Trying to win an argument that it's not OK to assault someone over their political views...

Trying to win an argument that it's not OK to assault someone over their political views, and I can't seem to convince some liberal idiot otherwise, even though our country is founded on free speech.
His entire argument boils down to whatever rights are being infringed don't matter, because Nazism is rooted in the killings of millions of people, therefore they are always wrong.

Counter that so is every major government and religion on earth. Counter with "ok who gets to label who is a nazi, I think you are a crypto nazi and are just hiding it, can I punch you?"

How is this related to republicans in america though. There is a very big difference and i dont see his point having anything to do with the politics in america. I wish these fucks would be under a nazi rule so they could see how it actually fucking looks like.

Tell him that by that logic, it's ok for you to knock the fuck out of anyone wearing a Che Guevarra or Bernout shirt, seeing as they preach the same Marxist rhetoric that can be attributed to countless millions of deaths, far more than Nazism.

He has an anti-Christ spirit and is being given strong delusion by God because he rejected God.

2 Thessalonians 2:11
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie

the left is STILL trying to place the nazi umbrella over anything to the right. How much longer will the hitler comparison hold ANY weight?

In order to define right and wrong there needs to be some higher authority than just the two of you. For some people that authority is god, for others the state, etc. find out what he believes that higher authority is then argue from there

Tell him that you should never start a fight you can't finish. If he REALLY believes that these people are evil, then they won't hesitate to retaliate in ways that are much more brutal than ways he would be willing to act.

He's never going to see reason behind the idiocy of his actions. So point out what the likely outcome of excusing violence over opinions is likely to turn out. His actions will create the brownshirts he's pretending are in front of him.

Or just rub salt in his wounds and use some quotes from people he respects who decried violence motivated by politics.

>Trying to win an argument
>Trying
Then you're not armed with logic and facts, friendo.

>it's not OK to assault someone over their political views
Yeah, unless you're a

>some liberal idiot


Don't bother. Your liberal friend is also probably a self-identifying feminist or womens rights activist and can argue in favor for assaulting women whose political views differ from his own.

This is from earlier in the discusdion

It hasn't held weight in a few years. Look around you user, the fires of the world are steadily being lit and nationalism is coming back in a swing possibly greater than the one that culminated in the second world war.

We aren't scared of being called Hitler anymore. They've gone too far now

If only that were true for these people. There are many who believe concepts such as right and wrong come from within. Moral relativism is at the heart of the atheist/leftist movement.

lol they always argue that poor innocent marxism in an innocent opressed socioeconomic good boi who did nothing wrong and was just mishandled. But national socialism can't not be antisemite under any circumstance because muh Hitler.

>Communism
>Socialism
>Democracy
>Religion
>Free-thought in general has led to countless deaths over the history of man
>KILL EVERYBODY, ITS ALL BULLSHIT
>REEEEEEEE
>muh teenage angst
>muh philosophipholical beleafs
>im rite n ur wrong
>racist
>white
>male

That convo is insane

"Communism and Socialism killed more people than Nazism, so should we assault anyone who is a Communist or Socialist?"

use emotions

make the liberal fear that they will be assaulted

You cannot use facts with these faggots.

Let's assume he's a moral relativist. Then his views are based on how he feels. Right now he's basically of the opinion that there is no greater evil than nazism, white supremacism, etc. He's obstinate to the point he's willing to let his own sister be stabbed if it means hurting a nazi. There are two solutions to "win" the argument. OP can point out someone you know who is a white supremacist, and tell him he needs to attack this person or he is letting evil live. He obviously won't do it cause he's a big b with a little p. Or, OP can take this screenshot and send it to people this person knows, who will reprimand him. This will force him to realize that greater society is against him, and that therefore his moral compass is relatively off. If he's really a moral relativist he will adapt

...

>Might makes right goy
Beat him up and see how feels about people using their capacity to commit violence in response to speech.

Take solace in the fact that the more the left reveals themselves to be hypocritical violent commies, the larger and more thorough the backlash will be. It already got us Trump, secured the supreme court, and gave us the largest Republican domination in federal and state government of all time.

Ask him why he is okay with communists and anarchists having free speech. They advocate killing the CEO, small buiness owners and the workers they deem counter revolutionary. The last one is called "lumpen proleterian"

Just had this argument.

Who defines "nazi"? People get called nazi for anything right of karl marx these days.

imams preach death to jews right here in the US. should they be attacked while grocery shopping?

if the answer is "no" then why not? all the same "supremacy" and "genocide" is there.

if the answer is yes then say that makes them an islamaphobe and therefore a nazi so they better watch their backs.

...

...

you can go the difficult route and redpill about the holohoax and the real causes of WW2, or go the easy one and say national socialism isnt about racism, but caring about your own country first, and offer socialized healthcare and living standards for your people, and hitler was just a bad example who mixed national socialism with fascism.

...

...

...

Well I'm like him. I see in communism the death of decency so I want to gas every communist without so much letting them utter a single word.

...

I gotta give you an a for effort, but that faggot isn't ever going to see the hypocrisy in their own pretzel logic

And that's pretty much the whole argument right there. All caught up so far.

OP

your friends a Liberal, and tthey're the ones calling for mass murder of Republicans, Christians, and Conservatives on Facebook and Twitter, holding massive protests and rallies claiming Whites need to be exterminated....

Your friend is a fucking imbecile.

But if you say this to him, he'll waddle back, puke out these words, "You can't define Liberals by a minority of us." Yet, he'll do the opposite to the Right. Hilarious.

ask him "how is assaulting someone for thinking differently, that didnt harm anyone yet, not fascism?"

Pointing out hypocracy is not a persuasive manuever.

I love how that faggot never responded to your point about slaughtering leftists for the exactly same logic

God I hate these sorts of people.

Actually no - LIBERALS are willing to tolerate fascists in the name of tolerance and democracy, even though fascism is directly opposed to them and has used such in bad faith before.

LEFTISTS do not, and correctly hold that it's appropriate to respond the philosophy of violence in fascism with violence.

>Actually no
>LIBERALS are
>tolerate

What fucking fantasy world do you live in, retard?

Maybe you MEANT to say Libertarians

im a leftie, and think most lefties are fucking crazy up to a point that i cant identify with anything on the media or internet because its too right, or just batshit crazy giving me kind of an identity crisis