Communism

Free healthcare is delivered efficiently, free at the point of use, in many countries. This is an established fact. Now consider a communist society. In this system, the employees in the state healthcare industry are not paid. They receive no money at all. However, the state has taken over completely free provision, not only of healthcare, but of housing, food, water, and everything else the healthcare workers need. Therefore they don't need to be paid money to maintain a happy and healthy life.

You may wonder how the state gets money, then, to build hospitals and schools, if everything is provided free, and there are no private industries or wages which tax revenue can be collected from. If the state takes in no money, it seems certain that they will be unable to pay for any new construction projects. But the fact is this: not only does the state face no wage costs, but they face no construction costs. Construction is really a wage cost paid to construction workers, and indirectly to the people who dig up the stone and other raw materials. These workers also don't receive a wage in a communist system, so construction becomes in this sense 'free'.

Now you may wonder, if the state is not paying doctors and nurses, or controlling the construction of schools and hospitals, what is the use of the state in this system? Why bother employing the stiff, tie-wearing tyrants at all? In fact, you are correct. The state being an unnecessary evil, it has been abolished.

But, you may wonder, without the state who will plan the economy? How will the construction workers and the doctors and teachers know what to do with themselves to create the orderly deployment of labour resources in different parts of society which we see every day?

The truth is this. Not only politicians, but everybody really wants an orderly deployment of resources in society. But communists don't think someone with a megaphone is the best person to do it.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eK76SIygVBo
youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2331185/100-patients-day-wait-hour-ambulance-reach-A-E.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The community, or representatives of the community, should absolutely create instructional, voluntarily followed plans together. They might decide that the construction workers should build a hospital that the doctors will work in to make people healthy. That's good for everyone. We don't see why sophisticated planning systems- bureaucratic, democratic, electronic, or all three- couldn’t spring up from the people, without any sort of commands, exploitative taxes, 'parliamentary sovereignty', or people in funny hats.

Anyway, the last big worry you might have is: if everything is free, what incentive is there to work?

This is a good question, and it's a leap of faith to say enough people will labour voluntarily without anything to force them to, for society to function. But we think they will. When they have comfortable lives and aren't ruined by the fight for survival, people are far from the self centred, calculating laybouts of myth. Not only will doctors, scientists, teachers, and labourers work to cure the wants and hungers of their fellow human beings- for only that reason- but out of desire for admiration, or the sense of having done something that could be admired. In addition, a life without labour is too sedentary for a majority of personality types.

The main take-away is this. People will work to be helpful, admired, and active, instead of parasitic, detested, and inactive.

Taking all that into account, then, we see that a communist society is one in which no-one is paid any wages, everything is free, the state is abolished, everyone is equal, and people work because they want to be helpful, admired and active, and enrich the lives of those around them.

This seems like a very admirable society to live in. It's also completely different from the arrangement they had in the former USSR. We can conclude that the USSR was not a communist society.

youtube.com/watch?v=eK76SIygVBo

doesnt work btw

yeah so why not aryan hitler brotherhood instead of some kike faggot gays?
ur basically agreeing it only works in authoritarian enforcing fascists.
so why not the obviously better fascist?
fuck communism

Not an argument.

>Free healthcare is delivered efficiently, free at the point of use, in many countries.

WRONG

>Free healthcare is delivered efficiently
Right from the gate I can tell you this is bullshit.

...

...

>American

>Canadian
That's strange
You need reforms

>if everything is free, what incentive is there to work?
youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc

Kek

>efficient

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2331185/100-patients-day-wait-hour-ambulance-reach-A-E.html

>Free healthcare is delivered efficiently, free at the point of use, in many countries.

It is paid for by taxation, it is not free.


You filthy communists don't understand where your free shit comes from.

> being this retarded

Not an argument because this shit is so stupid it doesn't deserve one. This isn't an economic system, it's a fairy tail. And if there was ever an accurate description of communism.

Autistic fat ugly lefty/pol/ sperg kill yourself cringy neckbeard

Free at the point of use

Definitely NOT arguments

Good vid

Kill yourself retarded fuck

That is like saying everything is free once you have paid for it.

In which OP enthusiastically describes slavery with extra steps

thanks for vid
unironically made me think