that leftists are acting as if this is some sort of "victory". As if punching a non-violent spokesperson really means anything.

Spencer is a slightly tubby well spoken person. He's not a fighter. It would be like having a Hammerskin run up to Noam Chomsky and punch him in the face only to run away right after. You didn't even knock the guy down or follow it up or anything and he's not even a fighter.

It honestly just isn't impressive, it's actually pretty pathetic tbqh.

violence against nazi scum is indeed o.k. and should be supported.

no tolerance towards the intolerant.

Thank you for making violence an acceptable form of discourse NYT.

This won't blow up in your faces at all, like Fake News etc.

tfw u get knocked the fuck out by a shit-eating nu-male.

that guy's a fucking eunuch anyway

people are too sensitive here to hear reasoned news analysis

Seen multiple people use it.

And yes, it's worrying when a 40 year old man says;

>Someone disagrees with my fringe politics

>But I saw a hero punch a villain in children's entertainment so that seems like a viable course of action

It's literally Mall Shooter logic.

Very worrying.

Its just so people know where the link came from since archive.is doesn't identify the source in its link. Its not so people will have to click the original.

WW2 veterans would shoot Gerry Duggan for being an Anti-American Soviet.

>le everything I don't le like is le Nazis meme

Deadly use of force in Self Defense is also OK

>all this hated for people who don't even exist anymore
>implying fag-enabler richard spencer is a national socialist

75 fucking years later, and jews are still able to hypnotized generations with their sob story. I bet the Chinese are feeling stupid right now for not playing up pol pot

I sense the time to stop treating the left with kiddy gloves is near.

youtube.com/watch?v=9P9tMXWyjUI

...

Is it ok to punch NYT writers?

Except he basically said
>i am not a nazi
>nazis were a product of its particular time and place
>implying i hold nearly the same beliefs just dont call me a nazi

Speeking of violence and Richard Spencer...

What would the US law say in the following situation?

>hypothetical "far right" conference is held somewhere
>when the participants are inside the conference building, antifa decides to surround the exits with their stinking mob of degenerate subhumans
>they will assault anyone who tries to leave

>in comes the Right Wing Fire Department who has been expecting the mob and waiting outside the building
>few guys (say 4-10) with gas masks and dry powder fire extinguishers go and drive the mob away
>the powder in the extinguisher is pretty much baking soda. It irritates eyes and lungs and has the potential to temporarily incapacitate a person but is not lethal or particularry dangerous

Would it be a crime for the RWFD to do such a thing and if so, what would be the consequences?

If the left wants to continue calling everyone to the right of john mccain a nazi, then we can only perceive this recent happening as a physical threat to most conservatives

Is NYT really trying to posture that initiating violence is ever moral?

Not that I expect less from MSM, but anyone with half a brain can see how obvious this subject is.

Oh yeah, and video related
youtube.com/watch?v=Jrb-IbUs-Js

That's fine to say, but the left knows no bounds and will call anybody to the right of Mao a Nazi. Where does it end?

Have you ever been sucker punched once in your life?

Spencer got assaulted from the side where he had no sight, with a sucker punch. Not even a swole bodybuilder would start fighting after being hit like that.

Spencer is not a nazi.

But for you, everyone who's not communist is a Hitler worshiper.

Oven yourself.

>oh my god my slightly effeminate alt-right leader got punched by a really effeminate leftist and nobody is doing anything about it!
Please fuck off with this shit.

It ends when a few more trayvon martins are created

I'm already starting to open carry more, especially around areas where I know there will be a lot of millennials

Choosing to open carry instead of concealed?

I hope 8pol is still pure

I hope Trump gets nation-wide conceal-carry and stand your ground laws passed.

Once a few of those would-be revolutionaries get deservedly shot, they might think twice before initiative violence on people that don't share their opinions. That's the only way they'll stop.

What has this guy done for the movement that he supposedly leads? I see that he apparently coined the term "alt right," but I fail to see how he is some sort of leader, like the so-called alt right is a formal organization and not just a loosely defined set of beliefs and e-culture held by people who tend to congregate on a few sites.

Is it part of condensing down a hard to define group into some easily hateable individuals, so leftists can more easily label real individuals as Nazis (and therefore feel justified in battering people), instead of having to deal with how to define and fight the nebulous group of anonymous Internet people who actually developed the so-called "alt-right" culture?

You need to cc. And be smart. Only shoot when you have to, you WILL be tried as a murderer if they even THINK you b8d some nigger into chimping so you could shoot.

Normalizing violence against others, one article at a time.

Ding ding ding
Also he has a huge army in here

Trump needs to change this. You should be able to bait criminals and end them. Normal upstanding people can't be baited into crime. Such harsh measures are required to clean a place like U.S.A up.

He's a Face and that's more than can be said for 99.9% of us that remain anonymous.

This is why you travel with friends.

youtube.com/watch?v=HECRyW4b4QI

>Yummy
>11199
Are you Kek?

>literally who gets a Jew York Times article about his attack
Yea Richard, you're legit not controlled opposition

Walking around in public with a trump hat isn't baiting, and if that's all it takes now for antifa to jump you, then there's going to be a lot of dead antifa soon

He didn't technically organize a raid, that was just twitter's dumb reasoning. If you were there, you would know that Leslie was retweeting hamtaro porn well befote Milo told her she looked like a man.

>so leftists can more easily label real individuals as Nazis

Oh yeah, because before Spencer appeared leftists had trouble coming up with reasons to call anyone to the right of them fascists and nazis.

>Is it part of condensing down a hard to define group

A hard to define group isn't a group, it's a bunch of individuals. It's less susceptible to attack but also more useless and uncoordinated. So having a face and being identifiable obviously isn't all negative.

> hasn't done anything
> also he has a huge army

hmm, it's almost as if he's doing *something*

That's despicable the way they word it specifically as if he's a nazi without outright calling him one and then only mention that fact at the very end of the article. He even says like a minute before he gets punched that he isn't a neo-nazi.

They spin in there graves, all the monuments and graves where Shit apon by americas electing a nazi.

So much for respecting you troops and the accomplishments.

>ID: KyK
oy vey I got found out

What he says means shit what he is and for who he acts is what counts, now prepare to die neo nazi.

t. banker's skinny and moribund attack dog

>more than can be said for 99.9% of us that remain anonymous.
Which is what protects us from both reprisals and characterization (pigeon-holing). Hillary attempting to vilify a cartoon frog was the result. And it was hilarious.

Spencer is retarded.

Misleading title. The NYT isn't actually endorsing violence, just reporting on the people that are.

The most enraging thing about this is how much of a bitch he is. He is "worried" and "needs bodyguards". He is embarrassingly weak and i can't respect him

the faggot could have literally ssaid alt-right hook

Cuck film made by a hack

Spencer said several times he's not a leader of anything. I'm not sure why you're buying the MSM narrative about him.

nazis and commies needs to get punch.

Because twitter's abuzz with tens of thousands of people literally saying he should be killed, be intimidated into submission, etc. What would make them stop? Nothing short of his death, which would make them ecstatic.

Additionally, they've already intimidated him & his family members at home.

I doubt you'd fare any better.

>having meetings yearly with jared taylor, kevin macdonald and other prominent alternative authors and content creators is a bad thing
He's brought people together that would never be in the same room otherwise. Shitposting is fun and all, but when it comes to irl organizing, Rochard, at the very least, can be considered an event organizer. He knows which places will and won't allow his press conferences and meetings.

>t. intolerant

Okay, I'm convinced, the Jew York Times and their (((owners))) are trying to employ divide & conquer to foment chaos to implement the hegelian dialectic.

Or else they are just hypocritical kikes.

I'm so sick of this shit!!!!